Thrombectomy of Mild Stroke : An Analysis of the Nationwide Registry of the German Society for Neuroradiology

Thrombectomy patients with minor stroke: factors of early neurological deterioration

BACKGROUND

A sizeable proportion of stroke patients with large vessel occlusion present with minor neurological deficits. Whether mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is beneficial in these patients is controversial. We aimed to investigate factors of early neurological deterioration (END) in thrombectomy patients with minor stroke and hypothesized that END is linked to unfavorable functional outcomes.

METHODS

Multicenter cohort study screening all patients prospectively enrolled in the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment (n=13 082) between 2015 and 2021. Patients who underwent MT for anterior circulation vessel occlusion with baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of <6 were included. END was defined as an increase in NIHSS score of ≥4 within the first 24 hours after MT. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to investigate factors associated with END and its association with unfavorable functional outcomes 90 days after treatment (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥2).

RESULTS

Among 817 patients included, 24% exhibited END and 48% had unfavorable functional outcomes. Prestroke mRS (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) [95% CI] 1.42 [1.13 to 1.78]), baseline NIHSS (aOR [95% CI] 0.83 [0.73 to 0.94]), time from admission to groin puncture (aOR [95% CI] 1.04 [1.02 to 1.07]), general anesthesia (aOR [95% CI] 1.68 [1.08 to 2.63]), number of passes (aOR [95% CI] 1.15 [1.03 to 1.29]), adverse events during treatment (aOR [95% CI] 1.89 [1.19 to 3.01]), successful recanalization (aOR [95% CI] 0.29 [0.17 to 0.50]), and intracranial hemorrhage on follow-up imaging (aOR [95% CI] 3.40 [1.90 to 6.07]) were independently associated with END. END was independently linked to unfavorable functional outcomes (aOR [95% CI] 7.51 [4.57 to 12.34]).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost a quarter of thrombectomy patients with minor stroke developed END. These patients had twice the odds of experiencing unfavorable functional outcomes.

Cineangiography versus standard digital subtraction angiography in mechanical thrombectomy: lowering the radiation exposure without sacrificing the outcome

BACKGROUND

Endovascular thrombectomy has become a standard procedure for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. Radiation exposure to the patient and operators during mechanical thrombectomy procedures is a concern.

METHODS

The use of a high frames per second unmasked protocol-cineangiography (CINE)-derived from cardiac intervention could mitigate radiation exposure without sacrificing procedural and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The analysis of a prospective-maintained monocentric database of 131 patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (65 with the CINE protocol and 66 with the conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) protocol) showed a significant reduction in radiation exposure for both air kerma (AK) and dose-area product (DAP) indicators (AK 463.7 mGy vs 772 mGy, P<0.01; DAP 41.35 Gy/cm2 CINE vs 83.77 Gy/cm2 DSA, P<0.01), with no differences regarding both safety and efficacy outcomes (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥2b 78.4% CINE and 81.5% DSA, P=0.79; overall complications rate both intracranial and extracranial 23% CINE and 19.6% DSA, P=0.65). There were no significant differences in post-thrombectomy radiographic hemorrhagic conversion rate (P=0.77) or functional independence on discharge defined as modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 (P=0.39). A post-hoc image assessment of vessel point occlusion and recanalization mTICI score performed by three experienced interventional neuroradiologists not involved in the procedure showed a non-significant difference between the two groups regarding occlusion point (0.928 vs 0.953, P=0.31) and recanalization grade (0.814 vs 0.847, P=0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial experience demonstrated that reduction of the quality of CINE images caused no modifications in safety and efficacy and should fit within the context of diagnostic requests in an intracranial revascularization procedure.