Preoperative irradiation for prevention of heterotopic ossification following prosthetic total hip replacement results of a prospective study in 462 hips

Single-Dose Radiation Therapy Without Additional Surgery as a Treatment for Heterotopic Ossification Developing After Transfemoral Amputation

ABSTRACT

Heterotopic ossification is the development of mature lamellar bone in soft tissues. Heterotopic ossification can occur in up to 23% of patients after amputation. Heterotopic ossification is often painful, causing significant dysfunction. While radiotherapy is used to prevent heterotopic ossification before formation, there is a dearth of literature on using radiotherapy to treat existing heterotopic ossification. This case report describes the use of late radiotherapy for the management of existing heterotopic ossification that developed after a transfemoral amputation. A 61-yr-old woman with peripheral artery disease of her bilateral lower limbs status post stenting and ultimately left transfemoral amputation was diagnosed with symptomatic heterotopic ossification limiting her function. Another surgery was not felt to be warranted. She was not improving with medical therapy and was prescribed 800 cGy in one fraction. After treatment, she experienced significant relief in her pain, allowing her to resume physical therapy and use of her prosthesis. There are no other published examples of using radiation alone for treatment of heterotopic ossification formation after transfemoral amputation without surgical revision of the bone formation. Our case shows possible utility in single-dose radiation as a treatment to prevent progression of heterotopic ossification, especially when limiting functional progress.

Efficacy of NSAIDs versus radiotherapy for heterotopic ossification prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aims of this systematic review were: (1) to investigate the prophylactic effect of radiotherapy (RT) and NSAIDs in high-risk patients following total hip arthroplasty (THA); and (2) to compare the efficacy of non-selective and COX-II selective NSAIDs in preventing post-THA HO, utilising a meta-analysis of randomised control studies.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Databases were searched for articles regarding HO following THA in March 2019. Studies were included if they contained data regarding HO incidence after THA or contained data regarding HO prophylaxis comparison of NSAIDs and/or RT in terms of dosage or duration.

RESULTS

24 studies reported on populations that were not at high-risk for HO. These studies reported between 47.3% and 90.4% of their patient populations had no HO formation; between 2.8% and 52.7% had mild formation; and between 0.0% and 10.4% had severe formation. A total of 13 studies reported on populations at high-risk for HO. Studies analysing RT in high-risk patients reported between 28.6% and 97.4% of patients developed no HO formation; between 1.9% and 66.7% developed mild HO formation; and between 0.0% and 11.9% developed severe HO formation. Studies analysing NSAID treatment among high-risk populations reported between 76.6% and 88.9% had no HO formation; between 11.1% and 23.4% had mild HO formation, and between 0.0% and 1.8% had severe HO formation. 9 studies were identified as randomised control trials and subsequently used for meta-analysis. The relative risk for COX-II in developing any HO after THA was not significantly different compared to non-selective NSAIDs (RR 1.00; CI, 0.801-1.256; p = 0.489).

CONCLUSIONS

NSAIDs prophylaxis for HO may have better efficacy than RT in high-risk patients following THA. Non-selective and COX-II selective NSAIDs have comparable efficacy in preventing HO. Factors such as medical comorbidities and side-effect profile should dictate the prophylaxis recommendation.

Severity of heterotopic ossification in patients following surgery for hip fracture: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a relatively common complication following hip surgery treated with open reduction and internal fixation, total arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty. Development of HO after hip surgery is an important clinical issue as it can affect functional status. We aimed to determine whether there was association between severity of heterotopic ossification about the hip and the interval between the time of hip fracture and surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our retrospective study included 151 patients (age range 33-95 years) treated for hip fractures by hemiarthroplasty. Medical records were reviewed for time interval to surgery, laterality, surgical approach, and patient age. Patients who had any post-operative complications were excluded. Radiographs were semiquantitatively assessed for the degree of heterotopic ossification based on Brooker Classification (5-point scale). Statistical analysis was performed utilizing Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and Score tests, and also a proportional odds model (significance level set at 0.05).

