1
|
Wirth S, Hebebrand J, Basilico R, Berger FH, Blanco A, Calli C, Dumba M, Linsenmaier U, Mück F, Nieboer KH, Scaglione M, Weber MA, Dick E. European Society of Emergency Radiology: guideline on radiological polytrauma imaging and service (short version). Insights Imaging 2020; 11:135. [PMID: 33301105 PMCID: PMC7726597 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-020-00947-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although some national recommendations for the role of radiology in a polytrauma service exist, there are no European guidelines to date. Additionally, for many interdisciplinary guidelines, radiology tends to be under-represented. These factors motivated the European Society of Emergency Radiology (ESER) to develop radiologically-centred polytrauma guidelines. RESULTS Evidence-based decisions were made on 68 individual aspects of polytrauma imaging at two ESER consensus conferences. For severely injured patients, whole-body CT (WBCT) has been shown to significantly reduce mortality when compared to targeted, selective CT. However, this advantage must be balanced against the radiation risk of performing more WBCTs, especially in less severely injured patients. For this reason, we recommend a second lower dose WBCT protocol as an alternative in certain clinical scenarios. The ESER Guideline on Radiological Polytrauma Imaging and Service is published in two versions: a full version (download from the ESER homepage, https://www.eser-society.org ) and a short version also covering all recommendations (this article). CONCLUSIONS Once a patient has been accurately classified as polytrauma, each institution should be able to choose from at least two WBCT protocols. One protocol should be optimised regarding time and precision, and is already used by most institutions (variant A). The second protocol should be dose reduced and used for clinically stable and oriented patients who nonetheless require a CT because the history suggests possible serious injury (variant B). Reading, interpretation and communication of the report should be structured clinically following the ABCDE format, i.e. diagnose first what kills first.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Wirth
- European Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Schwarzwald-Baar-Hospital, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
| | - Julian Hebebrand
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Raffaella Basilico
- European Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Science, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy
| | - Ferco H Berger
- European Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ana Blanco
- European Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital JM Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
| | - Cem Calli
- European Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiology, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Maureen Dumba
- European Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria
- Imperial College NHS Trust, St Mary's Campus, London, UK
| | - Ulrich Linsenmaier
- European Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Helios Clinic Munich West, Munich, Germany
| | - Fabian Mück
- European Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Helios Clinic Munich West, Munich, Germany
| | - Konraad H Nieboer
- European Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Radiology, University Ziekenhuis, Vrije University (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mariano Scaglione
- European Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria
- James Cook University Hospital, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
- Department of Imaging, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Italy
| | - Marc-André Weber
- European Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Elizabeth Dick
- European Society of Emergency Radiology, ESER Office, Am Gestade 1, 1010, Vienna, Austria
- Imperial College NHS Trust, St Mary's Campus, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Trauma centers, trauma management concepts, as well as integration of whole-body computed tomography (CT) reduced mortality significantly. The accuracy of a trauma care algorithm with emergency CT in children was evaluated. Data of 71 children with emergency CT were recorded retrospectively. In addition to epidemiological data admission date, kind of CT scan, mechanism of injury, missed diagnoses, injury severity score (ISS), admission to and time on intensive care unit (ICU), and time of hospitalization were observed. The algorithm for CT scanning was based on mechanism of injury, pattern of injury, and altered vital signs. Sixty-nine percent of the children reached the ER during on-call service hours. A percentage of 32.4 received a whole-body scan and 67.6 % a cranial scan. The mean ER ISS was 9.9 points (1-57). Children have different trauma mechanisms compared to adults. A percentage of 33.8 of the children had relevant trauma related findings in the CT scan. In 2 children, (2.8 %) 3 diagnoses (2.2 %) were initially missed. After reevaluation of the CT data, all diagnoses were identified. Thus, the accuracy of our algorithm in children was 100 %. In children, our algorithm detected all injuries, but only one third of the children had relevant trauma related findings in the CT scan. In order to reduce radiation exposure but preserve the advantages of CT, a new algorithm was developed with more flexibility taking the child's age and mental status more into account as well as clinical findings. The mechanism of injury itself is not anymore an indication for CT scanning.
Collapse
|
3
|
[Assessment of prehospital injury severity in children: challenge for emergency physicians]. Anaesthesist 2013; 62:380-8. [PMID: 23657537 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-013-2176-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2013] [Revised: 04/14/2013] [Accepted: 04/15/2013] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of polytraumatized patients is dependent on the quality of emergency room (ER) management and a smooth transition from prehospital to ER therapy is essential. The accurate assessment of prehospital injury severity by emergency physicians influences prehospital therapy and level of care of the destination hospital. It also helps to ensure that medical resources are immediately available. Overestimation of injury severity wastes resources and underestimation puts patients at risk. The assessment of prehospital injury severity in adults is unreliable. In children, the assessment of injury severity seems to be even more challenging. MATERIALS AND METHODS For the comparison of the prehospital documented injury severity and injury severity diagnosed after the ER phase, the injury severity score (ISS) and trauma-ISS (TRISS) were calculated. The TRISS consists of the ISS and the revised trauma score (RTS). All diagnoses of the prehospital and admission charts were collected and an injury severity was allocated according to the abbreviated injury scale (AIS). The concordance of the injury severity within different tolerances was evaluated. A tolerance of the prehospital documented injury severity of more than ± 25 % to the injury severity calculated after ER diagnostics was considered as overestimation or underestimation. The concordance of the prehospital documented diagnosed injury severity and the severity diagnosed after the ER phase of different body regions according to the AIS was evaluated. The documented mechanism of injury in the emergency physician protocol was judged as being detailed, satisfactory or poor. RESULTS The results showed that 69 % of the children reached the ER during on-call hours. Furthermore 92 % of the children reached the ER during the daytime between 08.00 h and 20.00 h. The transportation of 25 % of the children was on a private basis. The mean ER-ISS was 10 points (range 1-57). In 42 % of cases the ISS of the emergency physician protocol within a tolerance of ± 25 % was concordant with the ER-ISS. According to this criterion in 38 % of cases an overestimation of the assessment of the injury severity of the emergency physician was found and in 20 % an underestimation. Within a tolerance of ± 75 % based on the ER-ISS, the ISS of the emergency physician protocol was concordant in more than half of the cases (52 %). Using the TRISS with a tolerance of ± 25 % a concordance was observed in 46 % of the cases. Within a tolerance of ± 50 % based on the ER-ISS the ISS calculated after ER diagnostics was concordant in 50 % of the cases. A high concordance of the prehospital and hospital injury severity was found in the region of the face (75 %). The concordance in the body regions of the head, thorax, extremities and pelvis and soft tissue ranged between 43 % and 50 % of the cases. Of the children 38 % suffered a traffic accident, 52 % a fall of less than 3 m and 10 % of more than 3 m. The mechanism of injury was documented in detail in 70 % and satisfactory in 8 %. CONCLUSIONS The assessment of prehospital injury severity in children is unreliable. In order to evaluate injury severity the use of anatomical trauma scores alone is insufficient. The adequate documentation of the mechanism of injury implies that the mechanism of injury seems to play a relevant role in the assessment of prehospital injury severity. The unreliable assessment of the injury severity, the arrival in the ER in on-call hours and the private transport to the hospital is a challenge to the ER leader in trauma life support for children.
Collapse
|