1
|
Lechien JR, Hans S, Crevier-Buchman L. Influence of age on voice quality after transoral CO 2 laser microsurgery. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 52:59. [PMID: 37697412 PMCID: PMC10496204 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-023-00664-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the post-operative evolution of voice quality of patients treated by transoral CO2 laser microsurgery (TLM) according to the age. METHODS Patients treated by type I to VI TLM and post-operative speech therapy were prospectively recruited from our hospital. The voice quality was assessed pre-, 1-, 3- 6- and 12-month posttreatment with voice handicap index (VHI), dysphonia, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain (GRBAS), maximal phonation time (MPT), F0, F0 standard deviation (STD), percent jitter, percent shimmer, noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR), vocal fold vibration assessment and speech fluency. Evolution of voice outcomes was analyzed considering age of patients (< 60 vs. ≥ 60 years). RESULTS Seventy-five patients completed the evaluations. Thirty-four and forty-one patients were < 60 or ≥ 60 yo, respectively. Subjective and objective voice parameters (VHI, G, R, B), jitter and fluency significantly improved from 1- to 6-month post-TLM in < 60 yo individuals. The voice parameters improved 12-month post-TLM in the ≥ 60 yo group at the exception of VHI that improved 3-month post-TLM. There were positive associations between age and 12-month NHR, G and A parameters. CONCLUSION The post-operative evolution of voice quality parameters may vary between patients according to the age. Preoperative VHI is predictive of 12-month subjective and objective voice outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome R Lechien
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France.
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
- Department of Otolaryngology, Polyclinic of Poitiers, Elsan Hospital, Poitiers, France.
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium.
- Phonetics and Phonology Lab, CNRS UMR7018, Univ. Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
| | - Stephane Hans
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France
- Phonetics and Phonology Lab, CNRS UMR7018, Univ. Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Lise Crevier-Buchman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France
- Phonetics and Phonology Lab, CNRS UMR7018, Univ. Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reinhardt P, Giger R, Seifert E, Shelan M, Riggenbach E, Terribilini D, Joosten A, Schanne DH, Aebersold DM, Manser P, Dettmer MS, Simon C, Ozsahin EM, Moeckli R, Limacher A, Caparrotti F, Nair D, Bourhis J, Broglie MA, Al-Mamgani A, Elicin O. VoiceS: voice quality after transoral CO 2 laser surgery versus single vocal cord irradiation for unilateral stage 0 and I glottic larynx cancer-a randomized phase III trial. Trials 2022; 23:906. [PMID: 36303192 PMCID: PMC9615245 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06841-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surgery and radiotherapy are well-established standards of care for unilateral stage 0 and I early-stage glottic cancer (ESGC). Based on comparative studies and meta-analyses, functional and oncological outcomes after both treatment modalities are similar. Historically, radiotherapy (RT) has been performed by irradiation of the whole larynx. However, only the involved vocal cord is being treated with recently introduced hypofractionated concepts that result in 8 to 10-fold smaller target volumes. Retrospective data argues for an improvement in voice quality with non-inferior local control. Based on these findings, single vocal cord irradiation (SVCI) has been implemented as a routine approach in some institutions for ESGC in recent years. However, prospective data directly comparing SVCI with surgery is lacking. The aim of VoiceS is to fill this gap. Methods In this prospective randomized multi-center open-label phase III study with a superiority design, 34 patients with histopathologically confirmed, untreated, unilateral stage 0-I ESGC (unilateral cTis or cT1a) will be randomized to SVCI or transoral CO2-laser microsurgical cordectomy (TLM). Average difference in voice quality, measured by using the voice handicap index (VHI) will be modeled over four time points (6, 12, 18, and 24 months). Primary endpoint of this study will be the patient-reported subjective voice quality between 6 to 24 months after randomization. Secondary endpoints will include perceptual impression of the voice via roughness – breathiness – hoarseness (RBH) assessment at the above-mentioned time points. Additionally, quantitative characteristics of voice, loco-regional tumor control at 2 and 5 years, and treatment toxicity at 2 and 5 years based on CTCAE v.5.0 will be reported. Discussion To our knowledge, VoiceS is the first randomized phase III trial comparing SVCI with TLM. Results of this study may lead to improved decision-making in the treatment of ESGC. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04057209. Registered on 15 August 2019. Cantonal Ethics Committee KEK-BE 2019-01506 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06841-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Reinhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roland Giger
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Eberhard Seifert
- Division of Phoniatrics, Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Shelan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Elena Riggenbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Dario Terribilini
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Joosten
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel H Schanne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Matthias S Dettmer
- Department of Pathology, Klinikum Stuttgart, Kriegsbergstraße 60, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany.,Department of Pathology, University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 31, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christian Simon
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, CHUV University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon, 2, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat M Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Rue du Bugnon, 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institut of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Rue du Grand-Pré 1, 1007, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Limacher
- Clinical Trials Unit Bern, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Francesca Caparrotti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Genève University Hospital, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Deepa Nair
- Department of Head Neck Surgical Oncology, ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Rue du Bugnon, 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Martina A Broglie
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Abrahim Al-Mamgani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, 1066, Amsterdam, CX, Netherlands
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Inselspital, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mishra AK, Sinha VR, Suhag V, Nilakantan A. Evaluation of Voice After Definitive Radiotherapy in Patients of Early Stage Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Larynx (Glottis): A Prospective Observational Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 74:2386-2394. [PMID: 36452620 PMCID: PMC9701973 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-02193-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Post treatment voice quality is an important consideration in choosing the management option for laryngeal cancer. We assessed voice quality after radiotherapy in patients of early squamous cell carcinoma of glottis comprehensively using Videolaryngostroboscopy (VLS), Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia and Strain (GRBAS) scores and Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-10. Fifty four consenting patients of early squamous cell carcinoma of glottis (Tis, T1 and T2) awaiting definitive radiotherapy were recruited consecutively. Voice was evaluated by VLS, GRBAS scores and VHI-10 before radiotherapy as well as 3 months and 12 months after radiotherapy. There were 52 males and 2 females in the study. Hoarseness of voice was the commonest presenting symptom. Mean duration of symptoms was 2.45 months (± 0.80), ranging from 1 to 4 months. 35 (64.82%) were T1 while 19 (35.18%) were T2 lesions. They received 60-70 Gy of radiotherapy in 28-35 fractions. There was only one recurrence on follow up for 12 months. On VLS at 12 months post-RT the periodicity, phase symmetry, mucosal waves and amplitude were normal in 74.07%, 70.37%, 56.67% and 78.7% cases respectively. Complete glottic closure was obtained in 72.22%. The voice was 'acceptable' (Grade 1 or 2 on VLS parameters) in more than 90% cases. Mean total GRBAS score was 3.39 (± 2.67). Mean total VHI-10 was 6.7 (± 1.75). All indices were significantly better than pre RT levels. Good quality of voice can be expected after radiotherapy for early glottic cancer in majority of patients.
