Accuracy of CT-assisted pedicle screw placement after CT-controlled, presurgical guide wire implantation in traumatic and pathological fractures in the thoracic spine

Accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screws for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures compared with open technique

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the accuracy of screw placement between open pedicle screw fixation and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (MIS) for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures (TSF).

METHODS

forty-nine patients with acute TSF who were treated with transpedicular screw fixation from January 2013 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into Open and MIS groups. Laminectomy was performed in either group if needed. The accuracy of the screw placement, the evolution of the Cobb sagittal angle postoperatively and at 12-month follow-up and the neurological status were recorded. AO type of fracture and TLICS score were also recorded.

RESULTS

Mean age was 42 years old. Mean TLICS score was 6.29 and 5.96 for open and MIS groups respectively. Twenty-five MIS and 24 open surgeries were performed, and 350 (175 in each group) screws were inserted (7.14 per patient). Twenty-four and 13 screws were considered "out" in the open and MIS groups respectively (Odds ratio 1.98. 0.97-4,03 P=0.056). The Cobb sagittal angle went from 13.3º to 4.5º and from 14.9º to 8.2º in the Open and MIS groups respectively (both P<0.0001). Loss of correction at 12-month follow-up was 3.2º and 4.2º for the open and MIS groups, respectively. No neurological worsening was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of acute thoracolumbar fractures, the MIS technique seems to achieve similar results to the open technique in relation to neurological improvement and deformity correction, while placing the screws more accurately.

Minimally invasive screw fixation of fractures in the thoracic spine: CT-controlled pre-surgical guidewire implantation in routine clinical practice

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of minimally invasive, transpedicular screw placement in cervicothoracic fractures with the help of computed tomography (CT)-controlled guidewires.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred and ninety-three guidewires were inserted in 35 patients (42.9±21.2 years) under CT fluoroscopy (286 thoracic, seven cervical). There were 28 traumatic cases, three pathological fractures, three fractures due to infectious infiltrations, and one osteoporotic fracture. In 151 pedicles, screw placement was performed in the CT room. CT images were reviewed regarding accuracy and cortical violations using the popular 2 mm increment deviation classification of Gertzbein and Robbins.

RESULTS

Guidewire implantation resulted in only 28 cortical contacts. Minor encroachments of the pedicle wall by inserted screws occurred in 39.1% (59 of 151) and in 23.8% if taking unavoidable encroachments into account (30 of 59). Pedicular isthmus width correlated to cortical guidewire contacts (r=-0.449; p=0.077) and pedicle violations (all graded "A") by the inserted screws (r=-0.581; p=0.049). Total procedural duration was 138.6±44.2 minutes, representing 14.5±11.6 minutes for each pedicle, while showing a significant correlation against higher vertebral levels (r=-0.849; p=0.0002) and the occurrence of pedicle violations (r=-0.641; p=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of vertebral fractures with a guidewire-based pedicle screw insertion technique under CT imaging results in very high accuracy and a low complication rate.

Combining C-arm CT with a new remote operated positioning and guidance system for guidance of minimally invasive spine interventions

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience using C-arm cone beam CT (C-arm CBCT) combined with the new remote operated positioning and guidance system, iSYS1, for needle guidance during spinal interventions.

METHODS

A C-arm CBCT with a flat panel angiography system was acquired (Artis Zeego; Siemens Healthcare Sector, Forchheim, Germany). Reconstruction of CT-like images and planning of the needle path were performed using a common workstation. The needle holder of iSYS1 acted as a guide during insertion of Kirschner (K) wires. 20 percutaneous K wires were placed in the pedicles at T2-T3, T7-T12, and L1-L2 in a cadaver specimen. Postprocedure C-arm CBCT scans were obtained to confirm the accuracy of the K wire placement.

RESULTS

All K wire placements were successfully performed. Mean planning time with Syngo iGuide was 4:16 min, mean positioning time of iSYS1 was 3:35 min, and mean placement time of the K wires was 2:22 min. Mean total intervention time was 10:13 min per pedicle. A mean deviation of 0.35 mm between the planned path and the placed K wire with a mean path length of 6.73 cm was documented.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate the potential of combining C-arm CBCT with iSYS1 for safe and accurate percutaneous placement of pedicle K wires in spinal interventions.