Medial Tumor Localization in Breast Cancer – an Unappreciated Risk Factor?

Factors Influencing Recurrence in Medial Breast Cancer Tumors After Skin Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Skin sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) has been established as a safe option for curative-intent surgical resection. Prior studies have shown that medial location of the primary tumor is associated with increased risk of local recurrence. The purpose of this study is to determine the factors associated with recurrence and survival in individuals with breast cancers located in the inner quadrants (medial) who underwent SSM with IBR.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was done on individuals with medial breast cancer who received SSM with IBR in British Columbia between 1980 and 2012.

RESULTS

Of 136 individuals with medial breast cancer undergoing SSM with IBR, 27.9% experienced local recurrence and 42.6% overall recurrence. Factors associated with recurrence were T-stage (44.8 vs. 22.4% with T2 disease, P = .02), transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap reconstruction (48.3 vs. 29.5%, P = .00395), prior breast surgery (87.9 vs. 63%, P = .002), and prior radiation therapy (74.1 vs. 38.5%, P < .0001). LR was associated with higher mortality (OR 2.78, 95% CI: 1.26-6.09).

CONCLUSION

For patients with medial tumors undergoing SSM with IBR, potential risk factors for recurrence are T-stage, TRAM flap reconstruction, prior breast surgery, and prior radiation therapy. Local recurrence is associated with poor survival.

Prognostic significance of the primary tumor site and immune indexes in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The ability to predict high risk factors for recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is controversial. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the prognostic significance of tumor location, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) level, and pretreatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in determining the survival of patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer after treatment with NAC.

METHODS

The clinical data of 285 ER-positive, HER2-negative patients with clinical stage II-III breast cancer were analyzed from January 2009 to January 2015. To explore the prognostic factors for ER-positive, HER2-negative patients, we combined the conventional clinicopathological prognostic factors with tumor location, pretreatment LMR, and TIL. In addition, samples from 79 patients, who did not achieve pathological complete response (pCR) testing after NAC, were selected for hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining to analyze the effect of TIL on prognosis.

RESULTS

An LMR >5.2 was correlated with better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS; P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Patients with lower-inner/central quadrant tumors had lower 5-year DFS and OS than patients with tumors in the other quadrants (P=0.012 and P=0.048). Patients with a lower TIL level (≤10%) had better 5-year DFS than patients with a higher TIL level (P=0.010). According to the results of the multivariate analyses, tumor location was an independent prognostic factor for 5-year DFS (P=0.021). Pretreatment LMR was associated with both 5-year DFS and OS (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). In the subgroup analysis stratified by TIL level, the TIL level and the initial clinical stage were associated with 5-year DFS (P=0.027 and P<0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We explored the prognostic significance of the tumor site, TIL level, and pretreatment LMR level for ER-positive, HER2-negative patients. We concluded that the lower-inner/central quadrant tumors, TIL >10%, and pretreatment LMR level ≤5.2 were correlated with a poor prognosis. More aggressive NAC and/or endocrine therapy with internal mammary node radiotherapy (IMN-RT) should be administered to address the relatively poor prognosis of patients with breast carcinoma presenting the aforementioned adverse factors.

Tumor location of the central and nipple portion is associated with impaired survival for women with breast cancer

Background

Tumor location in the breast varies, with the highest frequency in the upper outer quadrant and lowest frequency in the lower inner quadrant. Nevertheless, tumors in the central and nipple portion (TCNP) are poorly studied types of breast cancer; therefore, we aimed to clarify the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic features of TCNP.

Methods

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identifed 105,037 patients diagnosed with tumor in the breast peripheral quadrant (TBPQ) (n=97,046) or TCNP (n=7,991). The chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables across TCNP and TBPQ. Cox proportional hazard models with hazard ratios were applied to estimate the factors associated with prognosis.

Results

The median follow-up was over 43 months. Compared with TBPQ, TCNP patients were signifcantly older (age ≥66 years: 40.4% vs 34.1%, P<0.001), with larger tumor sizes (>20 mm size: 46.9% vs 37.3%, P<0.001), higher proportions of TNM stage II–III (18.6% vs 9.9%, P<0.001), and more mastectomies (58.1% vs 37.8%, P<0.001). The breast cancer-specifc survival (BCSS)/overall survival (OS) rate was signifcantly worse for TCNP than for TBPQ. Multivariate Cox analysis showed a higher hazard ratios for TCNP over TBPQ (BCSS: hazard ratios =1.160, P=0.005, 95% CI: 1.046–1.287; OS: hazard ratios =1.301, P<0.001, 95% CI: 1.211–1.398). A subgroup analysis revealed inferior outcomes for TCNP in TNM stage II–III and breast subtype subgroup. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that TCNP was an independent contributing factor to LN metastasis.

