1
|
Elumalai T, Maitre P, Portner R, Billy Graham Mariam N, Young T, Hughes S, Wickramasinghe K, Bhana R, Sabar M, Thippu Jayaprakash K, Mistry H, Hoskin P, Choudhury A. Impact of prostate radiotherapy on survival outcomes in clinically node-positive prostate cancer: A multicentre retrospective analysis. Radiother Oncol 2023; 186:109746. [PMID: 37330057 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate clinical outcomes for cN1M0 prostate cancer treated with varied modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS Men with radiological stage cN1M0 prostate cancer on conventional imaging, treated from 2011-2019 with various modalities across four centres in the UK were included. Demographics, tumour grade and stage, and treatment details were collected. Biochemical and radiological progression-free survival (bPFS, rPFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan Meier analyses. Potential factors impacting survival were tested with univariable log-rank test and multivariable Cox-proportional hazards model. RESULTS Total 337 men with cN1M0 prostate cancer were included, 47% having Gleason grade group 5 disease. Treatment modalities included androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in 98.9% men, either alone (19%) or in combinations including prostate radiotherapy (70%), pelvic nodal radiotherapy (38%), docetaxel (22%), or surgery (7%). At median follow up of 50 months, 5-year bPFS, rPFS, and OS were 62.7%, 71.0%, and 75.8% respectively. Prostate radiotherapy was associated with significantly higher bPFS (74.1% vs 34.2%), rPFS (80.7% vs 44.3%) and OS (86.7% vs 56.2%) at five years (log rank p < 0.001 each). On multivariable analysis including age, Gleason grade group, tumour stage, ADT duration, docetaxel, and nodal radiotherapy, benefit of prostate radiotherapy persisted for bPFS [HR 0.33 (95% CI 0.18-0.62)], rPFS [HR 0.25 (0.12-0.51)], and OS [HR 0.27 (0.13-0.58)] (p < 0.001 each). Impact of nodal radiotherapy or docetaxel was not established due to small subgroups. CONCLUSION Addition of prostate radiotherapy to ADT in cN1M0 prostate cancer yielded improved disease control and overall survival independent of other tumour and treatment factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thiraviyam Elumalai
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
| | | | - Robin Portner
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, UK
| | | | - Tom Young
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Simon Hughes
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Muhammad Sabar
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Peter Hoskin
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nakamura K, Norihisa Y, Ikeda I, Inokuchi H, Aizawa R, Kamoto T, Kamba T, Inoue T, Yamasaki T, Akamatsu S, Kobayashi T, Ogawa O, Mizowaki T. Ten‐year outcomes of whole‐pelvic intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer with regional lymph node metastasis. Cancer Med 2022; 12:7859-7867. [PMID: 36536528 PMCID: PMC10134326 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of pelvic node-positive prostate cancer has been challenging and controversial. We conducted a study to evaluate the outcomes of whole-pelvic (WP) simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS A total of 67 consecutive patients with cT1c-4N1M0 prostate cancer were definitively treated by WP SIB-IMRT. Neoadjuvant ADT (median: 8.3 months) was administered in all cases. WP SIB-IMRT was designed to simultaneously deliver 78, 66.3, and 58.5 Gy in 39 fractions to the prostate plus seminal vesicles, metastatic lymph nodes (LNs), and the pelvic LN region, respectively. Adjuvant ADT (median: 24.7 months) was administered in 66 patients. RESULTS The median follow-up period was 81.6 months (range: 30.5-160.7). Biochemical relapse-free, overall, and prostate cancer-specific survival rates at 10 years were 59.8%, 79.6%, and 86.3%, respectively. Loco-regional recurrence was not observed. Being in International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 5 and having a posttreatment detectable nadir prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (≥0.010 ng/ml) were significantly associated with worse prostate cancer-specific survival and progression of castration resistance. The 10-year cumulative incidence rates of grade 2 and 3 late toxicities were, respectively, 1.5% and 0% for genitourinary, 0% and 1.5% for gastrointestinal events. No grade 4 acute or late toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS WP SIB-IMRT can be safely administered to patients with pelvic node-positive prostate cancer. Since grade group 5 and detectable nadir PSA levels are risks for castration resistance, we may need to increase the intensity of treatment for such cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiyonao Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image‐Applied Therapy Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
| | - Yoshiki Norihisa
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image‐Applied Therapy Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
| | - Itaru Ikeda
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image‐Applied Therapy Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
| | - Haruo Inokuchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image‐Applied Therapy Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
| | - Rihito Aizawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image‐Applied Therapy Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Kamoto
- Department of Urology Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
| | - Tomomi Kamba
- Department of Urology Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
