1
|
Zegers CML, Swinnen A, Roumen C, Hoffmann AL, Troost EGC, van Asch CJJ, Brandts L, Compter I, Dieleman EMT, Dijkstra JB, Granzier M, Hendriks M, Hofman P, Houben RMA, Ramaekers B, Ronner HE, Rouhl RPW, van der Salm S, Santegoeds RGC, Verhoeff JJ, Wagner GL, Zwemmer J, Schijns O, Colon AJ, Eekers DBP. High-precision stereotactic irradiation for focal drug-resistant epilepsy versus standard treatment: a randomized waitlist-controlled trial (the PRECISION trial). Trials 2024; 25:334. [PMID: 38773643 PMCID: PMC11106873 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08168-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The standard treatment for patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who are not eligible for open brain surgery is the continuation of anti-seizure medication (ASM) and neuromodulation. This treatment does not cure epilepsy but only decreases severity. The PRECISION trial offers a non-invasive, possibly curative intervention for these patients, which consist of a single stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatment. Previous studies have shown promising results of SRT in this patient population. Nevertheless, this intervention is not yet available and reimbursed in the Netherlands. We hypothesize that: SRT is a superior treatment option compared to palliative standard of care, for patients with focal DRE, not eligible for open surgery, resulting in a higher reduction of seizure frequency (with 50% of the patients reaching a 75% seizure frequency reduction at 2 years follow-up). METHODS In this waitlist-controlled phase 3 clinical trial, participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either receive SRT as the intervention, while the standard treatments consist of ASM continuation and neuromodulation. After 2-year follow-up, patients randomized for the standard treatment (waitlist-control group) are offered SRT. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with focal DRE and a pretreatment defined epileptogenic zone (EZ) not eligible for open surgery will be included. The intervention is a LINAC-based single fraction (24 Gy) SRT treatment. The target volume is defined as the epileptogenic zone (EZ) on all (non) invasive examinations. The seizure frequency will be monitored on a daily basis using an electronic diary and an automatic seizure detection system during the night. Potential side effects are evaluated using advanced MRI, cognitive evaluation, Common Toxicity Criteria, and patient-reported outcome questionnaires. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of the SRT treatment will be evaluated. DISCUSSION This is the first randomized trial comparing SRT with standard of care in patients with DRE, non-eligible for open surgery. The primary objective is to determine whether SRT significantly reduces the seizure frequency 2 years after treatment. The results of this trial can influence the current clinical practice and medical cost reimbursement in the Netherlands for patients with focal DRE who are not eligible for open surgery, providing a non-invasive curative treatment option. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05182437. Registered on September 27, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M L Zegers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - A Swinnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - C Roumen
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - A L Hoffmann
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - E G C Troost
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
| | - C J J van Asch
- Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - L Brandts
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - I Compter
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - E M T Dieleman
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam UMC (AMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J B Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Psychology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M Granzier
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M Hendriks
- Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - P Hofman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R M A Houben
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - B Ramaekers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - H E Ronner
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R P W Rouhl
- Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - S van der Salm
- University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - R G C Santegoeds
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J J Verhoeff
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam UMC (AMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UMC Utrecht, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - G L Wagner
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J Zwemmer
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, the Netherlands
| | - Oemg Schijns
- Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - A J Colon
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Epileptology, CHU Martinique, Fort-de-France, France