RESULTS

Thirty eight patients had no heterotopic ossification, 43 had class 1, 55 had class 2, and 15 had class 3 or greater heterotopic ossification. The majority of patients (59.6%) had surgery within 2 days of acute injury. Severe heterotopic ossification (HO 3+) was associated with the longer interval between the time of acute hip fracture and surgery (median 6 days) vs. median 2 days in all other groups (HO classes 0-2) (p = 0.0015). The odds ratio and 95% CI for one level higher HO class was 1.296 (1.152, 1.459), which meant that the odds of having HO class one level higher increased by about 29.6% for every one-day increase in the days to surgery. No significant association was found for other variables.

CONCLUSION

Class 3 or greater HO was associated with longer time interval between time of acute hip fracture and surgery compared to all other groups (HO class 0-2).

Prophylactic Celecoxib Administration Is Associated With Decreased Incidence and Severity of Heterotopic Ossification After Hip Resurfacing by Direct Lateral Approach in Male Patients

Heterotopic ossification is a potential complication that may have a particularly higher association with hip resurfacing. The 2 current mainstays for heterotopic ossification treatment and prophylaxis are administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and radiotherapy. Recent studies have determined that celecoxib is effective in heterotopic ossification prophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty. However, considering the reportedly higher incidence and severity of heterotopic ossification in these patients, relatively few studies have evaluated its role in hip resurfacing. Therefore, the authors assessed the incidence, severity, and risk factors of heterotopic ossification in patients who had hip resurfacing and did or did not receive celecoxib. Of the 198 patients, 83 received celecoxib and 115 did not. Radiographs were examined to grade heterotopic ossification using the Brooker classification system. The rate of heterotopic ossification differed between patients who did and patients who did not receive celecoxib prophylaxis (25% vs 65%, P<.001). Celecoxib was an independent predictor of decreased heterotopic ossification (odds ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.35). Celecoxib administration is associated with decreased incidence and severity of heterotopic ossification after hip resurfacing performed using the direct lateral approach in male patients. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(6):e807-e812.].

The Influence of Obesity on Total Elbow Arthroplasty

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has undergone a significant evolution in indications and outcomes in the past decade. Although rheumatoid patients once had the overwhelming number of TEAs, now TEAs for the sequelae of trauma predominate. Furthermore, as obesity has mirrored the increase in the posttraumatic population, TEA complications have increased whereas the durability of implants under these loads has decreased. Solutions are urgently needed to address the complications and revision burden related to posttraumatic deformity and obesity.

Heterotopic ossifications: role of radiotherapy as prophylactic treatment

BACKGROUND

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is abnormal formation of lamellar bone in soft tissue; the most frequent causes are total hip arthroplasty and trauma. Severe cases can lead to ankilosis with important impact on quality of life. Surgery is the elective treatment, but, especially in high-risk patients, it is important to prevent the re-formation of HO and, in these cases, radiotherapy (RT) can play an important role.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

we retrospectively analyzed a mono-institutional casistic of 30 patients (31 sites) at high risk for HO development, treated with surgery and pre- or postoperative RT. The majority of patients received a single RT fraction of 7 Gy, median age was 62, with a prevalence of male and hip as most frequently involved site. Radiological studies and clinical examination were performed in all patients during the follow-up period to evaluate both treatment efficacy and acute or late toxicity.

RESULTS

With a median follow up of 67 months, 23 patients had a complete response (CR) with excellent results in term of joint mobility. Two patients with CR showed a relapse of HO in the same site 19 and 12 months after treatment, respectively. Seven patients (22,6%) had a partial response (PR) to RT. One patient who reached CR had a history of previous irradiation in the same site 16 years before. No acute or late reactions have been reported.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirm safety and efficacy of RT in preventing HO, especially in high-risk patients, preferring a single fraction of 7 Gy.

