[Fractures of the olecranon]

Is Postoperative Splinting Advantageous After Upper Extremity Fracture Surgery? Results From the Arm Splint Pain Improvement Research Experiment

OBJECTIVES

The authors report no conflict of interest.To determine if short-term immobilization with a rigid long arm plaster elbow splint after surgery of the arm, elbow, or forearm results in superior outcomes compared with a soft dressing with early motion.

METHODS

DESIGN

Prospective Randomized Control Trial.

SETTING

Academic Medical Center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients undergoing operative treatment for a mid-diaphysis or distal humerus, elbow, or forearm fracture were consented and randomized according to the study protocol for postoperative application of a rigid elbow splint (10-14 days in a plaster Sugar Tong Splint for forearm fracture or a Long Arm plaster Splint for 10-14 for all others) or soft dressing and allowing immediate free range of elbow and wrist motion (range of motion [ROM]).

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Self-reported pain (visual analog score or VAS), Healthscale (0-100, 100 denoting excellent health), and physical function (EuroQol 5 Dimension or EQ-5D) surveyed on postoperative days 1-5 and 14 were compared between groups. Patient-reported pain score (0-10, 10 denoting highest satisfaction) at week 6, time to fracture union, ultimate disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score, and elbow ROM were also collected for analysis. Incidence of complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Hundred patients (38 men to 62 women with a mean age of 55.7 years) were included. Over the first 5 days and again at postop day 14, the splint cohort reported a higher "Healthscale" from 0 to 100 than the nonsplint group on all study days ( P = 0.041). There was no difference in reported pain between the 2 study groups over the same interval ( P = 0.161 and 0.338 for least and worst pain, respectively), and both groups reported similar rates of treatment satisfaction ( P = 0.30). Physical function ( P = 0.67) and rates of wound problems ( P = 0.27) were similar. Additionally, the mean time to fracture healing was similar for the splint and control groups (4.6 ± 2.8 vs. 4.0 ± 2.2 months, P = 0.34). Ultimate elbow ROM was similar between the study groups ( P = 0.48, P = 0.49, P = 0.61, and P = 0.51 for elbow extension, flexion, pronation, and supination, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Free range of elbow motion without splinting produced similar results compared with elbow immobilization after surgical intervention for a fracture to the humerus, elbow, and forearm. There was no difference in patient-reported pain outcomes, wound problems, or elbow ROM. Immobilized patients reported slightly higher "healthscale" ratings than nonsplinted patients and, however, reported similar rates of satisfaction. Both treatment strategies are acceptable after upper extremity fracture surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Risk Factors for Loss of Reduction After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Isolated Olecranon Fractures in Adults

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine whether any relevant patient, fracture, surgical, or postoperative characteristics are associated with loss of reduction after plate fixation of isolated olecranon fractures in adults.

METHODS

Patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of an olecranon fracture at our institution over an 11-year period were analyzed. Electronic patient charts and radiographic images were reviewed to gather patient, fracture, surgical, and postoperative data. Statistical analysis to explore the differences between groups was performed.

RESULTS

Seven of 96 patients experienced a loss of fracture reduction diagnosed at a median of 19 days after their initial surgery (range: 4-116 days). The radiographic mode of failure of all patients who lost reduction was proximal migration of the proximal fracture fragment with or without implant failure. The group that lost reduction had a significantly smaller proximal fragment (14.2 vs 18.6 mm), a higher incidence of malreduction with a persistent articular step-off greater than 2 mm (6/7 vs 14/89), a greater distance between the most proximal screw and the olecranon tip (19.8 vs 13.5 mm), a higher proportion of constructs with screws placed outside of the primary plate (4/7 vs 14/89), and a higher proportion of patients that were not immobilized postoperatively (3/7 vs 8/89).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest anatomical reduction at the articular surface and adequate fixation of the proximal fragment are key factors in maintenance of reduction, with smaller proximal fragments being at higher risk for failure. A period of postoperative immobilization may decrease the risk of loss of reduction.

