Die arthroskopische Ersatzplastik des anterolateralen Bündels des hinteren Kreuzbandes in Einzelbündeltechnik mit autologer Semitendinosus-/Grazilissehne

[Reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament complex with a flat semitendinosus auto- or allograft]

OBJECTIVE

Replacement of superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) and posterior oblique ligament (POL) with an allograft.

INDICATIONS

Chronic 3° isolated medial instability and combined anteromedial or posteromedial instability.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Infection, open growth plates, restricted range of motion (less than E/F 0-0-90°).

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Longitudinal incision from medial epicondyle to superficial pes anserinus and exposure of the medial collateral ligament complex. Thawing of the allogeneic semitendinosus tendon graft at room temperature, reinforcement of the tendon ends with sutures and preparation of a two-stranded graft. Placement of guidewires in the sMCL and POL insertions and control with image intensifier. Tunnel drilling. Pulling the graft loop into the femoral bone tunnel and fixation with a flip button. Pulling the two graft ends into the tibial tunnels. Tibial fixation by knotting the suture ends in a 20° flexion on the lateral cortex. Suture the tendon bundles to the remaining remnants of the medial collateral ligament complex to adopt the flat structure of the natural medial collateral ligament complex.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Six weeks partial weight-bearing, immediately postoperatively splint in the extended position, after 2 weeks movable knee brace for another 4-6 weeks. Mobility: 4 weeks 0-0-60, 5th and 6th weeks 0-0-90.

RESULTS

From 2015-2021, this surgical procedure was performed in 19 patients (5 women, 14 men, age 34 years). Mean Lysholm score at follow-up after at least 2 years was 89 (76-99) points. In 6 patients, there was restricted range of motion 3 months postoperatively, which resulted in further therapy (3 × systemic cortisone therapy, 3 × arthroscopically supported manipulations under anesthesia).

[Reconstruction of the patellar tendon with autologous or allogeneic semitendinosus tendon transplant for chronic rupture]

OBJECTIVE

Reconstruction of a patellar tendon defect in the event of a chronic rupture.

INDICATIONS

Chronic rupture of the patellar tendon due to delayed diagnosis or failure of primary refixation with a dehiscence that does not allow for anatomical refixation without patellar tendon shortening.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Infection.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Approximately 15 cm long incision from the tibial tuberosity to the patella. Depicting the rupture. Debridement of the tendon and insertion. Suture in the quadriceps tendon and distalization of the patella. If sufficient distalization of the patella is not possible, optionally perform a VY-plasty of the quadriceps tendon. Measuring the dehiscence. Securing the height of the patella by applying a patellotibial cerclage (strong suture cord). Extension of an existing tendon stump using a Z-plasty. Creation of 2 bone tunnels (diameter approx. 5 mm) in the patella and the tibial tuberosity. Insertion of an autologous or allogeneic semitendinosus tendon transplant and securing it by knotting the retaining threads in front of the tibial tuberosity.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Six weeks of partial weight-bearing with 10 kg of body weight in a straight, removable splint. Range of movement: weeks 1-4 E/F 0-0-60°, weeks 5-6 E/F 0-0-90°.

RESULTS

Seven patients who underwent this surgery as described above had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Secondary lengthening of the quadriceps tendon had to be performed twice due to excessive retraction. All patients were able to perform active extension postoperatively. The Lysholm score rose from 49.3 to 83.2 points. No further rupture was detectable in the final ultrasound examination.

Reconstruction of the Medial Collateral Ligament Complex With a Flat Allograft Semitendinosus Tendon

The aim of this Technical Note is to reconstruct the medial collateral ligament complex with the superior medial collateral ligament and posterior oblique ligament as anatomically as possible. An allograft or contralateral semitendinosus autograft is used for anatomic reconstruction of the superior medial collateral ligament and posterior oblique ligament. After bony fixation, the tendon bundles are sutured to the remnants of the medial collateral ligament complex. Thus, the tubular grafts are pulled apart to form a flat shape that resembles that of the normal medial ligaments.

