Arthroskopische Auffüllung von fehlplatzierten und erweiterten Bohrkanälen mit Beckenkammspongiosa bei Rezidivinstabilität nach Ersatzplastik des vorderen Kreuzbandes

Cancellous allogenic and autologous bone grafting ensure comparable tunnel filling results in two-staged revision ACL surgery

OBJECTIVES

Patients with recurrent instability after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction often present with enlarged or misplaced tunnels and bone grafting is required prior to the actual revision reconstruction. Autologous bone grafting features limited quantity and donor site morbidity. These problems may be eliminated utilizing cancellous bone allografts, but their efficiency and reliability have not been investigated systematically. The aim of the present study was to compare tunnel filling rates attained by utilizing either allogenic or autologous cancellous bone grafts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 103 consecutive patients were enrolled retrospectively. All patients suffered from recurrent instability and underwent either allogenic or autologous cancellous bone grafting. Computed tomography (CT) was carried out before and after the bone grafting procedure. Based on preoperative CT scans, positioning and maximum diameter of the femoral and tibial tunnels were determined. Tunnel filling rates were calculated as a ratio of pre- and postoperative tunnel volumes. Primary outcome was the tibial tunnel filling rate. Femoral filling rates and density of the grafted bone were assessed secondarily.

RESULTS

Preoperative CT scans revealed no significant differences between the two groups regarding distribution of misplacement and widening of the femoral or tibial tunnel. Postoperative CT scans were conducted after an interval of 5.2 months. Tunnel filling rates of 74.5% (± 14.3) femoral and 85.3% (± 10.3) tibial were achieved in the allogenic compared to 74.3% (± 15.9) femoral and 84.9% (± 9.4) tibial in the autologous group. With p values of 0.85 at the femur and 0.83 at the tibia, there were no significant differences between the groups. The density of the grafted bone revealed significantly higher values in the allogenic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing cancellous bone allografts in two-staged revision ACL surgery provides for sufficient and reproducible filling of enlarged or misplaced tunnels. The filling rates are comparable to those achieved with autologous bone grafting. Advantages of allografts are the unrestricted quantity and the absence of any harvesting procedure.

Revision ACL reconstruction using quadriceps or hamstring autografts leads to similar results after 4 years: good objective stability but low rate of return to pre-injury sport level

PURPOSE

Due to the increased importance of revision ACL reconstruction, this study aims to evaluate the outcome 4 years after the surgery, compare two revision strategies and identify factors that influence the results.

METHODS

Seventy-nine patients who received a revision ACL reconstruction were retrospectively evaluated. All patients were assessed with an average follow-up of 4.4 years (range 3.3-5.5 years). The results of patients treated with a quadriceps autograft were compared with those treated with a hamstring autograft.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven percent of patients had a KT-1000 side-to-side difference of ≤ 5 mm (mean 1.7 ± 2.0 mm). Pivot-shift test was absent or minor in 95%. In the SLTH-test, 70% of patients reached 90% of the contralateral side. The mean Lysholm score on follow-up was 83 ± 12 (56% excellent/good). The mean IKDC 2000 subjective evaluation score was 81 ± 14 (58% normal/almost normal). The median Tegner activity score was 6 (range 3-10), a median of 2 levels worse than before the first injury. Return to sport rate was 89% but only 34% of patients reached their pre-injury sport level. Most common cause for this reduction was fear of another injury. Three patients suffered a re-rupture. Patients with a hamstring autograft performed pivoting sports more often, but had worse pivot-shift results compared to those with a quadriceps autograft. No significant influence was seen for other parameters. Young, male patients with a high activity level and no chondral damage had the best results.

CONCLUSION

Through revision ACL reconstruction, the goal of stabilizing the knee can be achieved in the majority of patients. However, a good function and a high activity level are significantly less common in these patients. The main reason for this is fear of a renewed ACL-injury. Both quadriceps and hamstring autografts were able to achieve a good outcome. Young, male, patients with a normal BMI, a high activity level and without cartilage damage seem to benefit the most from revision ACL surgery. The discrepancy between the good laxity restoration and the lower activity rate should therefore be a main point in clinical counseling when deciding for or against revision ACL-Reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

[Primary revision with replasty of the anterior cruciate ligament]

OBJECTIVE

Restoration of knee stability after rerupture of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft.

