Surgical repair of acute pectoralis major muscle ruptures.Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2018;30:390-397. [PMID: 29980801 DOI: 10.1007/s00064-018-0557-5]

[Rupture of the pectoralis major muscle in amateur athletes: a rare injury or often overlooked?]

INTRODUCTION

A rupture of the pectoralis major muscle is a rare injury pattern overall, but it is frequently described in athletes, particularly in weightlifting. The risk of sustaining this type of injury is present especially during the eccentric phase of muscle loading. An association between such injuries and the abuse of anabolic steroids is described in the literature, but there is no coherent evidence to support this. We report the case of a young patient with a normal habitus who suffered a humeral rupture of the pectoralis major muscle during recreational sports. There was no history of excessive weight training or use of anabolic steroids.

CASE HISTORY

This 33-year-old patient reported a sudden onset of left pectoral pain during training on the chest fly machine as well as a whip-like popping sound, followed by an immediate painful restriction of movement in the left arm. A clinical examination revealed a mild haematoma located on the left medial upper arm with localised tenderness and a discrete asymmetry of the contour of the pectoral muscles. Due to the typical medical history, we established the indication for surgical exploration although the clinical picture was rather discrete and only an incomplete rupture was seen in an MRI scan. Intraoperatively, we detected a complete rupture of the sternocostal part of the pectoralis major muscle with marked retraction and haematoma. Reinforcement and reinsertion were performed at the "footprint" using titanium anchors (2 x 5.5mm Corkscrew FT, Arthrex, Florida). The patient was able to resume his sports activities at the pre-traumatic level four months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

A rupture of the insertion of the pectoralis major muscle must also be considered in amateur athletes with a typical history. The characteristic clinical symptoms described in the literature mostly refer to competitive athletes and bodybuilders, but these injuries can also be diagnosed in amateur athletes with lower muscle mass by subtle clinical examination. Nevertheless, there is a considerable risk of underestimating the extent of the injury. In case of doubt, surgical exploration should be performed promptly in amateur athletes. Surgical refixation of the humeral rupture of the pectoralis major muscle is the gold standard and should not be reserved to high-performance athletes.

Simultaneous repair of bilateral pectoralis major tendons: A case report

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the pectoralis major are infrequent, with only a few hundred cases currently recorded in the literature.

CASE SUMMARY

We report a case of a patient who sustained bilateral pectoralis major tendon ruptures. While other cases of bilateral pectoralis major tears have been reported in the literature, the operative management in this report differs. Due to delayed presentation of the patient right and left pectoralis major repairs were performed simultaneously.

CONCLUSION

Patients with delayed presentation of bilateral pectoralis major tendon ruptures can undergo simultaneous repair of both tendon with a good postoperative outcome and high patient satisfaction.

[Acute rupture of the pectoralis major muscle at the musculotendinous junction : Case report of a rare injury and literature review]

Die Pectoralis-major-Ruptur (PMR) ist eine seltene Verletzung, die v. a. beim Kraftsport aufritt. Vorgestellt wird der Fall eines 31-jährigen Profibasketballspielers, der sich beim Bankdrücken eine Komplettruptur am muskulotendinösen Übergang des M. pectoralis major (PM) zugezogen hatte. Drei Wochen nach dem erlittenen Trauma erfolgte bei persistierenden Schmerzen und Kraftdefizit die Refixation des PM. Drei Monate postoperativ konnte der Patient bei vollem Bewegungsumfang schmerzfrei in den Basketballsport zurückkehren. Die Verletzungsentität wird vor dem Hintergrund der aktuellen Literatur diskutiert und das operative Vorgehen im Detail dargestellt.

Everything pectoralis major: from repair to transfer

Background: Pectoralis major ruptures are increasing in incidence primarily due to an increase in awareness, activity level among young males between 20 and 40 years of age, and use of anabolic steroids. Although the majority of pectoralis major ruptures are acute injuries, many chronic ruptures are unrecognized and it is imperative to understand the proper evaluation of these injuries, as well as the appropriate treatment for acute and chronic ruptures.Purpose: Pectoralis major ruptures can lead to deformity and physical disability if left untreated. This review paper discusses both acute and chronic ruptures as well as indications for nonoperative treatment and operative treatment to give the reader the best understanding of this diagnosis and proper management.Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using a search of electronic databases. Search terms such as pectoralis major rupture, pectoralis major repair, pectoralis major tendon transfer, and pectoralis major nonoperative treatment were used. Case reports, systematic reviews, prospective and retrospective studies were included to provide a comprehensive review. The only exclusion criteria consisted of studies not published in English. This review article includes the anatomy and biomechanics of the pectoralis major muscle, proper evaluation of the patient, operative and nonoperative treatment of acute and chronic pectoralis major ruptures, and outcomes of the recommended treatment.Conclusion: Nonoperative treatment is indicated for patients with medical comorbidities, older age, incomplete tears, or irreparable damage. Patients treated non-operatively have been shown to lose strength, but regain full range of motion. Patients with surgery before 6 weeks reported better outcomes than patients with surgery between 6 and 8 weeks. The chronicity of the rupture (>8 weeks) increases the likelihood of reconstruction, involving the use of autografts or allografts. Patients treated with delayed repair had significantly better strength, satisfaction, and outcomes than patients with nonoperative treatment. The pectoralis tendon can also be transferred in patients with rotators cuff tears, atrophy, or significant functional limitation. Tendon transfers have been shown to have unpredictable outcomes, but overall satisfactory results.