Collapse
|
4
|
Rizzo D, Crescio C, Tramaloni P, De Luca LM, Turra N, Manca A, Crivelli P, Tiana CR, Fara A, Cossu A, Profili S, Scaglione M, Bussu F. Reliability of a Multidisciplinary Multiparametric Approach in the Surgical Planning of Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinomas: A Retrospective Observational Study. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12101585. [PMID: 36294725 PMCID: PMC9605535 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12101585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Endoscopy and morphological imaging are the mainstay of the diagnostic work up of laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas (LSCCs), which can be integrated in a multidisciplinary discussion to obtain a shared pretreatment staging. (2) Methods: A retrospective evaluation of patients, managed at a tertiary university hospital in Italy and submitted to major laryngeal surgery, has been performed. Four different stagings have been defined and compared: epTN (based on endoscopy and physical ENT examination); radTN (based on CT scan); cTN (based on multidisciplinary integration of the two above); pTN based on pathology on surgical samples. Oncological outcomes have been assessed. (3) Results: Three-year relapse free and disease specific survival were 88% and 92.5%, respectively, without significant differences between partial surgeries (n = 13) and total laryngectomies (n = 32). As for the pretreatment staging, and in particular the T classification, the cTN has been revealed as more reliable than epTN and radTN alone in predicting the final pT (Cohen kappa coefficient: 0.7 for cT, 0.44 for radT, 0.32 for epT). In the partial surgery group, we did not record any positive margin nor local recurrence, with a 100% overall and disease-specific survival. (4) Conclusions: The multidisciplinary approach is fundamental in the definition of the primary lesion in LSCC, in particular in order to safely perform surgical preservation of laryngeal function, which is associated with a higher laryngectomy-free survival than irradiation but to a lower salvageability in case of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Rizzo
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Science, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
- Division of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Claudia Crescio
- Division of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Pierangela Tramaloni
- Division of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 07100 Sassari, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-07-9228509
| | - Laura M. De Luca
- Division of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Nicola Turra
- Residency Program in Otolaryngology, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessandra Manca
- Institute of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Paola Crivelli
- Institute of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Chiara R. Tiana
- Institute of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Alberto Fara
- Institute of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Antonio Cossu
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Science, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
- Institute of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Stefano Profili
- Institute of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Mariano Scaglione
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Science, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
- Institute of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| | - Francesco Bussu
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Science, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
- Division of Otolaryngology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Survival and Larynx Preservation in Early Glottic Cancer: A Randomized Trial Comparing Laser Surgery and Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:96-100. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
6
|
Functional outcomes of early laryngeal cancer - endoscopic laser surgery versus external beam radiotherapy: a systematic review. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2021; 136:898-908. [PMID: 34641985 DOI: 10.1017/s0022215121002887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
7
|
Trignani M, DI Pilla A, Rosa C, Borgia M, Fasciolo D, Gasparini L, DI Guglielmo F, Allajbej A, DI Francesco M, Falcone G, Vitullo F, Croce A, Genovesi D, Caravatta L. Multimodal Evaluation of Voice Outcome in Early Glottic Cancers Treated With Definitive Radiotherapy. CANCER DIAGNOSIS & PROGNOSIS 2021; 1:143-149. [PMID: 35399320 PMCID: PMC8962787 DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM We employed a multimodal evaluation of voice outcome (MEVO) model to assess long-term voice outcome in early glottic cancer (EGC) patients treated with primary radiotherapy (RT). The model consisted of objective and subjective vocal evaluation during follow-up, by a dedicated Speech Pathologist and Speech Therapist. PATIENTS AND METHODS MEVO methodology includes Self-perception Voice Handicap Index (VHI-30), evaluation of parameters Grade (G), Roughness (R), Breathiness (B), Asthenia (A) and Strain (S) according to GRBAS scale, objective analysis and aerodynamics using the PRAAT software and laryngeal evaluation with videostroboscope (VS). RESULTS The MEVO methodology was described and tested on a sample of 10 EGCs submitted to definitive RT (total dose 66-70 Gy). Mean follow-up was 48.9 months (range=9-115). VHI was mild-moderate in 90% of patients; overall voice function (GRBAS) was normal-mildly impaired in 70% of patients; VS evaluation showed normal vocal cord motion in 90% of patients, but complete glottic closure in 60%. PRAAT scores confirmed these findings. CONCLUSION A multidimensional voice evaluation is time consuming, but useful to objectify vocal impact of radiotherapy. The MEVO model allowed to quantify vocal dysfunction, showing a good objective vocal outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Trignani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Angelo DI Pilla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Consuelo Rosa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Marzia Borgia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - David Fasciolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Gasparini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Fiorella DI Guglielmo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Albina Allajbej
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Marta DI Francesco
- Speech Rehabilitation and Phoniatrics, "Sant'Agostino" Centre, Fondazione Papa Paolo VI, Chieti, Italy
| | - Gianluca Falcone
- Speech Rehabilitation and Phoniatrics, "Sant'Agostino" Centre, Fondazione Papa Paolo VI, Chieti, Italy
| | - Francesca Vitullo
- Department of Otorinolaryngology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Adelchi Croce
- Department of Otorinolaryngology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | - Domenico Genovesi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Luciana Caravatta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, SS. Annunziata Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bridhikitti J, Chotigavanich C, Apiwarodom N. Voice Outcomes after Radiotherapy for Laryngeal Cancer. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective The study was aimed to assess changes in voice outcomes after radiotherapy in laryngeal cancer patients.
Materials and Methods The study included 60 laryngeal cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy between 2005 and 2012. The primary endpoint of this study was to assess abnormalities of the patients’ voices after the treatment. The Thai version of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and xerostomia questionnaire were conducted by telephone. Videostroboscopic examination was done to objectively assess voice outcomes.
Results The median age of patients was 63 years. Most patients had glottic cancer (84.1%) and T1–2 disease (84.1%). The median time from treatment to the study was 46 months. In terms of the total VHI score, most patients were in the normal and slight handicap groups (22% and 71.4%, respectively). Only 4.8% and 1.6% of the patients were in moderate and severe handicap group, respectively. Twenty-eight patients had significant xerostomia. Videostroboscopy examination was done in 23 patients and most common findings were telangiectasia (95.7%), abnormal mucosal wave (47.8%), and abnormal glottic closure configuration (34.8%). Regarding total VHI score, lower radiation dose, conventional radiation dose per fraction, longer period after treatment, and significant xerostomia status were significantly correlated with worse voice outcomes. There were no statistically significant correlations between the videostroboscopic findings and VHI scores.
