Acute Encephalopathy and Cardiac Arrest Induced by Intrathecal Gadolinium Administration

Glymphatic MRI techniques in sleep and neurodegenerative diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review article is to summarize the current in-vivo imaging techniques for the evaluation of the glymphatic function and discuss the factors influencing the glymphatic function and research directions in the future.

RECENT FINDINGS

The glymphatic system allows the clearance of metabolic waste from the central nervous system (CNS). The glymphatic pathway has been investigated using intrathecal or intravenous injection of a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) on MRI, so-called glymphatic MRI. The glymphatic MRI indirectly visualizes the dynamic CSF flow and evaluated the glymphatic function in the animal and human models. Several clinical and preclinical studies using glymphatic MRI have confirmed that the glymphatic function is impaired in neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Furthermore, physiologic process such as sleep facilitates the glymphatic clearance, thus clearing accumulation of protein deposition, such as amyloid or tau, potentially delaying the progression of neurodegenerative diseases.

SUMMARY

The glymphatic system plays a crucial role in clearing metabolic wastes in the brain. Glymphatic MR imaging using GBCA administration serves as a functional imaging tool to measure the glymphatic function and investigate various pathophysiologies of neurodegenerative diseases.

American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine contrast shortage position statement

The medical field has been experiencing numerous drug shortages in recent years. The most recent shortage to impact the field of interventional pain medicine is that of iodinated contrast medium. Pain physicians must adapt to these changes while maintaining quality of care. This position statement offers guidance on adapting to the shortage.

Safety of Intrathecal Administration of Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background The use of MR cisternography with intrathecal administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) is limited by a lack of understanding of the relationship between intrathecal GBCA exposure and dose-related adverse events. Purpose To perform a systematic review to establish an understanding of the dose-response relationship of intrathecal GBCAs and to characterize related adverse events, particularly at higher doses. Materials and Methods Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Central databases were searched for studies reporting intrathecal GBCA use. Data extraction included studies focused on rates and types of adverse events after intrathecal GBCA exposure. A two-tailed independent sample t test statistic was used to evaluate the relationship between GBCA dose and the presence of serious versus nonserious adverse events. Meta-analysis was used to determine the overall incidence of adverse events. Study quality and publication bias were assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale and a funnel plot (effect size measured using Hedges' g followed by the Egger test), respectively. Results Fifty-three studies with a total of 1036 patients were included for analysis. The overall rate of adverse events after intrathecal administration of GBCA was 13% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.3%, 18%). Meta-analysis revealed moderate heterogeneity (I² = 62%). Serious adverse event rates could not be determined with meta-analysis. They were reported in 10 studies and were primarily neurologic in nature, with two cases of coma-one resulting in death. Serious adverse events were associated with significantly higher GBCA doses when compared with nonserious adverse events (mean difference, 4.5 mmol; 95% CI: 2.3 mmol, 6.6 mmol; P = .008). For serious adverse events, there was no clear dose-dependent increase in severity above 2.0 mmol. Conclusion Overall, intrathecal administration of GBCAs at doses greater than 1.0 mmol are associated with serious neurotoxic complications with relative clinical safety at lower doses. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kanal in this issue.

The Glymphatic System: A Review of the Challenges in Visualizing its Structure and Function with MR Imaging

The central nervous system (CNS) was previously thought to be the only organ system lacking lymphatic vessels to remove waste products from the interstitial space. Recently, based on the results from animal experiments, the glymphatic system was hypothesized. In this hypothesis, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) enters the periarterial spaces, enters the interstitial space of the brain parenchyma via aquaporin-4 (AQP4) channels in the astrocyte end feet, and then exits through the perivenous space, thereby clearing waste products. From the perivenous space, the interstitial fluid drains into the subarachnoid space and meningeal lymphatics of the parasagittal dura. It has been reported that the glymphatic system is particularly active during sleep. Impairment of glymphatic system function might be a cause of various neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, normal pressure hydrocephalus, glaucoma, and others. Meningeal lymphatics regulate immunity in the CNS. Many researchers have attempted to visualize the function and structure of the glymphatic system and meningeal lymphatics in vivo using MR imaging. In this review, we aim to summarize these in vivo MR imaging studies and discuss the significance, current limitations, and future directions. We also discuss the significance of the perivenous cyst formation along the superior sagittal sinus, which is recently discovered in the downstream of the glymphatic system.