Retrospective analysis of linac-based radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations and testing of the Flickinger formula in predicting radiation injury

Dose-Response Effect and Dose-Toxicity in Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: A Review

Simple Summary

Brain metastases are one of the most frequent complications for cancer patients. Stereotactic radiosurgery is considered a cornerstone treatment for patients with limited brain metastases and the ideal dose and fractionation schedule still remain unknown. The aim of this literature review is to discuss the dose-effect relation in brain metastases treated by stereotactic radiosurgery, accounting for fractionation and technical considerations.

Abstract

For more than two decades, stereotactic radiosurgery has been considered a cornerstone treatment for patients with limited brain metastases. Historically, radiosurgery in a single fraction has been the standard of care but recent technical advances have also enabled the delivery of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for dedicated situations. Only few studies have investigated the efficacy and toxicity profile of different hypofractionated schedules but, to date, the ideal dose and fractionation schedule still remains unknown. Moreover, the linear-quadratic model is being debated regarding high dose per fraction. Recent studies shown the radiation schedule is a critical factor in the immunomodulatory responses. The aim of this literature review was to discuss the dose–effect relation in brain metastases treated by stereotactic radiosurgery accounting for fractionation and technical considerations. Efficacy and toxicity data were analyzed in the light of recent published data. Only retrospective and heterogeneous data were available. We attempted to present the relevant data with caution. A BED10 of 40 to 50 Gy seems associated with a 12-month local control rate >70%. A BED10 of 50 to 60 Gy seems to achieve a 12-month local control rate at least of 80% at 12 months. In the brain metastases radiosurgery series, for single-fraction schedule, a V12 Gy < 5 to 10 cc was associated to 7.1–22.5% radionecrosis rate. For three-fractions schedule, V18 Gy < 26–30 cc, V21 Gy < 21 cc and V23 Gy < 5–7 cc were associated with about 0–14% radionecrosis rate. For five-fractions schedule, V30 Gy < 10–30 cc, V 28.8 Gy < 3–7 cc and V25 Gy < 16 cc were associated with about 2–14% symptomatic radionecrosis rate. There are still no prospective trials comparing radiosurgery to fractionated stereotactic irradiation.

Single- and Multifraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery Dose/Volume Tolerances of the Brain

PURPOSE

As part of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Working Group on Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy investigating normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) after hypofractionated radiation therapy, data from published reports (PubMed indexed 1995-2018) were pooled to identify dosimetric and clinical predictors of radiation-induced brain toxicity after single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible studies provided NTCPs for the endpoints of radionecrosis, edema, or symptoms after cranial SRS/fSRS and quantitative dose-volume metrics. Studies of patients with only glioma, meningioma, vestibular schwannoma, or brainstem targets were excluded. The data summary and analyses focused on arteriovenous malformations (AVM) and brain metastases.

RESULTS

Data from 51 reports are summarized. There was wide variability in reported rates of radionecrosis. Available data for SRS/fSRS for brain metastases were more amenable to NTCP modeling than AVM data. In the setting of brain metastases, SRS/fSRS-associated radionecrosis can be difficult to differentiate from tumor progression. For single-fraction SRS to brain metastases, tissue volumes (including target volumes) receiving 12 Gy (V12) of 5 cm³, 10 cm³, or >15 cm³ were associated with risks of symptomatic radionecrosis of approximately 10%, 15%, and 20%, respectively. SRS for AVM was associated with modestly lower rates of symptomatic radionecrosis for equivalent V12. For brain metastases, brain plus target volume V20 (3-fractions) or V24 (5-fractions) <20 cm³ was associated with <10% risk of any necrosis or edema, and <4% risk of radionecrosis requiring resection.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of radionecrosis after SRS and fSRS can be modeled as a function of dose and volume treated. The use of fSRS appears to reduce risks of radionecrosis for larger treatment volumes relative to SRS. More standardized dosimetric and toxicity reporting is needed to facilitate future pooled analyses that can refine predictive models of brain toxicity risks.

Fast and high temperature hyperthermia coupled with radiotherapy as a possible new treatment for glioblastoma

Background

A new transcranial focused ultrasound device has been developed that can induce hyperthermia in a large tissue volume. The purpose of this work is to investigate theoretically how glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) can be effectively treated by combining the fast hyperthermia generated by this focused ultrasound device with external beam radiotherapy.

Methods/Design

To investigate the effect of tumor growth, we have developed a mathematical description of GBM proliferation and diffusion in the context of reaction–diffusion theory. In addition, we have formulated equations describing the impact of radiotherapy and heat on GBM in the reaction–diffusion equation, including tumor regrowth by stem cells. This formulation has been used to predict the effectiveness of the combination treatment for a realistic focused ultrasound heating scenario.

Our results show that patient survival could be significantly improved by this combined treatment modality.

Discussion

High priority should be given to experiments to validate the therapeutic benefit predicted by our model.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40349-016-0078-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Predictors for occlusion of cerebral AVMs following radiation therapy : Radiation dose and prior embolization, but not Spetzler-Martin grade

BACKGROUND

Intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) may show a harmful development. AVMs are treated by surgery, embolization, or radiation therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated obliteration rates and side effects in patients with AVMs treated by radiation therapy.

METHODS

A total of 40 cases treated between 2005 and 2013 were analyzed. Single-dose stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was received by 13 patients and 27 received hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HSRT). In 20 patients, endovascular embolization had been performed prior to irradiation and 24 patients (60 %) had a history of previous intracranial hemorrhage.

RESULTS

Treatment resulted in complete obliteration (CO) in 23/40 cases and partial obliteration in 8/40. CO was achieved in 85 % of patients receiving SRS compared to 44 % of those receiving HSRT. In the HSRT group, a first indication of an influence of AVM volume on obliteration rate was found. Equivalent 2 Gy fraction doses (EQD2) >70 Gy showed an obliteration rate of 50 %. Prior embolization was significantly associated with a higher portion of CO (p = 0.032). Median latency period (24.2 vs. 26 months) until CO was similar in both groups (SRS vs. HSRT). The rate of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with no prior bleeding events was 0 %.

CONCLUSION

Excellent obliteration rates were achieved by SRS. Consistent with the literature, this data analysis suggests that the results of HSRT are volume-dependent. Furthermore, regimens with EQD2 doses >70 Gy appear more likely to achieve obliteration than schemes with lower doses. The findings indicate that radiation therapy does not increase the risk of bleeding. Prior embolization may have a good prognostic impact.