1
|
Mukwada G, Chamunyonga C, Rowshanfarzad P, Gill S, Ebert MA. Insights into the dosimetric and geometric characteristics of stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: A systematic review. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0307088. [PMID: 39121064 PMCID: PMC11315342 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND GammaKnife (GK) and CyberKnife (CK) have been the mainstay stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) solution for multiple brain metastases (MBM) for several years. Recent technological advancement has seen an increase in single-isocentre C-arm linac-based SRS. This systematic review focuses on dosimetric and geometric insights into contemporary MBM SRS and thereby establish if linac-based SRS has matured to match the mainstay SRS delivery systems. METHODS The PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were interrogated which yielded 891 relevant articles that narrowed to 20 articles after removing duplicates and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary studies which reported the use of SRS for treatment of MBM SRS and reported the technical aspects including dosimetry were included. The review was limited to English language publications from January 2015 to August 2023. Only full-length papers were included in the final analysis. Opinion papers, commentary pieces, letters to the editor, abstracts, conference proceedings and editorials were excluded. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. The reporting of conformity indices (CI) and gradient indices, V12Gy, monitor units and the impact of translational and rotational shifts were extracted and analysed. RESULTS The single-isocentre technique for MBM dominated recent SRS studies and the most studied delivery platforms were Varian. The C-arm linac-based SRS plan quality and normal brain tissue sparing was comparable to GK and CK and in some cases better. The most used nominal beam energy was 6FFF, and optimised couch and collimator angles could reduce mean normal brain dose by 11.3%. Reduction in volume of the healthy brain receiving a certain dose was dependent on the number and size of the metastases and the relative geometric location. GK and CK required 4.5-8.4 times treatment time compared with linac-based SRS. Rotational shifts caused larger changes in CI in C-arm linac-based single-isocentre SRS. CONCLUSION C-arm linac-based SRS produced comparable MBM plan quality and the delivery is notably shorter compared to GK and CK SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Godfrey Mukwada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Ave, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Crispen Chamunyonga
- School of Clinical Sciences, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Pejman Rowshanfarzad
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Suki Gill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Ave, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Martin A. Ebert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Ave, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ito T, Kubo K, Monzen H, Yanagi Y, Nakamura K, Sakai Y, Nishimura Y. Overcoming Problems Caused by Offset Distance of Multiple Targets in Single-isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning for Stereotactic Radiosurgery. J Med Phys 2023; 48:365-372. [PMID: 38223796 PMCID: PMC10783189 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_8_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of the study is to investigate the impact of large target offset distances on the dose distribution and gamma passing rate (GPR) in single-isocenter multiple-target stereotactic radiosurgery (SIMT SRS) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a flattening filter-free (FFF) beam from a linear accelerator. Methods Two targets with a diameter of 1 cm were offset by "±2, ±4, and ±6 cm from the isocenter in a verification phantom for head SRS (20 Gy/fr). The VMAT plans were created using collimator angles that ensured the two targets did not share a leaf pair from the multi-leaf collimator. To evaluate the low-dose spread intermediate dose spill (R50%), GPRs were measured with a criterion of 3%/2 mm using an electronic portal imaging device and evaluated using monitor unit (MU), modulation complexity score for VMAT (MCSv), and leaf travel (LT) parameters. Results For offsets of 2, 4, and 6 cm, the respective parameters were: R50%, 4.75 ± 0.36, 5.13 ± 0.36, and 5.11 ± 0.33; GPR, 95.01%, 93.82%, and 90.67%; MU, 5893 ± 186, 5825 ± 286, and 5810 ± 396; MCSv, 0.24, 0.16, and 0.13; and LT, 189.21 ± 36.04, 327.69 ± 67.01, and 430.39 ± 114.34 mm. There was a spread in the low-dose region from offsets of ≥4 cm and the GPR negatively correlated with LT (r = -0.762). There was minimal correlation between GPR and MU or MCSv. Conclusions In SIMT SRS VMAT plans with an FFF beam from a linear accelerator, target offsets of <4 cm from the isocenter can minimize the volume of the low-dose region receiving 10 Gy or more. During treatment planning, it is important to choose gantry, couch, and collimator angles that minimize LT and thereby improve the GPR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Ito
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Radiological Technology, Kobe City Nishi Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Kazuki Kubo
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hajime Monzen
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuya Yanagi
