1
|
Preusser M, Kazda T, Le Rhun E, Sahm F, Smits M, Gempt J, Koekkoek JA, Monti AF, Csanadi M, Pitter JG, Bulbek H, Fournier B, Quoilin C, Gorlia T, Weller M, Minniti G. Lomustine with or without reirradiation for first progression of glioblastoma, LEGATO, EORTC-2227-BTG: study protocol for a randomized phase III study. Trials 2024; 25:366. [PMID: 38849943 PMCID: PMC11157762 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08213-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy with lomustine is widely considered as standard treatment option for progressive glioblastoma. The value of adding radiotherapy to second-line chemotherapy is not known. METHODS EORTC-2227-BTG (LEGATO, NCT05904119) is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic (PRECIS-2 score: 34 out of 45), randomized, multicenter phase III trial in patients with first progression of glioblastoma. A total of 411 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to lomustine (110 mg/m2 every 6 weeks) or lomustine (110 mg/m2 every 6weeks) plus radiotherapy (35 Gy in 10 fractions). Main eligibility criteria include histologic confirmation of glioblastoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase gene (IDH) wild-type per WHO 2021 classification, first progression at least 6 months after the end of prior radiotherapy, radiologically measurable disease according to RANO criteria with a maximum tumor diameter of 5 cm, and WHO performance status of 0-2. The primary efficacy endpoint is overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, response rate, neurocognitive function, health-related quality of life, and health economic parameters. LEGATO is funded by the European Union's Horizon Europe Research program, was activated in March 2024 and will enroll patients in 43 sites in 11 countries across Europe with study completion projected in 2028. DISCUSSION EORTC-2227-BTG (LEGATO) is a publicly funded pragmatic phase III trial designed to clarify the efficacy of adding reirradiation to chemotherapy with lomustine for the treatment of patients with first progression of glioblastoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05904119. Registered before start of inclusion, 23 May 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Tomáš Kazda
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Research Centre for Applied Molecular Oncology (RECAMO), Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital & University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Felix Sahm
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg and CCU Neuropathology, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Johan Af Koekkoek
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Angelo F Monti
- Department of Medical Physics, ASST GOM Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Helen Bulbek
- Brainstrust-the brain cancer people, Isle of Wight, Cowes, UK
| | | | | | | | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital & University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology and IRCCS Neuromed (IS), Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hatiboglu MA, Akdur K, Sakarcan A, Seyithanoglu MH, Turk HM, Sinclair G, Oztanir MN. Promising outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma after Gamma Knife-based hypofractionated radiotherapy. Neurochirurgie 2024; 70:101532. [PMID: 38215936 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2024.101532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 12/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) in recurrent glioblastoma remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of GKRS in a group of patients with recurrent glioblastoma, focusing on survival and safety. METHODS Patients undergoing GKRS for recurrent glioblastoma between September 2014 and April 2019 were included in this study. Relevant clinical and radiosurgical data, including GKRS-related complications, were recorded and analyzed. Overall survival (OS), local progression free survival (LPFS) and prognostic factors for outcome were thoroughly evaluated. RESULTS Fifty-three patients were analyzed (24 female, 29 male). The median age was 50 years (range, 19-78 years). The median GKRS treatment volume was 35.01 cm3 (range, 2.38-115.57 cm3). Twenty patients (38%) were treated with single fraction GKRS, while 33 (62%) were treated with GKRS-based hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT). The median prescription dose for single fraction GKRS, 3-fractions HSRT and 5-fractions HSRT were 16 Gy (range, 10-20 Gy), 27 Gy (range, 18-33 Gy) and 25 Gy (range, 25-30 Gy), respectively. The median LPFS and OS times were 8.1 months and 11.4 months after GKRS, respectively. HSRT and Bevacizumab were associated with improved LPFS, while HSRT alone was associated with longer OS. CONCLUSION Our findings suggested that HRST would likely improve LPFS and OS in definite settings; the addition of Bevacizumab to GKRS was associated with increased rates of local control. No major complications were reported. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Aziz Hatiboglu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Vatan Street, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey; Beykoz Institute of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Bezmialem Vakif University, Yalıkoy Mahallesi, Beykoz, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Kerime Akdur
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Vatan Street, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ayten Sakarcan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Vatan Street, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Hakan Seyithanoglu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Vatan Street, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Haci Mehmet Turk
- Department of Medical Oncology Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Vatan Street, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Georges Sinclair
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Vatan Street, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Southampton, UK
| | - Mustafa Namik Oztanir
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bezmialem Vakif University Medical School, Vatan Street, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Re-irradiation for recurrent high grade glioma (HGG) patients: Results of a single arm prospective phase 2 study. Radiother Oncol 2022; 167:89-96. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
4
|
Stiefel I, Schröder C, Tanadini-Lang S, Pytko I, Vu E, Klement R, Guckenberger M, Andratschke N. High-dose re-irradiation of intracranial lesions - Efficacy and safety including dosimetric analysis based on accumulated EQD2Gy dose EQD calculation. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 27:132-138. [PMID: 33659717 PMCID: PMC7890358 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Re-irradiation of the brain is feasible with an encouraging overall survival. Treatment related toxicity was low within the reported dose range. EQD2 cumulative dose distributions were calculated using rigid registration. Dose-Response-Modelling with logistic regression showed a correlation of the D1cc brain with any grade of acute toxicity.
Introduction The use of cranial re-irradiation is growing with improving overall survival and the advent of high-precision radiotherapy techniques. Still the value of re-irradiation needs careful evaluation regarding safety and efficacy. We analyzed dosimetric and clinical data of patients receiving cranial re-irradiation using EQD2 sum plans. Methods and material We retrospectively analyzed the data of 76 patients who received repeated cranial radiotherapy from 02/2013 to 09/2016. 34 patients suffered from recurrent primary brain tumors, 42 from brain metastases. Dosimetric analysis was performed accumulating EQD2 dose distributions based on rigid image registration. Clinical and radiological data was collected at follow-ups including toxicity, local control and overall survival. Results In total 76 patients had at least 2 courses of intracranial radiotherapy. The median accumulated prescription EQD2 dose was 96.5 Gy2 for all radiation courses combined. The median D(0.1 cc) of the brain for patients receiving more than 100 Gy2 was 114 Gy2 with a highest dose of 161.5 Gy2. 74% of patients suffered from low grade (G1–G2) acute toxicity, only two high grade (>G3) toxicities were recorded. Median overall survival from the time of first re-irradiation was 57 weeks (range 4–186 weeks). The median time to local failure for patients with a primary brain tumor was not reached and 24 weeks (range 1–77 weeks) for patients with brain metastases. Conclusion Repeated radiotherapy appears both safe and efficient in patients with recurrent primary or secondary brain tumors with doses to the brain up to 120 Gy2 EQD2, doses below 100 Gy2 for brainstem and doses below 75 Gy2 EQD2 to chiasm and optic nerves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I. Stiefel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - C. Schröder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer-Institut, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - S. Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - I. Pytko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - E. Vu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - R.J. Klement
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital, Schweinfurt, Germany
- University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M. Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - N. Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Corresponding author at: Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Minniti G, Niyazi M, Alongi F, Navarria P, Belka C. Current status and recent advances in reirradiation of glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:36. [PMID: 33602305 PMCID: PMC7890828 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01767-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite aggressive management consisting of maximal safe surgical resection followed by external beam radiation therapy (60 Gy/30 fractions) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, approximately 90% of WHO grade IV gliomas (glioblastomas, GBM) will recur locally within 2 years. For patients with recurrent GBM, no standard of care exists. Thanks to the continuous improvement in radiation science and technology, reirradiation has emerged as feasible approach for patients with brain tumors. Using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), either hypofractionated or conventionally fractionated schedules, several studies have suggested survival benefits following reirradiation of patients with recurrent GBM; however, there are still questions to be answered about the efficacy and toxicity associated with a second course of radiation. We provide a clinical overview on current status and recent advances in reirradiation of GBM, addressing relevant clinical questions such as the appropriate patient selection and radiation technique, optimal dose fractionation, reirradiation tolerance of the brain and the risk of radiation necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico le Scotte, 53100, Siena, Italy. .,IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, VR, Italy
| | - Piera Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang L, Tang S, Yu Y, Lv Y, Wang A, Yan X, Li N, Sha C, Sun K, Li Y. Intranasal Delivery of Temozolomide-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles Functionalized with Anti-EphA3 for Glioblastoma Targeting. Mol Pharm 2021; 18:915-927. [PMID: 33417456 DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly lethal and aggressive tumor of the brain that carries a poor prognosis. Temozolomide (TMZ) has been widely used as a first-line treatment for GBM. However, poor brain targeting, side effects, and drug resistance limit its application for the treatment of GBM. We designed a Temozolomide-conjugated gold nanoparticle functionalized with an antibody against the ephrin type-A receptor 3 (anti-EphA3-TMZ@GNPs) for targeted GBM therapy via intranasal administration. The system can bypass the blood-brain barrier and target active glioma cells to improve the glioma targeting of TMZ and enhance the treatment efficacy, while reducing the peripheral toxicity and drug resistance. The prepared anti-EphA3-TMZ@GNPs were 46.12 ± 2.0 nm and suitable for intranasal administration, which demonstrated high safety to the nasal mucosa in a toxicity assay. In vitro studies showed that anti-EphA3-TMZ@GNPs exhibited significantly enhanced cellular uptake and toxicity, and a higher cell apoptosis ratio has been seen compared with that of TMZ (54.9 and 14.1%, respectively) toward glioma cells (C6). The results from experiments on TMZ-resistant glioma cells (T98G) demonstrated that the IC50 of anti-EphA3-TMZ@GNPs (64.06 ± 0.16 μM) was 18.5-fold lower than that of TMZ. In addition, Western blot analysis also revealed that anti-EphA3-TMZ@GNPs effectively down-modulated expression of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and increased chemosensitivity of T98G to TMZ. The antiglioma efficacy in vivo was investigated in orthotopic glioma-bearing rats, and the results demonstrated that the anti-EphA3-TMZ@GNPs prolonged the median survival time to 42 days and increased tumor-cell apoptosis dramatically compared with TMZ. In conclusion, anti-EphA3-TMZ@GNPs could serve as an intranasal drug delivery system for efficacious treatment of GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liangxiao Wang
