Delayed Progression to Major Recanalization in Coiled Aneurysms with Minor Recanalization at 36-Month Follow-up : Incidence and Related Risk Factors

Progression from Early Minor Recanalization to Major Recanalization in Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms After Successful Coil Embolization: Risk Factors and Proposal of a Novel Predicting Variable

BACKGROUND

The risk factors for the progression from early minor recanalization to major recanalization are not well established. Herein, we evaluated ruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs) with minor recanalization within 1 year of coiling and their progression to major recurrence.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our database of coiled IAs and searched for ruptured saccular IAs that were successfully embolized without residual sacs. We selected IAs with minor recanalization confirmed on radiological studies within 1 year of coil embolization. All the IA cases had a follow-up period longer than 36 months based on the radiological results.

RESULTS

Minor recanalization occurred in 45 IAs within 1 year of coil embolization. Among them, 14 IAs (31.1%) progressed to major recanalization, and 31 remained stable. Progression to major recanalization was detected 12 months after minor recanalization in 2 patients, 24 months in 7 patients, and 36 months in 5 patients. Moreover, the progression to major recanalization occurred more frequently in IAs at the posterior location (P = 0.024, odds ratio 11.20) and IAs with a proportional forced area > 9 mm2 (P = 0.002, odds ratio 17.13), which was a newly proposed variable in the present study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that approximately one third of the ruptured IAs with early minor recanalization after coiling progressed to major recanalization within 3 years. Physicians should focus on the progression of ruptured IAs from minor to major recanalization, especially those with a posterior circulation location and a proportional forced area >9 mm2.

Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms Using a Microcatheter Protection

PURPOSE

Stent protective or balloon remodeling techniques have enabled coil embolization of complexly configured aneurysms. Still, the utility of such methods may be limited in some small-caliber and/or inherently tortuous lesions. The present study was conducted to examine the efficacy of microcatheter protection (MCP) when applied in these circumstances.

METHODS

This retrospective review included 432 patients with 452 intracranial aneurysms subjected to MCP between April 2001 and January 2021. All available medical records and radiologic data were analyzed, focusing on strategic, safety, and efficacy aspects of the procedures.

RESULTS

In a majority (255/452, 56.4%) of cases, MCP was applied throughout entire coiling procedures, as opposed to coil framing (137/452, 30.3%) or filling/finishing (60/452, 13.3%) only. Lesions of the middle cerebral artery (54.9%) predominated, followed by anterior (12.4%) and posterior (11.1%) communicating artery aneurysms. Stent protection was also used occasionally (46/452, 10.2%). Procedural morbidity was low (3/432, 0.7%), limited to symptomatic thromboembolism and procedural leakage, and there were no deaths. Occlusion was successfully achieved by MCP in 424 aneurysms (93.8%). During the follow-up period (mean, 43.4 ± 30.4 months), satisfactory occlusion was documented in 406 of 440 (92.3%) aneurysms.

CONCLUSION

MCP is feasible and safe for coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms, in conjunction with multicatheter, balloon, or stenting techniques. MCP may have merit in small-sized or tortuous lesions not amenable to balloon or stent usage, often eliminating the need for stenting altogether.

Woven EndoBridge (WEB) Width at the Aneurysm Neck Level Affects Early Angiographic Aneurysm Occlusion

Purpose

Endovascular therapy with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is a safe treatment approach, whereby neoendothelialization at the neck area is a crucial element for aneurysm occlusion. We hypothesized that WEB sizing at the aneurysmal neck level has an impact on early aneurysm occlusion.

Methods

Patients with short-term follow-up digital subtraction angiography following WEB treatment of unruptured aneurysms were included. Aneurysms were categorized according to the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score (BOSS) as adequately (BOSS 0, 0′, 1) or partially occluded (BOSS 2, 3, 1 + 3). The WEB device dimensions, including the average aneurysm diameter (AADi) and the average neck diameter (ANDi) as well as baseline patient characteristics were documented.