| | - Takahiro Inoue
- Department of Urology Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
| | - Toshinari Yamasaki
- Department of Urology Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
| | - Shusuke Akamatsu
- Department of Urology Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
| | - Takashi Kobayashi
- Department of Urology Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
| | - Osamu Ogawa
- Department of Urology Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image‐Applied Therapy Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Francolini G, Stocchi G, Detti B, Di Cataldo V, Bruni A, Triggiani L, Guerini AE, Mazzola R, Cuccia F, Mariotti M, Salvestrini V, Garlatti P, Borghesi S, Ingrosso G, Bellavita R, Aristei C, Desideri I, Livi L. Dose-escalated pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer in definitive or postoperative setting. Radiol Med 2021; 127:206-213. [PMID: 34850352 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01435-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Given the absence of standardized planning approach for clinically node-positive (cN1) prostate cancer (PCa), we collected data about the use of prophylactic pelvic irradiation and nodal boost. The aim of the present series is to retrospectively assess clinical outcomes after this approach to compare different multimodal treatment strategies in this scenario. METHODS Data from clinical records of patients affected by cN1 PCa and treated in six different Italian institutes with prophylactic pelvic irradiation and boost on pathologic pelvic lymph nodes detected with CT, MRI or choline PET/CT were retrospectively reviewed and collected. Clinical outcomes in terms of overall survival (OS) and biochemical relapse-free survival (b-RFS) were explored. The correlation between outcomes and baseline features (International Society of Urological Pathology-ISUP pattern, total dose to positive pelvic nodes ≤ / > 60 Gy, sequential or simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) administration and definitive vs postoperative treatment) was explored. RESULTS ISUP pattern < 2 was a significant predictor of improved b-RFS (HR = 0.3, 95% CI 0.1220-0.7647, P = 0.0113), while total dose < 60 Gy to positive pelvic nodes was associated with worse b-RFS (HR = 3.59, 95% CI 1.3245-9.741, P = 0.01). Conversely, treatment setting (postoperative vs definitive) and treatment delivery technique (SIB vs sequential boost) were not associated with significant differences in terms of b-RFS (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.338-2.169, P = 0.743, and HR = 2.39, 95% CI 0.93-6.111, P = 0.067, respectively). CONCLUSION Results from the current analysis are in keeping with data from literature showing that pelvic irradiation and boost on positive nodes are effective approaches. Upfront surgical approach was not associated with better clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy. .,CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza, Florence, Italy.
| | - Giulia Stocchi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 85, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Vanessa Di Cataldo
- CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura ed Assistenza, Florence, Italy
| | - Alessio Bruni
- Radiotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Luca Triggiani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Rosario Mazzola
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy
| | - Francesco Cuccia
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Italy
| | - Matteo Mariotti
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Pietro Garlatti
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Simona Borghesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Gianluca Ingrosso
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Rita Bellavita
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marzec J, Becker J, Paulsen F, Wegener D, Olthof SC, Pfannenberg C, Schwenck J, Bedke J, Stenzl A, Nikolaou K, la Fougère C, Zips D, Müller AC. 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT-directed IGRT/SBRT for oligometastases of recurrent prostate cancer after initial surgery. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:149-156. [PMID: 31559880 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1669816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Background: We evaluated efficacy and toxicity of 68Ga-PSMA-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT)-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy (SBRT/IGRT) for oligometastases of prostate cancer recurrences after previous surgery.Methods: Nineteen patients were analyzed within a prospective PET-registry study (064/2013BO1) and retrospectively analyzed (807/2017BO2) fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy, ≤five 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT positive lesions. Biochemical control was evaluated with EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer)- and Phenix-definitions. Toxicity was scored according to CTCAE-criteria v. 4.03.Results: A total of 38 oligometastases (19 patients, 2 with re-treatment) were treated with SBRT/IGRT from October 2014 to July 2017. 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT-positive lesions were detected on average 39 months (5-139) after prostatectomy (pT2b-3b pN0-1 cM0). Mean PSA (Prostate-specific antigen)-level at time of imaging reached 2.2 ng/mL (range 0.2-10.1). PET/CT-positive lesions were treated with different fractionation schedules reaching biological equivalent doses (BED) of 116.7-230.0 Gy. Concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was given in seven patients. After a median follow-up of 17 months (4-42) all patients were alive. Estimated 1-year PSA- control (n = 19) reached 80.8% (Phenix) and 67.5% (EORTC). A PSA-decline (≥50%) was detected in 16/19 patients after radiotherapy. Higher graded G3+-acute toxicity did not occur. Temporary late G3-proctitis was detected in one patient.Conclusions: Reaching of nadir ≤0.1 or 0.2 ng/mL was associated by improved DMFS (distant metastases free survival) and could serve as a surrogate endpoint for RT of oligometastases after initial prostatectomy. Short term effects of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT-based ablative radiotherapy for oligometastases demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and favorable biochemical response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Marzec
