Radiosurgery for ventricular tachycardia (RAVENTA): interim analysis of a multicenter multiplatform feasibility trial

Implementing stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation with STOPSTORM.eu consortium support: intermediate results of a prospective Israeli single-institutional trial

BACKGROUND

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening arrhythmia originating from the heart's ventricles. Traditional treatments include antiarrhythmic medications, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), and catheter ablation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) targeting the arrhythmogenic focus in the left ventricle-stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR)-is an emerging treatment and may offer a potential solution for patients with refractory VT.

OBJECTIVE

We designed an interventional prospective clinical trial in Israel aligned with the STOPSTORM.eu consortium's benchmarks, recommendations, and directives to assess the safety and efficacy of STAR in patients with refractory VT.

METHODS

Our phase I/II single-institutional trial was approved by the Ministry of Health of Israel for 10 patients, initially assessing safety in the first 3 patients. We included patients with ICDs experiencing symptomatic monomorphic VT after an inadequate response to previous therapies. The primary endpoints were treatment-related serious adverse events and a reduction in VT burden as assessed by ICD interrogation. Secondary outcomes included a reduction in antiarrhythmic medications and changes in quality of life.

RESULTS

From August 2023 to August 2024, 3 patients underwent STAR treatment. The prescription dose was a single fraction of 25 Gy. Planning target volumes were 47.8, 49.7, and 91.8 cc, and treatment was successfully delivered with no grade 3 or higher adverse events reported. Over a follow-up period of 12 months for the first patient and 8 months for the second one, no VT events were recorded after treatment. The third patient died from progressive heart failure 3 months after treatment. Left ventricular ejection fraction remained stable, and no significant radiation-induced inflammatory changes were noted.

CONCLUSION

The initial results of this trial suggest that STAR can reduce VT episodes in patients with refractory VT without severe adverse effects. The study highlights the importance of international collaboration and standardization in pioneering new treatments. Further follow-up and additional patient data will be necessary to confirm these findings and evaluate long-term outcomes, including potential adjustments to antiarrhythmic medication regimens.

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation in Ventricular Tachycardia: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) has emerged as a promising non-invasive treatment for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT), offering a novel alternative for patients who are poor candidates for catheter ablation. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the safety, efficacy, and technical aspects of STAR across preclinical studies, case reports, case series, and clinical trials.

Methods and Materials

A systematic review identified 80 studies published between 2015 and 2024, including 12 preclinical studies, 47 case reports, 15 case series, and 6 clinical trials. Data on patient demographics, treatment parameters, and clinical outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed for pooled mortality rates, VT burden reduction, and acute toxicities, with subgroup analyses exploring cardiomyopathy type, age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and treatment modality.

Results

The pooled 6- and 12-month mortality rates were 16% (95% CI: 11-21%) and 32% (95% CI: 26-39%), respectively. VT burden reduction at 6 months was 75% (95% CI: 73-77%), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 98.8%). Grade 3+ acute toxicities were observed in 7% (95% CI: 4-11%), with pneumonitis being the most common. Subgroup analyses showed comparable outcomes between LINAC- and CyberKnife-based treatments, with minor differences based on patient characteristics and cardiomyopathy type.

Conclusions

STAR demonstrates significant potential in reducing VT burden and improving patient outcomes. While favorable acute safety profiles and efficacy support clinical adoption, variability in treatment protocols underscores the need for standardized practices. Future studies should aim to optimize patient selection, establish robust dosimetric standards, and evaluate long-term safety.

Electrocardiogram-gated cardiac computed tomography-based patient- and segment-specific cardiac motion estimation method in stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for ventricular tachycardia

Background and purpose

Motion management strategies such as gating under breath-hold can reduce breathing-induced motion during stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) for refractory ventricular tachycardia. However, heartbeat-induced motion is essential to define an appropriate cardiac internal target volume (ITV) margin. In this study, we introduce a patient- and segment-specific cardiac motion estimation method and cardiac motion data of the clinical target volume (CTV), ICD lead tips and left ventricle (LV) segments.

Materials and methods

Data from 10 STAR-treated patients were retrospectively analyzed. The LV was semi-automatically segmented according to the 17-segment model. Electrocardiogram-gated contrast-enhanced breath-hold cardiac CTs were automatically non-rigidly registered for motion estimation. The correlation and significant differences between ICD tip motion and CTV motion were assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while spatial discrepancies with both CTV and segment motion were quantified using the Euclidean distance.

Results

The CTVs (center of mass) moved 3.4 ± 1.4 mm and the ICD lead tips moved 4.9 ± 2.2 mm. The maximum motion per patient was observed in basal and mid-cavity LV segments in 3D. The PCC showed a strong positive motion correlation between the ICD tip and CTV in 3D (0.84), while the p-values indicated statistically significant differences in the right-left, anterior-posterior and 3D directions.