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, P.R. China
| | - Shengnan Tang
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, P.R. China
| | - Yawen Yu
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, P.R. China
| | - Yanan Lv
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, P.R. China
| | - Aiping Wang
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, P.R. China
| | - Xiuju Yan
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, P.R. China
| | - Nuannuan Li
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, P.R. China
| | - Chunjie Sha
- State Key Laboratory of Long-Acting and Targeting Drug Delivery System, Luye Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Yantai 264003, P.R. China
| | - Kaoxiang Sun
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, P.R. China
| | - Youxin Li
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wenger KJ, Wagner M, Harter PN, Franz K, Bojunga J, Fokas E, Imhoff D, Rödel C, Rieger J, Hattingen E, Steinbach JP, Pilatus U, Voss M. Maintenance of Energy Homeostasis during Calorically Restricted Ketogenic Diet and Fasting-MR-Spectroscopic Insights from the ERGO2 Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123549. [PMID: 33261052 PMCID: PMC7760797 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The glioblastoma is a highly malignant brain tumor with very limited treatment options up to date. Metabolism of this tumor is highly dependent on glucose uptake. It is believed that glioblastoma cells cannot metabolize ketone bodies, which are found in the blood during periods of fasting or ketogenic dieting. According to this hypothesis, dieting could lead to cancer cell starvation. The ERGO2 (Ernaehrungsumstellung bei Patienten mit Rezidiv eines Glioblastoms) MR-spectroscopic imaging subtrial was designed to investigate tumor metabolism in patients randomized to calorically restricted ketogenic diet/intermittent fasting versus standard diet. The non-invasive investigation of tumor metabolism is of high clinical interest. Abstract Background: The ERGO2 (Ernaehrungsumstellung bei Patienten mit Rezidiv eines Glioblastoms) MR-spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) subtrial investigated metabolism in patients randomized to calorically restricted ketogenic diet/intermittent fasting (crKD-IF) versus standard diet (SD) in addition to re-irradiation (RT) for recurrent malignant glioma. Intracerebral concentrations of ketone bodies (KB), intracellular pH (pHi), and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) were non-invasively determined. Methods: 50 patients were randomized (1:1): Group A keeping a crKD-IF for nine days, and Group B a SD. RT was performed on day 4–8. Twenty-three patients received an extended MRSI-protocol (1H decoupled 31P MRSI with 3D chemical shift imaging (CSI) and 2D 1H point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS)) at a 3T scanner at baseline and on day 6. Voxels were selected from the area of recurrent tumor and contralateral hemisphere. Spectra were analyzed with LCModel, adding simulated signals of 3-hydroxybutyrate (βOHB), acetone (Acn) and acetoacetate (AcAc) to the standard basis set. Results: Acn was the only reliably MRSI-detectable KB within tumor tissue and/or normal appearing white matter (NAWM). It was detected in 4/11 patients in Group A and in 0/8 patients in Group B. MRSI results showed no significant depletion of ATP in tumor tissue of patients at day 6 during crKD-IF, even though there were a significant difference in ketone serum levels between Group A and B at day 6 and a decline in fasting glucose in Group A from baseline to day 6. The tumor specific alkaline pHi was maintained. Conclusions: Our metabolic findings suggest that tumor cells maintain energy homeostasis even with reduced serum glucose levels and may generate additional ATP through other sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina J. Wenger
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (M.W.); (E.H.); (U.P.)
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (P.N.H.); (K.F.); (E.F.); (D.I.); (C.R.); (J.P.S.); (M.V.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-69-6301-80407
| | - Marlies Wagner
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (M.W.); (E.H.); (U.P.)
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (P.N.H.); (K.F.); (E.F.); (D.I.); (C.R.); (J.P.S.); (M.V.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Patrick N. Harter
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (P.N.H.); (K.F.); (E.F.); (D.I.); (C.R.); (J.P.S.); (M.V.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
- Neurological Institute (Edinger-Institute), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Kea Franz
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (P.N.H.); (K.F.); (E.F.); (D.I.); (C.R.); (J.P.S.); (M.V.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Jörg Bojunga
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
- Department of Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (P.N.H.); (K.F.); (E.F.); (D.I.); (C.R.); (J.P.S.); (M.V.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Detlef Imhoff
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (P.N.H.); (K.F.); (E.F.); (D.I.); (C.R.); (J.P.S.); (M.V.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (P.N.H.); (K.F.); (E.F.); (D.I.); (C.R.); (J.P.S.); (M.V.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Johannes Rieger
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
- Interdisciplinary Division of Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Elke Hattingen
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (M.W.); (E.H.); (U.P.)
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (P.N.H.); (K.F.); (E.F.); (D.I.); (C.R.); (J.P.S.); (M.V.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Joachim P. Steinbach
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (P.N.H.); (K.F.); (E.F.); (D.I.); (C.R.); (J.P.S.); (M.V.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Ulrich Pilatus
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (M.W.); (E.H.); (U.P.)
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (P.N.H.); (K.F.); (E.F.); (D.I.); (C.R.); (J.P.S.); (M.V.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Martin Voss
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; (P.N.H.); (K.F.); (E.F.); (D.I.); (C.R.); (J.P.S.); (M.V.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
ERGO2: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Calorie-Restricted Ketogenic Diet and Fasting in Addition to Reirradiation for Malignant Glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:987-995. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
9
|
Efficacy and Safety of Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2019; 127:176-185. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2019] [Revised: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 03/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
10
|
Reynaud T, Bertaut A, Farah W, Thibouw D, Crehange G, Truc G, Vulquin N. Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy as a Salvage Therapy for Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas: Single-Center Experience. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2019; 17:1533033818806498. [PMID: 30343637 PMCID: PMC6198395 DOI: 10.1177/1533033818806498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the survival outcomes and safety of hypofractioned stereotactic radiotherapy as a salvage treatment for recurrent high-grade glioma. Patients and Methods: Between March 2012 and March 2017, 32 consecutive patients (12 women, 20 men) treated in a single center were retrospectively included in this study. Grade III gliomas were diagnosed in 14 patients and grade IV in 18 patients. Thirty-four lesions were treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy on a linear accelerator. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy delivered a median dose of 30 Gy (27-30) in 6 fractions (3-6) of 5 Gy (5-9). The treatment plans were normalized to 100% at the isocenter and prescribed to the 80% isodose line. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors were analyzed. Results: Median follow-up was 20.9 months. Median overall survival following hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was 15.6 months (median overall survival for patients with glioblastoma and grade III glioma was 8.2 and 19.5 months, respectively; P = .0496) and progression-free survival was 3.7 months (median progression-free survival for patients with glioblastoma and grade III glioma was 3.6 and 4.5 months, respectively; P = .2424). In multivariate analysis, tumor grade III (P = .0027), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status <2 at the time of reirradiation (P = .0023), and a mean dose >35 Gy (P = .0055) significantly improved overall survival. A maximum reirradiation dose above 38 Gy (P = .0179) was significantly associated with longer progression-free survival. Conclusion: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is well tolerated and offers an effective salvage option for the treatment of recurrent high-grade gliomas with encouraging overall survival. Our results suggest that the dose distribution had an impact on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Reynaud
- 1 Department of Radiotherapy, Georges François Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
| | - Aurélie Bertaut
- 2 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Georges François Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
| | - Walid Farah
- 3 Department of Neurosurgery, CHU, Dijon, France
| | - David Thibouw
- 1 Department of Radiotherapy, Georges François Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
| | - Gilles Crehange
- 1 Department of Radiotherapy, Georges François Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
| | - Gilles Truc
- 1 Department of Radiotherapy, Georges François Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
| | - Noémie Vulquin
- 1 Department of Radiotherapy, Georges François Leclerc Center, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Re-irradiation for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurooncol 2018; 142:79-90. [PMID: 30523605 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-03064-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 11/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the efficacy and toxicity of re-irradiation for patients with recurrent GBM. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched various biomedical databases from 1998 to 2018, for eligible studies where patients were treated with re-irradiation for recurrent GBM. Outcomes of interest were 6 and 12-month overall survival (OS-6, OS-12), 6 and 12-month progression free survival (PFS-6, PFS-12) and serious (Grade 3 +) adverse events (AE). We used the random effects model to pool outcomes across studies and compared pre-defined subgroups using interaction test. Methodological quality of each study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scoring system. RESULTS We found 50 eligible non-comparative studies including 2095 patients. Of these, 42% were of good or fair quality. The pooled results were as follows: OS-6 rate 73% (95% confidence interval (CI) 69-77%), OS-12 rate 36% (95% CI 32-40%), PFS-6 rate 43% (95% CI 35-50%), PFS-12 rate 17% (95% CI 13-20%), and Grade 3 + AE rate 7% (95% CI 4-10%). Subgroup analysis showed that prospective studies reported higher toxicity rates, and studies which utilized brachytherapy to have a longer OS-12. Within the external beam radiotherapy group, there was no dose-response [above or below 36 Gy in 2 Gy equivalent doses (EQD2)]. However, a short fractionation regimen (≤ 5 fractions) seemed to provide superior PFS-6. CONCLUSION The available evidence, albeit mostly level III, suggests that re-irradiation provides encouraging disease control and survival rates. Toxicity was not uniformly reported, but seemed to be low from the included studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) are needed to establish the optimal management strategy for recurrent GBM.