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - J. Becker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - F. Paulsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - D. Wegener
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - S.-C. Olthof
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C. Pfannenberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - J. Schwenck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Cluster of Excellnence iFIT (EXC 2180) “Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies”, University of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - J. Bedke
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - A. Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - K. Nikolaou
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C. la Fougère
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Cluster of Excellnence iFIT (EXC 2180) “Image Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies”, University of Tuebingen, Germany
| | - D. Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A.-C. Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim JI, Park JM, Choi CH, An HJ, Kim YJ, Kim JH. Retrospective study comparing MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) setup strategies for prostate treatment: repositioning vs. replanning. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:139. [PMID: 31387593 PMCID: PMC6683369 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1349-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study compared adaptive replanning and repositioning corrections based on soft-tissue matching for prostate cancer by using the magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) system. METHODS A total of 19 patients with prostate cancer were selected retrospectively. Weekly magnetic resonance image (MRI) scans were acquired for 5 weeks for each patient to observe the anatomic changes during the treatment course. Initial intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans (iIMRT) were generated for each patient with 13 coplanar 60Co beams on a ViewRay™ system. Two techniques were applied: patient repositioning and replanning. For patient repositioning, one plan was created: soft-tissue (prostate) matching (Soft). The dose distribution was calculated for each MRI with the beam delivery parameters from the initial IMRT plan. The replanning technique was used to generate the Adaptive plan, which was the reoptimized plan for the weekly MRI. The dose-volumetric parameters of the planning target volume (PTV), bladder, and rectum were calculated for all plans. During the treatment course, the PTV, bladder, and rectum were evaluated for changes in volume and the effect on dosimetric parameters. The differences between the dose-volumetric parameters of the plans were examined through the Wilcoxon test. The initial plan was used as a baseline to compare the differences. RESULTS The Adaptive plan showed better target coverage during the treatment period, but the change was not significant in the Soft plan. There were significant differences in D98%, D95%, and D2% in PTV between the Soft and Adaptive plans (p < 0.05) except for Dmean. There was no significant change in Dmax and Dmean as the treatment progressed with all plans. All indices for the Adaptive plan stayed the same compared to those of iIMRT during the treatment course. There were significant differences in D15%, D25%, D35%, and D50% in the bladder between the Soft and Adaptive plans. The Adaptive plan showed the worse dose sparing than the Soft plan for the bladder according to each dosimetric index. In contrast to the bladder, the Adaptive plan achieved better sparing than the Soft plan during the treatment course. The significant differences were only observed in D15% and D35% between the Soft and Adaptive plans (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Patient repositioning based on the target volume (Soft plan) can relatively retain the target coverage for patients and the OARs remain at a clinically tolerance level during the treatment course. The Adaptive plan did not clinically improve for the dose delivered to OARs, it kept the dose delivered to the target volume constant. However, the Adaptive plan is beneficial when the organ positions and volumes change considerable during treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung-In Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Min Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Center for Convergence Research on Robotics, Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Heon Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Joon An