Conclusion Voice outcomes in most of laryngeal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy had a normal or mild handicap at more than 1 year of follow-up. Only 4.8% and 1.6% of the patients had moderate and severe voice outcome handicap, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jidapa Bridhikitti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Chanticha Chotigavanich
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nantakan Apiwarodom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bahig H, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen-Tan FP, Fuller DC, Yuan Y, Hutcheson KA, Christopoulos A, Nichols AC, Fung K, Ballivy O, Filion E, Ng SP, Lambert L, Dorth J, Hu KS, Palma D. Vocal-cord Only vs. Complete Laryngeal radiation (VOCAL): a randomized multicentric Bayesian phase II trial. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:446. [PMID: 33888069 PMCID: PMC8061218 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08195-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy, along with laser surgery, is considered a standard treatment option for patients with early glottic squamous cell cancer (SCC). Historically, patients have received complete larynx radiotherapy (CL-RT) due to fear of swallowing and respiratory laryngeal motion and this remains the standard approach in many academic institutions. Local control (LC) rates with CL-RT have been excellent, however this treatment can carry significant toxicities include adverse voice and swallowing outcomes, along with increased long-term risk of cerebrovascular morbidity. A recent retrospective study reported improved voice quality and similar local control outcomes with focused vocal cord radiotherapy (VC-RT) compared to CL-RT. There is currently no prospective evidence on the safety of VC-RT. The primary objective of this Bayesian Phase II trial is to compare the LC of VC-RT to that of CL-RT in patients with T1N0 glottic SCC. METHODS One hundred and fifty-five patients with T1a-b N0 SCC of the true vocal cords that are n ot candidate or declined laser surgery, will be randomized in a 1:3 ratio the control arm (CL-RT) and the experimental arm (VC-RT). Randomisation will be stratified by tumor stage (T1a/T1b) and by site (each site will be allowed to select one preferred radiation dose regimen, to be used in both arms). CL-RT volumes will correspond to the conventional RT volumes, with the planning target volume extending from the top of thyroid cartilage lamina superiorly to the bottom of the cricoid inferiorly. VC-RT volumes will include the involved vocal cord(s) and a margin accounting for respiration and set-up uncertainty. The primary endpoint will be LC at 2-years, while secondary endpoints will include patient-reported outcomes (voice impairment, dysphagia and symptom burden), acute and late toxicity radiation-induced toxicity, overall survival, progression free survival, as well as an optional component of acoustic and objective measures of voice analysis using the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice. DISCUSSION This study would constitute the first prospective evidence on the efficacy and safety of VC-RT in early glottic cancer. If positive, this study would result in the adoption of VC-RT as standard approach in early glottic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759431 Registration date: November 30, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houda Bahig
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 1051 Sanguinet, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4 Canada
| | - David I. Rosenthal
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Félix-Phuc Nguyen-Tan
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 1051 Sanguinet, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4 Canada
| | - David C. Fuller
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Radiation Oncology Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Ying Yuan
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Biostatistics Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Katherine A. Hutcheson
- grid.240145.60000 0001 2291 4776Head and Neck Surgery Department, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Apostolos Christopoulos
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Head and Neck Surgery Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Anthony C. Nichols
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario Canada
| | - Kevin Fung
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario Canada
| | - Olivier Ballivy
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 1051 Sanguinet, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4 Canada
| | - Edith Filion
- grid.410559.c0000 0001 0743 2111Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 1051 Sanguinet, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4 Canada
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- grid.1055.10000000403978434Radiation Oncology Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Louise Lambert
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Intégré de Cancérologie de Laval, Laval, Canada
| | - Jennifer Dorth
- grid.67105.350000 0001 2164 3847Radiation Oncology Department, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
| | - Kenneth S. Hu
- Radiation Oncology Department, NYU Langone Health, Newyork, USA
| | - David Palma
- grid.39381.300000 0004 1936 8884Radiation Oncology Department, Western University, London, Ontario Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kocak Uzel E, Figen M, Uzel ÖE. Is Single Cord Irradiation Going to Be a New Standard for T1a Glottic Carcinoma? Front Oncol 2020; 10:1447. [PMID: 32974165 PMCID: PMC7481455 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose and Objective: To evaluate the disease-free survival, overall survival, dosimetric, and voice handicap index (VHI) results of T1a glottic invasive squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients who underwent hypofractionated single vocal cord irradiation (HSVCI). Materials and Methods: The data of 18 patients with stage T1a glottic SCC were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively between July 2016 and July 2019. Patients were immobilized using a custom-fitted thermoplastic face and shoulder mask in hyperextension position. The CT scan was performed with 1-mm-thick slices. A planned target volume (PTV) margin of 3 mm was given to clinical target volume (CTV) in all directions, and 13 organs at risk were identified. Patients were prescribed a total of 5760–5808 cGy in 15–16 fractions. Patients had daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and the treatment was carried out with the physician. VHI test was applied to patients before and at the end of radiotherapy (RT) and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months after the completion of RT. Results: Local control and overall survival rate is 100% for a median of 18 months (6–44 months) of follow-up. A patient was diagnosed with 2nd primary lung cancer and active treatment still continues. All patients completed the treatment within the scheduled time. Grade 1–2 dysphagia and dermatitis occurred in all patients, and no grade 3 and above side effects were observed. The mean values of VHI were 37.00, 39.83, 38.28, 17.17, 12.22, 8.56, and 6.06 at the beginning of RT, at the end of RT, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 months after RT, respectively. Conclusion: Compared to surgery and conventional laryngeal radiotherapy, HSVCI is an alternative treatment method for T1a glottic cancer by reducing the treatment time to 3 weeks, facilitating recurrence treatment, and providing effective sound quality without compromising local control. Considering that ~80% of recurrences in glottic cancer occur within the first 2 years, 100% local control in a median of 18 months is extremely successful, but long-term follow-up is essential to observe possible late side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esengul Kocak Uzel
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Science, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Metin Figen
- Radiation Oncology Department, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, University of Health Science, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ömer Erol Uzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Valentini V, Boldrini L, Mariani S, Massaccesi M. Role of radiation oncology in modern multidisciplinary cancer treatment. Mol Oncol 2020; 14:1431-1441. [PMID: 32418368 PMCID: PMC7332217 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer care is moving from a disease‐focused management toward a patient‐centered tailored approach. Multidisciplinary management that aims to define individual, optimal treatment strategies through shared decision making between healthcare professionals and patient is a fundamental aspect of high‐quality cancer care and often includes radiation oncology. Advances in technology and radiobiological research allow to deliver ever more tailored radiation treatments in an ever easier and faster way, thus improving the efficacy, safety, and accessibility of radiation therapy. While these changes are improving quality of cancer care, they are also enormously increasing complexity of decision making, thus challenging the ability to deliver quality affordable cancer care. In this review, we provide an updated outline of the role of radiation oncology in the modern multidisciplinary treatment of cancer. Particularly, we focus on the way some developments in key areas of cancer management are challenging multidisciplinary cancer care in the different clinical settings of early, locally advanced, and metastatic disease, thus highlighting some priority areas of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Istituto di Radiologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS-Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Mariani