Collapse
|
12
|
Re-irradiation of recurrent glioblastoma as part of a sequential multimodality treatment concept. Clin Transl Oncol 2018; 21:582-587. [PMID: 30284233 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1957-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Accepted: 09/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate survival outcomes in well-performing, mainly, young patients receiving a sequence of all available therapeutic options for relapsed glioblastoma, including re-irradiation. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of 27 patients irradiated twice for glioblastoma between 2008 and 2016. In the first line, all had surgical treatment of the tumor followed by radiotherapy with a total dose of 60 Gy and temozolomide. All re-irradiated patients were treated with a total dose of 36 Gy in 12 fractions. The endpoints were death from glioblastoma or any cause, and toxicity after re-irradiation. RESULTS The median follow-up of survivors was 35.6 months. At the time of analysis, 25 patients had died. The median time between first and second radiotherapy was 18.9 months (6.1-58.4). Re-irradiation was performed at different time points of first, second and third progression. The median overall survival after first diagnosis was 39.2 months. Five years after first surgery, nearly 20% of the patients were alive. CONCLUSION Carefully planned re-irradiation of the brain is a safe therapy for recurrent glioblastoma. Younger and well-performing patients benefit from all available therapy options. Every patient should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting at each time point of tumor progression. Further prospective studies are needed to define the optimal time, dose and volume of re-irradiation.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hunt A, Das P, Minsky BD, Koay EJ, Krishnan S, Herman JM, Taniguchi C, Koong A, Smith GL, Holliday EB. Hyperfractionated abdominal reirradiation for gastrointestinal malignancies. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:143. [PMID: 30086784 PMCID: PMC6081944 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1084-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We sought to determine the role of abdominal reirradiation for patients presenting with recurrent or new primary gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. At our institution, we have established a hyperfractionated, accelerated reirradiation regimen consisting of 39 Gray (Gy) in 26 twice-daily fractions. Although this regimen is used frequently in the pelvis, we sought to determine its toxicity and efficacy for abdominal tumors. Methods Twenty-four patients who received abdominal reirradiation with a hyperfractionated, accelerated approach from 2000 to 2017 were identified. Overall survival (OS) and local progression-free survival (LPFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Several patient, tumor and treatment characteristics were evaluated on univariate analyses for association with OS and LPFS using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results Of the twenty-four patients identified, the majority (n = 11, 46%) had pancreatic adenocarcinoma as their primary disease but also included upper GI adenocarcinoma (n = 4), colon adenocarcinoma (n = 3), hepatobiliary cancers (n = 4) and other malignancies (n = 2). The majority of patients received 45–50.4Gy in 1.8Gy fractions as their initial abdominal radiation course. The median reirradiation dose was 39Gy in 26 twice-daily fractions with a minimum six hour interval. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] interval between the courses of radiotherapy was 28 [18.6–38.9] months. Only palliative reirradiation intent was associated with decreased OS. While colon adenocarcinoma primary was significantly associated with increased LPFS, the sample size was small (n = 3). The 1-yr rate of LPFS was 38%. The median [IQR] duration of freedom from local progression was 8 [3.8–19.2] months. The 1-year OS was 50% and the median (IQR) OS was 14 [6.3–19.6] months. Thirteen patients (54%) had acute side effects with one patient experiencing G3 nausea and one experiencing a G4 bleed; the remaining patients experienced G1-G2 symptoms. Conclusion Hyperfractionated, accelerated reirradiation to the abdomen was relatively well-tolerated but provided limited local control to recurrent or second primary abdominal malignancies. Reirradiation could play a role in treating these patients with palliative or curative intent, but alternative strategies for delivering increased biologically effective dose should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Hunt
- University of Texas Health San Antonio Long School of Medicine, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Joseph M Herman
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Cullen Taniguchi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Albert Koong
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Grace L Smith
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Emma B Holliday
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd Unit 97, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shanker M, Chua B, Bettington C, Foote MC, Pinkham MB. Re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade gliomas: a systematic review and analysis of treatment technique with respect to survival and risk of radionecrosis. Neurooncol Pract 2018; 6:144-155. [PMID: 31386038 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npy019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Re-irradiation may be considered for select patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. Treatment techniques include conformal radiotherapy employing conventional fractionation, hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), and single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Methods A pooled, population-weighted, multiple linear regression analysis of publications from 1992 to 2016 was performed to evaluate the relationships between re-irradiation technique and median overall survival (OS) and radionecrosis outcomes. Results Seventy published articles were analyzed, yielding a total of 3302 patients. Across all studies, initial treatment was external beam radiotherapy to a median dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions, with or without concurrent chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis, there was a significant correlation between OS and radiotherapy technique after adjusting for age, re-irradiation biologically equivalent dose (EQD2), interval between initial and repeat radiotherapy, and treatment volume (P < .0001). Adjusted mean OS was 12.2 months (95% CI, 11.8-12.5) after SRS, 10.1 months (95% CI, 9.7-10.5) after FSRT, and 8.9 months (95% CI, 8.4-9.4) after conventional fractionation. There was also a significant association between radionecrosis and treatment technique after adjusting for age, re-irradiation EQD2, interval, and volume (P < .0001). Radionecrosis rate was 7.1% (95% CI, 6.6-7.7) after FSRT, 6.1% (95% CI, 5.6-6.6) after SRS, and 1.1% (95% CI, 0.5-1.7) after conventional fractionation. Conclusions The published literature suggests that OS is highest after re-irradiation using SRS, followed by FSRT and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Whether this represents superiority of the treatment technique or an uncontrolled selection bias is uncertain. The risk of radionecrosis was low for all modalities overall. Re-irradiation is a feasible option in appropriately selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihir Shanker
- The University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Benjamin Chua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Catherine Bettington
- The University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Matthew C Foote
- The University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Mark B Pinkham
- The University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ho A, Jena R. Re-irradiation in the Brain: Primary Gliomas. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:124-136. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Revised: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
16
|
Zwirner K, Paulsen F, Schittenhelm J, Borchers C, Skardelly M, Zips D, Eckert F. Prognostic parameters and outcome after re-irradiation for progressive glioblastoma. Acta Neurol Scand 2017; 136:239-245. [PMID: 28025828 DOI: 10.1111/ane.12719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In progressive glioblastoma, salvage treatment remains unstandardized, response is highly variable, and detailed analysis of individual approaches is mandatory. Re-irradiation is an established option in the therapy of progressive glioblastoma. Thus, we analysed outcome and prognostic parameters of patients with re-irradiated glioblastoma treated at our institution since 1998. MATERIALS AND METHODS In a total of 51 patients, clinical and treatment parameters were collected and analysed retrospectively. Re-irradiation protocols included radiosurgery, hypofractionated radiotherapy or normofractionated radiotherapy. Outcome was analysed regarding prognostic factors in this highly selected cohort. RESULTS Median overall survival after primary diagnosis was 28.8 months. Patients re-irradiated with single-dose stereotactic radiosurgery or hypofractionated regimes showed a superior overall survival after primary diagnosis compared to normofractionated treatment. Positive prognostic factors included a smaller gross tumour volume and younger age. A methylated MGMT promoter approached statistical significance as a positive factor regarding overall survival after re-irradiation. Further well-known prognostic factors as extension of the initial resection and the concomitance of temozolomide with the initial radiation treatment only appeared relevant in a subgroup of four long-term survivors. CONCLUSIONS The favourable results regarding overall survival are probably due to patient selection for re-irradiation. If technically feasible, stereotactic radiosurgery or hypofractionated regimes should be preferred. In this highly selected re-irradiation cohort, only some of the well-known prognostic factors of the primary tumour setting were found to influence overall survival significantly. In contrast, also some patients presenting with unfavourable predictive parameters showed an encouraging course of disease and thus should not be excluded from re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. Zwirner
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Hospital Tuebingen; Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
| | - F. Paulsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Hospital Tuebingen; Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
- Neuro-Oncology Center; Comprehensive Cancer Center Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
| | - J. Schittenhelm
- Department of Neuropathology; University Hospital Tuebingen; Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
- Neuro-Oncology Center; Comprehensive Cancer Center Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
| | - C. Borchers
- Department of Neurology; University Hospital Tuebingen; Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
- Department of Neurology; Sanderbusch Hospital; Sande Germany
- Neuro-Oncology Center; Comprehensive Cancer Center Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
| | - M. Skardelly
- Department of Neurosurgery; University Hospital Tuebingen; Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
- Neuro-Oncology Center; Comprehensive Cancer Center Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
| | - D. Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Hospital Tuebingen; Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
- Neuro-Oncology Center; Comprehensive Cancer Center Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK); German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) partner site Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
| | - F. Eckert
- Department of Radiation Oncology; University Hospital Tuebingen; Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
- Neuro-Oncology Center; Comprehensive Cancer Center Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK); German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) partner site Tuebingen; Tuebingen Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Clarke J, Neil E, Terziev R, Gutin P, Barani I, Kaley T, Lassman AB, Chan TA, Yamada J, DeAngelis L, Ballangrud A, Young R, Panageas KS, Beal K, Omuro A. Multicenter, Phase 1, Dose Escalation Study of Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy With Bevacizumab for Recurrent Glioblastoma and Anaplastic Astrocytoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:797-804. [PMID: 28870792 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.2466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Revised: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To establish the maximum tolerated dose of a 3-fraction hypofractionated stereotactic reirradiation schedule when delivered with concomitant bevacizumab to treat recurrent high-grade gliomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with recurrent high-grade glioma with Karnofsky performance status ≥60, history of standard fractionated initial radiation, tumor volume at recurrence ≤40 cm3, and absence of brainstem or corpus callosum involvement were eligible. A standard 3+3 phase 1 dose escalation trial design was utilized, with dose-limiting toxicities defined as any grade 3 to 5 toxicities possibly, probably, or definitely related to radiation. Bevacizumab was given at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Hypofractionated stereotactic reirradiation was initiated after 2 bevacizumab doses, delivered in 3 fractions every other day, starting at 9 Gy per fraction. RESULTS A total of 3 patients were enrolled at the 9 Gy × 3 dose level cohort, 5 in the 10 Gy × 3 cohort, and 7 in the 11 Gy × 3 cohort. One dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 fatigue and cognitive deterioration possibly related to hypofractionated stereotactic reirradiation was observed in the 11 Gy × 3 cohort, and this dose was declared the maximum tolerated dose in combination with bevacizumab. Although no symptomatic radionecrosis was observed, substantial treatment-related effects and necrosis were observed in resected specimens. The intent-to-treat median overall survival was 13 months. CONCLUSIONS Reirradiation using a 3-fraction schedule with bevacizumab support is feasible and reasonably well tolerated. Dose-escalation was possible up to 11 Gy × 3, which achieves a near doubling in the delivered biological equivalent dose to normal brain, in comparison with our previous 6 Gy × 5 schedule. Promising overall survival warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Clarke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Elizabeth Neil
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert Terziev
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Philip Gutin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Igor Barani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Thomas Kaley
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew B Lassman
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Neurology & Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Timothy A Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Josh Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lisa DeAngelis
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ase Ballangrud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Robert Young
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Katherine S Panageas
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Antonio Omuro
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hou W, Song L, Zhao Y, Liu Q, Zhang S. Inhibition of Beclin-1-Mediated Autophagy by MicroRNA-17-5p Enhanced the Radiosensitivity of Glioma Cells. Oncol Res 2017; 25:43-53. [PMID: 28081732 PMCID: PMC7840760 DOI: 10.3727/096504016x14719078133285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of miRNAs in the radiosensitivity of glioma cells and the underlying mechanism is still far from clear. In the present study, we detected six downregulated and seven upregulated miRNAs in the serum after radiotherapy compared with paired serum samples before radiotherapy via miRNA panel PCR. Among these, miR-17-5p was highly reduced (fold change = −4.21). Further, we validated the levels of miR-17-5p in all serum samples with qRT-PCR. In addition, statistical analysis suggested that a reduced miR-17-5P level was positively associated with advanced clinical stage of glioma, incidence of relapse, and tumor differentiation. Moreover, we provided evidence that irradiation markedly activated autophagy and decreased miR-17-5p in the glioma cell line. Further, we demonstrated that irradiation-induced autophagy activation was mediated by beclin-1, and downregulation of beclin-1 via siRNA significantly abolished the irradiation-activated autophagy. Interestingly, we demonstrated that miR-17-5p could directly target beclin-1 via luciferase gene reporter assay. Exotic expression of miRNA-17-5p decreased autophagy activity in vitro. In nude mice, miRNA-17-5p upregulation sensitized the xenograft tumor to irradiation and suppressed irradiation-induced autophagy. Finally, pharmacal inhibition of autophagy markedly enhanced the cytotoxicity of irradiation in RR-U87 cells.