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yi-Jun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Ho Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. .,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schwenck J, Olthof SC, Pfannenberg C, Reischl G, Wegener D, Marzec J, Bedke J, Stenzl A, Nikolaou K, la Fougère C, Zips D, Müller AC. Intention-to-Treat Analysis of 68Ga-PSMA and 11C-Choline PET/CT Versus CT for Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Surgery. J Nucl Med 2019; 60:1359-1365. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.224543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
|
7
|
Mavroidis P, Pearlstein KA, Dooley J, Sun J, Saripalli S, Das SK, Wang AZ, Chen RC. Fitting NTCP models to bladder doses and acute urinary symptoms during post-prostatectomy radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:17. [PMID: 29394931 PMCID: PMC5797360 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-0961-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To estimate the radiobiological parameters of three popular normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models, which describe the dose-response relations of bladder regarding different acute urinary symptoms during post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (RT). To evaluate the goodness-of-fit and the correlation of those models with those symptoms. METHODS Ninety-three consecutive patients treated from 2010 to 2015 with post-prostatectomy image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were included in this study. Patient-reported urinary symptoms were collected pre-RT and weekly during treatment using the validated Prostate Cancer Symptom Indices (PCSI). The assessed symptoms were flow, dysuria, urgency, incontinence, frequency and nocturia using a Likert scale of 1 to 4 or 5. For this analysis, an increase by ≥2 levels in a symptom at any time during treatment compared to baseline was considered clinically significant. The dose volume histograms of the bladder were calculated. The Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB), Relative Seriality (RS) and Logit NTCP models were used to fit the clinical data. The fitting of the different models was assessed through the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Odds Ratio methods. RESULTS For the symptoms of urinary urgency, leakage, frequency and nocturia, the derived LKB model parameters were: 1) D50 = 64.2Gy, m = 0.50, n = 1.0; 2) D50 = 95.0Gy, m = 0.45, n = 0.50; 3) D50 = 83.1Gy, m = 0.56, n = 1.00; and 4) D50 = 85.4Gy, m = 0.60, n = 1.00, respectively. The AUC values for those symptoms were 0.66, 0.58, 0.64 and 0.64, respectively. The differences in AIC between the different models were less than 2 and ranged within 0.1 and 1.3. CONCLUSIONS Different dose metrics were correlated with the symptoms of urgency, incontinence, frequency and nocturia. The symptoms of urinary flow and dysuria were poorly associated with dose. The values of the parameters of three NTCP models were determined for bladder regarding four acute urinary symptoms. All the models could fit the clinical data equally well. The NTCP predictions of urgency showed the best correlation with the patient reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panayiotis Mavroidis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7512 USA
| | - Kevin A. Pearlstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7512 USA
| | - John Dooley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7512 USA
| | - Jasmine Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7512 USA
| | - Srinivas Saripalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7512 USA
| | - Shiva K. Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7512 USA
| | - Andrew Z. Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7512 USA
| | - Ronald C. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7512 USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
A Retrospective Feasibility Study of Salvage Pelvic Nodal Radiation in 6 Patients With Biochemical Failure Following Prostate Fossa Radiation. Am J Clin Oncol 2016; 39:479-483. [DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
9
|
Rischke HC, Eiberger AK, Volegova-Neher N, Henne K, Krauss T, Grosu AL, Jilg CA. PET/CT and MRI directed extended salvage radiotherapy in recurrent prostate cancer with lymph node metastases. Adv Med Sci 2016; 61:212-218. [PMID: 26895459 DOI: 10.1016/j.advms.2016.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2015] [Revised: 01/21/2016] [Accepted: 01/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE PET/CT directed extended salvage radiotherapy (esRT) of involved lymph-node (LN) regions may be a salvage strategy for patients with nodal recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after primary therapy or after previous prostate fossa salvage RT. The aim of the study was to determine the time until prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, pattern of failure and toxicity after esRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS 25 patients with nodal or nodal+local recurrent PCa confirmed by Choline-PET/CT and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) were treated with esRT at the sites of recurrence. Acute and late toxicity was recorded. In case of subsequent PSA progression, imaging was performed to confirm next relapse. Mean follow-up was 2.9 years. RESULTS According to Choline-PET/CT and MRI findings, 84% (21/25) of esRT were treatment of pelvic only, 12% (3/25) of retroperitoneal only and 4% (1/25) of both pelvic and retroperitoneal regions. 