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kenji Nakamura
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sakai
- Department of Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yasumasa Nishimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dosimetric Parameters in Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Do Flattening Filter-Free Beams Bring Benefits? A Preliminary Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030678. [PMID: 36765636 PMCID: PMC9913515 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to compare the dosimetric results of flattening filter-free (FFF) vs. flattened (FF) treatment plans for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT), with the goal to highlight potential advantages of FFF beams. METHODS A group of 18 patients with brain metastases treated with fSRT (30 Gy delivered in 5 fractions) were included. The dosimetric parameters evaluated were: (1) physical dosimetric parameters (number of monitor units (MUs), conformity index (CI), dose gradient index (DGI), beam on time (BOT)); (2) clinical dosimetric parameters pertaining to target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). Two treatment plans were performed for all patients: one used 6 MV FFF beams and the other used 6 MV flattened beams. RESULTS A slight increase in MUs was observed for the FFF mode (+23.3 MUs). The CI showed a difference of -2.7% for the FF plans (p = 0.28), correlated with a poorer coverage of the PTV. DGI values reported in terms of PTV are in line with international recommendations and showed a +1.9% difference for FFF plans. An average BOT of 90.3 s was reported for FFF plans, which was 2.3 times shorter than that required for FF plans delivery (p ≤ 0.001). A slight decrease of PTV coverage (-1.26%, p = 0.036) for FF plans can be considered relevant, but no other significant differences were observed between the two optimizations. No statistically significant benefit of using FFF beams to reduce V20 for normal brain could be demonstrated. CONCLUSION These dosimetric results encourage the implementation of fSRT with standard flattened beams in centers where FFF linacs are not available.
Collapse
|
4
|
Domgouo AIN, Fiume A, Grimaldi L, Moyo MN. Target volume size effect on comparison of dynamic arc treatment plans computed using flattened and unflattened 6MV beams. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2022; 53:686-692. [PMID: 36280570 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2022.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND In conventional linear accelerators, to obtain flat profiles leading to uniform dose distribution in homogeneous medium, the flattening filter is usually applied on the beam path. In recent years, to obtain higher dose rates, there have been the options of flattening filter free (FFF) beams and it has been noticed that these have many advantages. The aim of this study was to clearly underline the advantages and the drawbacks of flattened filter free (FFF) beams in comparison with the flattening filter (FF) beams for different clinical contexts (planning target volumes locations). METHODS Two groups (planned with auto-planning VMAT, full and partial arcs) of eight patients each were analyzed: Group I (small planning target volume PTV, with average volume 48.9 ±44.4 cm3), Group II (large PTV, with average volume 532.4 ±368.8 cm3). Both beam modalities 6MV and 6MVFFF were compared in terms of Dmax, D95%, D1cc, D2cc, homogeneity index (HI), number of monitor units (MU), treatment delivery time. RESULTS Using the 6MVFFF, the treatment delivery time was significantly reduced (p<0.05). For larger PTVs, the number of MU increased by more than twice, and the p-value shown a significant difference (p= 0.008). The value of Dmax increased by 4%. On the contrary, for small volumes, the results were quite similar from 6MVFFF to 6MV except some differences in terms of MU. CONCLUSION It is recommended to use 6MVFFF beam with small PTV volumes. Dose distributions are almost the same as with 6MV and there is a significant reduction of the treatment delivery time up to 57%. Due to the dose profile shape in FFF mode, the dose is lowered beyond the central axis for the FFF beams, and the additional MU allows the dose to be delivered away from the beam axis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alfredo Fiume
- Medical physics department, Civil hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Grimaldi
- Medical physics department, Esine hospital of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Maurice Ndontchueng Moyo
- Centre for Atomic, Molecular Physics and Quantum Optics, Faculty of Science, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Flattening filter free Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases using dynamic conformal arcs: 6 MV or 10 MV? JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396920001247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractIntroduction:Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has proven itself as an effective tool in the treatment of intracranial lesions. Image-guided high dose single fraction treatments have the potential to deliver ablative doses to tumours; however, treatment times can be long. Flattening filter free (FFF) beams are available on most modern linacs and offer a higher dose rate compared to conventional flattened beams which should reduce treatment times. This study aimed to compare 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF to a 6 MV flattened