- Istituto di Radiologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS-Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariangela Massaccesi
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Scherl C, Kauffels J, Schützenberger A, Döllinger M, Bohr C, Dürr S, Fietkau R, Haderlein M, Koch M, Traxdorf M, Mantsopoulos K, Müller S, Iro H. Secondary Tracheoesophageal Puncture After Laryngectomy Increases Complications With Shunt and Voice Prosthesis. Laryngoscope 2020; 130:E865-E873. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.28517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Scherl
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of Erlangen Nuremberg Germany
| | - Julia Kauffels
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of Erlangen Nuremberg Germany
| | - Anne Schützenberger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of Erlangen Nuremberg Germany
| | - Michael Döllinger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of Erlangen Nuremberg Germany
| | - Christopher Bohr
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of Erlangen Nuremberg Germany
| | - Stephan Dürr
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of Erlangen Nuremberg Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Erlangen Nuremberg Germany
| | - Marlen Haderlein
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Erlangen Nuremberg Germany
| | - Michael Koch
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of Erlangen Nuremberg Germany
| | - Maximilian Traxdorf
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of Erlangen Nuremberg Germany
| | | | - Sarina Müller
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of Erlangen Nuremberg Germany
| | - Heinrich Iro
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of Erlangen Nuremberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mohamed ASR, Smith BD, Smith JB, Sevak P, Malek JS, Kanwar A, Browne T, Gunn GB, Garden AS, Frank SJ, Morrison WH, Phan J, Zafereo M, Skinner H, Lai SY, Hutcheson KA, Lewin JS, Hessel AE, Thekdi AA, Weber RS, Fuller CD, Rosenthal DI. Outcomes of carotid-sparing IMRT for T1 glottic cancer: Comparison with conventional radiation. Laryngoscope 2020; 130:146-153. [PMID: 30756394 PMCID: PMC6895404 DOI: 10.1002/lary.27873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Revised: 01/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aim to report oncologic outcomes after conventional radiotherapy (ConRT) using opposed lateral beams and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for tumor (T)1 nodal (N)0 T1 N0 glottic squamous cell carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case-control study. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed demographic, disease, and treatment characteristics for patients treated at our institution during 2000 to 2013. RESULTS One hundred fifty-three patients (71%) were treated using ConRT and 62 (29%) using IMRT. The median follow-up for all patients was 68 months. There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year local control between patients with T1a versus T1b disease (94% vs. 89%, respectively, P = 0.5). Three-year locoregional control for patients treated with ConRT was 94% compared to 97% with IMRT (P = 0.4). Three-year overall survival (OS) for patients treated with ConRT was 92.5% compared with 100% with IMRT (P = 0.1). Twelve of 14 patients with local recurrence underwent salvage surgery with 5-year ultimate locoregional control of 98.5% and 97.1% in the ConRT and IMRT cohorts, respectively (P = 0.7). Multivariate analysis showed age < 60 years (P < 0.0001) and pretreatment Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status <2 (P = 0.0022) to be independent correlates of improved OS. Postradiation cerebrovascular events were in four patients in the ConRT cohort (3%), whereas no patients in the IMRT cohort suffered any events. CONCLUSION Because the oncologic outcomes for patients treated with IMRT were excellent and IMRT allows for carotid sparing, we have transitioned to IMRT as our standard for most patients with T1 glottic cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3b Laryngoscope, 130:146-153, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdallah S R Mohamed
- Multidisciplinary Larynx Cancer Working Group from the Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Blaine D Smith
- Multidisciplinary Larynx Cancer Working Group from the Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
- University of Texas McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Joshua B Smith
- Multidisciplinary Larynx Cancer Working Group from the Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
- University of Texas McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | | | | | | | | | - G Brandon Gunn
- Multidisciplinary Larynx Cancer Working Group from the Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Adam S Garden
- Multidisciplinary Larynx Cancer Working Group from the Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Steven J Frank
- Multidisciplinary Larynx Cancer Working Group from the Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - William H Morrison
- Multidisciplinary Larynx Cancer Working Group from the Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Jack Phan
- Multidisciplinary Larynx Cancer Working Group from the Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Mark Zafereo
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Heath Skinner
- Multidisciplinary Larynx Cancer Working Group from the Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Stephen Y Lai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Katherine A Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Jan S Lewin
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Amy E Hessel
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Apurva A Thekdi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Randal S Weber
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Multidisciplinary Larynx Cancer Working Group from the Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
- Medical Physics Program, The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| | - David I Rosenthal
- Multidisciplinary Larynx Cancer Working Group from the Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vaculik MF, MacKay CA, Taylor SM, Trites JRB, Hart RD, Rigby MH. Systematic review and meta-analysis of T1 glottic cancer outcomes comparing CO 2 transoral laser microsurgery and radiotherapy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 48:44. [PMID: 31481120 PMCID: PMC6724253 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-019-0367-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study is to compare the oncologic outcomes of CO2 transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and radiotherapy (RT) for treatment of T1 glottic carcinoma. METHODS A literature search was conducted in the following databases: Medline/PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Search results were screened, and publications comparing oncologic outcomes of T1N0M0 glottic carcinoma treated with TLM or RT were included. Data was extracted independently by two authors, and publication quality was graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. Meta-analysis was performed for overall survival, disease specific survival, laryngeal preservation, and local control. RESULTS Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, the majority being retrospective cohort studies with two prospective cohort studies. Included studies were rated as either Level II or III evidence. Meta-analysis favoured treatment with TLM for T1 glottic carcinoma patients for the following outcomes: overall survival (odds ratio [OR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-2.14; P = 0.02), disease specific survival (OR, 2.70; CI, 1.32-5.54; P = 0.007), and laryngeal preservation (OR, 6.31; CI, 3.77-10.56; P < 0.00001). There was no difference in local control between TLM and RT in T1 glottic cancer (OR, 1.19; CI, 0.79-1.81; P = 0.40). DISCUSSION Our study provides a current and thorough comparison of TLM and RT outcomes in T1 glottic carcinoma. Limitations of our study include lack of randomized control trials, and non-randomized allocation of patients to treatment groups. Our meta-analysis suggests that TLM is the superior modality in terms of overall survival, disease specific survival, and laryngeal preservation. Future prospective randomized controlled studies are required for confirming these findings and developing appropriate clinical practice guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2A; as per the Centre of Evidence Based Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F Vaculik
- Dalhousie Medical School, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Colin A MacKay
- Dalhousie Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University, Suite 3044, Dickson Bldg. 5820 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V9, Canada