40% (10/25) received concomitant irradiation of the prostatic fossa (after primary radical prostatectomy). Median time to PSA progression of the whole cohort was 19.6 months. Median time to PSA progression for patients with 1-2 PET-positive LN (n=15) was 34.9 months versus median 12.7 months for patients with PET-positive LN≥3 (n=10), p-value: 0.0476. Acute and late toxicity was mild to moderate, no grade-3 adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION PET/CT and MRI directed esRT of nodal recurrent PCa with or without local recurrence is feasible with low acute and late toxicity. Patients with only one or two PET-positive LN treated by esRT achieved prolonged complete biochemical remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Christian Rischke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert-Ludwigs University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Ann-Kristin Eiberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert-Ludwigs University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Natalja Volegova-Neher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert-Ludwigs University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Karl Henne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert-Ludwigs University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Krauss
- Department of Radiology, Albert-Ludwigs University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert-Ludwigs University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Cordula A Jilg
- Department of Urology, Albert-Ludwigs University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jereczek-Fossa BA, Ciardo D, Ferrario S, Fossati P, Fanetti G, Zerini D, Zannoni D, Fodor C, Gerardi MA, Surgo A, Muto M, Cambria R, De Cobelli O, Orecchia R. No increase in toxicity of pelvic irradiation when intensity modulation is employed: clinical and dosimetric data of 208 patients treated with post-prostatectomy radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20150985. [PMID: 27109736 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the toxicity of image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) to the pelvis or prostate bed (PB) only. To test the hypothesis that the potentially injurious effect of pelvic irradiation can be counterbalanced by reduced irradiated normal tissue volume using IG-IMRT. METHODS Between February 2010 and February 2012, 208 patients with prostate cancer were treated with adjuvant or salvage IG-IMRT to the PB (102 patients, Group PB) or the pelvis and prostate bed (P) (106 patients, Group P). The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria were used to evaluate toxicity. RESULTS Median follow-up was 27 months. Toxicity G ≥ 2 in Group PB: in the bowel acute and late toxicities were 11.8% and 10%, respectively; urinary acute and late toxicities were 10.8% and 15%, respectively. Toxicity G ≥ 2 in Group P: in the bowel acute and late toxicities were both 13.2%; urinary acute and late toxicities were 13.2% and 15.1%, respectively. No statistical difference in acute or late toxicity between the groups was found (bowel: p = 0.23 and p = 0.89 for acute and late toxicity, respectively; urinary: p = 0.39 and p = 0.66 for acute and late toxicity, respectively). Of the clinical variables, only previous abdominal surgery was correlated with acute bowel toxicity. Dosimetric parameters that correlated with bowel toxicity were identified. CONCLUSION The toxicity rates were low and similar in both groups, suggesting that IG-IMRT allows for a safe post-operative irradiation of larger volumes. Further investigation is warranted to exclude bias owing to non-randomized character of the study. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Our report shows that modern radiotherapy technology and careful planning allow maintaining the toxicity of pelvic lymph node treatment at the acceptable level, as it is in the case of PB radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa
- 1 Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,2 Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Delia Ciardo
- 1 Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Ferrario
- 1 Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,2 Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Piero Fossati
- 1 Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,2 Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fanetti
- 1 Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,2 Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Zerini
- 1 Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Cristiana Fodor
- 1 Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Marianna A Gerardi
- 1 Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,2 Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia Surgo
- 1 Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,2 Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Muto
- 1 Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,2 Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Cambria
- 4 Division of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- 2 Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,5 Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- 1 Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.,2 Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Müller AC, Eckert F, Paulsen F, Zips D, Stenzl A, Schilling D, Alber M, Bares R, Martus P, Weckermann D, Belka C, Ganswindt U. Nodal Clearance Rate and Long-Term Efficacy of Individualized Sentinel Node–Based Pelvic Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 94:263-71. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2015] [Revised: 10/10/2015] [Accepted: 10/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
12
|
