Radial Head Fractures: Indications and Technique for Primary Arthroplasty

Demographics, Indications, and Revision Rates for Radial Head Arthroplasty: Analysis of Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND

Population-level data from national arthroplasty registries enable the use and outcomes of arthroplasty procedures to be monitored over time. This study aimed to describe the demographics, indications, and outcomes (up to 15 years) for radial head arthroplasty (RHA) procedures in Australia, as well as the factors associated with an increased likelihood of revision.

METHODS

Individual-level deidentified data on demographics and surgery characteristics, including revision surgery, were obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry for all primary isolated RHA procedures that had been performed from 2007 to 2021. The probability of prosthesis survival was determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for revision.

RESULTS

A total of 3,457 primary RHAs were performed during the study period (mean follow-up, 5.6 years; range, 0 to 15 years). The mean age at the time of RHA was 53 years, with female predominance (n = 2,009, 58%). The most common indication for RHA was fracture or dislocation (n = 3,166, 92%), followed by osteoarthritis (n = 232, 7%). The radial head prostheses that were most commonly used were monopolar (n = 3,378, 98%) with a modular design (n = 3,442, 99.6%) and cementless fixation (n = 3,387, 98%). Both metallic and nonmetallic prostheses were used (52% and 48%, respectively). Of the total cohort, 160 revisions (5%) were performed during the 15-year period; most revisions occurred in the first 5 years. The most common revision indication was prosthesis loosening (n = 62, 39%), and 54% of the revisions (n = 87) involved a change of the radial component. In multivariable analysis, primary procedures for osteoarthritis (HR, 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 2.70) or "other" indications (e.g., inflammatory arthritis, osteonecrosis, or tumor) were revised more frequently (HR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.14 to 11.91) than procedures for fracture or dislocation. Procedures with nonmetallic prostheses had higher rates of revision (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.22) than those with metallic prostheses.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma remained the most prevalent indication for RHA in Australia from 2007 to 2021. Encouragingly, revision rates were low, most notably for RHA that had been performed for fracture or dislocation. The likelihood of revision was highest for RHA procedures performed for osteoarthritis and for an indication other than osteoarthritis or trauma. Nonmetallic prostheses had a higher rate of revision than metallic prostheses.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Determinants of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I among Radial Head Fracture Patients with Unilateral Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the proportions of complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) in radial head fracture patients undergoing unilateral arthroplasty and to explore associated factors.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study. From March 2016 to May 2019, a total of 221 adult patients with radial head fracture patients were included in consecutive studies and completed the 1-year follow-up. All patients were treated by unilateral arthroplasty. At each follow-up visit, the visual analogue scale was used to measure patients' pain level. Occurrence of CRPS I, which was diagnosed by Budapest criteria, was the main outcome collected at baseline and the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-ups. The baseline data were collected before surgery and included demographic and clinical data. Independent t-tests and χ² tests were used as univariate analyses to compare the baseline data of patients with and without CRPS I. Multivariate analysis (Backword-Wald) was used to identify factors independently associated with CRPS I.

RESULTS

The proportion of CRPS I cases among radial head fracture patients undergoing unilateral arthroplasty was 11% (n = 24). A total of 19 (79%) patients were diagnosed with CRPS I within 1 month after surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that female gender (odds ratios [OR]: 1.537; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.138-2.072), age younger than 60 years (OR: 1.682; 95% CI: 1.246-2.267), moderate and severe Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) pain (OR: 3.229; 95% CI: 2.392-4.351) and anxiety (OR: 83.346; 95% CI: 61.752-112.320) were independently associated with CRPS I.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory study reported that the incidence of CRPS I developing after radial head arthroplasty was 11%. Female sex, younger age, moderate and severe MEPS pain and anxiety patients seems more likely to develop CRPS I.

Functional outcomes post-radial head arthroplasty: a systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND

The present study was conducted to determine the quality and content of research on the functional outcomes and complications post-metal radial head arthroplasty (RHAP).

METHODS

A comprehensive search of medical databases for studies reporting on functional outcomes of patients undergoing metallic RHAP was conducted. The Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale (SEQES) was used to evaluate quality of the studies.

RESULTS

We identified 21 Sackett's Level IV studies reporting on 391 radial heads. The mean duration of follow-up was 47.2 months and the mean (SD) age of patients was 48.4 years (6.9 years). The male to female ratio was found to be 1.05 : 1 and the dominant arm was involved in 54% of patients. When functional outcomes achieved post-RHAP were compared with normative scores, the comparison suggested that RHAP has good to excellent functional outcomes in short- to mid-term follow-up. The weighted mean (SD) Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 85.8 (4.1) (95% confidence interval 85.3 to 86.3). Incidences of implant removal (3.06%) and revision (2.22%) were found to be low.