| | - S Mark Taylor
- Dalhousie Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University, Suite 3044, Dickson Bldg. 5820 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V9, Canada
| | - Johnathan R B Trites
- Dalhousie Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University, Suite 3044, Dickson Bldg. 5820 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V9, Canada
| | - Robert D Hart
- Dalhousie Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University, Suite 3044, Dickson Bldg. 5820 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V9, Canada
| | - Matthew H Rigby
- Dalhousie Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University, Suite 3044, Dickson Bldg. 5820 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Che J, Wang Y, Zhang X, Chen J. Comparative efficacy of six therapies for Hypopharyngeal and laryngeal neoplasms: a network meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:282. [PMID: 30922243 PMCID: PMC6439970 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5412-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hypopharyngeal and laryngeal neoplasms are both fatal and hard to catch in early stages. Yet which treatment is the most efficacious one still remain unanswered. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to investigate effectiveness of six therapies being utilized in clinical practice nowadays. Methods PubMed and Embase were retrieved to synthesize data. Direct and indirect evidence was combined to compare efficacy of treatments. A relative ranking of the six regimens was calculated by the surface under the curve ranking area (SUCRA). Results A total of 28 trials with 9109 patients were included in our NMA. Five endpoints investigated included 3/5-year overall survival (3/5-OS), 3/5-year disease free survival (3/5-DFS) and 5-year overall survival rate (5-OSR). In terms of all efficacy outcomes, radiotherapy combined with surgery (RT + S) proved to be better than other therapies while radiotherapy (RT) alone also performed well. Induction chemoradiotherapy (ICRT) was the best regarding 3-DFS (SUCRA = 0.846) while current chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) ranked first in 5-DFS (SUCRA = 0.933) according to SUCRA results. No significant differences were demonstrated in 5-DFS and 5-OSR as shown in the results of NMA. Conclusions RT combined with surgery turned out to be optimal therapy of all the outcomes while the efficacy of RT was relatively poorer in the treatment of patients with larynx stage III-IV and hypopharynx stage II-IV. Also, the good performance of CCRT and ICRT in terms of DFS made them as secondary recommended therapies. There is no significant difference between surgery and transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) alone. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-5412-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Che
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, No. 661 Second Huanghe Road, Binzhou, 256603, Shandong, China
| | - Yanlin Wang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, No. 661 Second Huanghe Road, Binzhou, 256603, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaolin Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, No. 661 Second Huanghe Road, Binzhou, 256603, Shandong, China
| | - Jun Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, No. 661 Second Huanghe Road, Binzhou, 256603, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Longobardi Y, Savoia V, Bussu F, Morra L, Mari G, Nesci DA, Parrilla C, D'Alatri L. Integrated rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: a pilot trial study. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:3537-3544. [PMID: 30685792 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-4647-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acquisition and acceptance of the alaryngeal voice, psychological state, and Quality of Life (QoL) of laryngectomized patients. METHODS Thirty-two patients who underwent total laryngectomy were included in the study; 17 of them were treated by a psychologist and a speech therapist (experimental group); 15 performed only speech therapy (control group). RESULTS The experimental group showed a significant improvement in all parameters of the INFVo scale, in the score of the Environment subscale and in the total score of the I-SECEL (Self-Evaluation of Communication Experiences after Laryngeal Cancer); in the Depression, Obsession-Compulsion and Paranoia areas of the SCL-90-R (Symptom Check List-90-Revised); and in the Social area (REL) of the WHOQOL-B (World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale-Brief). CONCLUSIONS An integrated rehabilitative approach to laryngectomized patients improves emotional state and psychosocial aspects and promotes acceptance and use of the new voice and recovery of a better quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ylenia Longobardi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Otorinolaringoiatria, L.go F. Vito 1, I-00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Vezio Savoia
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Unità di Consultazione Psichiatrica, L.go F. Vito 1, I-00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Bussu
- Otolaryngology Division, AOU Sassari, V.le San Pietro 43/B, I-07100, Sassari, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Otorinolaringoiatria, L.go F. Vito 1, I-00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Luciana Morra
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Otorinolaringoiatria, L.go F. Vito 1, I-00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Mari
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Otorinolaringoiatria, L.go F. Vito 1, I-00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico A Nesci
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Unità di Consultazione Psichiatrica, L.go F. Vito 1, I-00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Parrilla
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Otorinolaringoiatria, L.go F. Vito 1, I-00168, Rome, Italy.
| | - Lucia D'Alatri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Otorinolaringoiatria, L.go F. Vito 1, I-00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van Loon Y, Hendriksma M, Heijnen BJ, van de Kamp VAH, Hakkesteegt MM, Böhringer S, Langeveld TPM, de Jong MA, Klop WMC, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Sjögren EV. Voice outcome after unilateral ELS type III or bilateral type II resections for T1-T2 glottic carcinoma: Results after 1 year. Head Neck 2019; 41:1638-1647. [PMID: 30652373 PMCID: PMC6590407 DOI: 10.1002/hed.25582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Voice outcome was assessed in patients with extended T1 and limited T2 glottic carcinoma, treated with a unilateral type III or a bilateral type II resection according to the European Laryngological Society (ELS) classification. Methods Objective evaluation (acoustic and aerodynamic parameters), perceptual evaluation (GRBAS), and patients' self‐assessment (voice handicap index [VHI]) were performed before and 1 year after treatment. Results were evaluated according to ELS resection type and the involvement of the anterior commissure. Results The majority of voice parameters in all resection subgroups showed an improvement of the mean score 1 year postoperatively. Grade of dysphonia varied between 1.15 and 1.66 postoperatively and VHI score varied from 23.3 to 24.5. Conclusion Voice outcome after ELS unilateral type III or a bilateral type II resection for extended T1 and limited T2 glottic carcinoma is good with mild to very moderate perceptive dysphonia and low self‐reported voice impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yda van Loon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Martine Hendriksma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Bas J Heijnen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Vivienne A H van de Kamp
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke M Hakkesteegt
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Böhringer
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ton P M Langeveld
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M A de Jong
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - W Martin C Klop
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Baatenburg de Jong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth V Sjögren
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bhattacharyya T, Kainickal CT. Current Status of Organ Preservation in Carcinoma Larynx. World J Oncol 2018; 9:39-45. [PMID: 29760831 PMCID: PMC5942206 DOI: 10.14740/wjon1105w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Organ preservation in carcinoma larynx is a long debated topic. There are multiple organ preserving approaches in the management of carcinoma larynx depending on various factors. Radical radiotherapy (RT) and conservation laryngeal surgery have shown equivalent results in early laryngeal cancer. Concurrent chemoradiation (CTRT) is the standard treatment in stage III and IV laryngeal cancer with intact cartilage and functional larynx. Patients with cartilage destruction or dysfunctional larynx are not the candidates for organ preservation. This systematic review is aimed at discussing the evolution of different organ preserving approaches, their efficacy, impact on voice quality, their pitfalls and future directions.
