Dual Testing to Achieve Low On-treatment Platelet Reactivity for Aneurysm Embolization

Initial Experience with the Derivo 2Heal Flow Diverter under Standard or Reduced-Dose Single Antiplatelet Therapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diverters with surface modifications or coatings have been recently introduced to clinical practice with the expectation that they can reduce the rate of thromboembolic complications and residual aneurysms. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of the Derivo 2Heal (D2H) device, a new fibrin and heparin-coated flow diverter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated by a single operator by using the D2H were retrospectively evaluated for demographic data, aneurysm characteristics, procedural variables, and follow-up data. All patients were treated by using a single D2H, monitored by platelet function testing and kept under single antiplatelet therapy with regular or half-dose clopidogrel or prasugrel after the procedure.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with 26 aneurysms were treated. Three presented acutely with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Adjunctive devices were used in 6 patients. There were no technical failures and 2 periprocedural self-limited nonthrombotic minor adverse events. During follow-up, 1 of the acutely ruptured aneurysms reruptured, and 1 patient had a visual TIA. All patients were doing well clinically (19 with mRS of 0 and 1 with 1) at the last follow-up after discharge. The rates of total occlusion on very early angiographic (MRA/CTA or DSA, mean: 2.4 months), DSA (mean: 5.8 months), and midterm angiographic (mean: 14.5 months) follow-up for all versus uncoiled aneurysms were 68% versus 70%, 77.8% versus 90.0%, and 91.7% versus 90.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The absence of permanent neurologic deficits in the periprocedural period and favorable occlusion rates in this preliminary study suggest that the novel coating comprising fibrin and heparin may have the potential to increase the safety and efficacy of flow diversion and needs to be further studied by comparing the D2H device with its bare counterpart and other coated or surface-modified flow diverters.

Assessing the efficacy of VerifyNow platelet-function testing in predicting postoperative thromboembolic complications of neuroendovascular surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis (part 1)

BACKGROUND

Despite the heavily debated use of routine platelet-function testing, the VerifyNow Platelet Reactivity Unit (PRU) assay has been increasingly adopted as standard of care for assessing risk of postoperative thromboembolic complications of neuroendovascular surgery.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the relationship between platelet response and risk of ischemic events from neuroendovascular surgery, assess the efficacy of point-of-care platelet-function testing in predicting thromboembolic outcomes, and assess whether a clinically useful threshold for platelet response can be defined in order to standardize guidelines.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched. Following deduplication, articles were first screened for relevance by title and abstract, followed by full text.

RESULTS

Of 735 resultant articles, 22 studies consisting of 3266 patients undergoing neuroendovascular intervention were included. Diagnoses included both intracranial and extracranial pathologies, of which 45.8% were treated with flow diversion, 16.4% with stent-assisted coil embolization, 15.8% with intracranial stenting, 12.0% with simple coil embolization, 3.4% with balloon-assisted coil embolization, 3.6% with extracranial stenting, and 3.0% with an alternate method. 54.5% (12/22) of studies determined platelet hyporesponse to be an independent predictor of postoperative thromboembolic complications, with 27.3% (6/22) of studies reporting a similar, but non-statistically significant trend. 18.2% (4/22) of studies found no relationship between platelet response and postoperative thromboembolic complications. The estimated clinical threshold for PRU to prevent thromboembolic complications varied greatly across studies (Range: > 144-295 PRU). Meta-analysis found platelet hyporesponse to have a 2.23-fold increased risk of thromboembolic complications compared to normoresponders (RR = 2.23, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

While PRU demonstrates a significant predictive value for postoperative thromboembolic complications of neuroendovascular surgery, the target therapeutic threshold for minimizing ischemic events remains unclear. Further studies, such as large multicenter cohorts of the existing data, are needed to standardize guidelines.