Collapse
|
19
|
Dong Y, Fu C, Guan H, Zhang T, Zhang Z, Zhou T, Li B. Re-irradiation alternatives for recurrent high-grade glioma. Oncol Lett 2016; 12:2261-2270. [PMID: 27703519 PMCID: PMC5038913 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2015] [Accepted: 03/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite advances in the fields of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the prognosis for high-grade glioma (HGG) remains unsatisfactory. The majority of HGG patients experience disease recurrence. To date, no standard treatments have been established for recurrent HGG. Repeat surgery and chemotherapy demonstrate moderate efficacy. As recurrent lesions are usually located within the previously irradiated field, a second course of irradiation was once considered controversial, as it was considered to exhibit unsatisfactory efficacy and radiation-related toxicities. However, an increasing number of studies have indicated that re-irradiation may present an efficacious treatment for recurrent HGG. Re-irradiation may be delivered via conventionally fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery and brachytherapy techniques. In the present review, the current literature regarding re-irradiation treatment for recurrent HGG is summarized with regard to survival outcome and side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanli Dong
- Sixth Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China; School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong 250014, P.R. China
| | - Chengrui Fu
- Sixth Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| | - Hui Guan
- Sixth Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China; School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Jinan-Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong 250014, P.R. China
| | - Tianyi Zhang
- Sixth Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| | - Zicheng Zhang
- Sixth Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| | - Tao Zhou
- Sixth Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| | - Baosheng Li
- Sixth Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, Shandong 250117, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Mallick S, Benson R, Hakim A, Rath GK. Management of glioblastoma after recurrence: A changing paradigm. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2016; 28:199-210. [PMID: 27476474 DOI: 10.1016/j.jnci.2016.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2016] [Revised: 06/30/2016] [Accepted: 07/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma remains the most common primary brain tumor after the age of 40years. Maximal safe surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy has remained the standard treatment for glioblastoma (GBM). But recurrence is an inevitable event in the natural history of GBM with most patients experiencing it after 6-9months of primary treatment. Recurrent GBM poses great challenge to manage with no well-defined management protocols. The challenge starts from differentiating radiation necrosis from true local progression. A fine balance needs to be maintained on improving survival and assuring a better quality of life. Treatment options are limited and ranges from re-excision, re-irradiation, systemic chemotherapy or a combination of these. Re-excision and re-irradiation must be attempted in selected patients and has been shown to improve survival outcomes. To facilitate the management of GBM recurrences, a treatment algorithm is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya Mallick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
| | - Rony Benson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Abdul Hakim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Goura K Rath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Leitzen C, Wilhelm-Buchstab T, Schmeel LC, Garbe S, Greschus S, Müdder T, Oberste-Beulmann S, Simon B, Schild HH, Schüller H. MRI during radiotherapy of glioblastoma : Does MRI allow for prognostic stratification? Strahlenther Onkol 2016; 192:481-8. [PMID: 27259515 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-016-0983-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2015] [Accepted: 04/20/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a predictor for the clinical course in patients with glioblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS In 64 patients with glioblastoma undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy MRI studies were obtained before radiation, after 30 gray (Gy), after 60 Gy and during follow-up. MRI findings were assigned to categories: definite progression, questionable progression, no change. Patients were followed clinically. RESULTS At 30 Gy, 23 of 64 patients (36 %) demonstrated definite (dp; n = 15) or questionable (qp; n = 8) progression; in 41/64 (64 %) no change was found compared with preradiation MRI. After radiotherapy at 60 Gy, 26 of 64 (41 %) patients showed dp (n = 18) or qp (n = 8). In 2 cases with qp at the 30 Gy MRI, progress was unquestionable in the 60 Gy MRI study. In the 64 patients, 5 of the 60 Gy MRIs showed dp/qp after being classified as no change at the 30 Gy MRI, 2 of the 30 Gy MRIs showed qp, while the 60 Gy MRI showed tumour regression and 3 fulfilled the criteria for pseudoprogression during ongoing radiotherapy. The 30 Gy study allowed for prognostic stratification: dp/qp compared to stable patients showed median survival of 10.5 versus 20 months. CONCLUSION MR follow-up after 30 Gy in patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy for glioblastoma allows prognostic appraisal. Pseudoprogression has to be taken into account, though rare in our setting. Based on these findings, early discussion of treatment modification is possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Leitzen
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany.
| | - T Wilhelm-Buchstab
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - L C Schmeel
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - S Garbe
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - S Greschus
- Radiologische Klinik, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - T Müdder
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - S Oberste-Beulmann
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - B Simon
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| | - H H Schild
- Radiologische Klinik, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - H Schüller
- Radiologische Klinik, FE Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinik Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53105, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jia A, Pannullo SC, Minkowitz S, Taube S, Chang J, Parashar B, Christos P, Wernicke AG. Innovative Hypofractionated Stereotactic Regimen Achieves Excellent Local Control with No Radiation Necrosis: Promising Results in the Management of Patients with Small Recurrent Inoperable GBM. Cureus 2016; 8:e536. [PMID: 27096136 PMCID: PMC4835149 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Management of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains a challenge. Several institutions reported that a single fraction of ≥ 20 Gy for small tumor burden results in excellent local control; however, this is at the expense of a high incidence of radiation necrosis (RN). Therefore, we developed a hypofractionation pattern of 33 Gy/3 fractions, which is a radiobiological equivalent of 20 Gy, with the aim to lower the incidence of RN. We reviewed records of 21 patients with recurrent GBM treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HFSRT) to their 22 respective lesions. Sixty Gy fractioned external beam radiotherapy was performed as first-line treatment. Median time from primary irradiation to HFSRT was 9.6 months (range: 3.1 – 68.1 months). In HFSRT, a median dose of 33 Gy in 11 Gy fractions was delivered to the 80% isodose line that encompassed the target volume. The median tumor volume was 1.07 cm3 (range: 0.11 – 16.64 cm3). The median follow-up time after HFSRT was 9.3 months (range: 1.7 – 33.6 months). Twenty-one of 23 lesions treated (91.3%) achieved local control while 2/23 (8.7%) progressed. Median time to progression outside of the treated site was 5.2 months (range: 2.2 – 9.6 months). Progression was treated with salvage chemotherapy. Five of 21 patients (23.8%) were alive at the end of this follow-up; two patients remain disease-free. The remaining 16/21 patients (76.2%) died of disease. Treatment was well tolerated by all patients with no acute CTC/RTOG > Grade 2. There was 0% incidence of RN. A prospective trial will be underway to validate these promising results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Jia
- Stich Radiation Oncology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center
| | - Susan C Pannullo
- Neurological Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center
| | | | - Shoshana Taube
- Stich Radiation Oncology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center
| | - Jenghwa Chang
- Stich Radiation Oncology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center
| | - Bhupesh Parashar
- Stich Radiation Oncology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center
| | - Paul Christos
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Scorsetti M, Navarria P, Pessina F, Ascolese AM, D'Agostino G, Tomatis S, De Rose F, Villa E, Maggi G, Simonelli M, Clerici E, Soffietti R, Santoro A, Cozzi L, Bello L. Multimodality therapy approaches, local and systemic treatment, compared with chemotherapy alone in recurrent glioblastoma. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:486. [PMID: 26118437 PMCID: PMC4484625 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1488-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2014] [Accepted: 06/14/2015] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term local control in Glioblastoma is rarely achieved and nearly all patients relapse. In this study we evaluated the clinical effect of different treatment approaches in recurrent patients. METHODS Forty-three patients, with median age of 51 years were evaluated for salvage treatment: re-resection and/or re-irradiation plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Response was recorded using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 4.0. Twenty-one patients underwent chemotherapy combined with local treatment, surgery and/or radiation therapy, and 22 underwent chemotherapy only. RESULTS The median follow up was 7 months (range 3-28 months). The 1 and 2-years Progression Free Survival was 65 and 10 % for combined treatment and 22 and 0 % for chemotherapy alone (p < 0.01). The 1 and 2-years overall survival was 69 and 29 % for combined and 26 and 0 % for chemotherapy alone (p < 0.01). No toxicity greater than grade 2 was recorded. CONCLUSION These data showed that in glioblastoma recurrence the combination of several approaches in a limited group of patients is more effective than a single treatment alone. This stress the importance of multimodality treatment whenever clinically feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Federico Pessina
- Neuro-oncological Surgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Anna Maria Ascolese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe D'Agostino
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Fiorenza De Rose
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Elisa Villa
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Giulia Maggi
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Matteo Simonelli
- Oncology and Hematology Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Milan, Italy.