INDICATION

Acute and chronic functional instability with rerupture of an ACL graft with subjective instability with anatomical or non-anatomical bone tunnel without tunnel widening.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Partial anatomical bone tunnels of the previous operation, significant tunnel widening of anatomical bone tunnels, local infection of the knee joint, local soft tissue damage.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Graft choices are hamstring tendons (semitendinosus muscle, gracilis muscle), the quadriceps tendon, patellar tendon and a peroneus tendon split graft. In cases with anatomical tunnels, careful debridement is performed down to the tunnel wall. In non-anatomical tunnels, a new femoral tunnel is drilled over a deep anteromedial portal with the knee flexed more than 110° in the insertion area of the ACL. Using drills and dilators, a tunnel is prepared. At the tibia, the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus serves as a landmark in the absence of an ACL stump. The cortical tibial tunnel aperture is probed with a guide wire and the tunnel is drilled stepwise until the tunnel wall is reached, which is debrided with a spoon or synovial resector to remove graft residues and implants from the tunnel. The femoral fixation can either be done with a flip button, an interference screw or in the case of a bone block graft implant-free. At the tibial side, the graft is fixed with a resorbable interference screw and fixation button.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

The rehabilitation program comprises 4-5 phases. Inflammatory phase (weeks 1-2): control of pain and swelling (cooling, isometric tension exercises, 20 kg partial load). Phase 2 (weeks 2-6): increasing load and range of motion with closed chain exercises (target: extension/flexion 0-0-120°). Phase 3 (from week 6): strength and coordination exercises. Phase 4: balance, strength and jump exercises. Return to competitive sport not before postoperative month 6-10.

RESULTS

Included were 51 patients with recurrent instability after ACL surgery where primary ACL replacement was performed with ipsilateral bone quadriceps tendon graft or contralateral semitendinosus-gracilis graft. All patients had anatomical or non-anatomical tunnel locations without significant widening (>11 mm). After 2 years, the side-to-side difference for anterior tibial translation measured with the KT 1000 arthrometer was 2.0 ± 1.2 mm for the quadriceps group and 3.0 ± 2.9 mm for the semitendinosus-gracilis group (P = 0.461). No difference in the rate of positive pivot shift tests (P = 0.661); no significant difference in the individual Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscores or in the frequency of anterior knee pain.

High incidence of partially anatomic tunnel placement in primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate tunnel position and width in failed primary single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. It was hypothesized that both femoral and tibial bone tunnels are frequently malplaced in terms of a partially anatomic position in the setting of failed SB ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent instability following isolated SB ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts, undergoing revision ACL surgery, were retrospectively included. Further inclusion criteria were age >18 years and availability of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans and radiographs of the affected knee. Patients with multiligamentous instabilities as well as incomplete or poor radiographs were excluded. Tunnel position was evaluated according to the method described by Harner et al. and Stäubli and Rauschning. Tunnel width was determined on CT scans perpendicular to the bone tunnel axis at three different heights of each bone tunnel.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and were considered for radiological analysis. Femoral tunnels were graded as anatomic in 60% (49 of 82) of all cases. In the remaining 40% (33/82), 27% of the tunnels were placed partially anatomic and 13% were graded as non-anatomic. Tibial tunnel placement was found to be anatomic in 54% (44/82) of all cases, partially anatomic in 45% and non-anatomic in 1% of the cases. No statistically significant difference between anatomic or partially anatomic tunnel position and tunnel diameter, neither for the femoral nor for the tibial side, was observed (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that there is a high incidence of partially anatomic placed tunnels in failed SB ACL reconstruction. Tunnel width was not associated with tunnel position. Clinically, partially anatomic bone tunnels frequently require a staged procedure with bone grafting and subsequent ACL revision surgery. Thus, surgeons should carefully analyse tunnel position and width preoperatively to properly plan ACL revision surgery.

Influence of Different Tibial Fixation Techniques on Initial Stability in Single-Stage Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision With Confluent Tibial Tunnels: A Biomechanical Laboratory Study

PURPOSE

To kinematically and biomechanically compare 4 different types of tibial tunnel management in single-stage anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision reconstruction with the control: primary ACL reconstruction using a robotic-based knee testing setup.