Modified lateral approach combined with medial percutaneous approach versus triceps tongue-shaped flap approach and bilateral triceps brachii approach for pin fixation in treatment of irreducible displaced pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the modified lateral approach combined with the medial percutaneous approach (MLACMPA) versus the triceps tongue-shaped flap approach (TTSFA) and the bilateral triceps brachii approach (BTBA) in the treatment of irreducible displaced supracondylar humeral fractures (SHFs) in children. Between March 2000 and July 2022, a total of 135 children who underwent open reduction and Kirschner wire cross internal fixation for irreducible displaced SHFs caused by trauma were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical approach, the patients were assigned to the TTSFA group (n = 36), the BTBA group (n = 40) and the MLACMPA group (n = 59). The duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and elbow range of motion were compared. The 3 groups were similar in terms of mean age, sex distribution, and time from injury to operation. The duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, incision length and postoperative elbow range of motion in the MLACMPA group were significantly superior to those in the TTSFA group and BTBA group (P < .05). Compared the use of the TTSFA or the BTBA, using the MLACMPA for pin fixation in the treatment of irreducible displaced pediatric SHFs could significantly shorten the duration of surgery, reduce the operation trauma, facilitate earlier functional exercise of joints after operation and yield better elbow function.

A novel internal fixation technique for the treatment of olecranon avulsion fracture

Objective

Tension band wiring and proximal ulnar plate fixation are commonly used fixation methods for olecranon fractures. However, they may not be suitable for repairing proximal olecranon avulsion fractures. In this study, we present a novel fixation technique for the treatment of proximal avulsion fractures, which is a T-shaped plate combined with a wire.

Materials and methods

Between March 2016 and May 2020, surgery was performed on 16 patients with proximal olecranon avulsion fractures by using a T-shaped plate combined with a wire fixation at our hospital. The parameters followed were fracture healing time, elbow range of motion (ROM), related functional scores (the Mayo score and the DASH score), and complications related to internal fixation.

Results

The average follow-up period was 17 (14-21) months and fractures had healed in all patients included in the study, with an average fracture union of 9.25 (8-12) weeks. No patient reported fixation failure, serious infection, or revision surgery. The average ROM of the elbow joint was 123° (120-135°). The Mayo score was excellent in 11 patients and good in 5. The average DASH score was 17.75 (12-24).

Conclusion

Olecranon avulsion fractures were fixed with a T-shaped steel plate combined with a steel wire, which can be used for early functional exercise and for achieving good final functional results. This method can provide stable fixation, especially in elderly patients with osteoporosis.

Analysis of the therapeutic effect of artificial leather embedding combined with fascial sleeve flap transplantation on chronic wounds of lower limbs with bone and plate exposure

Background

After severe trauma of lower limbs, bone, tendon or plate graft exposure is common. The traditional repair method is to use a variety of skin flap transplantation to cover the exposed part, but the wound often can not heal after operation, or the wound is cracked, ulcer, sinus, bone and steel plate are exposed again after wound healing. The reason for this result is that when the flap is covered, the space around the bone plate is not well closed, forming a dead cavity, blood and exudate accumulation, hematoma formation or infection, and finally the wound ruptures again. In addition, due to the swelling and contracture of the flap after operation, the suture tension between the flap and the receiving area becomes larger, the skin becomes thinner and broken, and then the wound is formed. In order to solve the above problems, we carried out the study of artificial true skin embedding combined with fascial sleeve flap transplantation in the treatment of chronic bone plate exposed wounds of lower limbs.

Methods

In this paper, 11 cases of chronic wounds with bone exposure and skin necrosis after steel plate implantation were selected. First stage is the wound bed preparation including primary wound expansion, removal of necrotic tissue and incision of sinus wall, removal of deep necrotic bone and fibrotic scarred skin on the outer wall of steel plate to normal tissue on the outer edge of the wound, removal of precipitated peptone and purulent fur in the hole, periphery and bone space of the steel plate, and removal of tendon tissue with basal necrosis and disintegration of the wound. After vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) 1–2 weeks, the peritraumatic basal granulation tissue grew well and there was no necrotic tissue in the wound. In the second stage, the exposed bone was covered with artificial dermis, the steel plate hole or the periphery and the basal space were filled, and the exposed steel plate was completely embedded, and then the fascia sleeve flap was transplanted to cover the wound. The sural neurovascular flap was performed in nine cases and the lateral superior malleolar artery perforator flap in two case.

Results

The flap survived well in all 11 cases. During the follow-up of 6 months to the removal of the plate, there was no case of rupture, exposure and sinus formation.

Conclusions

Artificial dermal covering combined with fascial sleeve flap transplantation can effectively avoid wound dehiscence or sinus formation caused by foreign body retention, infection and flap contracture. It has good effect in repairing chronic wounds with bone plate exposure after severe trauma of lower limbs.