| | - Elena Clerici
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
| | | | - Armando Santoro
- Oncology and Hematology Department, Humanitas Cancer Center, Milan, Italy.
| | - Luca Cozzi
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas Cancer Center, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Lorenzo Bello
- Neuro-oncological Surgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Müller K, Henke G, Pietschmann S, van Gool S, De Vleeschouwer S, von Bueren AO, Compter I, Friedrich C, Matuschek C, Klautke G, Kortmann RD, Hundsberger T, Baumert BG. Re-irradiation or re-operation followed by dendritic cell vaccination? Comparison of two different salvage strategies for relapsed high-grade gliomas by means of a new prognostic model. J Neurooncol 2015; 124:325-32. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1844-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2015] [Accepted: 06/08/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
25
|
Radiosurgery reirradiation for high-grade glioma recurrence: a retrospective analysis. Neurol Sci 2015; 36:1431-40. [PMID: 25805705 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-015-2172-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2015] [Accepted: 03/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Despite various treatment strategies being available, recurrent high-grade gliomas (r-HGG) are difficult to manage. To obtain local control, radiosurgery (SRS) reirradiation has been considered as potential treatment. In the present study, a retrospective analysis was performed on r-HGG patients treated with salvage single- (s-SRS) or multi-fraction SRS (m-SRS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of salvage SRS in terms of overall survival (OS); toxicity was analyzed as well. Between 2004 May and 2011 December, 128 r-HGG patients (161 lesions) treated with CyberKnife(®) SRS reirradiation were retrospectively analyzed. Toxicity was graded according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.3 criteria. OS from the diagnosis date and OS from reirradiation were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up was 9 months (range 15 days-82 months). All patients completed SRS without high-grade toxicity. Radiation necrosis was observed in seven patients (6 %) with large volume lesions. The median survival from initial diagnosis was 32 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-years survival rates from diagnosis were 95, 62, and 45 % respectively. Median survival following SRS was 11.5 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-years survival rate following SRS was 48, 20, and 17 % respectively. On multivariate analysis, age <40 years, salvage surgery before SRS, and other post-SRS therapies (second-line chemotherapy and/or surgery) were found to significantly improve survival (p = 0.03). SRS represents a safe and feasible option to treat r-HGG patients with low complication rates and potential survival benefit.
Collapse
|
26
|
Management of patients with recurrent glioblastoma using hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. TUMORI JOURNAL 2015; 101:179-84. [PMID: 25791534 DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/08/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults. The chance of cure is very limited due to treatment-refractory disease course with frequent recurrences despite aggressive multimodality management. In this retrospective study, we evaluated treatment outcomes of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) in the management of recurrent GBM and report our single-center experience. METHODS Twenty-eight patients receiving HFSRT for recurrent GBM between September 2008 and February 2014 were retrospectively assessed. Total radiotherapy dose was 25 Gy delivered in 5 fractions over 5 consecutive days for all patients. High-precision, image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy was delivered with a linear accelerator using 6-MV photons using the frameless technique. Analyzed prognostic factors were age, gender, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), tumor location, planning target volume (PTV) size, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time interval between completion of treatment with Stupp protocol at primary diagnosis and recurrence. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 42 months (range 2-68). Median time interval between primary chemoradiotherapy and HFSRT was 11.2 months (range 4-57.9). Median OS and PFS calculated from reirradiation was 10.3 months and 5.8 months, respectively. Longer interval between initial treatment and recurrence (p = 0.01), smaller PTV size (p = 0.001), KPS ≥70 (p = 0.005) and younger age (p = 0.004) were associated with longer OS on statistical analysis. CONCLUSION HFSRT offers a feasible and effective salvage treatment option for recurrent GBM management. Prognostic factors associated with longer OS in our study were longer interval between initial treatment and recurrence, smaller PTV size, KPS ≥70 and younger age.
Collapse
|
27
|
Navarria P, Ascolese AM, Tomatis S, Reggiori G, Clerici E, Villa E, Maggi G, Bello L, Pessina F, Cozzi L, Scorsetti M. Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: A New Challenge. Cancer Res Treat 2015; 48:37-44. [PMID: 25761491 PMCID: PMC4720100 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2014.259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2014] [Accepted: 11/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HSRT) in patients re-treated for recurrent high-grade glioma. Materials and Methods From January 2006 to September 2013, 25 patients were treated. Six patients underwent radiation therapy alone, while 19 underwent combined treatment with surgery and/or chemotherapy. Only patients with Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) > 70 and time from previous radiotherapy greater than 6 months were re-irradiated. The mean recurrent tumor volume was 35 cm3 (range, 2.46 to 116.7 cm3), and most of the patients (84%) were treated with a total dose of 25 Gy in five fractions (range, 20 to 50 Gy in 5-10 fractions). Results The median follow-up was 18 months (range, 4 to 36 months). The progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 and 2 years was 72% and 34% and the overall survival (OS) 76% and 50%, respectively. No severe toxicity was recorded. In univariate and multivariate analysis extent of resection at diagnosis significantly influenced PFS and OS (p < 0.01). Patients with smaller recurren tumor volume treated had better local control and survival. Indeed, the 2-year PFS was 40% (≤ 50 cm3) versus 11% (p=0.1) and the 2-year OS 56% versus 33% (> 50 cm3), respectively (p=0.26). Conclusion In our experience, HSRT could be a safe and feasible therapeutic option for recurrent high grade glioma even in patients with larger tumors. We believe that a multidisciplinary evaluation is mandatory to assure the best treatment for selected patients. Local treatment should also be considered as part of an integrated approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierina Navarria
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Ascolese
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Giacomo Reggiori
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Elisa Villa
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Giulia Maggi
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bello
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Federico Pessina
- Department of Neurosurgical Oncology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Luca Cozzi
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in combination with bevacizumab or fotemustine for patients with progressive malignant gliomas. J Neurooncol 2015; 122:559-66. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1745-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2014] [Accepted: 02/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
29
|
Niyazi M, Jansen NL, Rottler M, Ganswindt U, Belka C. Recurrence pattern analysis after re-irradiation with bevacizumab in recurrent malignant glioma patients. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:299. [PMID: 25529015 PMCID: PMC4307885 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-014-0299-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2014] [Accepted: 12/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the recurrence pattern in patients with recurrent malignant glioma after re-irradiation in combination with bevacizumab as there is limited data on how to optimally choose dose, fractionation and delineation margins. Methods Thirty-one patients with recurrent malignant glioma treated with re-irradiation and bevacizumab after previous chemoradiotherapy (concurrent temozolomide 75 mg/m2/d according to the EORTC/NCIC trial) and [18 F]FET-PET and/or MRI confirmed recurrence were retrospectively analyzed. Bevacizumab was applied twice during fractionated re-irradiation (10 mg/kg, d1 + d15, median 36 Gy, conventionally fractionated). Recurrence patterns were assessed by means of [18 F]FET-PET and/or MRI. Results Median follow-up was 34.0 months for all patients [95%-CI, 27.7-40.3] and median post-recurrence survival 10.8 months [95%-CI, 9.2-12.4]. Concerning the recurrence patterns, 61.3% of these were located in-field (19 patients), 22.6% were marginal (7 patients) and 16.1% ex-field (5 patients). No influence on the recurrence pattern was observed according to sex, WHO grade, maintenance chemotherapy or MGMT methylation status whereas planning target volume (PTV) size had a significant influence on the recurrence pattern (p = 0.032). PTV sizes > 75 ml were associated with a higher in-field recurrence rate and lower median post-recurrence progression-free survival (8.5 vs. 4.9 months, p = 0.016). Conclusions After the administration of re-irradiation with bevacizumab the recurrence pattern seems to be mainly centrally located. The PTV size was the main predictor for a marginal/ex-field recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Nathalie Lisa Jansen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Maya Rottler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Müller K, Henke G, Compter I, von Bueren AO, Friedrich C, Janssens G, Kramm CM, Hundsberger T, Paulsen F, Kortmann RD, Zwiener I, Baumert BG. External validation of a prognostic model estimating the survival of patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas after reirradiation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2014; 5:e143-e150. [PMID: 25424325 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2014.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2014] [Revised: 09/23/2014] [Accepted: 10/01/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to validate a controversial prognostic model for the survival of relapsed malignant glioma patients after reirradiation with an independent, multicentric patient cohort. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 165 malignant glioma patients underwent reirradiation at 4 different institutions between 1994 and 2012. Twenty-two patients had a good (score 1), 44 had a moderate (score 2), and 99 had a poor prognosis (score 3 or 4). Four statistical methods were used to validate the prognostic model: First, we compared survival according to prognostic group in the construction and the validation cohort by visual comparison of the respective Kaplan-Meier plots. Second, discrimination was quantified by calculating hazard ratios for death for each prognostic group, with the worst prognostic group serving as the reference. Calibration was assessed by a calibration plot for the time point 12 months after reirradiation. Finally, we compared the predictive performance of the score and a hypothetical prognostic model ignoring all predictor variables over time by means of a prediction error curve. RESULTS On visual validation, the survival curves of the 3 patient groups with good, moderate, and poor prognoses nicely separated from each other. Median survival rates after reirradiation were 17.9, 9.0, and 7.7 months in the patient groups with good, moderate, and poor prognosis, respectively. Hazard ratios confirmed satisfactory discrimination. Calibration was satisfactory for all and most accurate for the worst prognostic group. The score improved the prognostic performance in comparison to the "zero-model." CONCLUSIONS We successfully validated a prognostic model for the survival of malignant glioma patients after reirradiation with a multicentric, independent dataset. Being reliable and easy to handle, the model can be useful in personalized patient counseling and clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Guido Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland; Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Inge Compter
