[Influence of extreme weather conditions on the deployment volume of emergency medical services]

Cascading disasters and mental health inequities: Winter Storm Uri, COVID-19 and post-traumatic stress in Texas

Previous research on health effects of extreme weather has emphasized heat events even though cold-attributable mortality exceeds heat-attributable mortality worldwide. Little is known about the mental health effects of cold weather events, which often cascade to produce secondary impacts like power outages, leaving a knowledge gap in context of a changing climate. We address that gap by taking a novel "cascading disaster health inequities" approach to examine winter storm-associated post-traumatic stress (PTS) using survey data (n = 790) collected in eight Texas metro areas following Winter Storm Uri in 2021, which occurred against the backdrop of COVID-19. The incidence of storm-related PTS was 18%. Being Black (odds ratio [OR]: 6.6), Hispanic (OR: 3.5), or of another non-White race (OR: 4.2) was associated with greater odds of PTS compared to being White, which indicates substantial racial/ethnic inequities in mental health impacts (all p < 0.05). Having a disability also increased odds of PTS (OR: 4.4) (p < 0.05). Having piped water outages (OR: 1.9) and being highly impacted by COVID-19 (OR: 3.3) increased odds of PTS (both p < 0.05). When modelling how COVID-19 and outages cascaded, we compared householders to those with no outages and low COVID-19 impacts. PTS was more likely (p < 0.05) if householders had a water or power outage and high COVID-19 impacts (OR: 4.4) and if they had water and power outages and high COVID-19 impacts (OR: 7.7). Findings provide novel evidence of racial/ethnic inequities and cascading effects with regard to extreme cold events amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

[Thermal stress of urban dwellers during heat waves using the example of Freiburg (Breisgau)]

BACKGROUND

As a result of climate change, people are increasingly affected by heat and the negative health effects of heat. Air temperature is often used as a measurement. However, in order to characterize the effects of heat on humans, other factors must be considered in addition to air temperature.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this paper is to characterize the thermal stress of urban dwellers by means of the perceived temperature during heat waves, compare it with rural dwellers, and highlight differences from air temperature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from the year 2019 are used from two different German Weather Service (DWD) stations located within the city of Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany, and its surroundings (Freiburg Airport). Air temperature as well as other meteorological elements were taken to calculate the perceived temperature by means of the Klima-Michel model. Additionally, days with heat warnings as well as nightly indoor temperatures from the heat health warning system are presented.

RESULTS

The perceived temperature exceeds the air temperature during heat waves by up to 10 °C. The classic heat-island effect is particularly evident in the difference in the nightly air temperature while the difference in the daily air temperature is small. In the case of perceived temperature, the difference is significantly higher not only at night but also during the day.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to quantify negative impacts, not only the knowledge of air temperature is required, but also other factors that describe and control the thermal stress on humans. Urban-rural differences in air temperature and perceived temperature enable heat quantification. Adaptation measures taking into account the more intense conditions in cities are necessary.