Perioperative chemotherapy vs. neoadjuvant chemoradiation in gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma : A population-based evaluation of the Munich Cancer Registry

Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy is an essential modality for reducing the clinical stage of esophageal cancer; however, the superiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is unclear. Therefore, a discussion of these two modalities is necessary.

AIM

To investigate the benefits and complications of neoadjuvant modalities.

METHODS

To address this concern, predefined criteria were established using the PICO protocol. Two independent authors performed comprehensive searches using predetermined keywords. Statistical analyses were performed to identify significant differences between groups. Potential publication bias was visualized using funnel plots. The quality of the data was evaluated using the Risk of Bias Tool 2 (RoB2) and the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Ten articles, including 1928 patients, were included for the analysis. Significant difference was detected in pathological complete response (pCR) [P < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 0.27; 95%CI: 0.16-0.46], 30-d mortality (P = 0.015; OR: 0.4; 95%CI: 0.22-0.71) favoring the nCRT, and renal failure (P = 0.039; OR: 1.04; 95%CI: 0.66-1.64) favoring the nCT. No significant differences were observed in terms of survival, local or distal recurrence, or other clinical or surgical complications. The result of RoB2 was moderate, and that of the GRADE approach was low or very low in almost all cases.

CONCLUSION

Although nCRT may have a higher pCR rate, it does not translate to greater long-term survival. Moreover, nCRT is associated with higher 30-d mortality, although the specific cause for postoperative complications could not be identified. In the case of nCT, toxic side effects are suspected, which can reduce the quality of life. Given the quality of available studies, further randomized trials are required.

Multimodal treatments for resectable esophagogastric junction cancer: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To comprehensively investigate the optimal multimodal treatment of resectable esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched until March 11, 2022. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), locoregional and distant recurrence, and R0 resection. Network plots, forest plots and league tables were drawn for each outcome. Rank probabilities for different treatments in each outcome were also depicted.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies with 18,319 EGJ participants were included. No significant differences in OS between any two of the 6 treatments. Perioperative chemoradiotherapy (pCRT) had the highest probability (36.03%) to be the optimal treatment as regards OS. Patients undergoing pCRT had a significantly lower incidence of locoregional recurrence than those undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), perioperative chemotherapy (pCT), or surgery alone (S). Patients with pCRT had the greatest likelihood (68.86%) to have the lowest incidence of locoregional recurrence. Comparable impacts of the 6 treatments on the incidence of distant recurrence, and pCRT was most likely (46.65%) to be the optimal treatment with respect to distant recurrence. Neoadjuvant CRT (nCRT) was associated with a significantly increased incidence of R0 resection compared with nCT or S, and nCRT had the highest probability (97.68%) to be the best therapy regarding R0 resection.

CONCLUSION

For patients with resectable EGJ cancer, pCRT may be the optimal multimodal treatment regarding survival and recurrence.

Survival and complications after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis

Objectives: To identify the effective approach between neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) and chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) by comparing patient survival and complications. Methods: A systematic literature search of articles published between January 1980 and October 2020 was conducted. Data were extracted and analyzed with STATA 12.0. Results: Five randomized trials and 15 retrospective studies, including 4529 patients (NCT: 2035; NCRT: 2494), were enrolled. Compared with NCT, NCRT provided a higher 3-year survival benefit, higher R0 resection and pathological complete response rates and lower local recurrence and distant metastasis rates, but no increase in 5-year survival. Perioperative mortality and cardiovascular complications were more common in patients with adenocarcinoma. Conclusions: Further studies should concentrate on identifying the optimal neoadjuvant approach and suitable beneficiaries.

Treatment Patterns for Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma in the United States

Despite the increasing incidence of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJA), the optimal treatment strategy for the disease remains unknown. The objective of this study was to describe treatment patterns for GEJA in the United States. The National Cancer Database was searched to identify all patients who underwent resection of the lower esophagus, abdominal esophagus, and/or gastric cardia for GEJA between 2006 and 2016. Patients were grouped by clinical disease stage: early localized (L; T1-2N0), locally advanced (LA; T3-4N0), regional (R; T1-2N+), or regionally advanced (RA; T3-4N+). The search identified 28,852 GEJA patients. The dominant age range was 60–69 years (39%). Most patients were men (85%), and most were white (92%). Most L patients (69%) underwent upfront surgery, whereas most LA, R, and RA patients received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT; 86%, 80%, and 90%, respectively). Among patients who received NAT, 85% received chemoradiotherapy. Adjuvant therapy was relatively uncommon across all groups (15–20%). In the LA, R, and RA groups, overall survival was greater in patients who received NAT compared to upfront surgery (p < 0.001). With the exception of patients with early localized node-negative disease, most GEJA patients receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy despite the lack of prospective trials reporting survival benefit over chemotherapy alone.