Multimodality imaging review of the post-amputation stump pain

Limb amputation is one of the oldest known surgical procedures performed for a variety of indications. Little surgical technical improvements have been made since the first procedure, but perioperative and post-operative refinements have occurred over time. Post-amputation pain (PAP) of the stump is a common complication but is an extremely challenging condition to treat. Imaging allows early diagnosis of the underlying cause so that timely intervention is possible to minimize physical disability with its possible psychological and socioeconomic implications. A multidisciplinary approach should be taken involving the rehabilitation medicine team, surgeon, prosthetist, occupational therapist and social workers. Conventional radiographs demonstrate the osseous origin of PAP while high-resolution ultrasound is preferred to assess soft-tissue abnormalities. These are often the first-line investigations. MRI remains as a problem-solving tool when clinical and imaging findings are equivocal. This article aimed to raise a clear understanding of common pathologies expected in the assessment of PAP. A selection of multimodality images from our Specialist Mobility and Rehabilitation Unit are presented so that radiologists are aware of and recognize the spectrum of pathological conditions involving the amputation stump. These include but are not limited to aggressive bone spurs, heterotopic ossification, soft-tissue inflammation (stump bursitis), collection, nervosas, osteomyelitis etc. The role of the radiologist in reaching the diagnosis early is vital so that appropriate treatment can be instituted to limit long-term disability. The panel of authors hopes this article helps readers identify the spectrum of pathological conditions involving the post-amputation stump by recognizing the imaging features of the abnormalities in different imaging modalities.

Incidence and risk factors for heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aims to quantitatively summarize risk factors associated with heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

The computerized and additional manual searches were performed in Medline, Embase, CNKI, and Cochrane central database (all through March 2014) for potential studies. Studies eligible had to meet the quality assessment criteria by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and to evaluate the risk factors for heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty. Two reviewers independently extracted the relevant data and any disagreement was solved by consensus. Stata11.0 was used to perform all the statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies involving 6468 cases with total hip arthroplasty and 1939 heterotopic ossification (HOs) (30.0 %) were eligible and included in this meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis identified the significant increased risk factors for HO were male gender [odds ratio (OR) 2.11; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.80-2.48)], cemented implant (OR 1.48; 95 % CI 1.00-2.17), bilateral operations (OR 1.74; 95 % CI 1.24-2.45), ankylosing spondylitis (OR 1.90; 95 % CI 1.07-3.37) and ankylosed hip (OR 9.85; 95 % CI 2.61-37.24). Rheumatoid arthritis was protective for the development of HO (OR 0.51; 95 % CI 0.33-0.80). The other variables including age, use of NSAIDs, femoral neck fracture, previous hip fracture, hypertrophic osteoarthritis and osteophytes were identified not as the risk factors for development of HO (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients involved with the above-mentioned medical conditions should be carefully paid close attention by surgeons to reduce HO after total hip arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, meta-analysis.

Radiotherapy for non-malignant disorders: state of the art and update of the evidence-based practice guidelines

Every year in Germany about 50,000 patients are referred and treated by radiotherapy (RT) for "non-malignant disorders". This highly successful treatment is applied only for specific indications such as preservation or recovery of the quality of life by means of pain reduction or resolution and/or an improvement of formerly impaired physical body function owing to specific disease-related symptoms. Since 1995, German radiation oncologists have treated non-malignant disorders according to national consensus guidelines; these guidelines were updated and further developed over 3 years by implementation of a systematic consensus process to achieve national upgraded and accepted S2e clinical practice guidelines. Throughout this process, international standards of evaluation were implemented. This review summarizes most of the generally accepted indications for the application of RT for non-malignant diseases and presents the special treatment concepts. The following disease groups are addressed: painful degenerative skeletal disorders, hyperproliferative disorders and symptomatic functional disorders. These state of the art guidelines may serve as a platform for daily clinical work; they provide a new starting point for quality assessment, future clinical research, including the design of prospective clinical trials, and outcome research in the underrepresented and less appreciated field of RT for non-malignant disorders.

DEGRO practical guidelines for the radiotherapy of non-malignant disorders - Part IV: Symptomatic functional disorders

PURPOSE

To summarize the updated DEGRO consensus S2e guideline recommendations for the treatment of benign symptomatic functional disorders with low-dose radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This overview reports on the role of low-dose radiotherapy in the treatment of functional disorders in cases of heterotopic ossification (HO) and Graves orbitopathy (GO). The most relevant aspects of the DEGRO S2e Consensus Guideline "Radiation Therapy of Benign Diseases 2014" regarding diagnostics, treatment decision, dose prescription, as well as performance of radiotherapy and results are summarized.