Surgical technique: posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using double posteromedial arthroscopic portals

The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction is a technically demanding surgical procedure that requires optimal identification of both the femoral and the tibial anatomical footprints. To aid the tibial tunnel placement and many authors recommend creating a posteromedial (PM) portal. The further addition of a second PM portal, which could be used as a "working portal", may further allow a more straightforward reconstruction by improving the identification of the anatomical footprint, the clearing of the stump, and the graft passage.

Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a septum-preserving technique

OBJECTIVE

Description of a reproducible surgical technique for single-bundle anterolateral reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) based on a septum-sparing approach. This technique is less traumatic than the trans-septum approach. The article illustrates surgical steps to simplify the technical aspects of the procedure.

INDICATIONS

A complete grade III symptomatic tear of the PCL associated with instability and often discomfort (deceleration, stairs) or subsequent gonalgia arising from the medial compartment or patellofemoral joint. Injury of the peripheral joint stabilizers alongside the PCL including the posterolateral corner or a complete medial knee injury. The procedure is indicated in chronic cases, but also in acute cases of posterior instability > 10 mm, if it is an intraligamentous tear with dislocated PCL stumps.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Bony avulsions of the PCL suitable for refixation, soft tissue compromise, infection, advanced osteoarthritic disease.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

After diagnostic arthroscopy of the knee, the ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis tendons are harvested and prepared as a 6-strand graft for PCL reconstruction. One high anterolateral viewing portal, one low anterolateral portal, one anteromedial portal, and a posteromedial portal are used for single-bundle reconstruction via one femoral and one tibial bone tunnel and hybrid graft fixation.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Weight bearing is restricted to 20 kg for 6 weeks. PCL brace with tibial support for a period of 12 weeks. Flexion is limited to 30° in the first 2 postoperative weeks, then 60° for 2 weeks, and 90° for 2 further weeks. Passive flexion in prone position is performed. Active focused muscle strengthening exercise is begun after 6 weeks postoperatively and participation in competitive sports is not recommended before full muscle strength and coordination is re-established, at the earliest 9-12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Two isolated and 19 combined PCL injuries were treated. Mean patient age was 27.4 years, and the minimal follow-up was 12 months. On average, we found good clinical outcome with slight degree of posterior laxity (4.1 mm) after PCL reconstruction in comparison with the contralateral knee. No patient showed signs of effusion at follow-up. Range of motion was fully restored in 19 of 21 patients. One patient suffered failure due to persistent posterior instability and persistence of symptoms.

[Primary revision with replasty of the anterior cruciate ligament]

OBJECTIVE

Restoration of knee stability after rerupture of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft.

INDICATION

Acute and chronic functional instability with rerupture of an ACL graft with subjective instability with anatomical or non-anatomical bone tunnel without tunnel widening.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Partial anatomical bone tunnels of the previous operation, significant tunnel widening of anatomical bone tunnels, local infection of the knee joint, local soft tissue damage.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Graft choices are hamstring tendons (semitendinosus muscle, gracilis muscle), the quadriceps tendon, patellar tendon and a peroneus tendon split graft. In cases with anatomical tunnels, careful debridement is performed down to the tunnel wall. In non-anatomical tunnels, a new femoral tunnel is drilled over a deep anteromedial portal with the knee flexed more than 110° in the insertion area of the ACL. Using drills and dilators, a tunnel is prepared. At the tibia, the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus serves as a landmark in the absence of an ACL stump. The cortical tibial tunnel aperture is probed with a guide wire and the tunnel is drilled stepwise until the tunnel wall is reached, which is debrided with a spoon or synovial resector to remove graft residues and implants from the tunnel. The femoral fixation can either be done with a flip button, an interference screw or in the case of a bone block graft implant-free. At the tibial side, the graft is fixed with a resorbable interference screw and fixation button.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

The rehabilitation program comprises 4-5 phases. Inflammatory phase (weeks 1-2): control of pain and swelling (cooling, isometric tension exercises, 20 kg partial load). Phase 2 (weeks 2-6): increasing load and range of motion with closed chain exercises (target: extension/flexion 0-0-120°). Phase 3 (from week 6): strength and coordination exercises. Phase 4: balance, strength and jump exercises. Return to competitive sport not before postoperative month 6-10.

