[Intramedullary nailing of the distal tibia illustrated with the Expert(TM) tibia nail]

Imaging risk factors for predicting postoperative complications of intramedullary nailing for tibial fracture

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the ratio of fracture site diameter to tibial isthmus diameter (TFI ratio) as a predictor of postoperative complications, including malunion and delayed union, after tibial intramedullary nailing for middle and lower tibial fractures.

METHODS

Data were collected from all adult patients older than 20 years of age who underwent tibial intramedullary nailing for middle and lower tibial fractures between January 2015 and January 2023 and were followed up for at least 1 year. Diabetes history, smoking history, fracture type, injury mechanism, surgical method, surgical approach, diameter of the medullary cavity at the fracture site, and diameter of the tibial isthmus were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the variables affecting the occurrence of complications. The TFI ratio was used to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the parameters, and ROC curves were generated to establish TFI ratio thresholds for predicting complications.

RESULTS

A total of 123 patients with middle and lower tibial fractures were treated with intramedullary nails. The mean age of the patients was 43.72 years (range, 21-81 years); 89 were males, and 34 were females. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that fracture type, open reduction surgery, superior patellar approach, and TFI ratio were significantly correlated with postoperative complications after intramedullary nailing of a tibial fracture. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the TFI ratio was an independent risk factor for complications (P = 0.001*). By using the TFI ratio as a predictor of complications, an ROC curve was generated to establish a threshold. The ROC curve showed that a TFI ratio ≥ 1.31 had a sensitivity of 0.89, a specificity of 0.71, and an area under the ROC curve of 0.82 for predicting complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that a wider intramedullary diameter and a shorter fixed length at the fracture site are associated with a higher incidence of complications after tibial intramedullary nailing. The TFI ratio may be used as a reliable parameter for predicting complications after such surgery. In patients with a high TFI ratio (≥ 1.31), additional reduction and fixation techniques may be needed to obtain and maintain fracture reduction.

Retrograde tibial nailing of far distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical evaluation of double- versus triple-distal interlocking

Objectives

Retrograde tibial nailing using the Distal Tibia Nail (DTN) is a novel surgical option in the treatment of distal tibial fracture. Its unique retrograde insertion increases the range of surgical options in far distal fractures of the tibia beyond the use of plating. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the DTN for far distal tibia fractures where only double rather than triple-distal locking is possible due to fracture localisation and morphology.

Methods

Six Sawbones^® were instrumented with a DTN and an AO/OTA 43-A3 fracture simulated. Samples were tested in two configurations: first with distal triple locking, second with double locking by removing one distal screw. Samples were subjected to compressive (350 N, 600 N) and torsional (± 8 Nm) loads. Stiffness construct and interfragmentary movement were quantified and compared between double and triple-locking configurations.

Results

The removal of one distal screw resulted in a 60–70% preservation of compressive stiffness, and 90% preservation of torsional stiffness for double locking compared to triple locking. Interfragmentary movement remained minimal for both compressive and torsional loading.

Conclusions

The DTN with a distal double locking can, therefore, be considered for far distal tibia fractures where nailing would be preferred over plating.

Extra-articular distal tibia fractures-controversies regarding treatment options. A single-centre prospective comparative study

Distal tibia fractures are reported to have a high complication rate pre-operatively as well as post-operatively, which can include open fractures, soft tissue damage, infection, malalignment, pseudarthrosis and ankle arthrosis. The operative treatment for the extra-articular distal tibia fractures is a controversial topic in the orthopaedic literature. Some of these fractures are proximal enough to be treated with an intramedullary nail while others are too distal for that. The aim of our study was to compare the results we have had with intramedullary nail (IMN) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in distal metaphyseal (extra-articular) tibia fractures. The study was designed prospectively between January 2013 and March 2016 and took place on the Orthopaedics and Traumatology ward of a Clinical Emergency County Hospital in western Romania. The follow-up visits were scheduled one month, three months and six months post-operatively. For evaluating the ankle function, we used the Olerud-Molander ankle score (OMAS) and union was evaluated at six months on ankle X-rays. At the six-month follow-up visit the average scores were 75.55 (20-100) for the IMN lot and 74.23 (20-90) for the MIPO lot, without finding any statistical difference between the two groups (p >0.1). At the six-month follow-up, X-ray union was objected in 48 (90.5%) of our patients, the IMN lot having worse results (85.18%) than the MIPO lot (96.15%). The results we encountered showed little to no statistical difference when it comes to the functional score we used (OMAS score), leading us to believe that you can achieve comparable results with both implants.