RESULTS

For both indications (HO, GO), retrospective and some prospective analyses have shown remarkable effects in terms of symptom relief. Nevertheless, the level of evidence (LoE) and the grade of recommendation (GR) vary: LoE 1-2 and GR A-B (HO), LoE 2 and GR B (GO).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose radiotherapy for benign symptomatic functional disorders has proven to be effective, according to different authors, for 25-100 % of the patients studied and therefore it may be a reasonable prophylactic and therapeutic option if noninvasive or invasive methods have been used without persistent success. For HO, a single-fraction dose of 7-8 Gy or fractionated radiation with five fractions of 3.5 Gy is recommended. For GO, single-fraction doses of 0.3-2.0 Gy, and total doses of 2.4-20 Gy/series, applied in one daily fraction are recommended.

Radiotherapy for the prophylaxis of heterotopic ossification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data

INTRODUCTION

Following surgery, the formation of heterotopic ossification (HTO) can limit mobility and impair quality of life. Radiotherapy has been proven to provide efficacious prophylaxis against HTO, especially in high-risk settings.

PURPOSE

The current review aims to determine the factors influencing HTO formation in patients receiving prophylactic radiotherapy.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted on Ovid Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies were included if they reported the percentage of sites developing heterotopic ossification after receiving a specified dose of prophylactic radiotherapy. Weighted linear regression analysis was conducted for continuous or categorical predictors.

RESULTS

Extracted from 61 articles, a total of 5464 treatment sites were included, spanning 85 separate study arms. Most sites were from the hip (97.7%), from United States patients (55.2%), and had radiation prescribed postoperatively (61.6%) at a dose of 700cGy (61.0%). After adjusting for radiation site, there was no statistically significant relationship between the percentage of sites developing HTO and radiation dose (p=0.1) or whether radiation was administered preoperatively or postoperatively (p=0.1). Sites with previous HTO formation were more likely to develop recurrent HTO than those without previous HTO formation (p=0.04). There was a statistically significant negative relationship between the HTO development and the cohort mean year of treatment (p=0.007).

CONCLUSION

Decreases in rates of HTO over time in this patient population may be a function of more efficacious surgical regimens and prophylactic radiotherapy.

Blast injuries and heterotopic ossification

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is perhaps the single most significant obstacle to independence, functional mobility, and return to duty for combat-injured veterans of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. Recent research into the cause(s) of HO has been driven by a markedly higher prevalence seen in these wounded warriors than encountered in previous wars or following civilian trauma. To that end, research in both civilian and military laboratories continues to shed light onto the complex mechanisms behind HO formation, including systemic and wound specific factors, cell lineage, and neurogenic inflammation. Of particular interest, non-invasive in vivo testing using Raman spectroscopy may become a feasible modality for early detection, and a wound-specific model designed to detect the early gene transcript signatures associated with HO is being tested. Through a combined effort, the goals of early detection, risk stratification, and development of novel systemic and local prophylaxis may soon be attainable.

Radiation therapy for the treatment of benign vascular, skeletal and soft tissue diseases

The concept of radiation therapy for the treatment of benign diseases refers to the use of moderate to high-energy ionising radiation as part of the treatment of non-malignant, but not necessarily harmless, diseases. The usefulness of radiation therapy, based on the anti-inflammatory properties of ionising radiation, has long been known. Apart from the treatment of intracranial benign tumours, such as meningiomas and neurinomas, the prevention of cardiovascular restenosis or treatment of skeletal degenerative diseases are, without doubt, the main fields of action for radiation therapy in benign conditions. Nonetheless, many other non-cancer entities may benefit from ionising radiation therapy treatment. The purpose of this review is to highlight and update indications for treatment with radiation therapy in benign conditions, focusing on skeletal degenerative processes, vascular conditions and soft tissue diseases.