Collapse
|
19
|
Forastiere AA, Ismaila N, Lewin JS, Nathan CA, Adelstein DJ, Eisbruch A, Fass G, Fisher SG, Laurie SA, Le QT, O'Malley B, Mendenhall WM, Patel S, Pfister DG, Provenzano AF, Weber R, Weinstein GS, Wolf GT. Use of Larynx-Preservation Strategies in the Treatment of Laryngeal Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2017; 36:1143-1169. [PMID: 29172863 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.75.7385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To update the guideline recommendations on the use of larynx-preservation strategies in the treatment of laryngeal cancer. Methods An Expert Panel updated the systematic review of the literature for the period from January 2005 to May 2017. Results The panel confirmed that the use of a larynx-preservation approach for appropriately selected patients does not compromise survival. No larynx-preservation approach offered a survival advantage compared with total laryngectomy and adjuvant therapy as indicated. Changes were supported for the use of endoscopic surgical resection in patients with limited disease (T1, T2) and for initial total laryngectomy in patients with T4a disease or with severe pretreatment laryngeal dysfunction. New recommendations for positron emission tomography imaging for the evaluation of regional nodes after treatment and best measures for evaluating voice and swallowing function were added. Recommendations Patients with T1, T2 laryngeal cancer should be treated initially with intent to preserve the larynx by using endoscopic resection or radiation therapy, with either leading to similar outcomes. For patients with locally advanced (T3, T4) disease, organ-preservation surgery, combined chemotherapy and radiation, or radiation alone offer the potential for larynx preservation without compromising overall survival. For selected patients with extensive T3 or large T4a lesions and/or poor pretreatment laryngeal function, better survival rates and quality of life may be achieved with total laryngectomy. Patients with clinically involved regional cervical nodes (N+) who have a complete clinical and radiologic imaging response after chemoradiation do not require elective neck dissection. All patients should undergo a pretreatment baseline assessment of voice and swallowing function and receive counseling with regard to the potential impact of treatment options on voice, swallowing, and quality of life. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlene A Forastiere
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Jan S Lewin
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Cherie Ann Nathan
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - David J Adelstein
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Avraham Eisbruch
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Gail Fass
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Susan G Fisher
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Scott A Laurie
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Bernard O'Malley
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Snehal Patel
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - David G Pfister
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Anthony F Provenzano
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Randy Weber
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Gregory S Weinstein
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Gregory T Wolf
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lombardo N, Aragona T, Alsayyad S, Pelaia G, Terracciano R, Savino R. Objective and self-evaluation voice analysis after transoral laser cordectomy and radiotherapy in T1a-T1b glottic cancer. Lasers Med Sci 2017; 33:141-147. [PMID: 29075995 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2361-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Voice quality outcome becomes an important factor in the choice of the therapeutic option. The differences between radiotherapy and laser cordectomy have been extensively debated in the literature. We analyzed the vocal outcomes after carbon dioxide (CO2) laser cordectomy and radiotherapy treatment for T1a-b early glottic cancer by means of objective and subjective voice evaluation. A retrospective study was performed on 56 cancer patients, 30 treated with cordectomy and 26 with radiotherapy. All patients underwent laser cordectomy which was performed under general anesthesia using a surgical microscope in laryngeal suspension. The laser we used was an Ultrapulse one, 10.6-μm wavelength, and a power setting of 2 to 4 W in an Ultrapulse mode was selected. Two different sets of data were recorded: (a) voice acoustic analysis (jitter, shimmer, fundamental frequency and noise/harmonic ratio) and (b) voice handicap index (VHI). Data collected were statistically analyzed using SPSS 20.0 for Windows. Jitter, shimmer, and signal-to-noise ratio were significantly altered in both glottic cancer patient groups as compared to the control group. On the contrary, no statistically significant alteration of the fundamental frequency was found in both treatment groups. Interestingly, jitter and shimmer values were significantly more compromised in transoral laser surgery patients as compared with radiotherapy-treated patients. The VHI was also significantly altered in both cancer patient groups as compared to the control group. More importantly, however, the self-evaluation voice analysis was not significantly different between the two treatment groups, contrary to what we observed for two of the four parameters measured in the objective voice analysis. Given the importance of the self-perception of the voice quality, no treatment can be considered superior from the patients' point of view. Therefore, we suggest that priority should be given to the endoscopic surgery, due to lower costs, lower morbidity, and shorter hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Lombardo
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro, Campus Universitario, Località Germaneto, Viale Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
| | - Teodoro Aragona
- Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro, Campus Universitario, Località Germaneto, Viale Europa, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Said Alsayyad
- Radiotherapy Unit, Riuniti Hospital, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Girolamo Pelaia
- Respiratory Disease, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Rosa Terracciano
- Department of Health Sciences, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Rocco Savino
- Department of Health Sciences, "Magna Græcia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gioacchini FM, Tulli M, Kaleci S, Bondi S, Bussi M, Re M. Therapeutic modalities and oncologic outcomes in the treatment of T1b glottic squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274:4091-4102. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4736-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/31/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
22
|
Prettyjohns M, Winter S, Kerawala C, Paleri V. Transoral laser microsurgery versus radiation therapy in the management of T1 and T2 laryngeal glottic carcinoma: which modality is cost-effective within the UK? Clin Otolaryngol 2017; 42:404-415. [PMID: 27966287 DOI: 10.1111/coa.12807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the most cost-effective treatment strategy in patients with early stage (T1 and T2) cancers of the laryngeal glottis. DESIGN A Markov decision model populated using data from updated systematic reviews and meta-analyses, with attributable costs from NHS sources. Data on local control and mortality were obtained from updates of existing systematic reviews conducted for the NICE guideline on cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract. Procedure costs were sourced from NHS reference costs 2013/14 by applying tariffs associated with the appropriate health resource group code SETTING: The UK National Health Service. POPULATION Patients with early stage (T1 and T2) cancers of the laryngeal glottis. INTERVENTIONS Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and radiation therapy (RT). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Total costs, incremental costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) over a 10-year time horizon. RESULTS Radiation therapy as the initial treatment strategy was found to be more expensive (£2654 versus £623) and less effective (QALY reduction of 0.141 and 0.04 in T1a and T1b-T2 laryngeal cancers, respectively) than TLM. The dominance of TLM for T1a cancers was unchanged in most scenarios modelled in sensitivity analysis. For T1b-T2 laryngeal cancers, the result changed in numerous scenarios. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, TLM was found to have a 71% and 58% probability of being cost-effective in T1a and T1b-T2 laryngeal cancers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Transoral laser microsurgery is a cost-effective strategy to adopt in the management of T1a laryngeal cancers. Uncertainty remains over the optimal strategy to adopt in T1b-T2 laryngeal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Prettyjohns
- National Collaborating Centre for Cancer, Cardiff, UK
| | - S Winter
- Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | | | - V Paleri
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Weiss BG, Ihler F, Pilavakis Y, Wolff HA, Canis M, Welz C, Steiner W. Transoral laser microsurgery for T1b glottic cancer: review of 51 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 274:1997-2004. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4432-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
24
|
Evaluation of swallowing function after supracricoid laryngectomy as a primary or salvage procedure. Dysphagia 2015; 30:686-94. [PMID: 26267541 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-015-9645-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2015] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The primary functional issues following conservative therapy for advanced laryngeal cancer concern swallowing. Here, we evaluated the recovery of swallowing after supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCL) in patients with primary or recurrent laryngeal cancer. We evaluated the swallowing recovery in 27 SCL patients through oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy, and we evaluated their quality of life using EORTC questionnaires. Four patients underwent total laryngectomy during follow-up. Patients who retained their larynges were able to feed without nutritional support and without tracheostoma. The only significantly different parameter between the primary and salvage cases was the time elapsed to the removal of nasogastric/PEG tubes, which was longer in salvage cases. SCL has been demonstrated as a valuable option for primary and recurrent laryngeal cancer patients. The present data demonstrate good functional results, particularly in terms of swallowing after previous treatments and in primary settings. The combination of oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy and questionnaires appears to be an adequate, standardizable approach to assessing swallowing function after SCL.