beam for single fraction dynamic conformal arc SRS for a Varian Truebeam linac.Materials and methods:In total, 21 individual clinical treatment plans for 21 brain metastases treated with 6 MV were retrospectively replanned using both 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF. Plan quality and efficiency metrics were evaluated by analysing dose coverage, dose conformity, dose gradients, dose to normal brain, beam-on-time (BOT), treatment time and monitor units.Results:FFF resulted in a significant reduction in median BOT for both 6 MV FFF (57·9%; p < 0·001) and 10 MV FFF (76·3%; p < 0·001) which led to reductions in treatment times of 16·8 and 21·5% respectively. However, 6 MV FFF showed superior normal brain dose sparing (p < 0·001) and dose gradient (p < 0·001) compared to 10 MV FFF. No differences were observed for conformity.Conclusion:6 MV FFF offers a significant reduction in average treatment time compared to 6 MV (3·7 minutes; p = 0·002) while maintaining plan quality.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ji T, Sun L, Cai F, Li G. Comparison between flattening filter-free (FFF) and flattened photon beam VMAT plans for the whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampus sparing. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 18:e263-e267. [PMID: 34333848 PMCID: PMC9540553 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate and investigate the feasibility of flattening filter‐free (FFF) beam for the whole‐brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampus sparing. Methods Eighteen patients with volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans in FFF and conventional beam modes were included in this study. The prescribed dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index reported by TPS (HI‐M), and homogeneity index (HI) for planning target volume (PTV) were evaluated. Subsequently, the following parameters for PTV were calculated and compared: D2%, D98%; the mean dose, maximum dose, and minimal dose for OARs. Plan modulation index, total MUs, and the gamma index were used to evaluate the plan quality. Results HI‐M results were similar for the two techniques (1.239 vs. 1.247, respectively, p = 0.048); FFF beam plans yielded lower D2% compared to FF beam plans (3,416.3 cGy vs. 3,437.2 cGy, p = 0.22), mean dose (3,177.5 cGy vs. 3,195.2 cGy, p = 0.009), and CI (0.884 vs. 0.876, p = 0.001) for PTV. Significant differences were observed between the two beam modes (FF model vs. FFF model) for the maximum dose (1,612.9 cGy vs. 1,470.2 cGy, respectively, p < 0.001), minimum dose (987.6 cGy vs. 898.8 cGy, respectively, p < 0.001), and the mean dose (1144.4 cGy vs. 1047.3 cGy, respectively, p < 0.001) to the hippocampus, and the maximum dose to the eyes (2,792.6 cGy vs. 2,751.3 cGy, respectively, p < 0.001). The average total MUs for FFF‐VMAT plans was significantly greater than FF‐VMAT plans. However, differences for the plan modulation index and the gamma index were negligible. Conclusion In comparison with FF beam, the FFF beam mode offers a clear benefit with respect to WBRT with hippocampal sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianlong Ji
- Department of Radiation oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Lu Sun
- Department of Radiation oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Feng Cai
- Department of Radiation oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Guang Li
- Department of Radiation oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ghemiş DM, Marcu LG. Progress and prospects of flattening filter free beam technology in radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 163:103396. [PMID: 34146680 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this work is to summarize and evaluate the current status of knowledge on flattening filter free (FFF) beams and their applications in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). A PubMed search was undertaken in order to identify relevant publications using FFF and stereotactic radiotherapy as keywords. On a clinical aspect, lung tumors treated with FFF SBRT show promising results in terms of local control and overall survival with acute toxicities consistent with those that occur with standard radiotherapy. Beside lung, SBRT is suitable for different anatomical sites such as liver, prostate, cervix, etc. offering similar results: reduced treatment time, good tumor control and mild acute toxicities. Regarding brain tumors, the employment of SRS with FFF beams significantly reduces treatment time and provides notable normal tissue sparing due to the sharp dose fall-off outside the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana M Ghemiş
- West University of Timisoara, Faculty of Physics, Timisoara, Romania; MedEuropa, Oradea, Romania
| | - Loredana G Marcu
- West University of Timisoara, Faculty of Physics, Timisoara, Romania; Faculty of Informatics & Science, University of Oradea, Oradea, 410087, Romania; Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