A novel intramedullary nail for use in the treatment of supramalleolar malunion and nonunion: A preliminary report of three cases

Introduction

The fractures around the supramalleolar region are difficult to manage and deformities may occur following insufficient or inadequate treatment attempts. The treatment of those deformities is even more challenging. The available options for surgical fixation have inherent problems considering the soft tissue problems, infection and compliance of the patients. In this study, we report the preliminary outcome of new IMN system in use of supramalleolar deformities.

Patients and Methods

Three patients with supramalleolar deformities were recruited for this study. Two patients had periarticular distal tibia malunions and one patient had nonunion in same region. All patients were operated with using newly designed intramedullary nail system with a unique distal interlocking bolt screw. The outcome for each patient was followed-up and evaluated with using AOFAS score.

Results

The patients were followed up for 3 years, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively. The AOFAS scores were 36, 33, and 21 preoperatively; and 75, 68, and 75 postoperatively in Patients 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

Conclusion

In our patient series, adequate fixation following correction of the deformity was seen. Although the number of the cases are limited this study provides encouraging results regarding the outcome of new IMN system in use of supramalleolar deformities.

Treatment of distal intraarticular tibial fractures: A biomechanical evaluation of intramedullary nailing vs. angle-stable plate osteosynthesis

In factures of the distal tibia with simple articular extension, the optimal surgical treatment remains debatable. In clinical practice, minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and intramedullary nailing are both routinely performed. Comparative biomechanical studies of different types of osteosynthesis of intraarticular distal tibial fractures are missing due to the lack of an established model. The goal of this study was first to establish a biomechanical model and second to investigate, which are the biomechanical advantages of angle-stable plate osteosynthesis and intramedullary nailing of distal intraarticular tibial fractures. Seven 4(th) generation biomechanical composite tibiae featuring an AO 43-C2 type fracture were implanted with either osteosynthesis technique. After primary lag screw fixation, 4-hole Medial Distal Tibial Plate (MDTP) with triple proximal and quadruple distal screws or intramedullary nailing with double proximal and triple 4.0mm distal interlocking were implanted. The stiffness of the implant-bone constructs and interfragmentary movement were measured under non-destructive axial compression (350 and 600 N) and torsion (1.5 and 3Nm). Destructive axial compression testing was conducted with a maximal load of up to 1,200 N. No overall superior biomechanical results can be proclaimed for either implant type. Intramedullary nailing displays statistically superior results for axial loading in comparison to the MDTP. Torsional loading resulted in non-statistically significant differences for the two-implant types with higher stability in the MDTP group. From a biomechanical view, the load sharing intramedullary nail might be more forgiving and allow for earlier weight bearing in patients with limited compliance.

Plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing for displaced extra-articular distal tibia fractures: a system review

PURPOSE

The optimal surgical procedure for displaced extra-articular distal tibia fractures remains debated at present. The objective of this systematic review is to compare the complications and functional outcomes of this type of fracture after plate fixation and intramedullary nailing .

METHODS

A computer-aided search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane was carried out on July, 2012. Two independent reviewers screened and assessed abstracts. Every study published in English about the comparison between plate fixation and intramedullary nailing for displaced extra-articular distal tibia fractures was included. The outcomes were pooled or summarized separately per study according to heterogeneity between studies. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs) were calculated by Mantel-Haenszel method using either the fixed effects model or random effects model.