Collapse
|
25
|
Greulich MT, Parker NP, Lee P, Merati AL, Misono S. Voice outcomes following radiation versus laser microsurgery for T1 glottic carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 152:811-9. [PMID: 25837666 DOI: 10.1177/0194599815577103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2014] [Accepted: 02/20/2015] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Systematic review of literature on patient-reported voice handicap following T1 glottic squamous cell carcinoma treatment using transoral laser microsurgery or radiation therapy. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (1997-2013). REVIEW METHODS These data sources were searched for papers reporting Voice Handicap Index (VHI) after treatment of early glottic carcinoma. Review and reference cross-checking were performed using a priori selection criteria. Study data were abstracted and publication quality categorized independently by 2 authors. Corresponding authors were contacted to maximize data for analysis. Meta-analysis was performed only with studies that included both treatment modalities, to reduce heterogeneity and maximize rigor; random effects modeling was used to pool results. RESULTS Eighteen publications were identified that reported VHI data following surgery and radiotherapy for T1 glottic carcinoma. No studies were randomized. When studies that reported multiple T-stages or systematic treatment selection bias were excluded, 8 retrospective cohort studies describing 362 patients were suitable for meta-analysis. Follow-up time (mean, 47 months; range, 1-298 mo) and extent of surgical excision varied across studies. Six studies showed no VHI difference between treatment arms; 2 favored radiotherapy over surgery (1 of which reported transmuscular cordectomy for all surgical patients); and none favored surgery. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in posttreatment VHI between radiotherapy and surgery (mean difference, -5.52; 95% confidence interval, -11.40, 0.36; heterogeneity I (2) = 61%, P = .01). CONCLUSION VHI scores were comparable following transoral laser microsurgery and radiation therapy for T1 glottic carcinoma in the current literature, suggesting no clinically significant difference in functional voice outcomes between treatment types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T Greulich
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Noah P Parker
- The Voice Clinic of Indiana, Carmel, Indiana, USA The Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| | - Philip Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Albert L Merati
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Stephanie Misono
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
de Vincentiis M, De Virgilio A, Bussu F, Gallus R, Gallo A, Bastanza G, Parrilla C, Greco A, Galli J, Turchetta R, Almadori G, Pagliuca G, Valentini V, Paludetti G. Oncologic results of the surgical salvage of recurrent laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma in a multicentric retrospective series: emerging role of supracricoid partial laryngectomy. Head Neck 2014; 37:84-91. [PMID: 24327466 DOI: 10.1002/hed.23563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2013] [Revised: 08/24/2013] [Accepted: 12/05/2013] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies in the last decade evaluated conservative surgical procedures and, in particular, supracricoid operations as an alternative to total laryngectomy for the salvage of recurrences of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) after a first attempt of organ preservation. METHODS The clinical records of 68 consecutive patients primarily treated by irradiation or endoscopic surgery and surgically salvaged by total laryngectomy or supracricoid partial laryngectomy in 2 large university hospitals in Italy from 2004 to 2010 were reviewed. RESULTS The survival was not affected by the primary treatment or by salvage modality. The only parameter always keeping a prognostic value is the involvement of resection margins of salvage surgery. Patients with early relapse seem to have a worse prognosis than patients with a delayed relapse (p = .05 at Cox multivariate analysis and p = .048 at Wilcoxon test for overall survival [OS] from the primary treatment). CONCLUSION Supracricoid operations, if the indications are careful, can prove reliable salvage procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco de Vincentiis
- Department of Sensorial Organs, Ear, Nose, and Throat Section, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yoo J, Lacchetti C, Hammond JA, Gilbert RW. Role of endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) versus radiotherapy in the management of early (T1) glottic cancer: a systematic review. Head Neck 2013; 36:1807-19. [PMID: 24115131 DOI: 10.1002/hed.23504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2013] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment options for early glottic cancer include transoral microsurgery or radiotherapy (RT). There is continuing debate about which is the superior treatment. METHODS The literature was searched from 1996 to 2011 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. A quality assessment of each included study was conducted and reported. RESULTS There is no evidence in favor of 1 treatment modality when considering likelihood of local control or overall survival. There is a suggestion that RT may be associated with less measureable perturbation of voice as compared to surgery, but no significant differences were seen in patient perception. The likelihood of laryngeal preservation may be higher when surgery can be offered as initial treatment. CONCLUSION For patients with early (T1) glottic cancer, treatment options include the equally effective endolaryngeal surgery, with or without laser, or radiation therapy. The choice between treatment modalities should be based on patient and clinician preferences and general medical condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Yoo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Laoufi S, Mirghani H, Janot F, Hartl DM. Voice quality after treatment of T1a glottic cancer. Laryngoscope 2013; 124:1398-401. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.24445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2013] [Revised: 09/10/2013] [Accepted: 09/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Samia Laoufi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; Institut Gustave Roussy; Villejuif France
| | - Haïtham Mirghani
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; Institut Gustave Roussy; Villejuif France
| | - François Janot
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; Institut Gustave Roussy; Villejuif France
| | - Dana M. Hartl
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery; Institut Gustave Roussy; Villejuif France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Szyfter W, Leszczyńska M, Wierzbicka M, Kopeć T, Bartochowska A. Value of open horizontal glottectomy in the treatment for T1b glottic cancer with anterior commissure involvement. Head Neck 2013; 35:1738-44. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.23264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2011] [Revised: 07/16/2012] [Accepted: 01/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Witold Szyfter
- Department of Otolaryngology; Head and Neck Surgery; Poznań University of Medical Sciences; Poland
| | - Małgorzata Leszczyńska
- Department of Otolaryngology; Head and Neck Surgery; Poznań University of Medical Sciences; Poland
| | - Małgorzata Wierzbicka
- Department of Otolaryngology; Head and Neck Surgery; Poznań University of Medical Sciences; Poland
| | - Tomasz Kopeć
- Department of Otolaryngology; Head and Neck Surgery; Poznań University of Medical Sciences; Poland
| | - Anna Bartochowska
- Department of Otolaryngology; Head and Neck Surgery; Poznań University of Medical Sciences; Poland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yoo J, Lacchetti C, Hammond JA, Gilbert RW. Role of endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) compared with radiotherapy in the management of early (T1) glottic cancer: a clinical practice guideline. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013; 20:e132-5. [PMID: 23559880 DOI: 10.3747/co.20.1237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To provide evidence-based practice guideline recommendations concerning the role of endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) compared with radiation therapy for patients with early (T1) glottic cancer, assessing survival, locoregional control, laryngeal preservation rates, and voice outcomes. METHODS The medline, embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify relevant studies from 1996 to 2011. Recommendations were formulated based on that evidence and on the expert opinion of Cancer Care Ontario's Head and Neck Cancer disease site group. The systematic review and practice guideline were externally reviewed by practitioners in Ontario, Canada. RESULTS The available evidence was of a level insufficient to demonstrate a clear difference between treatment options when considering the likelihood of local control or overall survival. Although the evidence was mainly retrospective, there was a suggestion that, compared with surgery, radiotherapy might be associated with less measureable perturbation of voice without a significant difference in patient perception. The likelihood of laryngeal preservation may be higher when surgery can be offered as initial treatment. CONCLUSIONS For patients with early (T1) glottic cancer, the evidence is insufficient to demonstrate a difference between endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) and external-beam radiation therapy. The choice between treatment modalities has been based on patient and clinician preferences and general medical condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Yoo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Definitive radiotherapy for T1 glottic squamous cell carcinoma: a 15-year Cruces University Hospital experience. Clin Transl Oncol 2013; 15:925-31. [PMID: 23519536 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-013-1025-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2013] [Accepted: 02/25/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the treatment outcomes for T1 N0 glottic carcinoma after definitive radiotherapy. METHODS One hundred and seventeen patients treated with radical radiotherapy from 1990 to 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. The median follow-up duration for the entire group was 92 months (range 4-227). A median dose of 70 Gy (range 63-70 Gy) was administered. We determined the rates of local control (LC), regional control, overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) at 5, 10 and 15 years by Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. The Cox regression analysis was performed to identify significant prognostic factors for LC and survival. The incidence of secondary malignancies is also reported. RESULTS The 5-, 10- and 15-year LC rates for the whole group were 84, 80.2 and 80.2 %, respectively. There were 20 local recurrences, of which 19 were salvaged with laryngectomy, giving an ultimate control rate of 90.6 %. The 5-/10-/15-year OS and CSS rates were 81.2 %/66.1 %/48.3 % and 90.6 %/90.6 %/90.6 %, respectively. None of the parameters analyzed exhibited a statistically significant relationship with LC. The age ≥65 years had a statistically significant effect on OS (but not in CSS), with a hazard ratio of 2.45 (95 % confidence interval 1.29-4.66; p = 0.006). During follow-up, 26 patients (22 %) developed a secondary malignancy. Only two patients (1.7 %) presented with severe toxicity (edema and mucositis). CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy alone offers a high likelihood of LC and an excellent CSS rate. In addition, the surgical approach for the salvage is a successful option.