RESULTS

Included were 51 patients with recurrent instability after ACL surgery where primary ACL replacement was performed with ipsilateral bone quadriceps tendon graft or contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis graft. All patients had anatomical or non-anatomical tunnel locations without significant widening (>11 mm). After 2 years, the side-to-side difference for anterior tibial translation measured with the KT 1000 arthrometer was 2.0 ± 1.2 mm for the quadriceps group and 3.0 ± 2.9 mm for the semitendinosus-gracilis group (P = 0.461). No difference in the rate of positive pivot shift tests (P = 0.661); no significant difference in the individual Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscores or in the frequency of anterior knee pain.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Surgery: Ipsilateral Quadriceps Versus Contralateral Semitendinosus-Gracilis Autografts

PURPOSE

To evaluate the subjective outcomes, knee stability, and donor-site morbidity after revision ACL reconstruction using either autologous ipsilateral quadriceps tendon or contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis tendon.

METHODS

A sample size calculation suggested that we needed 25 patients in each group to detect equality between both groups. Therefore, we evaluated 30 consecutive patients who underwent an ACL revision surgery with ipsilateral bone-quadriceps tendon grafts and 30 consecutive patients with the contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis grafts between January 2010 and December 2012. Because of follow-up and exclusion criteria, finally 51 patients were evaluated. All patients were followed prospectively for at least 2 years with KT1000 arthrometer testing and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) objective grading. At the 24-month follow-up, additional clinical scores were evaluated: the Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the Lysholm score, assessing pain during kneeling, and anterior knee pain.

RESULTS

The KT1000 postoperative arthrometer side-to-side difference was 2.0 ± 1.2 mm for the quadriceps group and 3.0 ± 2.9 mm for the semitendinosus-gracilis group. The difference was not statistically significant (P = .461). There was also no difference in the rate of positive pivot-shift tests between groups (P = .661). The Lysholm score was 82.5 ± 18 in the quadriceps group and 73.8 ± 19 in the semitendinosus-gracilis group. The difference was not statistically significant (P = .060). There was also no significant difference in the single KOOS subscores, assessing pain while kneeling and anterior knee pain (included in the KOOS score). No rerupture occurred during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision ACL reconstruction using the quadriceps tendon graft showed clinical outcomes similar to those of the contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis graft in terms of knee stability and function. Thus, the bone-quadriceps tendon graft may be a good alternative to the contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis tendon graft for revision ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.

Bicruciate Knee Ligament Reconstruction Using 4 All-Anterior Arthroscopic Portals

The use of an accessory posteromedial portal for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in bicruciate knee ligament reconstruction has often been described. However, the use of a posteromedial portal can be time consuming and has some inherent risks including injury to the saphenous vein or nerve. We describe our bicruciate knee ligament reconstruction using 4 exclusively anterior portals including a high anteromedial, high anterolateral, low anteromedial, and low anterolateral portals. Arthroscopy is performed using a combination of 30° and 70° arthroscopes. Fluoroscopic assistance is used in conjunction with a 70° arthroscope for the creation of the posterior cruciate ligament tibial tunnel.

Hamstring Tendon Regeneration After Harvest for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To assess whether the portions of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have the potential to regenerate and, if so, to evaluate the histologic properties and actual function of this newly formed tissue.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Embase, Medline, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and SPORTDiscus from inception of the databases to July 2014, using various combinations of keywords. Studies focusing on hamstring tendon and muscle regeneration through imaging and histology, as well as on the related functional outcomes, were selected. We included studies assessing evidence of tissue regeneration with imaging (magnetic resonance imaging, 3-dimensional computed tomography, ultrasonography) or with histologic examination of biopsy samples (or a combination thereof).