| | - D B P Eekers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schmutzer M, Skrap B, Thorsteinsdottir J, Fürweger C, Muacevic A, Schichor C. Meningioma involving the superior sagittal sinus: long-term outcome after robotic radiosurgery in primary and recurrent situation. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1206059. [PMID: 37496660 PMCID: PMC10367096 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1206059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Treatment for meningiomas involving the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) is challenging and proved to be associated with higher risks compared to other brain locations. Therapeutical strategies may be either microsurgical (sub-)total resection or adjuvant radiation, or a combination of both. Thrombosis or SSS occlusion following resection or radiosurgery needs to be further elucidated to assess whether single or combined treatment is superior. We here present tumor control and side effect data of robotic radiosurgery (RRS) in combination with or without microsurgery. Methods From our prospective database, we identified 137 patients with WHO grade I meningioma involving the SSS consecutively treated between 2005 and 2020. Treatment decisions were interdisciplinary. Patients underwent RRS as initial/solitary treatment (group 1), as adjuvant treatment after subtotal resection (group 2), or due to recurrent tumor growth after preceding microsurgery (group 3). Positive tumor response was assessed by MRI and defined as reduction of more than 50% of volume. Study endpoints were time to recurrence (TTR), time to RRS, risk factors for decreased survival, and side effects. Overall and specific recurrence rates for treatment groups were analyzed. Side effect data included therapy-related morbidity during follow-up (FU). Results A total of 137 patients (median age, 58.3 years) with SSS meningiomas WHO grade I were analyzed: 51 patients (37.2%) in group 1, 15 patients (11.0%) in group 2, and 71 patients (51.8%) in group 3. Positive MR (morphological response) to therapy was achieved in 50 patients (36.4%), no response was observed in 25 patients (18.2%), and radiological tumor progression was detected in 8 patients (5.8%). Overall 5-year probability of tumor recurrence was 15.8% (median TTR, 41.6 months). Five-year probabilities of recurrence were 0%, 8.3.%, and 21.5% for groups 1-3 (p = 0.06). In multivariate analysis, tumor volume was significantly associated with extent of SSS occlusion (p = 0.026) and sex (p = 0.011). Tumor volume significantly correlated with TTR (p = 0.0046). Acute sinus venous thrombosis or venous congestion-associated bleedings did not occur in any of the groups. Conclusion RRS for grade I meningiomas with SSS involvement represents a good option as first-line treatment, occasionally also in recurrent and adjuvant scenarios as part of a multimodal treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schmutzer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Benjamin Skrap
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Jun Thorsteinsdottir
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Christian Schichor
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Surgical and Functional Outcome after Resection of 64 Petroclival Meningiomas. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14184517. [PMID: 36139677 PMCID: PMC9496694 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14184517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The management of petroclival meningiomas (PCMs) remains notoriously difficult due to their close association with neurovascular structures and their complex anatomy, hence the surgical paradigm change from radical to functional resection in the past. With this study, we aimed to analyze surgical and functional outcomes of a modern consecutive series of patients with PCMs. Methods: We reviewed patient charts and imaging data of 64 consecutive patients from 2006 to 2018 with a PCM resected at our institution and compared surgical and functional outcomes between subgroups stratified by surgical approach. Results: Females comprised 67.2% of patients (n = 43), with a mean age of 55 years (median 56; range 21-84). Follow-up data were available for 68.8% and reached a mean of 42.3 months (range 1-129) with a median of 28.5 months. The mean tumor diameter was 37.3 mm (standard deviation (SD) 15.4; median 37.0). Infiltration of the cavernous sinus was observed in 34 cases (53.1%), and the lesions affected the brain stem in 28 cases (43.8%). Preoperative cranial nerve palsy was observed in 73.4% of cases; trigeminal neuropathy (42.2%), hearing loss (32.8%), and impairment of vision (18.8%) were the most common. A retrosigmoid approach was employed in 47 cases (78.1%), pterional in 10 (15.6%), combined petrosal in 2 (3.1%), and transnasal and subtemporal in 1 (1.6%). Fifteen cases (23.4%) were resected in a two-staged fashion. Gross total resection (GTR) was attempted in 30 (46.9%) cases without cavernous sinus infiltration and was achieved in 21 (70.0%) of these cases. Surgical complications occurred in 13 cases (20.3%), most commonly meningitis (n = 4; 6.3%). Postoperatively, 56 patients (87.5%) developed new cranial nerve palsy, of which 36 (63.6%) had improved or resolved on last follow up. Achieving GTR was not significantly associated with higher rates of surgical complications (chi-square; p = 0.288) or postoperative cranial nerve palsy (chi-square; p = 0.842). Of all cases, 20 (31.3%) underwent postoperative radiation. Tumor progression was observed in 10 patients (15.9%) after a mean 102 months (median 124). Conclusions: Surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment for PCMs, with perioperative cranial neuropathies exhibiting favorable recovery rates. Most essentially, the preselection of patients with hallmarks of brain stem affection and cavernous sinus infiltration should dictate whether to strive for a functionally oriented strategy in favor of radical resection.
