Mediokarpale Teilarthrodese mit winkelstabiler Plattenosteosynthese

[Osteoarthritis of the wrist]

The term osteoarthritis (OA) of the wrist can be used as an umbrella term for various, often independent areas of OA, as the wrist is made up of several joints. Radiocarpal OA often occurs after untreated ligament injuries, incorrectly healed bone fractures in the carpus or after radius fractures involving the joint. A typical sequence of propagation is known for radiocarpal OA following scapholunate (SL) insufficiency or scaphoid pseudarthrosis. Other causes include inflammation, crystal deposits or bone necrosis. Ulnocarpal arthrosis occurs posttraumatically or primarily when there are differences in levels between the ulna and radius. When treating wrist arthrosis, after conservative measures have been exhausted a surgical procedure should be chosen that enables the best possible load-bearing and residual mobility, considering the surgical risks and individual requirements. During salvage operations, the defective cartilage areas are either fused directly or eliminated using appropriate diverting partial fusions and resection arthroplasty. An accurate analysis of the affected zones is crucial for selecting an appropriate intervention.

[Arthroplasty of the hand and wrist]

Arthrosis and autoimmune arthritis frequently lead to major impairment of hand function. Primary therapy consists of well- tried conservative treatments and joint preserving surgical options for special indications. In advanced stages silicon spacers remain the gold standard surgical option for replacement of proximal interphalangeal and metacarpophalgeal joints of the fingers. Alternatively, surface replacement prostheses can restore the biomechanical properties of these joints more porperly. In case of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint of the thumb, arthroplasty is gaining popularity as modern implants show excellent mid-term outcome. Although current forth generation implants for wrist replacement are promising, total wrist arthroplasty is currently reserved for exceptional indications.

[Revision surgery after total wrist arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

Wrist arthroplasty is still an exceptional indication in the field of hand surgery. In recent years, it has become increasingly accepted as an alternative to wrist arthrodesis as the ultima ratio for panarthrosis or similar destruction of the wrist. In particular, the patient's desire for functional integrity also plays an important role.

COMPLICATIONS

While there were often complications with earlier prosthesis designs of the older generations and only a short survival rate could be achieved, this has improved, if the indication of the so-called fourth generation prostheses is done properly. Survival rates of over 10 years are no longer uncommon, even without revision operations. Currently, the indication for hemiarthroplasty has been increasing, particularly in the case of post-traumatic destruction. Those who are seriously interested in endoprosthesis should also be able to treat the associated complications. The present article is intended to provide an overview of common or potential complications in the context of wrist arthroplasty and to demonstrate possible solutions by presenting case studies. The basics of primary implantation are, therefore, not discussed. Reference is made to further literature.

Salvage procedure after malunited distal radius fractures and management of pain and stiffness

Indications for surgical treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF) remain controversial in the literature, especially in elderly patients. Complication rates after operatively treated DRF are low and well documented. These include malunion, degenerative osteoarthritis in the radiocarpal joint and subsequently pain and impaired hand function. If conservative treatment fails then salvage procedures are necessary. This review summarizes the therapeutic options available to treat degenerative osteoarthritis after malunited distal radius fractures, regardless of the initial operative or conservative treatment.

Low-profile locking-plate vs. the conventional AO system: early comparative results in wrist arthrodesis

INTRODUCTION

Total wrist arthrodesis represents a reliable salvage procedure for severe painful conditions of the wrist. To date, wrist arthrodesis using a dorsal plate reaching from the distal radius to the third metacarpal is still recommended. A new implant (APTUS© 2.5 TriLock Wrist Fusion Plate, Medartis Suisse) that does not cross the third carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ-3) has been introduced recently. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare both implants concerning early functional and clinical results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 20 patients underwent total wrist arthrodesis [10, using the new APTUS© implant (APT); 10 using the Depuy-Synthes© LCP plates (AO)]. The postoperative control interval was 18.2 and 37.2 months in APT and AO, respectively. Clinical assessment included functional parameters such as active range of motion (AROM) for pronation and supination, grip strength, and passive range of motion of the CMCJ-3. Additionally the DASH score and the Krimmer wrist score as well as pain levels at rest and under stress conditions were evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients showed osseous healing without complications except one case of non-union in APT. There were no significant differences between both groups concerning grip strength, AROM of the wrist, pain levels, DASH- and Krimmer Score. APT showed a significantly increased passive range of motion of the CMCJ-3 compared to the unaffected contralateral side.

