Sind initialer pH- und Laktatwert nach kardiopulmonaler Wiederbelebung immer entscheidend?

Survival with Good Neurological Outcome despite Prolonged Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Extreme Acidosis after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

We report the case of a 49-year-old male who suffered from a myocardial infarction with subsequent cardiac arrest. The emergency medical team began cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation. Although a return of spontaneous circulation was achieved after approximately 30 min of continued efforts, the patient went back into cardiac arrest on the way to the hospital and resuscitation had to be resumed. On admission, the patient was severely acidotic with a pH of 6.67, lactatemia of 19 mmol/L, and pronounced hypercapnia (pCO₂ 127 mmHg). Despite the poor prognosis, all possible efforts including coronary intervention and therapeutic hypothermia were carried out and the patient made a quick recovery with discharge from the intensive care unit on day 5. Survival of extreme acidosis, such as in this case, is rare. This is the first report of survival with good neurologic outcome in a patient with myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, and pH of under 6.7 on admission at the clinic.

[Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR)]

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) is the implementation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in selected patients with cardiac arrest and may be considered when conventional CPR efforts fail, as written in the latest international guidelines. eCPR is a complex intervention that requires a highly trained team, specialized equipment, and multidisciplinary support within a healthcare system and it has the risk of several life-threatening complications. However, there are no randomized, controlled studies on eCPR, and valid predictors of benefit and outcome are lacking. Therefore, optimal timing, patient selection, location and method of implementation vary across centers. As utilization of eCPR has increased in recent years and more centers begin to perform eCPR, considerable uncertainties exist in the prehospital setting as well as in the emergency room. However, structured communication and clearly defined processes are essential especially at the interface between prehospital rescue teams and the eCPR team to achieve the highest possible benefit for cardiac arrest patients using eCPR. This article presents an algorithm for structured, evidence-based logistic considerations, patient selection, and implementation of eCPR as well as early care after establishment of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) which are mainly based on the German national recommendations for eCPR of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC published in 2019 as well as the S3 guideline "Use of extracorporeal circulation (ECLS/ECMO) for cardiac and circulatory failure" and local standard operating procedures of the authors.

[Recommendations for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) : Consensus statement of DGIIN, DGK, DGTHG, DGfK, DGNI, DGAI, DIVI and GRC]

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (eCPR) may be considered as a rescue attempt for highly selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest and potentially reversible etiology. Currently there are no randomized, controlled studies on eCPR, and valid predictors of benefit and outcome which might guide the indication for eCPR are lacking. Currently selection criteria and procedures differ across hospitals and standardized algorithms are lacking. Based on expert opinion, the present consensus statement provides a proposal for a standardized treatment algorithm for eCPR.