An Experimental Intervention Study Assessing the Impact of a Thin Silicone Gel Surface Overlay on Interface Pressure. Radiol Res Pract 2020; 2020:3246531. [PMID: 33299607 PMCID: PMC7710438 DOI: 10.1155/2020/3246531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The incidence of pressure ulcers (PUs) presents a substantial threat to patients, especially geriatric patients, those with restricted mobility, and patients suffering from chronic diseases such as cancer. PUs creates a huge financial burden on healthcare authorities and patients, costing billions to treat and manage. Radiography and radiotherapy patients may experience medical device related (MDR) PUs and studies have shown that high interface pressure (IP) values exist for the head when placed on an X-ray table without a mattress. These high IP values pose a PU risk to patients, especially those accessing prolonged radiography/radiology and radiotherapy procedures. The current study assessed the impact on IP values for the head from using a thin silicone gel surface overlay during radiographic procedures and identified whether this reduced the risk of PUs. Materials and Methods A calibrated XSENSOR pressure mat was used to measure IP for the head on an X-ray table with and without a thin silicone gel surface overlay. Prior to pressure mapping, the silicone gel surface overlay was assessed for its impact on radiation attenuation and image quality. Results Study participants were 14 males (70%) and six females (30%), with an age range of 25-53 years (mean = 34.4 ± 7.0). Paired-samples t-test results indicated that there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean IP for the head on the X-ray table without the silicone gel surface overlay (mean = 83.9 ± 8.2 in mmHg) and the X-ray table with the gel surface overlay (mean = 62.4 ± 6.1 in mmHg), p ≤ 0.001. Paired-samples t-test results indicated that there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean peak pressure index (PPI) for the head on the X-ray table without the silicone gel surface overlay (mean = 205.1 ± 28.2 in mmHg) and the X-ray table with the gel surface overlay (mean = 159.8 ± 26.8 in mmHg), p ≤ 0.001. Conclusions The use of a thin silicone gel surface overlay could reduce IP risk for the head by approximately 25%. The reduction in IP risk could have a significant impact in reducing the risk of developing a PU. To ensure maximum benefit, the silicone gel surface overlay should be evaluated to address the specific needs within radiography and radiotherapy planning and treatment settings.
Collapse
|
9
|
El Shafie RA, Tonndorf-Martini E, Schmitt D, Celik A, Weber D, Lang K, König L, Höne S, Forster T, von Nettelbladt B, Adeberg S, Debus J, Rieken S, Bernhardt D. Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy vs. CyberKnife M6 for the Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases. Front Oncol 2020; 10:568. [PMID: 32457829 PMCID: PMC7225280 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is becoming more frequently used for patients with multiple brain metastases (BMs). Single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (SI-VMAT) is an emerging alternative to dedicated systems such as CyberKnife (CK). We present a dosimetric comparison between CyberKnife M6 and SI-VMAT, planned at RayStation V8B, for the simultaneous SRS of five or more BM. Patients and Methods: Twenty treatment plans of CK-based single-session SRS to ≥5 brain metastases were replanned using SI-VMAT for delivery at an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator. Prescription dose was 20 or 18 Gy, conformally enclosing at least 98% of the total planning target volume (PTV), with PTV margin-width adapted to the respective SRS technique. Comparatively analyzed quality metrics included dose distribution to the healthy brain (HB), including different isodose volumes, conformity, and gradient indices. Estimated treatment time was also compared. Results: Median HB isodose volumes for 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 Gy were consistently smaller for CK-SRS compared to SI-VMAT (p < 0.001). Dose falloff outside the target volume, as expressed by the gradient indices GI_high and GI_low, was consistently steeper for CK-SRS compared to SI-VMAT (p < 0.001). CK-SRS achieved a median GI_high of 3.1 [interquartile range (IQR), 2.9–1.3] vs. 5.0 (IQR 4.3–5.5) for SI-VMAT (p < 0.001). For GI_low, the results were 3.0 (IQR, 2.9–3.1) for CK-SRS vs. 5.6 (IQR, 4.3–5.5) for SI-VMAT (p < 0.001). The median conformity index (CI) was 1.2 (IQR, 1.1–1.2) for CK-SRS vs. 1.5 (IQR, 1.4–1.7) for SI-VMAT (p < 0.001). Estimated treatment time was shorter for SI-VMAT, yielding a median of 13.7 min (IQR, 13.5–14.0) compared to 130 min (IQR, 114.5–154.5) for CK-SRS (p < 0.001). Conclusion: SI-VMAT offers enhanced treatment efficiency in cases with multiple BM, as compared to CyberKnife, but requires compromise regarding conformity and integral dose to the healthy brain. Additionally, delivery at a conventional linear accelerator (linac) may require a larger PTV margin to account for delivery and setup errors. Further evaluations are warranted to determine whether the detected dosimetric differences are clinically relevant. SI-VMAT could be a reasonable alternative to a dedicated radiosurgery system for selected patients with multiple BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami A El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric Tonndorf-Martini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniela Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aylin Celik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dorothea Weber