Collapse
|
4
|
Clinical outcome after high-precision radiotherapy for skull base meningiomas: Pooled data from three large German centers for radiation oncology. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:274-279. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2015] [Revised: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
5
|
Dolera M, Malfassi L, Pavesi S, Marcarini S, Sala M, Mazza G, Carrara N, Finesso S, Urso G. Stereotactic Volume Modulated Arc Radiotherapy in Canine Meningiomas: Imaging-Based and Clinical Neurological Posttreatment Evaluation. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2018; 54:77-84. [PMID: 29372870 DOI: 10.5326/jaaha-ms-6488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
A prospective study to assess high-dose hypofractionated volume modulated arc radiotherapy feasibility and efficacy in canine meningiomas was conducted. Thirty-nine patients with encephalic and spinal meningiomas assumed from MRI findings were recruited and received high-dose hypofractionated volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy by a linear accelerator equipped with an external beam modulator micro-multileaf collimator and an XVI cone beam computed tomography system. The prescribed mean dose was 33 Gy in five fractions. The treatment feasibility was tested through planned and delivered dose agreement checks. Regular clinical examinations were performed during and after irradiation time, with regard to mentation, deambulation, cranial nerve dysfunction, and seizures. Serial MRI exams were done 60 days after irradiation and after 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo. Volumetric disease reduction criteria implemented with clinical neurological systematic evaluation were adopted to assess the course and to categorize patients' responses. Complete and partial responses were observed on the whole in 65.5% of alive patients 24 mo after irradiation. Two-yr overall and disease-specific survival rates were 74.3% and 97.4%, respectively, and the putative radiotoxic effects were found to be few and slight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Dolera
- From the La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Romanengo, Italy (M.D., L.M., S.P., S.M., M.S., G.M., N.C., S.F.); and Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lodi, Lodi, Italy (G.U.)
| | - Luca Malfassi
- From the La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Romanengo, Italy (M.D., L.M., S.P., S.M., M.S., G.M., N.C., S.F.); and Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lodi, Lodi, Italy (G.U.)
| | - Simone Pavesi
- From the La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Romanengo, Italy (M.D., L.M., S.P., S.M., M.S., G.M., N.C., S.F.); and Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lodi, Lodi, Italy (G.U.)
| | - Silvia Marcarini
- From the La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Romanengo, Italy (M.D., L.M., S.P., S.M., M.S., G.M., N.C., S.F.); and Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lodi, Lodi, Italy (G.U.)
| | - Massimo Sala
- From the La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Romanengo, Italy (M.D., L.M., S.P., S.M., M.S., G.M., N.C., S.F.); and Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lodi, Lodi, Italy (G.U.)
| | - Giovanni Mazza
- From the La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Romanengo, Italy (M.D., L.M., S.P., S.M., M.S., G.M., N.C., S.F.); and Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lodi, Lodi, Italy (G.U.)
| | - Nancy Carrara
- From the La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Romanengo, Italy (M.D., L.M., S.P., S.M., M.S., G.M., N.C., S.F.); and Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lodi, Lodi, Italy (G.U.)
| | - Sara Finesso
- From the La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Romanengo, Italy (M.D., L.M., S.P., S.M., M.S., G.M., N.C., S.F.); and Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lodi, Lodi, Italy (G.U.)