Collapse
|
32
|
Milovanovic J, Djukic V, Milovanovic A, Jotic A, Banko B, Jesic S, Babic B, Trivic A, Artiko V, Petrovic M, Stankovic P. Clinical outcome of early glottic carcinoma in Serbia. Auris Nasus Larynx 2013; 40:394-9. [PMID: 23291215 DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2012.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2012] [Revised: 11/15/2012] [Accepted: 11/19/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Proposed methods for treating early glottic carcinoma are cordectomy through laryngofissure, laser cordectomy, and radiotherapy. The aim of the study was to conduct comprehensive study to evaluate oncological and functional results of different treatment modalities for Tis and T1 glottic carcinoma, identify prognostic factors for the outcome of treatment and decide where we stand in applying worldwide standards of early glottic carcinoma treatment. METHODS Prospective study was conducted on 221 patients treated with Tis and T1 glottic carcinoma from 1998 to 2003 (72 patients were treated endoscopically with CO2 laser, 75 patients with cordectomy through laryngofissure and 74 with radiotherapy), with follow-up period from 38 to 107 months. Important demographic and clinical variables were analyzed. Voice quality after the treatment was assessed using multidimensional voice analysis. RESULTS Comparing oncological results of three modalities of treatment, there were no significant differences. Functional results of treatment were better after laser cordectomy and primary radiotherapy than following the open cordectomy. Five-year survival rate was almost identical in all three groups of patients, and important prognostic factors for survival were age and histological grade of the tumor. CONCLUSION Considering that the choice of treatment in our country is also greatly influenced by other paramedical factors, such as distance from treatment facility, reliability of follow-up, significant time delay of radiotherapy because of small number of radiology centers and strong patients' surgeon and treatment preference, we consider endoscopic laser surgery highly efficient and preferred choice of treatment for early glottic carcinoma.
Collapse
|
33
|
|
34
|
Patient satisfaction during radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2012; 188:492-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-011-0056-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2011] [Accepted: 11/23/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
|
35
|
Rutkowski T, Wygoda A, Składowski K, Hejduk B, Rutkowski R, Lukaszczyk-Widel B, Hutnik M, Maciejewski B. Predictors of radiotherapy outcome in patients with T2 supraglottic carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 269:923-9. [PMID: 22116382 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1847-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2011] [Accepted: 11/09/2011] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The decision regarding treatment of early supraglottic carcinoma remains controversial. Single institution clinical data of patients with T2 supraglottic carcinoma treated exclusively with radiotherapy in terms of prognostic factors and treatment results were analyzed. Patient-related factors that would potentially by useful for optimal therapeutic decision to be undertaken were especially investigated. Between 1994 and 2004, 78 patients with T2 supraglottic carcinoma underwent radiotherapy (RT) in Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Poland. There were 54 (69%) males and 24 (31%) females in the median age of 61 years. There were 17 (22%) patients with N+. Median body mass of patients before (BM0) and after RT (BM1) was 74 kg (range 45.2-130 kg) and 72.9 kg (range 49.9-122.5 kg), respectively. Median hemoglobin concentrations before (Hb0) and after (Hb1) RT were 14.3 and 13.4 g/dl, respectively. Median change of Hb concentration during RT (dHb) was -0.8 g/dl. All were treated up to total doses (TD) ranged from 62.5 to 72 Gy. The overall treatment time (OTT) ranged from 30 to 70 days. Estimates of local control (LC), ultimate local control (uLC), and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log rank statistics, Cox proportional hazard model and step-wise Cox regression hazard model were employed to identify prognostic factors for LC, uLC, and OS in univariate and multivariate analyses. The 5-year LC, RC, uLC and OS rates were 85, 92, 88, and 56%, respectively. In multivariate analysis N+ (p = 0.01) and prolonged OTT (p = 0.03) significantly decreased LC. Females (p = 0.02), higher BM0 (p = 0.03), and HB0 (p = 0.006) significantly prolonged OS. Patient-related factors like gender, hemoglobin concentration, and body mass may predict treatment outcome. Radiotherapy is effective for T2 supraglottic carcinoma of the larynx unless higher dose intensity is provided. Involved regional lymph nodes significantly deteriorate locoregional cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Rutkowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, ul. Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 15, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Feng Y, Wang B, Wen S. Laser surgery versus radiotherapy for T1-T2N0 glottic cancer: a meta-analysis. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2011; 73:336-42. [PMID: 22005723 DOI: 10.1159/000327097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2010] [Accepted: 02/21/2011] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laser surgery and radiotherapy are commonly used to treat glottic cancer. OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW To compare outcomes and cost of laser surgery versus radiotherapy for T1-T2N0 glottic cancer. TYPE OF REVIEW Meta-analysis. SEARCH STRATEGY The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid MEDLINE® In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Embase, Web of Science (1990-2010) were searched electronically. Three Chinese journals in otolaryngology were searched manually. EVALUATION METHOD Retrieved studies were analyzed with Review Manager 5.0 software. Methodological and outcome heterogeneity was analyzed using the χ(2) test and the I(2) test. Homogeneous and heterogeneous data were analyzed using a fixed random effect model. RESULTS Eleven studies involving 1,135 patients were included in the analysis. The cure rate did not differ between patients receiving laser surgery versus radiotherapy. Results on voice preservation were inconclusive. The overall cost for laser surgery was lower. CONCLUSIONS The quality of the reported clinical studies is limited. No level I data are available. Nonetheless, our analysis suggests that laser surgery and radiotherapy produce comparable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Feng
- Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Budach W, Bölke E, Fietkau R, Buchali A, Wendt TG, Popp W, Matuschek C, Sack H. Evaluation of Time, Attendance of Medical Staff, and Resources During Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Strahlenther Onkol 2011; 187:449-60. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-011-2273-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2011] [Accepted: 05/16/2011] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|