RESULTS

Eight studies, with 270 patients in the intramedullary nailing and 217 patients in the plates fixation group, met the inclusion criteria. Functional outcome, days of hospital stay and time for bone union were comparable between intramedullary fixation and plate fixation. Total complication rate was significant higher for intramedullary nailing compared with plate fixation (44.5 vs. 25.8 %, P < 0.001). Similarly, the rate of minor complications was higher for intramedullary nailing than that for plate fixation (35.9 vs. 21.2 % P < 0.001). Major complication rate was 8.52 % for intramedullary nailing and 4.6 % for plate fixation, but the difference had no statistical significance (P = 0.06). Our pooled estimates showed a decreased risk of total complication in plate fixation (RR, 2.38; 95 % CI, 1.13-5.03; P = 0.02). Among these complications, malunion and anterior knee pain were more common in intramedullary nailing than in plate fixation (20.1 vs. 4.5 %, P < 0.001; 4.2 vs. 0.45 %, P = 0.02, respectively). Meanwhile, significantly less wound problems happened in intramedullary nailing than in plate fixation (2.9 vs. 7.5 %, P = 0.03). In addition, locking plate fixation with mini-invasive technique tended to have a lower complication rate than conventional plate fixation, although the difference was not significant (21 vs. 28.4 %, P = 0.26).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this systematic review suggested that plate fixation, especially minimally invasive percutaneous plating osteosynthesis technique would be preferred for extra-articular distal tibia fractures because of its low complication rate. Nevertheless, intramedullary fixation should be taken priority for distal tibia fractures with serious soft tissue injuries.

Unreamed intramedullary nailing in distal tibial fractures

PURPOSE

Unreamed nailing has gained acceptance in the treatment of diaphyseal long bone fractures, especially in cases with polytrauma or high-energy injuries. Its application in distal tibial fractures, however, remains controversial.

METHODS

In this study, 101 distal tibial fractures treated using closed unreamed nailing were reviewed after a mean follow-up of 32 months. There were 59 type A und 42 type B fractures. The most common fracture pattern was the A1 spiral fracture (n = 40) followed by the B2 wedge fracture (n = 18). Intra-articular extension was encountered in 14 cases. One-fourth of the patients (n = 24) had open injuries. Forty-seven patients had additional injuries, and nearly one-third of them were polytraumatised.

RESULTS

Union occurred after a mean time of 23.9 (range, 11-134) weeks. There were 13 cases of delayed union and seven non-unions; all healed eventually with additional surgery in only six fractures. Malunion was seen in 12 cases (five valgus, two varus and five external torsion), ten of which were associated with unplated fibular fractures. Three fractures (two open) were treated for deep infection. The most common complication seen was fatigue failure of the locking screws (27 cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Unreamed nailing of distal tibial fractures is associated with a rather high rate of bone healing complications and locking screw failure. The decision for its use in the notoriously challenging fractures of this segment should be critically considered.

Management of simple (types A and B) closed tibial shaft fractures using percutaneous lag-screw fixation and Ilizarov external fixation in adults

PURPOSE

Although intramedullary fixation of closed simple (type A or B) diaphyseal tibial fractures in adults is well tolerated by patients, providing lower morbidity rates and better mobility, it is associated with some complications. This study evaluated the results of managing these fractures using percutaneous minimal internal fixation using one or more lag screws, and Ilizarov external fixation.

METHODS

This method was tested to evaluate its efficacy in immediate weight bearing, fracture healing and prevention of any post-immobilisation stiffness of the ankle and knee joints. This randomised blinded study was performed at a referral, academically supervised, level III trauma centre. Three hundred and twenty-four of the initial 351 patients completed this study and were followed up for a minimum of 12 (12-88) months. Patient ages ranged from 20 to 51 years, with a mean of 39 years. Ankle and knee movements and full weight bearing were encouraged immediately postoperatively. Solid union was assessed clinically and radiographically. Active and passive ankle and knee ranges of motion were measured and compared with the normal side using the Wilcoxon signed rank test for matched pairs. Subjective Olerud and Molander Ankle Score was used to detect any ankle joint symptoms at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

No patient showed delayed or nonunion. All fractures healed within 95-129 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on final clinical and radiographic outcomes, this technique proves to be adequate for managing simple diaphyseal tibial fractures. On the other hand, it is relatively expensive, technically demanding, necessitates exposure to radiation and patients are expected to be frame friendly.