| | - Gaetano Urso
- From the La Cittadina Fondazione Studi e Ricerche Veterinarie, Romanengo, Italy (M.D., L.M., S.P., S.M., M.S., G.M., N.C., S.F.); and Azienda Ospedaliera della Provincia di Lodi, Lodi, Italy (G.U.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu A, Garcia MA, Magill ST, Chen W, Vasudevan HN, Perry A, Theodosopoulos PV, McDermott MW, Braunstein SE, Raleigh DR. Presenting Symptoms and Prognostic Factors for Symptomatic Outcomes Following Resection of Meningioma. World Neurosurg 2017; 111:e149-e159. [PMID: 29248774 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2017] [Revised: 12/03/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meningioma is the most common primary intracranial tumor and patients present with diverse neurologic symptoms related to meningioma location. This study aimed to systematically quantify the presenting symptoms of meningioma and identify prognostic factors for symptomatic outcome following resection. METHODS test and multivariate regression were used to compare groups. RESULTS Patients presented primarily with headaches (48.2%) and either cerebral dysfunctions (48.5%) with convexity meningiomas or cranial nerve deficits (38.9%) with skull base meningiomas. Symptomatic improvement in the acute postoperative period was significantly correlated with long term symptomatic improvement (P ≤ 0.01). Headaches and seizures had the greatest rates of symptomatic improvement after surgery (78%), and the vast majority of patients with symptom improvement experienced complete resolution (86%). In contrast, symptoms persisted in >60% of patients with anosmia, sensory changes, or frontal, temporal, or cerebellar symptoms. Multivariate regression identified subtotal resection as a prognostic factor for persistent symptoms (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-1.21; P = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS Symptoms improve in the majority of patients after resection of meningioma, with the rate of improvement varying according to symptom type and extent of resection. These data may be a useful when counseling patients about symptoms after resection of meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Michael A Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Stephen T Magill
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - William Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Harish N Vasudevan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Arie Perry
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Philip V Theodosopoulos
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Michael W McDermott
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Steve E Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - David R Raleigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
High-precision radiotherapy for meningiomas : Long-term results and patient-reported outcome (PRO). Strahlenther Onkol 2017. [PMID: 28620750 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-017-1156-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate long-term outcome after high-precision radiotherapy (RT) of meningioma patients in terms of survival and side effects. METHODS We analyzed 275 meningioma cases: 147 low-grade and 43 high-grade meningiomas (WHO II: n = 40, III: n = 3). In all, 85 patients had no pathologically confirmed histology but were determined as low-grade based on multimodal imaging. Surgery was performed in 183 cases. RT was delivered as either radiosurgery (RS, n = 16), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT, n = 241), or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT, n = 18). Of 218 patients contacted for patient-reported-outcome (PRO), 207 responded (95%). RESULTS Median follow-up was 7.2 years. For low-grade meningioma the survival rate (OS) was 97% at 3 years, 85% at 10 years, and 64% at 15 years, for atypical meningioma 91% at 3 years, 62% at 10 years, and 50% at 15 years. Local control rate (PFS) for low-grade meningioma was 91% at 3 years, 87% at 5 years, and 86% at 10 years, for atypical cases 67% at 3 years and 55% at 5 years. Of all, 3.0% of patients reported worsened or new symptoms grade ≥3 during RT and the first 6 months thereafter; 17.5% reported a deterioration after more than 2 years. We found the prognostic factors tumor volume and age significantly influencing OS and PFS. CONCLUSION Complemented by PRO, we found long-term low toxicity rates in addition to excellent local control. Thus, due to the beneficial risk-benefit profile of benign and high-risk meningiomas, RT should be performed as adjuvant treatment and should not be postponed until tumor progression.