Heterotopic ossification following traumatic and combat-related amputations. Prevalence, risk factors, and preliminary results of excision

BACKGROUND

Although infrequently reported in amputees previously, heterotopic ossification has proven to be a common and problematic clinical entity in our recent experience in the treatment of traumatic and combat-related amputations related to Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. The purpose of the present study was to report the prevalence of and risk factors for heterotopic ossification following trauma-related amputation as well as the preliminary results of operative excision.

METHODS

We identified 330 patients with a total of 373 traumatic and combat-related amputations who had been managed at our centers between September 11, 2001 and November 30, 2005. We reviewed the medical records and radiographs of 187 patients with 213 amputations who had adequate radiographic follow-up. Additional analysis was performed for twenty-four patients with twenty-five limbs that required excision of symptomatic lesions. The mechanism and zone of injury, amputation level, timing of excision, use of prophylaxis against recurrence, and other confounding variables were examined. Outcomes were assessed by determining clinical and radiographic recurrence rates, perioperative complications, preoperative and follow-up pain medication requirements, and the ability to be fit with a functional prosthesis.

RESULTS

Heterotopic ossification was present in 134 (63%) of 213 residual limbs, with twenty-five lesions requiring excision. A final amputation level within the zone of injury was a risk factor for both the development and the grade of heterotopic ossification (p < 0.05). A blast mechanism was predictive of occurrence (p < 0.05) but did not correlate with grade. All patients who had been managed with excision were tolerating the prosthetic limb at an average of twelve months of follow-up. Twenty-three limbs demonstrated no evidence of recurrence, and two limbs had development of clinically asymptomatic, radiographically minimal recurrences. Six patients experienced wound-related complications that required reoperation, and two patients required subsequent minor revision surgery. There was a significant decrease in the use of pain medication following surgery (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Heterotopic ossification following trauma-related amputation is more common than the literature would suggest, particularly following amputations that are performed within the initial zone of injury and those that are due to blast injuries. Many patients are asymptomatic or can be successfully managed with modification of the prosthesis. For patients with refractory symptoms, surgical excision is associated with low recurrence rates and decreased medication requirements, with acceptable complication rates.

Heterotopic ossification in the residual limbs of traumatic and combat-related amputees

Reports on the occurrence and treatment of heterotopic ossification in amputees are rare. Heterotopic ossification in the residual limbs of amputees may cause pain and skin breakdown and complicate or prevent optimal prosthetic fitting and utilization. Basic science research has shed light on the cellular and molecular basis for this disease process, but many questions remain unanswered. The recent experience of the military amputee centers with traumatic and combat-related amputations has demonstrated a surprisingly high prevalence of heterotopic ossification in residual limbs. Primary prophylactic regimens, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and local irradiation, which have proved to be effective in preventing and limiting heterotopic ossification in other patient populations, have not been studied in amputees and generally are not feasible in the setting of acute traumatic amputation. When nonsurgical measures such as activity and repeated prosthetic modifications fail to provide relief, surgical excision has provided good early clinical results, with low rates of recurrence and acceptable complication rates in military amputees.

Prevention of heterotopic ossification in high-risk patients with total hip arthroplasty: the experience of a combined therapeutic protocol

The combination of radiotherapy and indomethacin for the prevention of heterotopic ossification (HO) in high-risk patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) has not been reported. The aim of the present study was to present the experience of our department with this combined therapeutic protocol. Fifty-four patients who underwent THA received a single dose of 7 Gy of postoperative radiotherapy and 75 mg of indomethacin for 15 days. Patients were analyzed for clinical and radiographical evidence of HO development at 1 year postoperatively. The overall radiographical incidence of HO was 20.4% (95% CI 10.6-33.5%), while only 1 patient with clinically significant HO was seen. Patients with secondary arthritis due to congenital hip disease had a statistically significantly higher incidence of HO compared with those with osteoarthrosis. The clinical assessment with the Merle d'Aubigné score showed that patients with radiographic documentation of HO had a lower mean score compared with those with no evidence of HO. No treatment-related side effects were seen. Combined radiotherapy and indomethacin was effective in preventing heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty. The evaluation of this efficacy compared with radiotherapy or NSAIDs alone should be the future target of larger randomized designs.