Assessing the efficacy of VerifyNow platelet-function testing in predicting postoperative hemorrhagic complications of neuroendovascular surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis (part 2)

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy is used to reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications in neuroendovascular surgery. However, the predictive utility of preoperative platelet-sensitivity testing for decreasing bleed risk in patients undergoing endovascular neurointervention remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to illustrate the association between platelet response and risk of hemorrhagic complications from neuroendovascular surgery, examine the efficacy of the VerifyNow platelet reactivity unit (PRU) assay in predicting hemorrhagic outcomes, and assess whether a clinically useful threshold for platelet response can be defined to standardize guidelines.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched. Articles were screened for relevance by title and abstract, followed by full text.

RESULTS

Of 735 resultant articles, 17 studies of 2084 patients undergoing neuroendovascular intervention were included. Diagnoses included both intracranial and extracranial pathologies, of which 37.8% were treated with flow diversion, 22.4% with stent-assisted coil embolization, 14.3% with intracranial stenting, 12.8% with simple coil embolization, 5.8% with balloon-assisted coil embolization, 2.0% with extracranial stenting, and 4.8% with an alternate method. Precisely, 52.9% (9 out of 17) of studies determined platelet hyperresponse to be an independent predictor of postoperative hemorrhagic complications, with 11.8% (2 out of 17) of studies reporting a similar but non-statistically significant trend. 35.3% (6 out of 17) of studies found no relationship between platelet response and postoperative hemorrhagic complications. The estimated clinical threshold for PRU to prevent hemorrhagic complications varied considerably across studies (range: <46-118 PRU). Meta-analysis found platelet hyperresponse to have more than a 3-fold increased risk of hemorrhagic complications compared to normoresponders (relative risk = 3.2, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although this meta-analysis shows the predictive utility of the P2Y12 assay for postoperative hemorrhagic complications in neuroendovascular surgery, the optimal therapeutic threshold for minimizing bleeding risk is still uncertain. To better understand the utility of the P2Y12 assay in the perioperative period, further prospective research is needed.

Utility of flow diverters in treatment of acutely ruptured uncoilable aneurysms of the posterior circulation of the brain

PURPOSE

Aim of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of flow diverters (FDs) in treatment of acutely ruptured posterior circulation aneurysms MATERIALS AND METHODS: Databases of three participating institutions were retrospectively scanned for patients in whom FD placement was attempted for treatment of acutely ruptured vertebrobasilar aneurysms. An interval of 14 days or fewer between the latest ictus and treatment was used as inclusion criterion. Patients with dolichoectasia of vertebrobasilar arteries were excluded. If necessary, adjunctive techniques including coiling or stenting were utilized. Clinical outcomes were graded using mWFNS (modified World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Scale) and mRS (modified Rankin Scale). Aneurysmal occlusion was defined as Raymond-Roy Class 1. Spearman's (ρ) test was used to assess the correlation between variables. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess outcomes.

RESULTS

31 patients (25 women, mean age: 52.7 ± 15.2) harboring 32 aneurysms (16 non-saccular, mean size: 11.4 ± 7 mm) were included. Mean number of FDs used was 1.22 ± 0.42. In six cases, adjunctive coiling and in five cases, apposing stent placement were used. Overall mortality rate and procedure-related mortality rates were 22.5% (7/31) and 9.6% (3/31), respectively. At a mean imaging follow-up of 17.2 ± 12.6 months, total occlusion was achieved in 22 aneurysms (91.6%). Univariate analysis showed that mortality was positively correlated with vasospasm (ρ = 0.600, p < 0.05), higher mWFNS Scale (ρ = 0.685, p < 0.05), higher modified Fischer Score (ρ = 0.609, p < 0.05), higher mRS (ρ = 0.594, p < 0.05) on admission and negatively correlated with saccular morphology (ρ = -0.529, p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified mWFNS on admission as a significant predictor. (OR: 7.148, 95% CI 1.777-28.758, p: 0.01). Adjunctive coiling positively correlated with aneurysm occlusion. (ρ = 0.522, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The procedure-related morbidity and mortality is not negligible. However, the risks and efficacy associated with FDs are acceptable, especially when adjunctive coiling is possible, given the lack of treatment alternatives.