CONCLUSIONS

The new implant shows similar functional results compared to the standard procedure. The main advantage of the new implant is the fact that no implant removal is necessary due to the unaffected CMCJ-3. Furthermore the mobility of the CMCJ slightly increased and showed positive impact on hand kinematics.

Reconstruction of chronic scapholunate dissociation with the modified scapholunate axis method (SLAM)

INTRODUCTION

Injury to the scapholunate (SL) ligament represents a common trauma of the wrist but is frequently misdiagnosed because of non-specific pain. Established methods for SL reconstruction mainly focus on reducing pain and maintaining the reposition result at the expense of mobility and strength. This study aimed at restoring stability and reducing pain while simultaneously maintaining mobility and strength using the scapholunate axis method (SLAM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

22 patients (19 male and 3 female) aged between 26 and 64 years with an SL ligament lesion underwent SLAM reconstruction. Mean duration between injury and operation was 7.9 ± 5 (1-24) months. Hand functions using DASH, Mayo Wrist Score, range of motion, pain (at rest and weight-bearing) and grip strength were assessed prior and 12 months postoperative. Additionally SL angle was collected pre- and postoperative.

RESULTS

Each of the 22 patients improved significantly postoperative in DASH and Mayo Wrist Score with regard to pain at rest and under weight-bearing. Additionally, grip strength could be improved up to 31% compared to preoperatively. In contrast, range of motion and SL angle and grip strength did not change essentially.

CONCLUSIONS

The secondary SL ligament reconstruction technique SLAM shows promising results. Pain was significantly relieved and grip strength was significantly increased. Additionally, DASH and Mayo Wrist Score could be significantly improved. However, SL angle and range of motion could not be improved in every patient and plane.

[Total wrist arthroplasty-a review]

BACKGROUND

Total wrist arthroplasty is still a rare procedure. This issue is being discussed controversially, particular in German-speaking countries. Lately, its acceptance has risen, especially as an alternative to wrist fusion regarding treatment of panarthritis or similar pathologies. Previous arthroplasty designs had short survival spans and devastating complications.

THE CURRENT SITUATION

Currently, these problems have been reduced by the development of fourth generation arthroplasty systems. Nowadays, survival spans of 10 years and more can be seen on a regular basis. The development of hemi-arthroplasty may be of interest, especially for traumatic destruction of the distal radius. This review outlines the current state of wrist arthroplasty and is based on the author's 15 years of experience.

Practicability of a locking plate for difficult pathologies of the scaphoid

INTRODUCTION

Headless compressions screws are the most implanted devices for scaphoid fractures and nonunions. For cases when screw osteosynthesis is not possible, a special locking plate for scaphoid reconstruction has been developed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and practicability of this device for difficult scaphoid pathologies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2010 and December 2014, 20 patients (age range 16-59 years) were treated with scaphoid locking plate osteosynthesis. In 17 cases it was due to scaphoid nonunion or delayed union and in three cases to treat a complex multi-fragmentary fracture of the scaphoid. Most of the initial fractures were located either in the proximal third (n = 9) or the middle third (n = 8) of the scaphoid.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 14.6 ± 8.9 months (range 2-30 months). All three scaphoid fractures (100%) showed bony healing in the CT scan after 2.7 ± 0.6 months. 15 of 17 (88.2%) patients with scaphoid nonunion demonstrated bony healing in the latest CT scan at an average of 6.2 ± 8.1 months (range 2-11 months) after scaphoid reconstruction. Range of motion (extension/flexion) was 104° ± 18.4° (range 80°-150°) and about one third less than the unaffected side. The average grip strength averaged 38.2 kg on the operated side and 44.1 kg on the unaffected side after surgery. 13 plates (65%) had to be removed due to impaction of the plate or protrusion of the screws.