Collapse
|
8
|
Mozes P, Dittmar JO, Habermehl D, Tonndorf-Martini E, Hideghety K, Dittmar A, Debus J, Combs SE. Volumetric response of intracranial meningioma after photon or particle irradiation. Acta Oncol 2017; 56:431-437. [PMID: 27911139 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2016.1259659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meningiomas are usually slow growing, well circumscribed intracranial tumors. In symptom-free cases observation with close follow-up imaging could be performed. Symptomatic meningiomas could be surgically removed and/or treated with radiotherapy. The study aimed to evaluate the volumetric response of intracranial meningiomas at different time points after photon, proton, and a mixed photon and carbon ion boost irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS In Group A 38 patients received proton therapy (median dose: 56 GyE in 1.8-2 GyE daily fractions) or a mixed photon/carbon ion therapy (50 Gy in 2 Gy daily fractions with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and 18 GyE in 3 GyE daily dose carbon ion boost). Thirty-nine patients (Group B) were treated by photon therapy with IMRT or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy technique (median dose: 56 Gy in 1.8-2 Gy daily fractions). The delineation of the tumor volume was based on the initial, one- and two-year follow-up magnetic resonance imaging and these volumes were compared to evaluate the volumetric tumor response. RESULTS Significant tumor volume shrinkage was detected at one- and at two-year follow-up both after irradiation by particles and by photons. No significant difference in tumor volume change was observed between photon, proton or combined photon plus carbon ion boost treated patients. WHO grade and gender appear to be determining factors for tumor volume shrinkage. CONCLUSION Significant volumetric shrinkage of meningiomas could be observed independently of the applied radiation modality. Long-term follow-up is recommended to evaluate further dynamic of size reduction and its correlation with outcome data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Mozes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Oliver Dittmar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Habermehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Eric Tonndorf-Martini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katalin Hideghety
- Department of Oncotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Attosecond Light Pulse Source, ELI-Hu Nkft, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Anne Dittmar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy, Department of Radiation Sciences, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Casas Parera I, Báez A, Banfi N, Blumenkrantz Y, Halfon MJ, Barros M, Campero Á, Larrarte G, De Robles P, Rostagno R, Gonzalez Roffo A, Campanucci V, Igirio Gamero JL, Figueroa Intriago WL, Díaz Granados S, Martínez Tamborini N, Kuchkaryan VB, Lozano C. Meningiomas en neurooncología. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuarg.2016.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
10
|
Mawrin C, Chung C, Preusser M. Biology and clinical management challenges in meningioma. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016:e106-15. [PMID: 25993161 DOI: 10.14694/edbook_am.2015.35.e106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most frequently occurring intracranial tumors. They are characterized by a broad spectrum of histopathologic appearance. Molecular alterations driving meningioma development, which affect the NF2 gene, are found in roughly 50% of patients. Rare genetic events in benign meningiomas are mutations in TRAF7, KLF4, AKT1, and SMO; all of these mutations are exclusive of NF2 alterations. Progression to a clinically aggressive meningioma is linked to inactivation of CDKN2A/B genes, and a plethora of signaling molecules have been described as activated in meningiomas, which supports the concept of successful clinical use of specific inhibitors. Established treatments include surgical resection with or without radiotherapy delivered in a single fraction, a few large fractions (radiosurgery), or multiple fractions (fractionated radiotherapy). For recurrent and aggressive tumors, inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway, such as vatalinib, bevacizumab, and sunitinib, showed signs of activity in small, uncontrolled studies, and prospective clinical studies will test the efficacy of the tetrahydroisoquinoline trabectedin and of SMO and AKT1 inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Mawrin
- From the Department of Neuropathology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto/Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Caroline Chung
- From the Department of Neuropathology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto/Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Preusser
