[Acute-on-chronic liver failure: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for intensive care]

Use of Bacterial DNA Concentration in Ascites as a Marker for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

Background and aims

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a common and serious complication in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Precise quantification of bacterial DNA (bactDNA) and the related inflammatory response might add further information on the course of disease. The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between bactDNA, cytokine levels and clinical outcome.

Methods

Ascites and serum samples of 98 patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis (42 with SBP and 56 without SBP) as well as serum samples of 21 healthy controls were collected. BactDNA in ascites and serum was detected and quantified by 16S rRNA PCR. Concentrations of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 were measured by a LEGENDplexTM multi-analyte flow assay. Clinical data were collected and analyzed retrospectively.

Results

BactDNA was detected more frequently in ascites of patients with SBP (n = 24/42; 57.1%) than in ascites of patients without SBP (n = 5/56; 8.9%; P < 0.001). Additionally, IL-6 levels in both ascites and serum were significantly higher in patients with SBP (ascites P < 0.001, serum P = 0.036). The quantity of bactDNA in ascites was strongly correlated with polymorphonuclear neutrophil count in ascites (r = 0.755; P < 0.001) as well as ascites IL-6 levels (r = 0.399; P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to diagnose SBP provided an AUC of 0.764 (95% CI: 0.661-0.867) for serum IL-6 levels, an AUC of 0.810 (95% CI: 0.714-0.905) for ascites IL-6 levels, and an AUC of 0.755 (95% CI: 0.651-0.858) for bactDNA levels in ascites.

Conclusions

The correlation between the amount of bactDNA and IL-6 confirms the pathophysiological relevance of bactDNA and IL-6 as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of SBP.

[Liver diseases in the intensive care unit]

The frequency of liver diseases in the intensive care unit has increased significantly in recent years and is now observed in up to 20% of critically ill patients. The occurrence of liver disease is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Two groups of liver diseases in the intensive care unit can be distinguished. First, the group of "primary hepatic dysfunctions", which includes primary acute liver failure as well as acute-on-chronic liver failure in patients with pre-existing liver cirrhosis. The second group of "secondary or acquired liver diseases" includes cholestatic liver diseases, as well as hypoxic liver injury and mixed forms, as well as other rarer liver diseases. Due to the diversity of liver diseases and the very different triggers, sufficient knowledge of the underlying changes (including hemodynamic changes, inflammatory states or drug-related) is essential. Early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of the underlying disease are essential for all liver dysfunction in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit. This review article aims to take a closer look at liver diseases in the intensive care unit and provides insight into diagnostics and treatment options.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure alters linezolid pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with continuous hemodialysis: an observational study

BACKGROUND

In acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), adequate antibiotic dosing is challenging due to changes of drug distribution and elimination. We studied the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in critically ill patients with ACLF during continuous renal replacement therapy compared to patients without concomitant liver failure (NLF).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, patients received linezolid 600 mg bid. Linezolid serum samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed followed by Monte-Carlo simulations of 150 mg bid, 300 mg bid, 450 mg bid, 600 mg bid, and 900 mg bid to assess trough concentration target attainment of 2-7 mg/L.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included in this study with nine suffering from ACLF. Linezolid body clearance was lower in the ACLF group with mean (standard deviation) 1.54 (0.52) L/h versus 6.26 (2.43) L/h for NLF, P < 0.001. A trough concentration of 2-7 mg/L was reached with the standard dose of 600 mg bid in the NLF group in 47%, with 42% being underexposed and 11% overexposed versus 20% in the ACLF group with 77% overexposed and 3% underexposed. The highest probability of target exposure was attained with 600 mg bid in the NLF group and 150 mg bid in the ACLF group with 53%.

CONCLUSION

Linezolid body clearance in ACLF was markedly lower than in NLF. Given the overall high variability, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with dose adjustments seems required to optimize target attainment. Until TDM results are available, a dose reduction may be considered in ACLF patients to prevent overexposure.