RESULTS

Nineteen articles were included in this review, with a total of 400 patients observed. The overall rate of tissue regeneration was 86.0%, with similar values shown in most studies regardless of the methodology of the assessment. Biopsy confirmed that the tissue found at the site in 74% of the cases showed typical histologic features of the tendon. The mean modified Coleman Methodology Score of the studies included was 52.7 points, showing a modest methodologic quality for the studies published to date.

CONCLUSIONS

In over 85% of the cases analyzed, regeneration signs of the harvested tendon were found through different imaging and histologic methodologies. A torque deficit in deep knee flexion is always present postoperatively, but the cause for this is still unclear. There is a need for better-designed trials featuring a higher level of evidence to further investigate this matter, and the effects of postoperative care and the surgical approach used on the regeneration process should be analyzed in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level II, III, and IV studies.

[Surgical treatment of sternoclavicular joint instability with tenodesis]

BACKGROUND

Instability of the sternoclavicular joint is a very uncommon disorder of the shoulder girdle. Acute traumatic dislocations are commonly treated nonoperatively. But severe displacement or chronic instability with recurrent symptomatic subluxation may require surgical intervention. We present our results with open reduction and internal fixation through an autologous gracilis tendon transplant or fiber tape in 8 patients treated surgically. The operative stabilisation of the sternoclavicular joint reduces pain level and improves function of the shoulder. This technique provides an effective surgical procedure for treatment of symptomatic sternoclavicular joint instability.

OBJECTIVE

Restoration of the function and aspect of the sternoclavicular joint.

INDICATIONS

Chronic and painful instabilities.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Local infection, tumor.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

The gracilis tendon graft is harvested as previously described by Petersen. Direct incision over the sternoclavicular joint. Sharp dissection of the periostal sleeve and partial release of sternocleidomastoideus and pextoralis muscle. Resection of osteophytes. Careful placement of a raspatorium under the proximal clavicle and sternum to protect the mediastinal structures. Application of 2.5 or 3.2 mm drill holes to the sternum and the proximal clavicle. The gracilis tendon or the fiber tape is pulled through the drill holes in a figure of eight and then sutured. Recontruction of the joint capsule, closure of the wound.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Gilchrist brace for 3-5 days, functional physiotherapy with a maximum abduction of 90° for 6 weeks. No carrying or lifting of weights greater than 5 kg for 3 months.

RESULTS

During the period from January 2006 to December 2010, 8 patients with sternoclavicular instability were treated. Four patients were treated with fiber tape and four were treated with a gracilis tendon autograft. Postoperative all patients described a reduction of pain and improved shoulder function. The Constant score was 72 points, the DASH 58 points.

[Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with the autologous quadriceps tendon. Primary and revision surgery]

OBJECTIVE

Restore function of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

INDICATIONS

Chronic functional instability with rupture of the ACL, giving way phenomena, acute rupture of the ACL with concomitant meniscus repair, rerupture of ACL graft with anatomical tunnels.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Local infection of the skin at the knee joint, local soft tissue damage, after rupture of the quadriceps tendon, enthesopathia of the quadriceps tendon, lack of patient compliance.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Harvest quadriceps tendon graft with a bone block via a 4-5 cm long incision, starting from the middle third of the proximal patella pole without damaging the tendon fibers. Drill the femoral tunnel via a deep anteromedial portal with the knee flexed of more than 110° (tunnel diameter 0.5-1 mm smaller in diameter than bone block). Gentle tunnel preparation using dilators. In absence of an ACL stump the lateral meniscus anterior horn serves as tibial landmark. In case of revision surgery, remove graft material and implants from the tunnel. Graft fixation using press fit method in the femoral tunnel. Tibial graft fixation archieved with a resorbable interference screw and a button.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Goal of the inflammatory phase (weeks 1-2) is pain and inflammation control (20 kg partial weight bearing). During the proliferative phase (weeks 2-6), load and mobility slowly increased (closed-chain exercises). During the remodeling phase (> 6 weeks), strength and coordination exercises are performed. In revision cases and in case of concomitant injuries, longer partial weight-bearing period might be necessary. Athletes should not return to competitive sports before 6-8 months.