Conclusions

TCNP was associated with older age, larger tumor size, higher TNM stage, and lymph node metastasis. Compared with TBPQ, TCNP had adverse impacts on BCSS and OS.

Prognostic implication of the primary tumor location in early-stage breast cancer: focus on lower inner zone

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of tumor location of lower inner zone (LIZ) on the survival of patients with early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 961 breast cancer patients from Jan 2000 to Apr 2016 from hospital database. We evaluated overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with tumors in and outside LIZ. Subgroup analyses were performed according to clinicopathological characteristics and treatment strategies.

RESULTS

A total of 838 cases were finally included. Patients with tumor location of LIZ showed significantly lower survival rates than tumors in other sites in terms of DFS (p = 0.028) but not OS (p = 0.106). When stratified into subgroups, tumors in LIZ retained a significant worse prognosis in DFS in patients with HER-2-negative, high ki-67 expression breast cancers, those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, axillary nodal negative patients, and patients with lymphovascular invasion. Univariate and multivariate analyses suggested that tumor location of LIZ was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that tumor location of LIZ was an independent adverse prognostic factor for DFS in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Multicenter studies with larger sample size are needed to confirm the conclusion and anatomical experiments are desired to elaborate the mechanism.

Prognostic Significance of Inner Quadrant Involvement in Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

PURPOSE

In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the initial tumor location as a prognostic factor in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

Between March 2002 and January 2007, a total of 179 patients with stage II/III breast cancer underwent NAC followed by breast surgery. Using physical and radiologic findings, patients were grouped by their initial tumor location into inner/both quadrant (upper/lower inner quadrant involvement +/- multicentric tumor involving outer quadrant; n=97) and outer quadrant (n=82) tumor groups. All patients received neoadjuvant docetaxel/doxorubicin chemotherapy. One hundred two patients underwent modified radical mastectomy and 77 patients underwent breast-conserving surgery. Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and hormonal therapy were administered after surgery when indicated. While 156 patients underwent postoperative RT, 23 did not. The median follow-up duration was 61.1 (12-106) months.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival rates of all patients were 74.8% and 89.9%, respectively. Patients with inner/both quadrant tumors had lower 5-year DFS than those with outer quadrant tumors (67.7% vs. 83.4%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR]=1.941, p=0.034). A nodal ratio >25% was also an independent adverse prognostic factor for DFS (HR=3.276; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in DFS (p=0.592) after RT on the internal mammary node (IMN). Treatment failed in 44 out of 179 patients (24.6%), of which 27 patients had inner/both quadrant tumors. Twenty-one out of 27 patients had distant failures.

CONCLUSION

Among breast cancer patients treated with NAC, those with inner/both quadrant tumors had lower DFS than those with outer quadrant tumors. More aggressive neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy with IMN RT is required for improved disease control and long-term survival.

Outcome and Medial Presentation of Breast Cancer: European Institute of Oncology Experience

BACKGROUND

No analyses have investigated the prognostic role of medial presentation in breast cancer patients on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival according to immunohistochemically-defined subtypes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected information from the institutional clinical database on consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent conservative surgery at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy, between 1994 and 2008. We compared the outcomes of patients with medial breast cancer with those of patients with nonmedial tumors observed at the institution during the same period.

RESULTS

Among 7369 evaluable patients, 2254 (24%) had their primary tumors in medial quadrants and 7015 (76%) in other areas. Five-year DFS was 84.7% and 86.6% (P = .008) in patients with medial and nonmedial disease, respectively. In multivariate analysis, medial location was correlated with greater risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.35; P < .0001) and death (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.09-1.49; P = .0028).

CONCLUSION

Medial presentation is an adverse prognostic factor for breast cancer patients.

Tumour location within the breast: Does tumour site have prognostic ability?

Introduction

Tumour location within the breast varies with the highest frequency in the upper outer quadrant (UOQ) and lowest frequency in the lower inner quadrant (LIQ). Whether tumour location is prognostic is unclear. To determine whether tumour location is prognostic, associations between tumour site and clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated.

Materials and Methods

All patients enrolled in the Clinical Breast Care Project whose tumour site—UOQ, upper inner quadrant (UIQ), central, LIQ, lower outer quadrant (LOQ)—was determined by a single, dedicated breast pathologist were included in this study. Patients with multicentric disease (n = 122) or tumours spanning multiple quadrants (n = 381) were excluded from further analysis. Clinicopathological characteristics were analysed using chi-square tests for univariate analysis with multivariate analysis performed using principal components analysis (PCA) and multiple logistic regression. Significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Results

Of the 980 patients with defined tumour location, 30 had bilateral disease. Tumour location in the UOQ (51.5%) was significantly higher than in the UIQ (15.6%), LOQ (14.2%), central (10.6%), or LIQ (8.1%). Tumours in the central quadrant were significantly more likely to have higher tumour stage (P = 0.003) and size (P < 0.001), metastatic lymph nodes (P < 0.001), and mortality (P = 0.011). After multivariate analysis, only tumour size and lymph node status remained significantly associated with survival.