Toxicity and quality of life after choline-PET/CT directed salvage lymph node dissection and adjuvant radiotherapy in nodal recurrent prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:178. [PMID: 25112785 PMCID: PMC4251989 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-9-178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2014] [Accepted: 08/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a previous study we demonstrated that, based on 11C/18 F-choline positron emission tomography-computerized-tomography as a diagnostic tool, salvage lymph node dissection (LND) plus adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) is feasible for treatment of pelvic/retroperitoneal nodal recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the toxicity of this combined treatment strategy has not been systematically investigated before. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the acute and late toxicity and quality of life of ART after LND in pelvic/retroperitoneal nodal recurrent PCa. MATERIAL AND METHODS 43 patients with nodal recurrent PCa were treated with 46 LND followed by ART (mean 49.6 Gy total dose) at the sites of nodal recurrence. Toxicity of ART was analysed by physically examination (31/43, 72.1%), by requesting 15 frequent items of adverse events from the Common-Terminology-Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0-catalogue and by review of medical records. QLQ-C30 (EORTC quality of life assessment) and PR25 (prostate cancer module) questionnaires were used to investigate quality of life. Toxicity was evaluated before starting of ART, during ART (acute toxicity), after ART (mean 2.3 months) and at end of follow up (mean 3.2 years after end of ART) reflecting late toxicity. RESULTS 71.7% (33/46) of 46 ART were treatment of pelvic, 10.9% (5/46) of retroperitoneal only and 28.3% (13/46) of pelvic and retroperitoneal regions. Overall 52 symptoms representing toxicities were observed before ART, 107 during ART, 88 after end of ART and 52 at latest follow up. Leading toxicities during ART were diarrhoea (19%, 20/107), urinary incontinence (16%, 17/107) and fatigue (16%, 17/107). The spectrum of late toxicities was almost equal to those before beginning of ART. No grade 3 adverse events or chronic lymphedema at extremities were observed. We observed no clear correlation between localisation of treated regions, technique of ART and frequency or severity of toxicities. Mean quality of life at final evaluation was 74%. CONCLUSION ART after extended LND in PCa relapse is justifiable with respect to adverse effects and toxicity. The side effects were circumscribed and well tolerated. The spectrum of adverse events at latest follow up was almost equal to those before start of ART.
Collapse
|
13
|
Van Praet C, Ost P, Lumen N, De Meerleer G, Vandecasteele K, Villeirs G, Decaestecker K, Fonteyne V. Postoperative high-dose pelvic radiotherapy for N+ prostate cancer: Toxicity and matched case comparison with postoperative prostate bed-only radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2013; 109:222-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2013] [Revised: 08/12/2013] [Accepted: 08/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
14
|
Jereczek-Fossa B, Pobbiati C, Santoro L, Fodor C, Fanti P, Vigorito S, Baroni G, Zerini D, De Cobelli O, Orecchia R. Prostate positioning using cone-beam computer tomography based on manual soft-tissue registration. Strahlenther Onkol 2013; 190:81-7. [DOI: 10.1007/s00066-013-0387-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2012] [Accepted: 05/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
15
|
Mounessi FS, Lehrich P, Haverkamp U, Willich N, Bölling T, Eich HT. Pelvic Ewing sarcomas. Three-dimensional conformal vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2013; 189:308-14. [PMID: 23443613 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-012-0304-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2012] [Accepted: 12/20/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of the present work was to assess the potential advantage of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) over three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) planning in pelvic Ewing's sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 8 patients with Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis undergoing radiotherapy were analyzed. Plans for 3D-CRT and IMRT were calculated for each patient. Dose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV), conformity and homogeneity indices, as well as further parameters were evaluated. RESULTS The average dose coverage values for PTV were comparable in 3D-CRT and IMRT plans. Both techniques had a PTV coverage of V95 > 98 % in all patients. Whereas the IMRT plans achieved a higher conformity index compared to the 3D-CRT plans (conformity index 0.79 ± 0.12 vs. 0.54 ± 0.19, p = 0.012), the dose distribution across the target volumes was less homogeneous with IMRT planning than with 3D-CRT planning. This difference was statistically significant (homogeneity index 0.11 ± 0.03 vs. 0.07 ± 0.0, p = 0.035). For the bowel, Dmean and D1%, as well as V2 to V60 were reduced in IMRT plans. For the bladder and the rectum, there was no significant difference in Dmean. However, the percentages of volumes receiving at least doses of 30, 40, 45, and 50 Gy (V30 to V50) were lower for the rectum in IMRT plans. The volume of normal tissue receiving at least 2 Gy (V2) was significantly higher in IMRT plans compared with 3D-CRT, whereas at high dose levels (V30) it was significantly lower. CONCLUSION Compared to 3D-CRT, IMRT showed significantly better results regarding dose conformity (p = 0.012) and bowel sparing at dose levels above 30 Gy (p = 0.012). Thus, dose escalation in the radiotherapy of pelvic Ewing's sarcoma can be more easily achieved using IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F S Mounessi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|