Analysis of Return to Sport and Weight Training After Repair of the Pectoralis Major Tendon

BACKGROUND

The use of routine patient-reported outcomes after repair of the pectoralis major tendon (PMT) is often prone to the ceiling effect owing to the high functional demand of those who sustain this injury.

HYPOTHESIS

A significant number of patients are expected to fail to achieve return to preoperative activity after PMT repair despite achieving significant improvements in functional score.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained institutional database was reviewed for all patients undergoing PMT repair from 2010 to 2016. Patients were surveyed with regard to pre- and postoperative participation in sports, level of intensity, maximum weight repetitions in exercises utilizing the PMT, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (73.3%) were available for final follow-up. All patients were male. Mean ± SD follow-up was 51.1 ± 24.1 months. Mean age was 39.6 ± 8.8 years (range, 24-61 years), and mean body mass index was 28.6 ± 3.5 kg/m². The dominant side was affected in 20 of 44 cases. Acute repairs were performed in 30 cases and chronic in 14. There were statistically significant improvements in both ASES and SANE scores (P < .001). Return to sport at any level was achieved by 43 of 44 (97.7%) patients, while 22 of 44 patients (50.0%) reported returning to sport at the same or better intensity as preinjury status. On average, there was a 23.3% ± 45.6% decrease in 1-repetition maximum (1RM) barbell bench press, 14.7% ± 62.3% decrease in 5-repetition maximum barbell bench press, 24.3% ± 21.8% decrease in 1RM dumbbell bench press, 35.7% ± 32.1% decrease in 1RM dumbbell fly, and 15.6% ± 39.8% decrease in consecutive push-ups able to be performed. Seventeen patients (38.6%) reported a degree of apprehension that affected their ability to lift weights. When all preoperative variables were accounted for, history of surgery to the contralateral shoulder (odds ratio, 0.600; 95% CI, 0.389-0.925) was associated with a decreased likelihood of returning to sport at the same or better level of intensity, while injury sustained during sport had a greater likelihood (odds ratio, 2.231; 95% CI, 1.234-4.031).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing PMT repair should expect significant functional improvements and a low complication rate. Yet, only 50% are able to return to preoperative intensity of sport, and they will also have significant reductions in their ability to weight lift.

Outcomes and Return to Sport After Pectoralis Major Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT:

Pectoralis major tendon ruptures are becoming increasingly common due to the growing prevalence of active lifestyles. Studies investigating the efficacy of pectoralis major tendon repair have limited sample sizes and offer mixed results, while existing reviews do not explore postoperative activity outcomes for patients.

OBJECTIVE:

To summarize and synthesize the clinical outcomes and rate of return to activity after isolated pectoralis major tendon repair.

DATA SOURCES:

Four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and CINAHL) were searched from database inception through March 7, 2018.

STUDY SELECTION:

Studies reporting outcomes of isolated pectoralis major tendon repair for pectoralis major tendon rupture were included.

STUDY DESIGN:

Systematic review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Level 4.

DATA EXTRACTION:

Data including patient demographics, intervention details, and clinical outcomes were extracted. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated.

RESULTS:

Of 2332 retrieved articles, 18 studies were included, with a total of 536 patients. A majority (90%; 134/149) of patients undergoing pectoralis major tendon repair successfully returned to sport at a mean 6.1 ± 1.7 months postsurgery, of which 74% (95/128) successfully returned to their preinjury level of sport. The majority (95%; 269/284) of patients returned to work at a mean 6.9 ± 1 months. Postsurgically, 81% (83/102) of patients experienced complete pain relief after the surgery, and 19% (21/109) had cosmetic complaints after pectoralis major repair. Of the 10 studies that reported complications, 18% (75/423) of patients had postoperative complications, including reruptures and wound infections; 7% (30/423) of patients required reoperation for their complications.

CONCLUSION:

Pectoralis major tendon repair is an effective treatment that results in a high rate of return to sport and work, pain relief, and improved cosmetic appearance, albeit with a significant rate of complication. The evidence supporting all outcomes was limited by the rarity of the injury, the variable surgical techniques, and outcome assessment criteria.