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Höne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bastian von Nettelbladt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hartgerink D, Swinnen A, Roberge D, Nichol A, Zygmanski P, Yin FF, Deblois F, Hurkmans C, Ong CL, Bruynzeel A, Aizer A, Fiveash J, Kirckpatrick J, Guckenberger M, Andratschke N, de Ruysscher D, Popple R, Zindler J. LINAC based stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: guidance for clinical implementation. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1275-1282. [PMID: 31257960 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1633016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a promising treatment option for patients with multiple brain metastases (BM). Recent technical advances have made LINAC based SRS a patient friendly technique, allowing for accurate patient positioning and a short treatment time. Since SRS is increasingly being used for patients with multiple BM, it remains essential that SRS be performed with the highest achievable quality in order to prevent unnecessary complications such as radionecrosis. The purpose of this article is to provide guidance for high-quality LINAC based SRS for patients with BM, with a focus on single isocenter non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods: The article is based on a consensus statement by the study coordinators and medical physicists of four trials which investigated whether patients with multiple BM are better palliated with SRS instead of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT): A European trial (NCT02353000), two American trials and a Canadian CCTG lead intergroup trial (CE.7). This manuscript summarizes the quality assurance measures concerning imaging, planning and delivery. Results: To optimize the treatment, the interval between the planning-MRI (gadolinium contrast-enhanced, maximum slice thickness of 1.5 mm) and treatment should be kept as short as possible (< two weeks). The BM are contoured based on the planning-MRI, fused with the planning-CT. GTV-PTV margins are minimized or even avoided when possible. To maximize efficiency, the preferable technique is single isocenter (non-)coplanar VMAT, which delivers high doses to the target with maximal sparing of the organs at risk. The use of flattening filter free photon beams ensures a lower peripheral dose and shortens the treatment time. To bench mark SRS treatment plan quality, it is advisable to compare treatment plans between hospitals. Conclusion: This paper provides guidance for quality assurance and optimization of treatment delivery for LINAC-based radiosurgery for patients with multiple BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianne Hartgerink
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ans Swinnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - David Roberge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHUM, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Alan Nichol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHUM, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Piotr Zygmanski
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Coen Hurkmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Chin Loon Ong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HagaZiekenhuis, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiotherapy, Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ayal Aizer
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John Fiveash
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - John Kirckpatrick
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Dirk de Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Popple
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Jaap Zindler
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Holland Proton Therapy Center, Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Linac-based radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with flattening filter-free volumetric modulated arc therapy in elderly patients : A mono-institutional experience on 110 brain metastases. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 195:218-225. [PMID: 30478669 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1405-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility and clinical results of linear accelerator (linac-)based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SFRT) with flattening filter-free (FFF) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in elderly patients affected by brain metastases (BMs). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients selected for the present analysis were ≥65 years old with a life expectancy of >3 months, a controlled or synchronous primary tumor, and <10 BMs with a diameter <3 cm. All patients were treated with FFF linac-based SRS/SFRT. The prescribed total dose (15-30 Gy/1-5 fractions) was based on BM size and proximity to organs at risk (OAR). Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. MedCalc v18.2 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS From April 2014 to December 2017, 40 elderly patients with 110 BMs were treated by FFF linac-based SRS/SFRT. With a median follow-up of 28 months (range 6-50 months), median and 1‑year overall survival were 9 months and 39%, respectively; median intracranial progression-free survival was 6 months. At the time of the analysis, local control was reported in 109/110 BMs (99.1%): 12 BMs had a complete response; 51 a partial response; 46 showed stable disease. One BM (0.9%) progressed after 2 months. BM volume (<1 cc) and higher SRS/SFRT dose correlated to treatment response (p = 0.01 and p = 0.0017, respectively). No adverse events higher than grade 2 were observed. CONCLUSION The present findings highlight the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of FFF linac-based SRS/SFRT in elderly patients with BMs.