Conclusion

The proposed methods enable patient- and segment-specific cardiac ITV margin estimation. The motion in most LV segments was limited, however, cardiac ITV margins may need adjustment in individual cases. The impact of cardiac motion on the dosimetry needs further investigation.

Refining Treatment Planning in STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation: Benchmark Results and Consensus Statement From the STOPSTORM.eu Consortium

PURPOSE

STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) showed promising results in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia. However, clinical data are scarce and heterogeneous. The STOPSTORM.eu consortium was established to investigate and harmonize STAR in Europe. The primary goal of this benchmark study was to investigate current treatment planning practice within the STOPSTORM project as a baseline for future harmonization.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Planning target volumes (PTVs) overlapping extracardiac organs-at-risk and/or cardiac substructures were generated for 3 STAR cases. Participating centers were asked to create single-fraction treatment plans with 25 Gy dose prescriptions based on in-house clinical practice. All treatment plans were reviewed by an expert panel and quantitative crowd knowledge-based analysis was performed with independent software using descriptive statistics for International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements report 91 relevant parameters and crowd dose-volume histograms. Thereafter, treatment planning consensus statements were established using a dual-stage voting process.

RESULTS

Twenty centers submitted 67 treatment plans for this study. In most plans (75%) intensity modulated arc therapy with 6 MV flattening filter free beams was used. Dose prescription was mainly based on PTV D95% (49%) or D96%-100% (19%). Many participants preferred to spare close extracardiac organs-at-risk (75%) and cardiac substructures (50%) by PTV coverage reduction. PTV D0.035cm3 ranged from 25.5 to 34.6 Gy, demonstrating a large variety of dose inhomogeneity. Estimated treatment times without motion compensation or setup ranged from 2 to 80 minutes. For the consensus statements, a strong agreement was reached for beam technique planning, dose calculation, prescription methods, and trade-offs between target and extracardiac critical structures. No agreement was reached on cardiac substructure dose limitations and on desired dose inhomogeneity in the target.

CONCLUSIONS

This STOPSTORM multicenter treatment planning benchmark study not only showed strong agreement on several aspects of STAR treatment planning, but also revealed disagreement on others. To standardize and harmonize STAR in the future, consensus statements were established; however, clinical data are urgently needed for actionable guidelines for treatment planning.

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR)-A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials on behalf of the STOPSTORM.eu consortium

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a noninvasive treatment of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). In this study, we aimed to systematically review prospective trials on STAR and pool harmonized outcome measures in a meta-analysis. After registration in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42023439666), we searched OVID Medline, OVID Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar on November 9, 2023, to identify reports describing results of prospective trials evaluating STAR for VT. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Meta-analysis was performed using generalized linear mixed models. We identified 10 prospective trials in which 82 patients were treated with STAR between 2016 and 2022. The 90-day rate of treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events was 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.2). The proportions of patients achieving given VT burden reductions were 0.61 (95% CI 0.45-0.74) for ≥95%, 0.80 (95% CI 0.62-0.91) for ≥75%, and 0.9 (95% CI 0.77-0.96) for ≥50% in 63 evaluable patients. The 1-year overall survival rate was 0.73 (95% CI 0.61-0.83) in 81 patients, 1-year freedom from recurrence was 0.30 (95% CI 0.16-0.49) in 61 patients, and 1-year recurrence-free survival was 0.21 in 60 patients (95% CI 0.08-0.46). Limitations include methodological heterogeneity across studies and moderate to significant risk of bias. In conclusion, STAR is a promising treatment method, characterized by moderate toxicity. We observed 1-year mortality of ≈27% in this population of critically ill patients suffering from refractory VT. Most patients experience a significant reduction in VT burden; however, 1-year recurrence rates are high. STAR should still be considered an investigational approach and recommended to patients primarily within the context of prospective trials.

Stereotactic cardiac radiotherapy for refractory ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease patients: a systematic review