Results

In this study 75 patients with 76 aneurysms were included and 65 aneurysms showed adequate occlusion at short-term follow-up (86%). In univariable logistic regression analysis, smaller differences in WEB size to ANDi (D-ANDi) were significantly associated with adequate aneurysm occlusion (odds ratio, OR = 0.41, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.23–0.71, p = 0.002). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses displayed higher discriminative power for the D‑ANDi (AUC = 0.77, 95% CI 0.66–0.86, cut-off ≤2.9 mm) compared to the difference in WEB size to the average aneurysm diameter (D-AADi, AUC = 0.65, 95% CI 0.53–0.75, cut-off ≤1.0 mm).

Conclusion

Smaller differences between the WEB width and ANDi were associated with adequate early aneurysm occlusion and might thus have a higher impact on the results than the traditional device sizing considering the mean aneurysm diameter. D‑ANDi ≤2.9 mm served as an optimal cut-off to classify occlusion after WEB treatment at the short-term follow-up. Further external validation is warranted.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00062-021-01034-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Bifurcation Aneurysms. A Retrospective Observational Study of Short- and Long-Term Follow-Up

PURPOSE

With the introduction of new devices and the development of approved devices, endovascular techniques are more and more considered as a treatment option for middle cerebral artery aneurysms (MCA). In this study, we present data on ruptured MCA aneurysms that were treated endovascularly in our hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a retrospective case series of ruptured MCA bifurcation aneurysms, 118 (94%) cases were managed endovascularly between May 2008 and July 2017. Most were managed with coiling (= 62) and the remaining were managed with stent-assisted-coiling (= 35) and endovascular flow disruptor (WEB-device) (= 21). We measured the clinical outcome at the time of discharge and long-term follow-up on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and evaluated the rates of periprocedural complications and retreatment.

RESULTS

A good clinical outcome (mRS 0-2) at discharge was achieved in 58.5% of these cases. Mortality rate was 19.5%. Nine aneurysms required retreatment. Eighty-three percent demonstrated a good clinical outcome at long-term follow-up (mRS 0-2). In total, 6 (5.1%) procedure-related complications and 10 (8.5%) disease-related complications occurred. No significant difference between reintervention, complications or outcome was found between the employment of different devices (P > 0.05). Endovascular treatment of ruptured MCA aneurysms at our practice showed similar morbidity and mortality to data published about surgical clipping.

CONCLUSION

The endovascular device evolution permits a feasible and safe treatment of ruptured MCA bifurcation aneurysms. Endovascular treatment can therefore be considered as an alternative treatment option to microsurgery for this type of aneurysm.

The clinical value of ceMRA versus DSA for follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by coil embolization: an assessment of occlusion classifications and impact on treatment decisions

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was a detailed analysis of the value of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (ceMRA) compared to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for follow-up imaging of intracranial aneurysms treated by coil embolization.

METHODS

Patients with coiled aneurysms and follow-up exams including both DSA and 3 T ceMRA were retrospectively identified. In blinded readings, both modalities were graded according to the modified Raymond-Roy classification (MRRC) and the Meyers scale. Additionally, readers were asked to make a decision regarding retreatment/follow-up based on the respective imaging findings.

RESULTS

The study comprised 92 patients harboring 102 coiled aneurysms. There was good intermethod agreement of DSA and ceMRA concerning both the MRRC (κ = 0.64) and the Meyers scale (κ = 0.74). Agreement regarding occlusion of < 90% of the aneurysm (Meyers grade ≥ 2) was very good (κ = 0.87). Regarding the detection of a remnant with contrast between the coil mass and the aneurysm wall (MRRC IIIb), there were 12 discrepant findings and agreement was good (κ = 0.70). Comparing treatment/follow-up decisions, the two methods agreed very well (κ = 0.92). In seven patients with discrepant treatment decisions, the authors concurred with DSA in four cases and with ceMRA in three cases when evaluating both modalities together. Interval aneurysm growth was found in more cases with ceMRA (n = 19) than with DSA (n = 16).

CONCLUSIONS

CeMRA is very unlikely to miss a relevant aneurysm remnant and thus could be suitable as the primary follow-up method. In case of remnant growth or recurrence, however, additional DSA might be required to guide treatment decisions.

KEY POINTS

• There is high accordance between ceMRA and DSA regarding the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular coil embolization, but closer analysis also revealed relevant differences. • CeMRA could be suitable as the primary follow-up imaging modality, potentially eliminating the need for routine DSA. • DSA will still be required in case of aneurysm remnant growth or recurrence as detected by ceMRA.