Modification of preoperative radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer (CROSS protocol) is safe and efficient with no impact on surgical morbidity

Purpose

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (RCTH) is proven to be highly effective in the treatment of esophageal cancer (EC). We investigated oncological outcome and morbidity in patients treated with a modified CROSS protocol followed by esophagectomy at our institution.

Methods

Patients with EC receiving neoadjuvant RCTH with paclitaxel and carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy (46 Gy) followed by esophagectomy were included in this retrospective analysis. Histopathological response, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free interval (RFI) as well as perioperative morbidity were investigated.

Results

Thirty-six patients (86.1% male, mean age 61.3 years, standard deviation 11.52) received neoadjuvant RCTH before surgery. Sixteen patients (44.4%) were treated for squamous cell cancer, whereas 20 patients (55.6%) had adenocarcinoma. The majority (75%) underwent abdominothoracic esophageal resection. Major complications occurred in 7 patients (19.5%) including anastomotic leakage in 4 patients (11.1%). A R0 resection was achieved in 97.2%. A complete pathological remission was seen in 13 patients (36.1%). Major response, classified as Mandard tumor regression grade 1 and 2, was found in 26 patients (72.2%). Median OS and RFI were not reached.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy with 46 Gy and concomitant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma is safe and effective. The results of this modified radiotherapy protocol are encouraging and should be considered in future patient treatment and study designs.

Precision Surgical Therapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction

INTRODUCTION

To facilitate the initial clinical decision regarding whether to use esophagectomy alone or neoadjuvant therapy in surgical care for individual patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction-information not available from randomized trials-a machine-learning analysis was performed using worldwide real-world data on patients undergoing different therapies for this rare adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

Using random forest technology in a sequential analysis, we (1) identified eligibility for each of four therapies among 13,365 patients: esophagectomy alone (n = 6649), neoadjuvant therapy (n = 4706), esophagectomy and adjuvant therapy (n = 998), and neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy (n = 1022); (2) performed survival analyses incorporating interactions of patient and cancer characteristics with therapy; (3) determined optimal therapy as that predicted to maximize lifetime within 10 years (restricted mean survival time; RMST) for each patient; and (4) compared lifetime gained from optimal versus actual therapies.

RESULTS

Actual therapy was optimal in 61% of those receiving esophagectomy alone; neoadjuvant therapy was optimal for 36% receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Many patients were predicted to benefit from postoperative adjuvant therapy. Total RMST for actual therapy received was 58,825 years. Had patients received optimal therapy, total RMST was predicted to be 62,982 years, a 7% gain.

CONCLUSIONS

Average treatment effect for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus yields only crude evidence-based therapy guidelines. However, patient response to therapy is widely variable, and survival after data-driven predicted optimal therapy often differs from actual therapy received. Therapy must address an individual patient's cancer and clinical characteristics to provide precision surgical therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction.

Aggressive Graphic/Surgical R0 Resection and Jejunal Interposition with Preservation of Mesojejunal Autonomic Nerves in Patients with Stage IV Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Report of 3 Cases

BACKGROUND Three patients with stage IV esophagogastric junction cancer (EGJC) underwent extended resection to achieve a graphic/surgical R0 status (no visible remnant of viable tumor in imaging/surgical findings) and adjuvant chemotherapy from the early postoperative period. We also introduced use of our digestive reconstruction technique in these patients. CASE REPORT We used jejunal interposition for digestive reconstruction, which involved end-to-end jejunojejunostomy with a biofragmentable anastomosis ring. The mesojejunal autonomic nerves of the lifted jejunum were preserved. The first adenocarcinoma involved the perilesional lymph nodes (LNs). Graphic/surgical R0 resection was completed by para-aortic LN dissection. The diagnosis (Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma) was stage IV [pM1(LYM)]. Adjuvant chemotherapy began on postoperative day (POD) 11. The second adenocarcinoma was accompanied by a solitary lung metastasis. Intraoperative cytology of ascitic fluid was positive, and cisplatin was intraperitoneally administered. Adjuvant chemotherapy began on POD 10. The solitary lung metastasis was then resected, and graphic/surgical R0 resection was achieved. The diagnosis was stage IV [pM1(PUL) and CY1]. The third adenocarcinoma was accompanied by multiple liver metastases and metastatic regional LNs. The diagnosis was stage IV [H1]. Systemic chemotherapy was repeated. Only a solitary liver metastasis remained and was treated by radiofrequency ablation. Conversion surgery was conducted, achieving graphic/surgical R0 resection. Systemic chemotherapy was continued from POD 10. CONCLUSIONS For patients with stage IV EGJC, extended resection to achieve a graphic/surgical R0 status is still controversial, and systemic chemotherapy is important. The results of the present study suggest that our physiological reconstruction technique does not affect the efficacy of other therapies, such as adjuvant chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy for gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The preferred neoadjuvant treatment for gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is still matter of debate. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the different impact of neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CTRT) versus chemotherapy (CT) alone.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 30th June 2018. Studies comparing survival of patients who underwent CTRT or CT alone before surgery for GEJ adenocarcinoma were included. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was extracted, and a random-effects model was used for pooled analysis. Median OS, 5-year OS, complete pathologic response (pCR), locoregional and distant failure rates were also calculated.