Mitigation of Triceps Avulsion Fracture After Proximal Ulna Plate Fixation

OBJECTIVES

Triceps avulsion fractures have become an increasingly common postoperative complication of olecranon fracture repair with proximal ulna plate (PUP) fixation. The purpose of this study is to create an efficient, reproducible mechanism to mitigate this issue.

METHODS

Ten matched pair cadaveric specimens underwent a complete transverse osteotomy to simulate an olecranon fracture, followed by fracture reduction with a PUP. One arm from each pair underwent an additional augmented suture repair, where the triceps tendon was sutured directly to the plate. A custom jig was used to hold the specimen in position and apply a tensile force on the triceps until mechanical failure.

RESULTS

All control specimens (without augmented suture repair) failed through a full-thickness triceps avulsion fracture at an average force of 967.7 N. The augmented suture-repaired specimens failed at an average force of 1204.3 N through partial avulsion fractures, widening of the osteotomy site, and triceps ruptures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that an augmented suture repair of PUP fixation for olecranon fractures is a simple and effective way to significantly increase fixation strength and change the potential failure mechanism.

Comparison of tension band wiring and plate fixation in Mayo type 2A olecranon fractures

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare clinically and functionally patients who had previously undergone tension band wiring (TBW) or plate fixation (PF) procedure due to the diagnosis of Mayo type 2A olecranon fracture in our clinic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of 92 patients (51 males, 41 females; mean age 42.3±12.6 years; range, 16 to 75 years) operated on for olecranon fractures between January 2014 and December 2018 were recorded retrospectively. Forty-four patients received TBW and 48 patients received PF treatment. Their Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Mayo scores and elbow range of motion (ROM) measurements were used for clinical and functional evaluations. Data including the time to return to work, revision rate, and follow-up time were also recorded.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 38.2±17.2 months. Patients returned to work in 9.2±4.1 weeks in the TBW group and 7.8±3.6 weeks in the PF group (p=0.279). The revision rate was 14% in the TBW group and 2% in the PF group (p=0.335). The mean DASH score was 10.0±1.8 in the TBW group and 7.7±1.2 in the PF group (p=0.001). The mean Mayo score was 84.0±9.3 in the TBW group and 88.3±9.1 in the PF group (p=0.049). For elbow flexion-extension ROM, 4° of difference was measured in favor of the PF group (p=0.043). Mean Mayo score, mean DASH score, and mean flexion-extension ROM values were statistically significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Both surgical techniques are suitable and reliable in the treatment of olecranon fractures. Although TBW treatment is low-cost and simple to apply, its biggest disadvantage is a high rate of secondary surgery for implant removal due to irritation of the skin.

Where should the pins be placed to decrease the failure rate after fixation of a Mayo IIA olecranon fracture? A biomechanical analysis

BACKGROUND

Clinically, treatment of Mayo IIA olecranon fractures (MIOF) using pins is associated with a high rate of failure. The purpose of our study was to compare the biomechanical stability and strength of four different fracture fixation configurations and to recommend the best method for the clinical treatment of MIOFs.

METHODS

Twenty synthetic ulnar models were created and equally divided into 4 different fracture fixation groups: a double cortical configuration using Kirschner (K) wires; a double cortical configuration using transcortical pins; an intramedullary pin system; and an intramedullary pin system with a 3-mm distance between the eyelet and the proximal end of the olecranon (loose fixation). The stiffness and strength of all specimens were tested under a loading rate of 2 mm/min. Between-group differences were evaluated using an independent t-test, with significance set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Stiffness and strength were significantly better for the K-wire than intramedullary group: stiffness, 63.467±14.063 N/mm and 36.243±5.625 N/mm, respectively (P=0.009); and strength, 624.293±148.728 N and 406.486±74.109 N, respectively (P=0.019). There was no difference in stiffness (P=0.370) or strength (P=0.929) between the use of transcortical pins and K-wires. Moreover, a 3-mm prominence of the pin at the olecranon did not have a negative effect on either stiffness (P=0.494) or strength (P=0.391).

CONCLUSIONS

Our biomechanical analysis indicated that using a double cortical pin configuration provided the best stability and strength and, thus, may lower the risk of fracture fixation failure. The use of either K-wires or pins in the double cortical configuration did not influence fixation stability. A loose double cortical configuration might decrease fracture stability, although there differences were not significant.