RESULTS

In a prospective study, 33 patients (age 16-48 years) were examined after replacement of the ACL with a quadriceps tendon graft after a minimum follow-up (FU) of 2 years (12 revision; 21 primary surgery). No post- or perioperative complications. Postoperative radiographs showed an anatomical tunnel location and no dislocation of the bone block. After 2 years the difference of a-p translation compared to the other leg was assessed by the use of KT 1000. The revision group improved from an average of 7.2 mm (pre-op) to 2.2 mm (FU). The group with primary surgery improved from 6.4 mm (pre-op) to 1.7 mm (FU). A sliding pivot shift phenomenon was detected in 2 patients in the revision group and 1 patient in the primary surgery group.

Structural and functional analysis of the semitendinosus tendon after harvest for soft tissue reconstructive procedures: a dynamic ultrasonographic study

PURPOSE

To assess the potential for regeneration of the hamstring tendons after harvesting for various soft tissue reconstructive procedures, this study uses dynamic, high-resolution ultrasound to evaluate the presence of any tissue in the harvest gap and to characterize tissue functionality.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using ipsilateral hamstring autograft were identified in the database of a single surgeon. Dynamic 12-MHz sonographic imaging was used to evaluate the ipsilateral and contralateral (control) semitendinosus tendons from their insertion sites to proximal muscle bellies. The presence or absence and echogenicity of tissue in the harvest defect, tissue appearance, degree of retraction of the proximal tendon stump, thickness of gap tissue, and motion of the proximal tendon stump were recorded. Data were analysed with Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, sign or binomial tests, with significance of P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Eighteen knees in 15 patients (aged 17-51 years) were studied. The proximal amputated stump was retracted an average of 9.0 ± 7.6 cm (range, 0-18 cm; P = 0.0063). With dynamic testing, 9 of 15 knees demonstrated decreased excursion of the proximal tendon stump when compared to the native, contralateral muscle-tendon unit (P = 0.0039). Tissue was detected in the harvest gap in nine knees, five of which had harvest gap tissue with a disorganized appearance compared to the native tendon (P < 0.0001). Six of these nine knees had tissue in the gap demonstrating either less or no excursion with active knee flexion when compared to the native, contralateral side (P = 0.0313).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of tissue in the harvest gap after ACL reconstruction is variable. When tissue is present, there is proximal retraction of the musculotendinous junction and disorganized appearance of the tissue that does not demonstrate normal excursion or physiological function similar to the native muscle-tendon unit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

Isolated AL bundle reconstruction of the PCL

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results after isolated reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) using the semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis (GR) tendons with the arthroscopic single-bundle technique.

METHODS

All patients upon whom we had performed a single-bundle PCL reconstruction between 2002 and 2005 prospectively underwent a standardized follow-up examination after 2 years. Isolated PCL reconstruction was carried out on 41 patients during the observation period. Pre- and postoperative stress radiographs were taken using the Telos stress device in order to evaluate the dorsal translation. Knee joint function and degree of activity were recorded using the Tegner activity score, the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and the overall IKDC score.

RESULTS

33 of 41 patients (80.4%, 17 men, 16 women) completed the study. The posterior tibial translation of -10.1 ± 1.8 mm had an overall average improvement to a postoperative value of -5.0 ± 2.5 mm (p < 0.001). The patients showed a significant improvement in the Tegner activity score from an average 2.8 ± 0.8 points to 5.9 ± 1.2 points (p < 0.001). Evaluation of the subjective IKDC showed a significant improvement from a preoperative score of 41.86 ± 11.49 points to a postoperative score of 69.54 ± 11.39 points (p < 0.001). In total, 24 patients (72.8%) exhibited a normal or nearly normal outcome.

CONCLUSION

The abovementioned reconstruction technique can achieve a stable knee function in patients with isolated PCL insufficiency. The isolated single-bundle PCL reconstruction offers an improvement regarding the activity level and stability of the knee joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.