CONCLUSIONS

This new locking device for scaphoid reconstruction seems to be a safe, useful and reliable tool in the treatment of difficult nonunions or multi-fragmentary scaphoid fractures. The practicability is convincing and satisfying fusion rates can be accomplished. However, most patients require hardware removal. We recommend using this plate as a rescue option when a stable osteosynthesis is necessary for the healing process and screw fixation has already failed or is not possible.

Treatment of scaphoid waist nonunion by one, two headless compression screws or plate with or without additional extracorporeal shockwave therapy

INTRODUCTION

Scaphoid nonunion remains challenging for hand surgeons. Several treatment options are available such as: non-vascularized or vascularized bone grafting, with or without additional stabilization. In the last few decades, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has become an established procedure for treating delayed and nonunions. Purpose of this retrospective follow-up study was (a) to investigate union rate and clinical outcome of the different implants [either one/two headless compression screws (HCS) or a plate] and (b) union rate and clinical outcome using only surgery, or a combination of surgery and ESWT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 42 patients with scaphoid nonunions of the waist with a mean follow-up of 52 months. All patients received a non-vascularized bone graft from the iliac crest and stabilization was achieved by using one, two HCS or a plate. ESWT was performed with 3000 impulses, energy flux density per pulse 0.41 mJ/mm² within 2 weeks after surgery. Clinical assessment included range of motion (ROM), pain according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), grip strength, Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Score, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Score, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and modified Green O'Brien (Mayo) Wrist Score. In addition, each patient had a CT scan of the wrist.

RESULTS

A total of 33/42 (79%) patients showed union at the follow-up investigation. Patients treated with additional ESWT showed bony healing in 21/26 (81%) and without ESWT in 12/16 (75%). Patients that were stabilized using one HCS showed bony healing in 6/10 (60%), with two HCS 10/12 (83%) and by plate 17/20 (85%). The ESWT group had a significantly lower pain score according to the VAS and better modified Green O'Brien (Mayo) Score. No differences could be found in respect of ROM, grip strength, functional outcome score depending of which stabilization method was used.

CONCLUSIONS

Stabilization of scaphoid waist nonunions with two HCS or plate showed higher union rates than a stabilization using only one HCS. In addition, ESWT combined with a nonvascularized bone graft from the iliac crest seems a suitable option for treating scaphoid nonunions.

Force distribution of a cylindrical grip differs between dominant and nondominant hand in healthy subjects

INTRODUCTION

Grip strength and load distribution of the hand are important parameters for evaluating hand function. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare grip force and load distribution of dominant and nondominant hands in right-handed healthy subjects.

METHODS

Gripping measurements were performed on 40 healthy right-handed subjects using a cylindrical gripping device. Two different cylinders with circumferences of 150 mm (small cylinder) and 200 mm (large cylinder), respectively, were used for the measurements. Subjects were assigned to either the small or the large cylinder with respect to their hand size. Maximum and mean force applied during three intervals of gripping as well as the percent contribution of each digit, thenar, and hypothenar in relation to the total load applied were acquired. Values of dominant and nondominant hands were compared.

RESULTS

Percent contribution of mean grip strength differed for the thumb (p = 0.007), ring finger (p < 0.001), little finger (p = 0.047), and palm (p < 0.001). Comparing the dominant and nondominant side, the dominant hand showed a lower contribution of the thumb, ring finger, and little finger, but a higher contribution of the palm. When analyzing maximum grip, percent contribution of the small fingers was equal between dominant and nondominant side (p = 0.1). Differences between dominant and nondominant thumb, ring finger, and palm persisted (p = 0.007, p = 0.001, p = 0.005, respectively). No differences could be shown for the index finger, middle finger, thenar, and hypothenar when analyzing both mean and maximum force.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Percent contribution of the thumb and the fingers to total grip strength differed between dominant and nondominant hands with a change in distribution when assessing maximum grip force. In right-handed subjects, thumb and ring finger have important roles during gripping.