Voriconazole Pharmacokinetics Are Not Altered in Critically Ill Patients with Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An Observational Study

Infection and sepsis are a main cause of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Besides bacteria, molds play a role. Voriconazole (VRC) is recommended but its pharmacokinetics (PK) may be altered by ACLF. Because ACLF patients often suffer from concomitant acute renal failure, we studied the PK of VRC in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (RRT) with ACLF and compared it to PK of VRC in critically ill patients with RRT without concomitant liver failure (NLF). In this prospective cohort study, patients received weight-based VRC. Pre- and post-dialysis membrane, and dialysate samples obtained at different time points were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. An integrated dialysis pharmacometric model was used to model the available PK data. The recommended, 50% lower, and 50% higher doses were analyzed by Monte-Carlo simulation (MCS) for day 1 and at steady-state with a target trough concentration (TC) of 0.5–3mg/L. Fifteen patients were included in this study. Of these, 6 patients suffered from ACLF. A two-compartment model with linear clearance described VRC PK. No difference for central (V1) or peripheral (V2) volumes of distribution or clearance could be demonstrated between the groups. V1 was 80.6L (95% confidence interval: 62.6–104) and V2 106L (65–166) with a body clearance of 4.7L/h (2.87–7.81) and RRT clearance of 1.46L/h (1.29–1.64). MCS showed TC below/within/above target of 10/74/16% on day 1 and 9/39/52% at steady-state for the recommended dose. A 50% lower dose resulted in 26/72/1% (day 1) and 17/64/19% at steady-state and 7/57/37% and 7/27/67% for a 50% higher dose. VRC pharmacokinetics are not significantly influenced by ACLF in critically ill patients who receive RRT. Maintenance dose should be adjusted in both groups. Due to the high interindividual variability, therapeutic drug monitoring seems inevitable.

[Hepatic dysfunction in sepsis]

Sepsis represents a life-threatening condition that frequently accompanies acute hepatic dysfunction. As a result of systemic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and microcirculatory derangements, different types of liver dysfunction can occur, such as hypoxic hepatitis, sepsis-associated cholestasis, or liver failure. A very serious and late sequela is secondary sclerosing cholangitis of the critically ill patient. Clinical management of sepsis-related liver dysfunction includes the rapid identification and treatment of the suspected underlying infection, hemodynamic stabilization to improve hepatic perfusion, and the optimization of oxygen delivery to the liver. Despite maximum efforts in supportive treatment, the outcome of patients with sepsis or septic shock and concomitant severe hepatic dysfunction remains very poor.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure alters meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with continuous hemodialysis: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Infection and sepsis are a main cause of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Adequate dosing of antimicrobial therapy is of central importance to improve outcome. Liver failure may alter antibiotic drug concentrations via changes of drug distribution and elimination. We studied the pharmacokinetics of meropenem in critically ill patients with ACLF during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) and compared it to critically ill patients without concomitant liver failure (NLF).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, patients received meropenem 1 g tid short-term infusion (SI). Meropenem serum samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed followed by Monte Carlo simulations of (A) meropenem 1 g tid SI, (B) 2 g loading plus 1 g prolonged infusion tid (C) 2 g tid SI, and (D) 2 g loading and continuous infusion of 3 g/day on days 1 and 7. Probability of target attainment (PTA) was assessed for 4× the epidemiological cut-off values for Enterobacterales (4 × 0.25 mg/L) and Pseudomonas spp. (4 × 2 mg/L).

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included in this study. Of these, 8 patients suffered from ACLF. A two-compartment model with linear clearance from the central compartment described meropenem pharmacokinetics. The peripheral volume of distribution (V₂) was significantly higher in ACLF compared to NLF (38.6L versus 19.7L, p = .05). PTA for Enterobacterales was achieved in 100% for all dosing regimens. PTA for Pseudomonas spp. in ACLF on day 1/7 was: A: 18%/80%, B: 94%/88%, C: 85%/98% D: 100%/100% and NLF: A: 48%/65%, B: 91%/83%, C: 91%/93%, D: 100%/100%.

CONCLUSION

ALCF patients receiving CVVHD had a higher V₂ and may require a higher loading dose of meropenem. For Pseudomonas, high doses or continuous infusion are required to reach PTA in ACLF patients.