Conclusions

Evaluation of tumour location as a prognostic factor revealed that although tumours in the central region are associated with less favourable outcome, these associations are not independent of location but rather driven by larger tumour size. Tumours in the central region are more difficult to detect mammographically, resulting in larger tumour size at diagnosis and thus less favourable prognosis. Together, these data demonstrate that tumour location is not an independent prognostic factor.

Internal mammary node management in breast cancer. A review

BACKGROUND

Internal mammary nodes visualized during sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer, remain an unresolved management issue. Further, both internal mammary node (IMN) radiotherapy and biopsy have attendant risks and hence should be used with caution. The purpose of this review is to highlight the available data and evidence.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A PubMed database from 1960 to 2012 using key words: internal mammary nodes, breast cancer radiotherapy planning, adjuvant radiotherapy, sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer and selected publications on the significance of internal mammary nodes in breast cancer treatment, published data and approaches used. We found 14513 relevant papers and we selected 30 that clearly investigated the management of internal mammary nodes during sentinel node search. We focused on the incidence of IMN metastasis (6 papers), risk factors associated with IMN drainage (9 reports), management of IMN and the impact on disease free and overall patient survival (15 papers).

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for breast cancer axillary nodes management is good but the data for other draining nodes such as internal mammary nodes are far less conclusive and further research is needed.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy of the internal mammary chain in breast cancer

Routine removal of the internal mammary chain (IMC) sentinel node in breast cancer patients remains a subject of discussion. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of routinely performed IMC sentinel node biopsy on the systemic and locoregional treatments plan. All patients with biopsy proven breast cancer who underwent a sentinel node procedure between 2002 and 2011 were included in a prospective database. In cases of IMC drainage, successful exploration of the IMC (i.e., sentinel node removed) and surgical complications were registered. If the removed sentinel node contained malignant cells we determined if this altered the treatment plan when practising the current guidelines. In total, 119 of the 493 included patients showed IMC drainage on lymphoscintigraphy. Exploration of the IMC was performed in 107 (89 %) patients; in 86/107 (80 %) exploration was successful. In 14/107 patients (13 %) the IMC sentinel node was tumor positive. Macro and micro metastases were found in eight and six patients, respectively. In the group of patients who underwent surgical exploration of the IMC, systemic treatment was changed in none, radiotherapy treatment in 13/107 patients (11 %). Routine sentinel node biopsy of the IMC does not alter the systemic treatment. Radiotherapy treatment is altered in a small proportion of the patients; however, solid scientific evidence for this adjustment is lacking.

Retrospective study of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancer : survival advantage in cT2 category by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy

PURPOSE

This retrospective study compares patients treated between 1991 and 1998 with neoadjuvant radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy (RCT) or adjuvant RCT for locally advanced noninflammatory breast cancers (LABC) in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR), 10-year relapse-free (RFS), and overall survival (OS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Preoperative RCT in 315 and adjuvant RCT in 329 cases consisted in 50 Gy (5 x 2 Gy/week) to the breast and the supra-/infraclavicular lymph nodes. 101 neoadjuvant patients received - in case of breast conservation - a 10-Gy interstitial boost with (192)Ir afterloading before and 214 neoadjuvant patients a preoperative electron boost after external-beam radiotherapy. In the neoadjuvant RCT group, chemotherapy was applied prior to radiotherapy in 192 patients, and simultaneously in 113; ten had no chemotherapy. In the adjuvant RCT group, chemotherapy was applied to 44 patients before surgery and to 166 after surgery; 119 had no chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Breast conservation became possible in 50.8% after neoadjuvant RCT for LABC with a pCR rate at surgery of 29.2%. A complete nodal remission (pN0) after RCT was observed in 56% (89/159) of the cN+ (clinically node-positive) neoadjuvant patients. There were trends in favor of preoperative RCT for RFS and OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85; p = 0.09 for RFS; HR = 0.8130; p = 0.1037 for OS). For patients with cT2 tumors the RFS and OS were statistically significantly better (HR = 0.5090; p = 0.0130 for RFS; HR = 0.4390; p = 0.0026 for OS) after neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant RCT.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant RCT achieved a pCR rate of 29.2% and a statistically significantly better RFS and OS in patients with cT2-category breast cancer.