METHODS

Porcine knees and flexor tendons were used. One hundred specimens were randomly assigned to 5 testing groups: (1) open tibial tunnel, (2) bone plug technique, (3) biodegradable interference screw, (4) dilatation technique, and (5) primary ACL reconstruction. A robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system was used to simulate the KT-1000 (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA) and pivot-shift tests. Cyclic loading and load-to-failure testing were performed.

RESULTS

Anterior tibial translation increased significantly with all of the techniques compared with the intact ACL (P < .05). In the simulated KT-1000 test, groups 2 and 3 achieved results equal to those of primary ACL reconstruction (P > .05). The open tunnel and dilated tunnel techniques showed significantly greater anterior tibial translation (P < .05). The results of the simulated pivot-shift test were in accordance with those of the KT-1000 test. No significant differences could be observed regarding stiffness or maximum load to failure. However, elongation was significantly lower in the primary ACL reconstruction group compared with groups 1 and 3 (P = .02 and P = .03, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Filling an incomplete and incorrect tibial tunnel with a press-fit bone plug or a biodegradable interference screw in a standardized laboratory situation provided initial biomechanical properties and knee stability comparable with those of primary ACL reconstruction. In contrast, the dilatation technique or leaving the malplaced tunnel open did not restore knee kinematics adequately in this model. Backup extracortical fixation should be considered because the load to failure depends on the extracortical fixation when an undersized interference screw is used for aperture fixation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our biomechanical results could help orthopaedic surgeons to optimize the results of primary ACL revision with incomplete, incorrect tunnel placement.

Femoral marrow cavity bone harvesting used for arthroscopic refilling of misplaced or enlarged bone tunnels in revision ACL surgery: an arthroscopically supported technique with antegrade intramedullary bone harvesting by a reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) system

PURPOSE

In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision surgery, refilling of misplaced or enlarged tunnels frequently requires bone harvesting from the iliac crest. Unfortunately, donor-site pain displays a relevant complication. In order to optimize patients' comfort, we developed a procedure combining minimally invasive intramedullary bone harvesting from the femur with arthroscopic tunnel refilling.

METHODS

Patients with ACL reconstruction failure that were not eligible for one-step revision surgery but required tunnel refilling prior to the next ACL reconstruction were enrolled prospectively. Cancellous bone was harvested intramedullarily from the ipsilateral femur using the reamer-irrigator-aspirator system in a minimally invasive manner. Afterwards, the femoral and tibial tunnels were arthroscopically refilled using cones and push rods. Computer tomography (CT) analyses were carried out before and after the filling procedure. Pain levels were assessed during the entire follow-up. Patients undergoing iliac crest bone harvesting for other reasons served as a control group. Finally, the quality of the newly formed bone stock was evaluated in the subsequent ACL reconstruction procedure.

RESULTS

Five patients were included during a 6-month period. Prior to refilling, tunnel analysis revealed a mean tunnel volume of 7.9 cm(3) at the femur [SD ± 5.3 cm(3)] and of 6.7 cm(3) [SD ± 5.1 cm(3)] at the tibia. The CT analyses further revealed that graft failure was predominantly caused by tunnel misplacement. Post-operatively, pain levels due to intramedullary bone harvesting were significantly lower compared to iliac crest bone harvesting at every analysed time point. Three to five months after tunnel filling, CT analyses showed sufficiently incorporated bone stocks with filling rates of 75 % femoral and 94 % tibial. ACL revision surgery was performed 4-5 months after tunnel filling without any complication.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary bone harvesting from the ipsilateral femur combined with arthroscopic refilling of the bone tunnels ensures a high-quality bone stock for further ACL reconstruction. The clinical relevance is shown by the feasibility of this technique and the significantly reduced pain levels during post-operative recovery.

[Anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with the autologous quadriceps tendon. Primary and revision surgery]