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW (School for Oncology & Developmental Biology), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - André O von Bueren
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Carsten Friedrich
- Division of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Hemostaseology, Department of Woman's and Children's Health, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Geert Janssens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Christof M Kramm
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Hundsberger
- Departments of Neurology and Haematology/Oncology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Frank Paulsen
- Department of Radiooncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Rolf-Dieter Kortmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Isabella Zwiener
- Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Brigitta G Baumert
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW (School for Oncology & Developmental Biology), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Clinic & University of Bonn Med Centre, Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Miwa K, Matsuo M, Ogawa SI, Shinoda J, Yokoyama K, Yamada J, Yano H, Iwama T. Re-irradiation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme using 11C-methionine PET/CT/MRI image fusion for hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy by intensity modulated radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:181. [PMID: 25123357 PMCID: PMC4155106 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-9-181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2014] [Accepted: 08/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This research paper presents a valid treatment strategy for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) using hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy by intensity modulated radiation therapy (HS-IMRT) planned with 11C-methionine positron emission tomography (MET-PET)/computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion. Methods Twenty-one patients with recurrent GBM received HS-IMRT planned by MET-PET/CT/MRI. The region of increased amino acid tracer uptake on MET-PET was defined as the gross tumor volume (GTV). The planning target volume encompassed the GTV by a 3-mm margin. Treatment was performed with a total dose of 25- to 35-Gy, given as 5- to 7-Gy daily for 5 days. Results With a median follow-up of 12 months, median overall survival time (OS) was 11 months from the start of HS-IMRT, with a 6-month and 1-year survival rate of 71.4% and 38.1%, respectively. Karnofsky performance status was a significant prognostic factor of OS as tested by univariate and multivariate analysis. Re-operation rate was 4.8% for radiation necrosis. No other acute or late toxicity Grade 3 or higher was observed. Conclusions This is the first prospective study of biologic imaging optimized HS-IMRT in recurrent GBM. HS-IMRT with PET data seems to be well tolerated and resulted in a median survival time of 11 months after HS-IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiro Miwa
- Chubu Medical Center for Prolonged Traumatic Brain Dysfunction, Kizawa Memorial Hospital, Minokamo, Gifu, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Müller K, Scheithauer H, Pietschmann S, Hoffmann M, Rössler J, Graf N, Baumert BG, Christiansen H, Kortmann RD, Kramm CM, von Bueren AO. Reirradiation as part of a salvage treatment approach for progressive non-pontine pediatric high-grade gliomas: preliminary experiences from the German HIT-HGG study group. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:177. [PMID: 25112658 PMCID: PMC4283148 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-9-177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2014] [Accepted: 08/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The aim of the present analysis was to assess the feasibility, toxicity, and the tumor control of reirradiation as a salvage treatment for progressive pediatric non-pontine high-grade gliomas (HGG). PATIENTS AND METHODS The database of the Reference Center for Radiation Oncology of the German HIT (HIT = German acronym for brain tumor) treatment network for childhood brain tumors was screened for children who were reirradiated for progressive non-pontine HGG. RESULTS We identified eight patients (WHO grade III: n = 5; WHO grade IV: n = 3) who underwent reirradiation between April 2006 and July 2012. Median age was 13.5 years at primary diagnosis and 14.8 years at first progression. All patients initially underwent surgery (incomplete resection, n = 7; biopsy, n = 1) followed by radiochemotherapy. Relapses occurred inside (n = 2), at the margin (n = 4), and outside of the preirradiated area (n = 2). In all patients, reirradiation was tolerated well without significant acute toxicity. Temporary clinical improvement and tumor regression on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following reirradiation was reported (n = 3). However, all patients finally died by disease progression. Median survival time was 26.2 months from initial diagnosis and 11.4 months after first progression. Median time interval between initial radiotherapy and first reirradiation was 9.0 months. In six patients, all macroscopic tumor deposits were reirradiated. In these patients, median progression-free (overall) survival from the start of reirradiation was 2.4 (4.6) months. CONCLUSION Our analysis, although based on a limited patient number, suggests that reirradiation of progressive non-pontine HGG is feasible in children. Benefit in terms of quality of life and/or survival needs to be assessed in a prospective and ideally in a randomized manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - André O von Bueren
- Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Niyazi M, Flieger M, Ganswindt U, Combs SE, Belka C. Validation of the prognostic Heidelberg re-irradiation score in an independent mono-institutional patient cohort. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:128. [PMID: 24893775 PMCID: PMC4083332 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-9-128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2014] [Accepted: 03/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Re-irradiation has been shown to be a valid option with proven efficacy for recurrent high-grade glioma patients. Overall, up to now it is unclear which patients might be optimal candidates for a second course of irradiation. A recently reported prognostic score developed by Combs et al. may guide treatment decisions and thus, our mono-institutional cohort served as validation set to test its relevance for clinical practice. Patients and methods The prognostic score is built upon histology, age (< 50 vs. ≥ 50 years) and the time between initial radiotherapy and re-irradiation (≤ 12 vs. > 12 months). This score was initially introduced to distinguish patients with excellent (0 points), good (1 point), moderate (2 points) and poor (3–4 points) post-recurrence survival (PRS) after re-irradiation. Median prescribed radiation dose during re-treatment of recurrent malignant glioma was 36 Gy in 2 Gy single fractions. A substantial part of the patients was additionally treated with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg intravenously at d1 and d15 during re-irradiation). Results 88 patients (initially 61 WHO IV, 20 WHO III, 7 WHO II) re-irradiated in a single institution were retrospectively analyzed. Median follow-up was 30 months and median PRS of the entire patient cohort 7 months. Seventy-one patients (80.7%) received bevacizumab. PRS was significantly increased in patients receiving bevacizumab (8 vs. 6 months, p = 0.027, log-rank test). KPS, age, MGMT methylation status, sex, WHO grade and the Heidelberg score showed no statistically significant influence on neither PR-PFS nor PRS. Conclusion In our cohort which was mainly treated with bevacizumab the usefulness of the Heidelberg score could not be confirmed probably due to treatment heterogeneity; it can be speculated that larger multicentric data collections are needed to derive a more reliable score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistr, 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Orza A, Casciano D, Biris A. Nanomaterials for targeted drug delivery to cancer stem cells. Drug Metab Rev 2014; 46:191-206. [DOI: 10.3109/03602532.2014.900566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
35
|
Flieger M, Ganswindt U, Schwarz SB, Kreth FW, Tonn JC, la Fougère C, Ertl L, Linn J, Herrlinger U, Belka C, Niyazi M. Re-irradiation and bevacizumab in recurrent high-grade glioma: an effective treatment option. J Neurooncol 2014; 117:337-45. [PMID: 24504501 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1394-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2013] [Accepted: 01/26/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Re-irradiation has been shown to be a meaningful option for recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) patients. Furthermore, bevacizumab exerts certain activity in combination with chemotherapy/as monotherapy and was safely tested in combination with radiotherapy in several previous studies. To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort of patients treated with both re-irradiation and bevacizumab to date. After receiving standard radiotherapy (with or without TMZ) patients with recurrent HGG were treated with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg intravenously at d1 and d15) during re-irradiation. Median prescribed radiation dose during re-treatment was 36 Gy, conventionally fractionated. Datasets of 71 re-irradiated patients were retrospectively analyzed. Patients either received bevacizumab (N = 57) or not (N = 14; other substances (N = 4) and sole radiation (N = 10)). In patients receiving bevacizumab, both post-recurrence survival (PRS) (median 8.6 vs. 5.7 months; p = 0.003, log-rank test) and post-recurrence progression-free survival (PR-PFS, 5.6 vs. 2.5 months; p = 0.005, log-rank test; PFS-6 42.1 % for the bevacizumab group) were significantly increased which was confirmed by multivariate analysis. KPS, re-surgery, MGMT methylation status, sex, WHO grade, tumor volume and age were no significant predictors for neither PR-PFS nor PRS (univariate analysis). Re-irradiation with bevacizumab remains a feasible and highly effective treatment schedule. Studies on further salvage strategies and timing of sequential treatment options versus observation are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Flieger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Low-dose fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy for recurrent or progressive glioblastoma: final report of a pilot study. Strahlenther Onkol 2014; 190:370-6. [PMID: 24429479 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-013-0506-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2013] [Accepted: 11/08/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluated in this study were the feasibility and the efficacy of concurrent low dose fractionated radiotherapy (LD-FRT) and chemotherapy as palliative treatment for recurrent/progressive glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had recurrent or progressive GBM, Karnofsky performance status ≥ 70, prior surgery, and standard radiochemotherapy treatment. Recurrence/progression disease during temozolomide (TMZ) received cisplatin (CDDP; 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15), fotemustine (FTM; 40 mg/m(2) on days 2, 9, 16), and concurrent LD-FRT (0.3 Gy twice daily); recurrence/progression after 4 months from the end of adjuvant TMZ were treated by TMZ (150/200 mg/m(2) on days 1-5) concomitant with LD-FRT (0.4 Gy twice daily). Primary endpoints were safety and toxicity. RESULTS A total of 32 patients were enrolled. Hematologic toxicity G1-2 was observed in 18.7 % of patients and G3-4 in 9.4 %. One patient (3.1 %) had complete response, 3 (9.4 %) had partial response, 8 (25 %) had stable disease for at least 8 weeks, while 20 patients (62.5 %) experienced progressive disease. The clinical benefit was 37.5 %. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5 and 8 months, respectively. Survival rate at 12 months was of 27.8 %. CONCLUSION LD-FRT and chemotherapy for recurrent/progressive GBM have a good toxicity profile and clinical outcomes, even though further investigation of this novel palliative treatment approach is warranted.