RESULTS

22 studies including 18,260 patients were considered for the final analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that combined CTRT do not significantly reduce the risk of death (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.07; P = 0.41) but has a positive impact on the risk of relapse (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.97; P = 0.01) compared to CT alone. Addition of RT to CT alone significantly increased the odds of pCR by 2.8 (95% CI 2.27-3.47; P < 0.001) and reduced the risk of locoregional failure (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.39-0.91; P = 0.01) but not the risk of distant metastases (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59-1.11; P = 0.19).

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing neoadjuvant CTRT with CT for adenocarcinoma of GEJ, we found no difference in terms of median OS, despite a higher pCR rate and a reduced risk of locoregional recurrences for the combined approach. Further studies, preferably large randomized clinical trials, are needed to confirm these results.

The effect of preoperative treatments on lymph node counts after total gastrectomy in esophagogastric adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to explore the effects of preoperative treatments on lymph nodes (LNs) counts after total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed for 446 patients with locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. The patients were divided into three groups: surgery first (SF), preoperative chemotherapy (PCT), and preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT). Clinical-pathological data were analyzed.

RESULTS

The case number in SF, PCT, and PCRT groups was 281, 109, and 56, respectively, and the median total LNs count was 32.0 (10.0-102.0), 31.0 (12.0-62.0), and 25.5 (10.0-50.0), respectively, (P < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated the total LNs count was lower in PCRT than SF/PCT (P < 0.001), and had no correlation with tumor regression grades (TRGs). Subgroup comparison showed radiation target LNs count was lower in PCRT than SF/PCT (P < 0.001), and peritarget LNs count was lower in PCRT than SF (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

For esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, PCRT reduced total LNs count after total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, whereas PCT did not. In the PCRT group, LNs count was lower in both radiation target and peritarget areas than in the SF group but only in radiation target area than in the PCT group. The correlation between TRGs and total LNs count remained unclear.

Adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus: neoadjuvant chemoradiation and radical surgery : Long-term results

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate long-term treatment results following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) and radical surgery in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma (AC) of the oesophagus.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2005 and 2015, a total of 102 consecutive patients with a median age of 64 years (range, 44-86 years) and AC of the oesophagus were evaluated of whom 84 received a full CRT. A group of 51 patients was treated with neoadjuvant intent followed by radical surgery. A total dose of 50.4 Gy with mostly weekly paclitaxel/fluorouracil chemotherapy was administered. Six to eight weeks following CRT, a transthoracic subtotal oesophageal and proximal gastric resection was performed. Survival curves for overall survival and no evidence of disease (NED) survival (primary endpoints) were calculated according to Kaplan-Meier, and possible prognostic factors were evaluated by the log-rank test as well as by a Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time of the surviving patients was 48 months (range, 14-134 months). Overall and NED survival rates for patients of the study group (n = 51) were 40 and 32%, respectively, at 5 years. Age (p = 0.04), ypT category (p = 0.1) and the development of distant metastases (p = 0.05) were identified as (marginally) independent prognostic variables with impact on survival. Median survival time for patients of the study group (n = 51) was 45 ± 18 months (95%CI 9-81 months). Clear resection margins were achieved in 46/51 patients (92%). Regression rates with complete regression rare residual cancer and increased number of residual cells, but predominantly fibrosis were 33, 41, and 10%, respectively. Patterns of failure revealed local with distant recurrence in 2/51 (4%), regional recurrence alone in 2/51 (4%), and distant metastases in 27/51 (53%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant CRT in patients with AC of the oesophagus followed by thoracoabdominal surgery is a locally very effective concept. A significant tumour regression in almost 75% of the patients may stimulate prospective trials on the omission of radical surgery for some elderly patients. Due to a high rate of distant metastases further investigations in terms of effective systemic therapy may be warranted.