Collapse
|
12
|
Dosimetric superiority of flattening filter free beams for single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery in single brain metastasis. Oncotarget 2018; 8:35272-35279. [PMID: 27823985 PMCID: PMC5471053 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
For single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using linac in brain metastases, more accurate treatment delivery with higher tumor absorbed doses and lower absorbed doses to normal tissues remains an enormous challenge. The purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric superiority in flattening filter free beams (FFF) for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in single brain metastasis. 68 patients with single brain metastasis were included in this study. Every patient was subjected to VMAT treatment plans using 6 MV standard flattened (FF) beams (VMAT_FF) and 6 MV FFF beams (VMAT_FFF) with single fraction doses of 20 Gy. Dosimetric evaluation was performed by analysis of target coverage, dose gradients, beam-on time (BOT), gantry speed and number of monitor units (MU). There were no differences between VMAT_FF and VMAT_FFF plans in conformity and MU. VMAT_FFF plans showed obvious superiority in homogeneity, dose gradients and efficiency. For the mean BOT, VMAT_FFF plans provided a significant decrease by 42.8% compared with VMAT_FF. By the use of FFF beams, brain irradiation was minimized with about 2% reductions in low-dose regions (about 5-10 Gy). FFF beams not only resulted in more efficiency by reducing treatment time, but also provided further brain sparing compared to traditional techniques for SRS in single brain metastasis.
Collapse
|
13
|
Fiorentino A, Tebano U, Sicignano G, Ricchetti F, Di Paola G, Aiello D, Giaj-Levra N, Mazzola R, Fersino S, Ruggieri R, Alongi F. Hippocampal dose during Linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: An observational study. Phys Med 2017; 49:135-138. [PMID: 28951047 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.09.129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2017] [Revised: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 09/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Aim of the present study is to evaluate homolateral and contralateral hippocampus (H-H, C-H, respectively) dose during Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (FSRT) or Radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM). MATERIALS & METHODS Patients with BM<5, size≤30mm, KPS≥80 and a life expectancy>3months, were considered for SRS/FSRT (total dose 15-30Gy, 1-5 fractions). For each BM, a Flattening Filter Free (FFF) Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plan was generated with one or two arcs. Hippocampi were not considered during optimizations phase and were contoured and evaluated retrospectively in terms of dose: the Dmedian, Dmean, D0.1cc and the V1Gy, V2Gy, V5Gy and V10Gy were analyzed. RESULTS From April 2014 to December 2015, 81 BM were treated with FFF-FSRT/SRS. For the H-H, the average values of Dmedian, Dmean and D0.1cc were 1.5Gy, 1.54Gy and 2.2Gy, respectively, while the V1Gy, V2Gy, V5Gy and V10Gy values were 25%, 8.9%, 8.9% and 2.1%, respectively. For the C-H, the average Dmedian, Dmean and D0.1cc were 0.7Gy, 0.7Gy, 0.9Gy, respectively, while the average values of V1Gy, V2Gy, V5Gy and V10Gy were 18%, 10.2%, 2.8% and 1.4%, respectively. Tumor dimension, tumor cranial-caudal length and the distance between BM and H-H were correlated to Dmedian, Dmean and D0.1cc. For C-H, only the distance from PTV was correlated with a dose reduction. CONCLUSION During FFF-FSRT/SRS, hippocampus received a negligible dose. Despite its clinical significance is still under evaluation, in patients with a long life expectancy, H-H should be considered during Linac-based FSRT/SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba Fiorentino
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Umberto Tebano
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy.
| | | | | | | | - Dario Aiello
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Sergio Fersino
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Ruggero Ruggieri
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy; University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for brain metastases with volumetric modulated arc therapy and flattening filter free delivery: feasibility and early clinical results. Radiol Med 2017; 122:676-682. [DOI: 10.1007/s11547-017-0768-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2016] [Accepted: 04/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|