Risk Factors for Hardware-Related Complications After Olecranon Fracture Fixation

The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for symptomatic hardware and removal of hardware (ROH) after olecranon open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and to assess differences between olecranon locking plate and screws (P&S) or tension band (TB) wire cohorts. The medical records of 331 patients with olecranon fractures treated at two academic level I trauma centers with ORIF from 2012 to 2016 were reviewed. A total of 189 patients were included in the study. Complications, ROH, and subsequent surgery were assessed and compared between cohorts. There were 124 cases in the P&S cohort and 65 in the TB cohort. The overall reoperation rate was 31.2% (59 of 189). The overall incidence of ROH for all cases was 29.1% (55 of 189). Patients who required ROH or developed symptomatic hardware were significantly younger than those who did not (P&S, P<.003; TB, P<.004). Age and body mass index (BMI) were associated with ROH plus symptomatic hardware after P&S. Age (but not BMI) was associated with ROH/symptomatic hardware after TB. Measured hardware prominence was not associated with ROH or ROH plus symptomatic hardware for either the P&S or the TB cohort. Risk factors including patient age and BMI were found to be significantly associated with hardware-related complications. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(3):141-146.].

Olecranon mayo IIA fractures treated with transosseous high strength suture: A series of 29 cases

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to assess the causes and rates of re-operation in olecranon fractures in adults treated with transosseous suture.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 29 patients who were treated with this technique between 2010 and 2018. The type of suture used, tourniquet time and surgical time were analyzed for each one. X-rays were taken after 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months, recording complications, causes, rates of re-operation and the final clinical condition.

RESULTS

Median time for ischemia and surgery were 51 (95% CI:48;62) and 45 (95% CI:42;55) minutes respectively. The radiologic studies showed diastasis of the posterior cortex in the X-rays taken after 2 weeks and after 6 weeks in 7 (24,1%) cases. Of these cases, two (6,8%) were no longer followed-up after 6 months. There was only one case of aseptic non-union. Among these cases, two patients (6.8%) required surgical debridement due to acute soft tissue infection. No complication had any clinical impact, maintaining all patients full range of motion and no pain. Osteosynthesis removal was not necessary in any case.

CONCLUSION

Transosseous suture with high strength thread is a valid alternative for treating Mayo IIA olecranon fractures in adult patients, decreasing re-operation rates for implant removal. There may be, in a moderate percentage of cases, radiologic diastasis of the posterior cortex at the fracture site, without causing pain nor limiting mobility LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Long-Term Outcomes after Colton Type I and II Fractures of the Olecranon

Background:

It is unclear if the outcomes differ in different subtypes of olecranon fractures.

Objective:

Evaluate the outcomes of different Colton types of olecranon fractures, and if outcomes differ in dominant and non-dominant arms and in men and women.

Methods:

We evaluated primary journals and radiographs in 40 men and 55 women with isolated olecranon fractures and classified fractures according to Colton. Mean 19 years after fracture event, we re-examined subjective, clinical and radiographic outcomes in the former patients, using the uninjured arms as controls.

Results:

89% of patients with Colton type I fractures reported at follow-up no subjective differences between the elbows, 84% with type II oblique/transverse fractures and 84% with type II comminuted fractures (p=0.91). The uninjured to former fractured arm differences in elbow range of motion and strength were no different in the 3 fracture types, the proportions of individuals with radiographic elbow degenerative changes were greater in type II than in type I factures (p<0.001), and there were no differences between the proportions of individuals with reduced joint space in the 3 groups (p=0.40). The outcomes were no different if the fractures had occurred in the dominant or non-dominant arms (p=0.43), or in men or women (p=0.43).

Conclusion:

There were no different outcomes after Colton type I, type II oblique/transverse or type II comminuted fractures, no different outcomes between fractures in dominant or non-dominant arms and no different outcomes in men and women.

[Typical fractures and dislocations of the elbow joint and their treatment]

Diagnosis and treatment of injuries to the elbow joint place high demands on the treating physicians. The complex anatomy of the elbow joint enables a wide range of movement and complex functions in everyday and professional life. These must be restored in the event of injury.Clinical and imaging-based diagnostic procedures serve to classify typical injuries of this joint according to a large variety of different pathologies. These include fractures of the distal humerus, the proximal ulna, and the radial head, as well as dislocations and dislocation fractures.The following article gives an overview of the most common of these injuries.