AIMS

Among patients with structural heart disease with ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to medical therapy and catheter ablation, cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a paradigm-changing treatment option. This study aims to assess the efficacy of cardiac SBRT in refractory VT by comparing the rates of VT episodes, anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapies, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks post-SBRT with pre-SBRT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a comprehensive literature search and included all clinical studies reporting outcomes on cardiac SBRT for VT. Treatment efficacy was evaluated as random-effects pooled rate-ratios of VT episodes, ATP therapies and ICD shocks post-SBRT (after 6-week blanking) and pre-SBRT, with patients serving as their own controls. Post-SBRT overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method. We included 23 studies published 2017-24 reporting on 225 patients who received cardiac SBRT, with median follow-up 5.8-28 months. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies for all three efficacy endpoints (P < 0.00001). The random-effects pooled rate-ratios of VT episodes, ATP therapies and ICD shocks post- vs. pre-SBRT were 0.10 (95% CI 0.06, 0.16), 0.09 (0.05, 0.15), and 0.09 (0.05, 0.17), respectively (all P < 0.00001). The most common reported complications included pericardial (8.0%, including 0.9% late oesophagogastro-pericardial fistula) and pulmonary (5.8%). There was no change in left ventricular ejection fraction post-SBRT (P = 0.3) but some studies reported an increase in mitral regurgitation. The combined 3-, 12-, and 24-month overall patient survival was 0.86 (0.80, 0.90), 0.72 (0.65, 0.78), and 0.57 (0.47, 0.67), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with refractory VT in context of structural heart disease, VT burden and ICD shocks are dramatically reduced following cardiac SBRT. The overall mortality in this population with heart failure and refractory VT receiving palliative cardiac SBRT remains high.

Semi-automated reproducible target transfer for cardiac radioablation - A multi-center cross-validation study within the RAVENTA trial

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a therapeutic option for ventricular tachycardia (VT) where catheter-based ablation is not feasible or has previously failed. Target definition and its transfer from electro-anatomic maps (EAM) to radiotherapy treatment planning systems (TPS) is challenging and operator-dependent. Software solutions have been developed to register EAM with cardiac CT and semi-automatically transfer 2D target surface data into 3D CT volume coordinates. Results of a cross-validation study of two conceptually different software solutions using data from the RAVENTA trial (NCT03867747) are reported.

METHODS

Clinical Target Volumes (CTVs) were created from target regions delineated on EAM using two conceptually different approaches by separate investigators on data of 10 patients, blinded to each other's results. Targets were transferred using 3D-3D registration and 2D-3D registration, respectively. The resulting CTVs were compared in a core-lab using two complementary analysis software packages for structure similarity and geometric characteristics.

RESULTS

Volumes and surface areas of the CTVs created by both methods were comparable: 14.88 ± 11.72 ml versus 15.15 ± 11.35 ml and 44.29 ± 33.63 cm2 versus 46.43 ± 35.13 cm2. The Dice-coefficient was 0.84 ± 0.04; median surface-distance and Hausdorff-distance were 0.53 ± 0.37 mm and 6.91 ± 2.26 mm, respectively. The 3D-center-of-mass difference was 3.62 ± 0.99 mm. Geometrical volume similarity was 0.94 ± 0.05 %.

CONCLUSION

The STAR targets transferred from EAM to TPS using both software solutions resulted in nearly identical 3D structures. Both solutions can be used for QA (quality assurance) and EAM-to-TPS transfer of STAR-targets. Semi-automated methods could potentially help to avoid mistargeting in STAR and offer standardized workflows for methodically harmonized treatments.

Patient vulnerability in stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR): a preliminary ethical appraisal from the STOPSTORM.eu consortium

This preliminary ethical appraisal from the STOPSTORM.eu consortium is meant to raise critical points that clinicians administering stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation should consider to meet the highest standards in medical ethics and thus promote quality of life of patients recruited for radiotherapy treatments at a stage in which they experience a significant degree of vulnerability.

The Current Landscape of Ventricular Tachycardia Trials: A Systematic Review of Registered Studies

BACKGROUND

Although there are evolving techniques and technologies for treating ventricular tachycardia (VT), the current landscape of clinical trials for managing VT remains understudied.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to provide a systematic characterisation of the interventional management of VT through an analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov, clinicaltrialsregister.eu, anzctr.org.au and chictr.org.cn databases.

METHODS

We queried all phase II to IV interventional trials registered up to November 2023 that enrolled patients with VT. Published, completed but unpublished, terminated, or ongoing trials were included for final analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 698 registered studies, 135 were related to VT, with 123 trials included in the final analysis. Among these trials, 25 (20%) have been published, enrolling a median of 35 patients (interquartile range [IQR] 20-132) over a median of 43 months (IQR 19-62). Out of the published trials, 14 (56%) were randomised, and 12 (48%) focused on catheter ablation. Twenty-two (18%) have been completed but remain unpublished, even after a median of 36 months (IQR 15-60). Furthermore, 27 (22%) trials were terminated or withdrawn, with the most common cause being poor enrolment. Currently, 49 (40%) trials are ongoing and novel non-ablative technologies, such as radioablation and autonomic modulation, account for 35% and 8% of ongoing trials, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis revealed that many registered trials remain unpublished or incomplete, and randomised controlled trial evidence is limited to only a few studies. Furthermore, many ongoing trials are focused on non-catheter ablation-based strategies. Therefore, larger pragmatic trials are needed to create stronger evidence in the future.