- From the Department of Neuropathology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto/Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abacioglu U, Ozen Z, Yilmaz M, Arifoglu A, Gunhan B, Kayalilar N, Peker S, Sengoz M, Gurdalli S, Cozzi L. Critical appraisal of RapidArc radiosurgery with flattening filter free photon beams for benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife: a treatment planning study. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:119. [PMID: 24884967 PMCID: PMC4038714 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-9-119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2014] [Accepted: 05/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the role of RapidArc (RA) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of benign brain lesions in comparison to GammaKnife (GK) based technique. METHODS Twelve patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS, n = 6) or cavernous sinus meningioma (CSM, n = 6) were planned for both SRS using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) by RA. 104 MV flattening filter free photon beams with a maximum dose rate of 2400 MU/min were selected. Data were compared against plans optimised for GK. A single dose of 12.5 Gy was prescribed. The primary objective was to assess treatment plan quality. Secondary aim was to appraise treatment efficiency. RESULTS For VS, comparing best GK vs. RA plans, homogeneity was 51.7 ± 3.5 vs. 6.4 ± 1.5%; Paddick conformity Index (PCI) resulted 0.81 ± 0.03 vs. 0.84 ± 0.04. Gradient index (PGI) was 2.7 ± 0.2 vs. 3.8 ± 0.6. Mean target dose was 17.1 ± 0.9 vs. 12.9 ± 0.1 Gy. For the brain stem, D(1cm3) was 5.1 ± 2.0 Gy vs 4.8 ± 1.6 Gy. For the ipsilateral cochlea, D(0.1cm3) was 1.7 ± 1.0 Gy vs. 1.8 ± 0.5 Gy. For CSM, homogeneity was 52.3 ± 2.4 vs. 12.4 ± 0.6; PCI: 0.86 ± 0.05 vs. 0.88 ± 0.05; PGI: 2.6 ± 0.1 vs. 3.8 ± 0.5; D(1cm3) to brain stem was 5.4 ± 2.8 Gy vs. 5.2 ± 2.8 Gy; D(0.1cm3) to ipsi-lateral optic nerve was 4.2 ± 2.1 vs. 2.1 ± 1.5 Gy; D(0.1cm3) to optic chiasm was 5.9 ± 3.1 vs. 4.5 ± 2.1 Gy. Treatment time was 53.7 ± 5.8 (64.9 ± 24.3) minutes for GK and 4.8 ± 1.3 (5.0 ± 0.7) minutes for RA for schwannomas (meningiomas). CONCLUSIONS SRS with RA and FFF beams revealed to be adequate and comparable to GK in terms of target coverage, homogeneity, organs at risk sparing with some gain in terms of treatment efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Luca Cozzi
- Medical Physics Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, 6504 Bellinzona, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kaul D, Budach V, Wurm R, Gruen A, Graaf L, Habbel P, Badakhshi H. Linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery in patients with meningioma. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:78. [PMID: 24650090 PMCID: PMC4028108 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-9-78] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2013] [Accepted: 03/16/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It was our purpose to analyze long-term clinical outcome and to identify prognostic factors after Linac-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (Linac-based FSRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with intracranial meningiomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 10/1995 and 03/2009, 297 patients with a median age of 59 years were treated with FSRT for intracranial meningioma. 50 patients had a Grade I meningioma, 20 patients had a Grade II meningioma, 12 patients suffered from a Grade III tumor, and in 215 cases no histology was obtained (Grade 0). Of the 297 patients, 144 underwent FSRT as their primary treatment and 158 underwent postoperative FSRT. 179 patients received normofractionated radiotherapy (nFSRT), 92 patients received hypofractionated FSRT (hFSRT) and 26 patients underwent SRS. Patients with nFSRT received a mean total dose of 57.31 ± 5.82 Gy, patients with hFSRT received a mean total dose of 37.6 ± 4.4 Gy and patients who underwent SRS received a mean total dose of 17.31 ± 2.58 Gy. RESULTS Median follow-up was 35 months. Overall progression free survival (PFS) was 92.3% at 3 years, 87% at 5 years and 84.1% at 10 years. Patients with adjuvant radiotherapy showed significantly better PFS-rates than patients who had been treated with primary radiotherapy. There was no significant difference between PFS-rates of nFSRT, hFSRT and SRS patients. PFS-rates were independent of tumor size. Patients who had received nFSRT showed less acute toxicity than those who had received hFSRT. In the Grade 0/I group the rate of radiologic focal reactions was significantly lower than in the atypical/malignant histology group. CONCLUSION This large study showed that FSRT is an effective and safe treatment modality with high PFS-rates for intracranial meningioma. We identified "pathological grading" and and "prior surgery" as significant prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité School of Medicine and University Hospital, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Badakhshi H, Muellner S, Wiener E, Budach V. Image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with vestibular schwannoma. A clinical study. Strahlenther Onkol 2014; 190:533-7. [PMID: 24589920 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-014-0646-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2013] [Accepted: 11/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Local