OBJECTIVE

Restore function of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

INDICATIONS

Chronic functional instability with rupture of the ACL, giving way phenomena, acute rupture of the ACL with concomitant meniscus repair, rerupture of ACL graft with anatomical tunnels.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Local infection of the skin at the knee joint, local soft tissue damage, after rupture of the quadriceps tendon, enthesopathia of the quadriceps tendon, lack of patient compliance.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Harvest quadriceps tendon graft with a bone block via a 4-5 cm long incision, starting from the middle third of the proximal patella pole without damaging the tendon fibers. Drill the femoral tunnel via a deep anteromedial portal with the knee flexed of more than 110° (tunnel diameter 0.5-1 mm smaller in diameter than bone block). Gentle tunnel preparation using dilators. In absence of an ACL stump the lateral meniscus anterior horn serves as tibial landmark. In case of revision surgery, remove graft material and implants from the tunnel. Graft fixation using press fit method in the femoral tunnel. Tibial graft fixation archieved with a resorbable interference screw and a button.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Goal of the inflammatory phase (weeks 1-2) is pain and inflammation control (20 kg partial weight bearing). During the proliferative phase (weeks 2-6), load and mobility slowly increased (closed-chain exercises). During the remodeling phase (> 6 weeks), strength and coordination exercises are performed. In revision cases and in case of concomitant injuries, longer partial weight-bearing period might be necessary. Athletes should not return to competitive sports before 6-8 months.

RESULTS

In a prospective study, 33 patients (age 16-48 years) were examined after replacement of the ACL with a quadriceps tendon graft after a minimum follow-up (FU) of 2 years (12 revision; 21 primary surgery). No post- or perioperative complications. Postoperative radiographs showed an anatomical tunnel location and no dislocation of the bone block. After 2 years the difference of a-p translation compared to the other leg was assessed by the use of KT 1000. The revision group improved from an average of 7.2 mm (pre-op) to 2.2 mm (FU). The group with primary surgery improved from 6.4 mm (pre-op) to 1.7 mm (FU). A sliding pivot shift phenomenon was detected in 2 patients in the revision group and 1 patient in the primary surgery group.

Tunnel widening after anatomic double-bundle and mid-position single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the amount of postoperative bone tunnel enlargement after anatomic double-bundle (DB) and single-bundle (SB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction 6 to 8 months after surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-one consecutive patients undergoing anatomic 4-tunnel DB ACL reconstruction and 24 patients undergoing anatomic 2-tunnel SB ACL reconstruction were included in this study. In both groups a hybrid fixation technique with interference screw and extracortical fixation at the tibia and an extracortical fixation technique at the femur were used. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed on the second postoperative day and at a mean of 8 months' follow-up (range, 6.8 to 8.3 months) to assess intraoperative and postoperative bone tunnel enlargement. Tunnel widening was determined in different planes by digitally measuring the diameters of the bone tunnels. Tunnel position was measured and classified according to Harner et al. (femoral) and Stäubli et al. and Petersen et al. (tibial).

RESULTS

Magnetic resonance imaging showed that all bone tunnels were anatomically placed within the area of the original ACL insertion zone. Compared with the intraoperative drill diameter, we observed only a slight increase in tunnel diameter in both groups on the second postoperative day. At 8 months postoperatively, significant bone tunnel widening occurred in all bone tunnels (P < .001). However, no significant differences were found between tunnel enlargement in the DB group and tunnel enlargement in the SB group (P > .05), either on the tibial side or on the femoral side. In 2 cases tibial tunnel communication was noted at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of anatomic SB and DB ACL reconstruction techniques, the results of bone tunnel enlargement were comparable; no significant difference was observed between the tibial and femoral tunnels.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prospective comparative study.

Technique of anatomical footprint reconstruction of the ACL with oval tunnels and medial portal aimers

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article was to demonstrate an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction technique using oval tunnels. Aim of this single bundle technique is to fit the footprint anatomy of the ACL as closely as possible. TECHNIQUE AND PATIENTS: The presented technique is a single bundle technique using a semitendinosus graft. For femoral tunnel placement, a specific medial portal aimer (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) is used. Aiming and drilling of the femoral tunnel are performed via the medial portal. Oval tunnels are created by stepwise dilatation with ovally shaped dilatators. The position of the femoral tunnel is visualized and controlled with the arthroscope via the medial portal. For the tibial tunnel placement, a specific aimer was used as well. With this technique, 24 patients were operated and all intra- and postoperative complications were analyzed prospectively. The tunnel position was documented postoperatively by CT scan.

RESULTS

There were no significant intra- and postoperative complications associated with the oval tunnel technique. The postoperative 3D CT scan revealed that all femoral and tibial tunnels were located within the area of the anatomical ACL insertions.

CONCLUSIONS

This article presents an ACL reconstruction technique using oval dilatators and medial portal aimers to create oval tunnels. These oval tunnels match the insertion site anatomy much closer than round tunnels do.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.