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation and its implications for modern cardiac electrophysiology: results of an EHRA survey

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a treatment option for recurrent ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). The current and future role of STAR as viewed by cardiologists is unknown. The study aimed to assess the current role, barriers to application, and expected future role of STAR. An online survey consisting of 20 questions on baseline demographics, awareness/access, current use, and the future role of STAR was conducted. A total of 129 international participants completed the survey [mean age 43 ± 11 years, 25 (16.4%) female]. Ninety-one (59.9%) participants were electrophysiologists. Nine participants (7%) were unaware of STAR as a therapeutic option. Sixty-four (49.6%) had access to STAR, while 62 (48.1%) had treated/referred a patient for treatment. Common primary indications for STAR were recurrent VT/VF in SHD (45%), recurrent VT/VF without SHD (7.8%), or premature ventricular contraction (3.9%). Reported main advantages of STAR were efficacy in the treatment of arrhythmias not amenable to conventional treatment (49%) and non-invasive treatment approach with overall low expected acute and short-term procedural risk (23%). Most respondents have foreseen a future clinical role of STAR in the treatment of VT/VF with or without underlying SHD (72% and 75%, respectively), although only a minority expected a first-line indication for it (7% and 5%, respectively). Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation as a novel treatment option of recurrent VT appears to gain acceptance within the cardiology community. Further trials are critical to further define efficacy, patient populations, as well as the appropriate clinical use for the treatment of VT.

Role of Nuclear Imaging in Cardiac Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening arrhythmia common in patients with structural heart disease or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Many VTs originate from regions of fibrotic scar tissue, where delayed electrical signals exit scar and re-enter viable myocardium. Cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a completely noninvasive alternative to catheter ablation for the treatment of recurrent or refractory ventricular tachycardia. While there is no common consensus on the ideal imaging workflow, therapy planning for cardiac SBRT often combines information from a plurality of imaging modalities including MRI, CT, electroanatomic mapping and nuclear imaging. MRI and CT provide detailed anatomic information, and late enhancement contrast imaging can indicate regions of fibrosis. Electroanatomic maps indicate regions of heterogenous conduction voltage or early activation which are indicative of arrhythmogenic tissue. Some early clinical adopters performing cardiac SBRT report the use of myocardial perfusion and viability nuclear imaging to identify regions of scar. Nuclear imaging of hibernating myocardium, inflammation and sympathetic innervation have been studied for ventricular arrhythmia prognosis and in research relating to catheter ablation of VT but have yet to be studied in their potential applications for cardiac SBRT. The integration of information from these many imaging modalities to identify a target for ablation can be challenging. Multimodality image registration and dedicated therapy planning tools may enable higher target accuracy, accelerate therapy planning workflows and improve patient outcomes. Understanding the pathophysiology of ventricular arrhythmias, and localizing the arrhythmogenic tissues, is vital for successful ablation with cardiac SBRT. Nuclear imaging provides an arsenal of imaging strategies to identify regional scar, hibernation, inflammation, and sympathetic denervation with some advantages over alternative imaging strategies.

MR-LINAC, a New Partner in Radiation Oncology: Current Landscape

Technological advances in radiation oncology are oriented towards improving treatment precision and tumor control. Among these advances, magnetic-resonance-image-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) stands out, with technological advances to deliver targeted treatments adapted to a tumor's anatomy on the day while minimizing incidental exposure to organs at risk, offering an unprecedented therapeutic advantage compared to X-ray-based IGRT delivery systems. This new technology changes the traditional workflow in radiation oncology and requires an evolution in team coordination to administer more precise treatments. Once implemented, it paves the way for newer indication for radiation therapy to safely deliver higher doses than ever before, with better preservation of healthy tissues to optimize patient outcomes. In this narrative review, we assess the technical aspects of the novel linear accelerators that can deliver MRgRT and summarize the available published experience to date, focusing on oncological results and future challenges.

Cardiac Arrhythmias in Patients Treated for Lung Cancer: A Review

Cardio-oncology currently faces one of the greatest challenges in the field of health care. The main goal of this discipline is to ensure that patients treated for cancer do not suffer or die from cardiovascular disease. The number of studies on the mechanisms of heart injury during cancer treatment is constantly increasing. However, there is insufficient data on heart rhythm disorders that may result from this treatment. This issue seems to be particularly important in patients with lung cancer, in whom anticancer therapy, especially radiotherapy, may contribute to the onset of cardiac arrhythmias. The observed relationship between cardiac dosimetry and radiotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in lung cancer treatment may explain the increased mortality from cardiovascular causes in patients after chest irradiation. Further research is essential to elucidate the role of cardiac arrhythmias in this context. Conversely, recent reports have highlighted the application of stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. This review of available studies on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of arrhythmias in patients treated for lung cancer aims to draw attention to the need for regular cardiological monitoring in this group of patients. Improving cardiac care for patients with lung cancer has the potential to enhance their overall therapeutic outcomes.