Collapse
|
37
|
Niyazi M, Karin I, Söhn M, Nachbichler SB, Lang P, Belka C, Ganswindt U. Analysis of equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and conventional radiation treatment parameters after primary and re-irradiation of malignant glioma. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8:287. [PMID: 24330746 PMCID: PMC4029146 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-8-287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2013] [Accepted: 12/08/2013] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Re-irradiation is a reasonable second treatment option for patients with recurrent malignant glioma (MG) after previous radio(chemo)therapy. However, only limited data is available allowing for a precise selection of patients suitable for re-treatment in regard to safety and efficacy. METHODS Using the department database, 58 patients with two courses of percutaneous radiation were identified. Besides classical dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters equivalent uniform dose (EUD) values were calculated for the tumor and organs at risk (OARs), retrospectively analyzed and correlated to survival outcome parameters. Cumulative EUD values were also calculated in all cases where previous OAR DVHs were available. RESULTS Median follow-up was 265 days and no relevant toxicity was observed after re-irradiation in our patient cohort during follow-up. Time interval between first and second irradiation was regularly above 6 months. As a conservative estimation of the cumulative EUD to the OARs, the EUDs of first and second irradiation were added. Median cumulative EUD to the optic chiasm was 48.8 Gy (range, 2.5-76.5 Gy), 57.4 Gy (range, 2.7-75.3 Gy) to the brainstem, 20.9/22.1 Gy (range, 0.0-68.3 Gy) to the right/left optic nerve and 73.8 Gy (range, 64.9-77.3 Gy) to the brain. No correlation between treated volume and survival was seen. CONCLUSIONS This study provides retrospective estimates on cumulative doses at the OARs. EUD values are derived and may serve as reference for further studies, including planning studies where specific constraints are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Marchioninistr, 15, Munich 81377, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ciammella P, Podgornii A, Galeandro M, D’Abbiero N, Pisanello A, Botti A, Cagni E, Iori M, Iotti C. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy for recurrent glioblastoma: single institutional experience. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8:222. [PMID: 24066926 PMCID: PMC3852333 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-8-222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2013] [Accepted: 09/17/2013] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Tumor control and survival have improved with the use of radiotherapy (RT) plus concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy, but the prognosis remain poor. In most cases the recurrence occurs within 7-9 months after primary treatment. Currently, many approaches are available for the salvage treatment of patients with recurrent GBM, including resection, re-irradiation or systemic agents, but no standard of care exists. METHODS We analysed a cohort of patients with recurrent GBM treated with frame-less hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy with a total dose of 25 Gy in 5 fractions. RESULTS Of 91 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated between 2007 and 2012 with conventional adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy, 15 underwent salvage RT at recurrence. The median time interval between primary RT and salvage RT was 10.8 months (range, 6-54 months). Overall, patients undergoing salvage RT showed a longer survival, with a median survival of 33 vs. 9.9 months (p= 0.00149). Median overall survival (OS) from salvage RT was 9.5 months. No patients demonstrated clinically significant acute morbidity, and all patients were able to complete the prescribed radiation therapy without interruption. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy is effective and safe in recurrent GBM. However, until prospective randomized trials will confirm these results, the decision for salvage treatment should remain individual and based on a multidisciplinary evaluation of each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizia Ciammella
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Ala Podgornii
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Maria Galeandro
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Nunziata D’Abbiero
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Anna Pisanello
- Neurology Unit, Dipartimento Neuro-Motorio, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Andrea Botti
- Medical Physics Unit,Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Cagni
- Medical Physics Unit,Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Mauro Iori
- Medical Physics Unit,Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Cinzia Iotti
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology and Advanced Technology, Azienda Ospedaliera ASMN, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Viale Risorgimento 80, 42123 Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Oehler J, Brachwitz T, Wendt TG, Banz N, Walther M, Wiezorek T. Neural stem cell sparing by linac based intensity modulated stereotactic radiotherapy in intracranial tumors. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8:187. [PMID: 23883368 PMCID: PMC3729420 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-8-187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2013] [Accepted: 07/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neurocognitive decline observed after radiotherapy (RT) for brain tumors in long time survivors is attributed to radiation exposure of the hippocampus and the subventricular zone (SVZ). The potential of sparing capabilities for both structures by optimized intensity modulated stereotactic radiotherapy (IMSRT) is investigated. Methods Brain tumors were irradiated by stereotactic 3D conformal RT or IMSRT using m3 collimator optimized for PTV and for sparing of the conventional OARs (lens, retina, optic nerve, chiasm, cochlea, brain stem and the medulla oblongata). Retrospectively both hippocampi and SVZ were added to the list of OAR and their dose volume histograms were compared to those from two newly generated IMSRT plans using 7 or 14 beamlets (IMSRT-7, IMSRT-14) dedicated for optimized additional sparing of these structures. Conventional OAR constraints were kept constant. Impact of plan complexity and planning target volume (PTV) topography on sparing of both hippocampi and SVZ, conformity index (CI), the homogeneity index (HI) and quality of coverage (QoC) were analyzed. Limits of agreement were used to compare sparing of stem cell niches with either IMSRT-7 or IMSRT-14. The influence of treatment technique related to the topography ratio between PTV and OARs, realized in group A-D, was assessed by a mixed model. Results In 47 patients CI (p ≤ 0.003) and HI (p < 0.001) improved by IMSRT-7, IMSRT-14, QoC remained stable (p ≥ 0.50) indicating no compromise in radiotherapy. 90% of normal brain was exposed to a significantly higher dose using IMSRT. IMSRT-7 plans resulted in significantly lower biologically effective doses at all four neural stem cell structures, while contralateral neural stem cells are better spared compared to ipsilateral. A further increase of the number of beamlets (IMSRT-14) did not improve sparing significantly, so IMSRT-7 and IMSRT-14 can be used interchangeable. Patients with tumors contacting neither the subventricular zone nor the cortex benefit most from IMSRT (p < 0.001). Conclusion The feasibility of neural stem cell niches sparing with sophisticated linac based inverse IMSRT with 7 beamlets in an unselected cohort of intracranial tumors in relation to topographic situation has been demonstrated. Clinical relevance testing neurotoxicity remains to be demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Oehler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Bachstrasse 18, Jena D-07743, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Scholtyssek F, Zwiener I, Schlamann A, Seidel C, Meixensberger J, Bauer M, Hoffmann KT, Combs SE, von Bueren AO, Kortmann RD, Müller K. Reirradiation in progressive high-grade gliomas: outcome, role of concurrent chemotherapy, prognostic factors and validation of a new prognostic score with an independent patient cohort. Radiat Oncol 2013; 8:161. [PMID: 23822643 PMCID: PMC3707836 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-8-161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2013] [Accepted: 06/18/2013] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purposes First, to evaluate outcome, the benefit of concurrent chemotherapy and prognostic factors in a cohort of sixty-four high-grade glioma patients who underwent a second course of radiation therapy at progression. Second, to validate a new prognostic score for overall survival after reirradiation of progressive gliomas with an independent patient cohort. Patients and methods All patients underwent fractionated reirradiation with a median physical dose of 36 Gy. Median planned target volume was 110.4 ml. Thirty-six patients received concurrent chemotherapy consisting in 24/36 cases (67%) of carboplatin and etoposide and in 12/36 cases (33%) of temozolomide. We used the Kaplan Meier method, log rank test and proportional hazards regression analysis for statistical assessment. Results Median overall survival from the start of reirradiation was 7.7 ± 0.7 months. Overall survival rates at 6 and 12 months were 60 ± 6% and 24 ± 6%, respectively. Despite relatively large target volumes we did not observe any major acute toxicity. Concurrent chemotherapy did not appear to improve outcome. In contrast, female gender, young age, WHO grade III histology, favorable Karnofsky performance score and complete resection of the tumor prior to reirradiation were identified as positive prognostic factors for overall survival. We finally validated a recent suggestion for a prognostic score with our independent but small patient cohort. Our preliminary findings suggest that its ability to discriminate between different prognostic groups is limited. Conclusions Outcome of our patients was comparable to previous studies. Even in case of large target volumes reirradiation seems to be feasible without observing major toxicity. The benefit of concurrent chemotherapy is still elusive. A reassessment of the prognostic score, tested in this study, using a larger patient cohort is needed.