CONCLUSIONS

There is consistent low-quality evidence of positive functional outcomes following RHAP. The heterogeneity of type of implant, patient characteristics and outcome measures used, along with an inadequate reporting of study details, restrict any definitive conclusions being made.

[Results after Judet radial head prosthesis for non-reconstructable radial head fractures]

BACKGROUND

With regard to the treatment of non-reconstructable radial head fractures, both the resection and the implantation of a prosthesis are considered. Various studies have shown poor results concerning the resection of the radial head with accompanying osteoligamentous injuries. Due to these experiences, different types of prosthesis have been developed. However, the majority of them were not convincing. Judet developed a type of a bipolar prosthesis which had been modeled on the anatomy of the radial head. The aim of our retrospective study consists in examining the results of the Judet prosthesis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1995 and 2007, 50 patients were treated with an arthroplasty. These were, corresponding to the classification by McKee and Jupiter, 19 type III and 31 type IV fractures. Thirty patients were available for a follow-up after 2.5 years on average.

RESULTS

According to the Morrey Score, 16 very good, 7 good, 3 fair and 4 bad results could be obtained. Following the criteria of Radin and Riseborough, 17 patients achieved a good, 9 a fair and 4 a bad result. The complications which appeared were: one patient with aseptic loosening, one patient with luxation of a prosthesis, one persistent radial joint instability, three patients with heterotopic ossification and four patients with protrusion relative to the capitulum humeri.

Radial head arthroplasty: a radiologic outcome study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to provide a radiographic outcome assessment of radial head arthroplasty in correlation with clinical outcomes and to determine whether there is an association between certain patient factors and clinical and radiographic outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 10-year retrospective review was performed to identify patients with metal radial head arthroplasty. At least two follow-up radiographs were reviewed for each patient and were correlated with clinical information. Statistical analysis included calculation of complication rates, phi coefficient for variable association with complications, and Kaplan-Meier survival.

RESULTS

A total of 258 radial head implants in 244 patients were reviewed. The mean patient age was 46 years, with mean follow-up time of 12.8 months. Two hundred nineteen (84.9%) implants were unipolar in design, whereas 39 implants were bipolar. The most common indication for arthroplasty was trauma (94% acute and 2% failed internal fixation). Radiographic abnormalities included nonbridging heterotopic ossification (38.0%), secondary radiocapitellar joint osteoarthritis (27.9%), loosening (19.8%), bridging heterotopic ossification (8.9%), fracture (2.3%), and hardware dislocation (2.7%). Overall, there were 62 second surgeries for either revision or removal. Reasons for second surgery included heterotopic ossification (53.2%), synovectomy or capsulectomy (43.5%), and infection (3.2%). There was a statistically significant association between radiographic complications and the presence of patient symptoms (p < 0.05). There was no association between radiographic or clinical complications with age, sex, side, or type of arthroplasty (R < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is a positive association between radiographic findings and patient symptoms for postoperative complications after radial head arthroplasty. By 9 months, 50% of implants showed radiographic complications.

Management and treatment of elbow and forearm injuries

Orthopedic injuries to the upper extremity are frequently seen in the emergency department (ED). The emergency medicine practitioner must be proficient in recognizing these injuries and their associated complications, and be able to provide appropriate orthopedic management. This article highlights the most frequent forearm and elbow injuries seen in the ED.

Radial head arthroplasty with an uncemented modular metallic radial head prosthesis: short- and mid-term results

BACKGROUND

In comminuted radial head fractures, arthroplasty is an alternative treatment to open reduction and internal fixation or radial head excision. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short- and mid-term results after the implantation of the EVOLVE™ uncemented modular metallic radial head prosthesis.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with an unreconstructible comminuted radial head fracture were treated with the EVOLVE™ prosthesis. Two groups were formed in order to evaluate short-term (mean 1.6 years, range 1-2.3 years) and mid-term (mean 5.1 years, range 3-7.2 years) results. The short-term group consisted of 10 patients and the mid-term group of 15 patients. Objective physical outcome (ROM, grip strength) and outcome scores (Broberg/Morrey score, DASH) as well as radiological findings (periprosthetic lucency, prosthetic sizing, heterotopic ossification, posttraumatic osteoarthritis) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Significant impairments in ROM and grip strength were observed in the affected arm. Differences in impairment of the affected arm between the two groups were not significant. There were no significant differences in the outcome scores between the two groups, with good results obtained overall. Understuffing was observed in 3 patients. Three patients had severe and 5 had no periprosthetic lucency. The groups barely differed in periprosthetic lucency.

CONCLUSIONS

Radial head arthroplasty with the EVOLVE™ prosthesis gave good results in terms of objective physical outcome and outcome scores at short- and mid-term follow-up. Periprosthetic lucency does not affect the outcome negatively. We assume that periprosthetic lucency does not necessarily imply prosthesis loosening in which revision is required. Radiological findings and the severity of the initial injury do not necessarily correlate with results.