tumor control and functional outcome after linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for vestibular schwannoma (VS) were assessed. METHODS In all, 250 patients with VS were treated: 190 patients with tumors < 2 cm diameter underwent SRS and 60 patients with tumors >2 to 3.5 cm underwent FSRT. Dose prescription for all cases with SRS (n = 190, 76 %) was 13.5 Gy. For FSRT, mainly two hypofractionated schedules (n = 60, 24 %) with either 7 fractions of 5 Gy (total dose: 35 Gy; n = 35) or 11 fractions of 3.8 Gy (total dose: 41.8 Gy; n = 16) were used. The primary endpoint was local tumor control. Secondary endpoints were symptomatic control and morbidity. RESULTS The median follow-up was 33.8 months. The 3-year local tumor control was 88.9 %. Local control for SRS and FSRT was 88 and 92 %, respectively. For FSRT with 35 and 41.8 Gy, local control was 90 and 100 %, respectively. There were no acute reactions exceeding grade I. In 61 cases (24.4 % of the entire cohort), trigeminal neuralgia was reported prior to treatment. At last follow-up, 16.3 % (10/61) of those patients reported relief of pain. Regarding facial nerve dysfunction, 45 patients (18 %) presented with symptoms prior to RT. At the last follow-up, 13.3% (6/45) of those patients reported a relief of dysesthesia. CONCLUSION Using SRS to treat small VS results in good local control rates. FSRT for larger lesions also seems effective. Severe treatment-related complications are not frequent. Therefore, image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy is an appropriate alternative to microsurgery for patients with VS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Badakhshi
- Departments for Radiation Oncology, Charité School of Medicine and University Hospital of Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Badakhshi H, Graf R, Böhmer D, Synowitz M, Wiener E, Budach V. Results for local control and functional outcome after linac-based image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery in 190 patients with vestibular schwannoma. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2014; 55:288-292. [PMID: 23979079 PMCID: PMC3951065 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrt101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2013] [Revised: 07/07/2013] [Accepted: 07/18/2013] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed local control (LC) and functional outcome after linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS). METHODS Between 1998 and 2008, 190 patients with VS were treated with SRS. All patients had tumors <2 cm diameter. Patients received 13.5 Gy prescribed to the 80th isodose at the tumor margin. The primary endpoint was LC. Secondary endpoints were symptomatic control and morbidity. RESULTS Median follow-up was 40 months. LC was achieved in 88% of patients. There were no acute reactions exceeding Grade I. Trigeminal nerve dysfunction was present in 21.6% (n = 41) prior to SRS. After treatment, 85% (n = 155) had no change, 4.4,% (n = 8) had a relief of symptoms, 10.4% (n = 19) had new symptoms. Facial nerve dysfunction was present in some patients prior to treatment, e.g. paresis (12.6%; n = 24) and dysgeusia (0.5%; n = 1). After treatment 1.1% (n = 2) reported improvement and 6.1% (n = 11) experienced new symptoms. Hearing problems before SRS were present in 69.5% of patients (n = 132). After treatment, 62.6% (n = 144) had no change, 10.4% (n = 19) experienced improvement and 26.9% (n = 49) became hearing impaired. CONCLUSION This series of SRS for small VS provided similar LC rates to microsurgery; thus, it is effective as a non-invasive, image-guided procedure. The functional outcomes observed indicate the safety and effectiveness of linac-based SRS. Patients may now be informed of the clinical equivalence of SRS to microsurgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harun Badakhshi
- Departments for Radiation Oncology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Reinhold Graf
- Departments for Radiation Oncology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Böhmer
- Departments for Radiation Oncology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Synowitz
- Department for Neurosurgery, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Edzard Wiener
- Institute for Neuroradiology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Departments for Radiation Oncology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an established alternative to surgery in the treatment of meningiomas. Particularly in cases of symptomatic tumors of the optical pathways, irradiation is the treatment of choice when the functional risks of surgery are high. Because histological findings are often lacking an interdisciplinary discussion is important to determine neuroradiological and neuro-ophthalmological patterns of the tumor. As a general benefit for immediate irradiation after subtotal resection could not yet be shown and the risk for side effects is increased, a postoperative radiotherapy has to be discussed in each individual patient. The choice of the special irradiation schedule depends on tumor size and its localization in the proximity of critical structures. Three-dimensional treatment planning with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) information on the tumor and its surroundings is mandatory. A precise immobilization of the patient is necessary for treatment in the area of the anterior visual pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Paulsen