Collapse
|
41
|
McKenzie JT, Guarnaschelli JN, Vagal AS, Warnick RE, Breneman JC. Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for unifocal and multifocal recurrence of malignant gliomas. J Neurooncol 2013; 113:403-9. [PMID: 23589034 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1126-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2012] [Accepted: 03/31/2013] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for unifocal and multifocal recurrence of malignant gliomas. Between June 2007 and October 2010, 35 consecutive patients with 47 recurrent lesions were treated with salvage SRT at the University of Cincinnati. Thirty-three patients treated had a diagnosis of high grade glioma, four Grade III and twenty-nine Grade IV, while two patients initially were diagnosed with grade II tumors but recurred as high grade lesions. All patients had previously received a median dose of 59.4 Gy. Twenty-six patients were treated for a single lesion, and nine patients were treated for multiple lesions. Using SRT, patients were re-treated with a median total dose of 30 Gy in a median of five fractions. Median survival from diagnosis was 22 months and median survival following SRT was 8.6 months. The median survival following SRT for those patients treated for multifocal recurrence was 7.9 versus 10 months for those treated for unifocal recurrence (p = 0.7). Multivariate analysis showed local control of the SRT treated lesion(s) 6 months after SRT was associated with a significant improvement in survival (p ≤ 0.01). All patients tolerated their treatment well and completed their prescribed SRT as planned. Three patients (9 %) were felt to possibly have developed radiation necrosis following therapy. SRT was both well tolerated and efficacious with the local control provided by SRT resulting in improved overall survival. This benefit also seems to be apparent for patients with multi-focal recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua T McKenzie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Precision Radiotherapy, University of Cincinnati, West Chester, OH, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Narita Y. Drug review: Safety and efficacy of bevacizumab for glioblastoma and other brain tumors. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2013; 43:587-95. [PMID: 23585688 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyt051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is a highly vascular tumor that expresses vascular endothelial growth factor, a key regulator of angiogenesis and tumor blood vessel permeability. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor and the growth of gliomas. Bevacizumab monotherapy has proven effective for recurrent glioblastoma, and it extended progression-free survival and improved patient quality of life in various clinical trials. Some patients who receive bevacizumab experience improvements in neurological symptoms and steroid dose reductions. Bevacizumab induces a dramatic and rapid radiological response, but non-enhancing lesions are often detected on magnetic resonance imaging without enhancing lesions. Rebound phenomena such as rapid tumor regrowth are occasionally observed after the discontinuation of bevacizumab therapy. Therefore, Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria were recently devised to evaluate the efficacy and radiological response of bevacizumab treatment. Hypertension and proteinuria are characteristic adverse events associated with bevacizumab therapy. In addition, many fatal adverse events such as intracranial hemorrhage and venous thromboembolism are reported in patients treated with bevacizumab. However, these events are also associated with glioma itself, and careful attention needs to be paid to these events. Bevacizumab is used to treat various diseases including radiation necrosis and recurrent brain tumors such as brain metastases, schwannoma and meningioma, but additional clinical trials are necessary. The efficacy and current problems associated with bevacizumab in the treatment of glioblastoma and other brain tumors are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshitaka Narita
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neuro-Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Orza A, Soriţău O, Tomuleasa C, Olenic L, Florea A, Pana O, Bratu I, Pall E, Florian S, Casciano D, Biris AS. Reversing chemoresistance of malignant glioma stem cells using gold nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine 2013; 8:689-702. [PMID: 23467447 PMCID: PMC3589121 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s37481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The low rate of survival for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma may be attributed to the existence of a subpopulation of cancer stem cells. These stem cells have certain properties that enable them to resist chemotherapeutic agents and ionizing radiation. Herein, we show that temozolomide-loaded gold nanostructures are efficient in reducing chemoresistance and destroy 82.7% of cancer stem cells compared with a 42% destruction rate using temozolomide alone. Measurements of in vitro cytotoxicity and apoptosis indicate that combination with gold facilitated the ability of temozolomide, an alkylating drug, to alter the resistance of these cancer stem cells, suggesting a new chemotherapy strategy for patients diagnosed with inoperable recurrent malignant glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anamaria Orza
- Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Understanding high grade glioma: molecular mechanism, therapy and comprehensive management. Cancer Lett 2013; 331:139-46. [PMID: 23340179 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2012.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 190] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2012] [Accepted: 12/25/2012] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
High-grade gliomas (HGGs) account for the vast majority of all gliomas, including glioblastoma (World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV) and anaplasticgliomas (WHO grade III). Despite tremendous efforts in developing multimodal treatments, the overall prognosis remains poor; however, survival time varies considerably between patients. The nature of diffuse permeation into surrounding brain parenchyma poses dilemma for neurosurgeons between extensive surgical resection to eliminate as much as tumor cells as possible and adverse effects associated with brain function. Heterogeneity in both cytology and gene expression makes it difficult to coordinate an effective therapy which works for every patient. This article reviews recent advancements in the molecular mechanism, multimodal treatment and clinical management, and the updated view on the biomarkers in patients with HGG, both in primary and recurrent setting, with an emphasis on targeted therapies tailored to the patient.
Collapse
|
45
|
Combs SE, Edler L, Rausch R, Welzel T, Wick W, Debus J. Generation and validation of a prognostic score to predict outcome after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma. Acta Oncol 2013; 52:147-52. [PMID: 22686472 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2012.692882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Re-irradiation using high-precision radiation techniques has been established within the clinical routine for patients with recurrent gliomas. In the present work, we developed a practical prognostic score to predict survival outcome after re-irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) was applied in 233 patients. Primary histology included glioblastoma (n = 89; 38%), WHO Grade III gliomas (n = 52; 22%) and low-grade glioma (n = 92; 40%). FSRT was applied with a median dose of 36 Gy in 2 Gy single fractions. We evaluated survival after re-irradiation as well as progression-free survival after re-irradiation; prognostic factors analyzed included age, tumor volume at re-irradiation, histology, time between initial radiotherapy and re-irradiation, age and Karnofsky Performance Score. RESULTS Median survival after FSRT was 8 months for glioblastoma, 20 months for anaplastic gliomas, and 24 months for recurrent low-grade patients. The strongest prognostic factors significantly impacting survival after re-irradiation were histology (p < 0.0001) and age (< 50 vs. ≥ 50, p < 0.0001) at diagnosis and the time between initial radiotherapy and re-irradiation ≤ 12 vs. > 12 months (p < 0.0001). We generated a four-class prognostic score to distinguish patients with excellent (0 points), good (1 point), moderate (2 points) and poor (3-4 points) survival after re-irradiation. The difference in outcome was highly significant (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION We generated a practical prognostic score index based on three clinically relevant factors to predict the benefit of patients from re-irradiation. This score index can be helpful in patient counseling, and for the design of further clinical trials. However, individual treatment decisions may include other patient-related factors not directly influencing outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie E Combs
- University Hospital of Heidelberg, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and continuous low-dose temozolomide in patients with recurrent or progressive malignant gliomas. J Neurooncol 2012; 111:187-94. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-012-0999-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2012] [Accepted: 10/31/2012] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
47
|
Katsoulakis E, Beal K, Yamada Y. Image guidance in malignant gliomas: a focused strategy. CNS Oncol 2012; 1:131-6. [PMID: 25057863 DOI: 10.2217/cns.12.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The standard of care for malignant gliomas is maximal surgical cytoreduction followed by concurrent chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide. Chemotherapy adds a modest improvement in overall survival. Unfortunately, tumor recurrence is the rule and typically occurs at the initial site of disease. Salvage reirradiation may be a useful approach in selected patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Image-guided technology coupled with highly conformal treatment planning techniques have allowed the safe delivery of high-dose radiotherapy in the setting of tumor recurrence. Defining the optimal combination of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with chemotherapy is under investigation. In this perspective, we examine the role of image guidance in malignant gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelia Katsoulakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sminia P, Mayer R. External beam radiotherapy of recurrent glioma: radiation tolerance of the human brain. Cancers (Basel) 2012; 4:379-99. [PMID: 24213316 PMCID: PMC3712703 DOI: 10.3390/cancers4020379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2012] [Revised: 03/23/2012] [Accepted: 03/29/2012] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant gliomas relapse in close proximity to the resection site, which is the postoperatively irradiated volume. Studies on re-irradiation of glioma were examined regarding radiation-induced late adverse effects (i.e., brain tissue necrosis), to obtain information on the tolerance dose and treatment volume of normal human brain tissue. The studies were analyzed using the linear-quadratic model to express the re-irradiation tolerance in cumulative equivalent total doses when applied in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2cumulative). Analysis shows that the EQD2cumulative increases from conventional re-irradiation series to fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) to LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The mean time interval between primary radiotherapy and the re-irradiation course was shortened from 30 months for conventional re-irradiation to 17 and 10 months for FSRT and SRS, respectively. Following conventional re-irradiation, radiation-induced normal brain tissue necrosis occurred beyond an EQD2cumulative around 100 Gy. With increasing conformality of therapy, the smaller the treatment volume is, the higher the radiation dose that can be tolerated. Despite the dose escalation, no increase in late normal tissue toxicity was reported. On basis of our analysis, the use of particle therapy in the treatment of recurrent gliomas, because of the optimized physical dose distribution in the tumour and surrounding healthy brain tissue, should be considered for future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Sminia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiobiology Section, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, P.O. Box 7057, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: ; Tel.: +31-20-444-1574; Fax: +31-20-444-0410
| | - Ramona Mayer
- EBG MedAustron GmbH., Viktor Kaplan-Strasse 2, A-2700, Wiener Neustadt, Austria; E-Mails: (R.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Radiation therapy for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: an overview. Cancers (Basel) 2012; 4:257-80. [PMID: 24213239 PMCID: PMC3712688 DOI: 10.3390/cancers4010257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2012] [Revised: 03/01/2012] [Accepted: 03/05/2012] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the therapeutic advances in neuro-oncology, most patients with glioblastoma ultimately experience local progression/relapse. Re-irradiation has been poorly viewed in the past, mainly due to the overestimated risk of side effects using conventional radiotherapy. To date, thanks to the improvement of several delivery techniques, together with improved imaging capabilities, re-irradiation is a viable salvage treatment option to manage such clinical scenario. A literature overview on the feasibility and efficacy of the different irradiation modalities for recurrent glioblastoma along with considerations on areas of improvement are provided.
Collapse
|
50
|
Niyazi M, Söhn M, Schwarz SB, Lang P, Belka C, Ganswindt U. Radiation treatment parameters for re-irradiation of malignant glioma. Strahlenther Onkol 2012; 188:328-33. [PMID: 22349710 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-011-0055-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2011] [Accepted: 10/20/2011] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Most patients with malignant glioma ultimately fail locally or loco-regionally after the first treatment, with re-irradiation being a reasonable treatment option. However, only limited data are presently available allowing for a precise selection of patients suitable for re-treatment with regard to safety and efficacy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Using the department database, 39 patients with a second course of radiation were identified. Doses to gross tumor volume (GTV), planning target volume (PTV), and relevant organs at risk (OARs; brainstem, optic chiasm, optic nerves, brain) were retrospectively analyzed and correlated to outcome parameters. Relevant treatment parameters including D(max), D(min), D(mean), and volume (ml) were obtained. Equivalent uniform dose (EUD) values were calculated for the tumor and OARs. To address the issue of radiation necrosis/leukoencephalopathy posttherapeutic MRI images were routinely examined every 3 months. RESULTS Median follow-up was 147 days. The time interval between first and second irradiation was regularly greater than 6 months. Median EUDs to the OARs were 11.9 Gy (range 0.7-27.4 Gy) to the optic chiasm, 17.6 Gy (range 0.7-43.0 Gy) to the brainstem, 4.9/2.1 Gy (range 0.3-24.5 Gy) to the right/left optic nerve, and 29.4 Gy (range 25.2-32.5 Gy) to the brain. No correlation between treated volume and survival was observed. Cold spots and dose did not correlate with survival. Re-irradiated volumes were treated with on average lower doses if they were larger and vice versa. CONCLUSION In general, re-irradiation is a safe and feasible re-treatment option. No relevant toxicity was observed after re-irradiation in our patient cohort during follow-up. In this regard, this analysis provides baseline data for the selection of putative patients. EUD values are derived and may serve as reference for further studies, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|