- Klinik für Radioonkologie, Universität Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076 Tübingen.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Soldà F, Wharram B, De Ieso PB, Bonner J, Ashley S, Brada M. Long-term efficacy of fractionated radiotherapy for benign meningiomas. Radiother Oncol 2013; 109:330-4. [PMID: 24183065 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2013] [Revised: 09/13/2013] [Accepted: 10/13/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess long term efficacy of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) in the treatment of benign intracranial meningiomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective study of 222 patients with histologically confirmed (58%) and unverified presumed (42%) grade I intracranial meningioma treated with fSRT in a single institution to doses of 50-55Gy in 30-33 fractions. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 43months (range 3-144) the 5 and 10years local control (LC) were 93% and 86%. Patients with tumors involving the optic nerve (42 patients) and patients with cavernous sinus/parasellar region meningiomas (78 patients) had 5 and 10years LC of 100%. The 5 and 10years survival probabilities were 93% and 84%. On multivariate analysis gender and tumor site were independent predictors of LC. Worsening of pre-existing cranial nerve deficit occurred in 8 (3.5%) and onset of new deficit in 1 (0.5%) patient. Two patients with optic nerve sheath meningioma (1%) developed radiation retinopathy. There were no cases of radiation necrosis or second brain tumors. CONCLUSION fSRT achieves excellent medium and long term tumor control with minimal morbidity particularly in patients with benign meningiomas involving the parasellar region and the optic nerves and questions the role of other treatment modalities for tumors at these locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Soldà
- Neuro-oncology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Maclean J, Fersht N, Short S. Controversies in radiotherapy for meningioma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2013; 26:51-64. [PMID: 24207113 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2013.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2013] [Revised: 08/21/2013] [Accepted: 10/02/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumour. Although external beam radiotherapy and radiosurgery are well-established treatments, affording local control rates of 85-95% at 10 years, the evidence base is mainly limited to single institution case series. This has resulted in inconsistent practices. It is generally agreed that radiotherapy is an established primary therapy in patients requiring treatment for surgically inaccessible disease and postoperatively for grade 3 tumours. Controversy exists surrounding whether radiotherapy should be upfront or reserved for progression for incompletely excised and grade 2 tumours. External beam radiotherapy and radiosurgery have not been directly compared, but seem to offer comparable rates of control for benign disease. Target volume definition remains contentious, including the inclusion of hyperostotic bone, dural tail and surrounding brain, but pathological studies are shedding some light. Most agree that doses around 50-54 Gy are appropriate for benign meningiomas and ongoing European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group studies are evaluating dose escalation for higher risk disease. Here we address the 'who, when and how' of radiotherapy for meningioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Maclean
- Department of Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - N Fersht
- Department of Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - S Short
- Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Combs SE, Ganswindt U, Foote RL, Kondziolka D, Tonn JC. State-of-the-art treatment alternatives for base of skull meningiomas: complementing and controversial indications for neurosurgery, stereotactic and robotic based radiosurgery or modern fractionated radiation techniques. Radiat Oncol 2012; 7:226. [PMID: 23273161 PMCID: PMC3551826 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-7-226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2012] [Accepted: 12/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
For skull base meningiomas, several treatment paradigms are available: Observation with serial imaging, surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery, radiation therapy or some combination of both. The choice depends on several factors. In this review we evaluate different treatment options, the outcome of modern irradiation techniques as well as the clinical results available, and establish recommendations for the treatment of patients with skull-base meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|