Procalcitonin as an excellent differential marker between uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis in adult patients

Novel Biomarkers: Soluble Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor and Procalcitonin- and Histological Chorioamnionitis after Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes

Fetal inflammatory response syndrome or infection after preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) increases neonatal morbidity in preterm deliveries. Biochemical markers from the amniotic fluid (AF) have been used to evaluate possible intra-amniotic infection during the asymptomatic phase after PPROM. This study aimed to describe whether soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) or procalcitonin (PCT) from AF or maternal sera could reveal fetal inflammatory response or infection after PPROM. AF and maternal serum samples were collected weekly after PPROM (23+ 0 - 34+ 6 gestational weeks) until delivery from twenty women and two women with possible chorioamnionitis with intact membranes. Levels of suPAR, PCT, interleukin-6 (IL-6), glucose, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and bacterial PCR were determined from AF and suPAR and PCT and IL-6 from maternal sera. Fetal infection or inflammation response were determined by the histology of the placenta after delivery. AF glucose was significantly lower and AF LDH higher in the fetal site histologic chorioamnionitis (HCA) group, while AF suPAR concentrations tended to be higher in this group. AF suPAR correlated significantly with AF glucose and LDH. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, AF glucose had the best predictability for fetal site histological chorioamnionitis. The findings of AF PCT were insignificant considering HCA. AF glucose had the highest accuracy in predicting fetal site histologic chorioamnionitis. AF suPAR may be a promising marker; however, our findings were limited by a small study population.

Usefulness of extended inflammatory parameters related to neutrophil activation reported by Sysmex XN-1000 hematology analyzer for predicting complicated acute appendicitis. Comparison with canonical inflammatory laboratory tests

AIM

Accurate diagnosis of complicated appendicitis is of importance to ensure that patients receive early and effective treatment, minimizing the risk of postoperative complications to promote successful recovery. Biochemical markers are a promising tool to identify complicated appendicitis. We aimed to evaluate the potential role of novel parameters related with neutrophil activation, known as "Extended Inflammation Parameters" (EIP), included in blood cell count reported by Sysmex XN-Series analyzers, compared to other canonical biomarkers in identifying complicated appendicitis.

METHOD

Prospective observational study including patients with confirmed diagnosis of acute appendicitis. C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, cell blood count, including white blood cell (WBC), absolute neutrophil (ANC) and immature granulocyte (IG) count and EIP (neutrophil reactivity [NEUT-RI] and granularity intensity [NEUT-GI]) were analyzed before surgery. Their accuracy to diagnose complicated appendicitis was tested in an ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

Our population study included 119 patients, and appendicitis was complicated in 58 (48.7%). NLR, CRP and procalcitonin levels, ANC and IG count and NEUT-RI and NEUT-GI were higher in patients with complicated appendicitis. Regarding accuracy for complicated appendicitis, CRP was the biomarker with the highest performance (ROC AUC: 0.829), with an optimal cutoff of 73.1 mg/L (sensitivity: 63.8%, specificity: 88.5%). NEUT-RI and NEUT-GI achieved both significant but poor accuracy, with ROC AUC of 0.606 and 0.637, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel laboratory tests reported by Sysmex XN-Series analyzers have poor accuracy for identifying complicated appendicitis. In this study, CRP was the biomarker with the highest performance and may be useful as predictor of the severity of acute appendicitis.

Diagnostic performance of type I hypersensitivity-specific markers combined with CRP and IL-6 in complicated acute appendicitis in pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the diagnostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL)-6, and specific markers for type I hypersensitivity were evaluated in pediatric patients with severe acute appendicitis.

METHODS

A total of 140 pediatric patients with "acute appendicitis" who underwent surgery at the Department of General Surgery of the Anhui Provincial Pediatric Patients' Hospital between December 2022 and April 2023 were studied retrospectively. The data collected included the gender, age, onset time, white blood cell count (WBC), CRP, procalcitonin (PCT), serum IgE, serum IL-4, serum IL-5, serum IL-6, serum IL-9, and serum IL-13 levels. The pediatric patients were divided into two groups based on the intraoperative situation and postoperative pathology: the non-complicated acute appendicitis group (NCAA) and the complicated acute appendicitis group (CAA). We analyzed the data from both groups using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models and constructed an ROC curve.

RESULTS

The CAA group outperformed the NCAA group in terms of onset time, WBC, CRP, PCT, IgE, IL-6, IL-9, and IL-13 levels (P < 0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, IL-4, or IL-5 levels (P > 0.05). Then, significant independent variables were incorporated into multivariate logistic regression. According to the results, CRP, IgE, IL-6, and IL-13 are all independent risk factors for CAA. The OR and 95% CI for each factor are as follows: CRP (OR = 1.073, 95%CI: 1.010-1.140, P = 0.022), IgE (OR = 0.975, 95%CI: 0.952-0.999, P = 0.038), IL-6 (OR = 1.494, 95%CI: 1.052-2.121, P = 0.025), and IL-13 (OR = 1.310, 95%CI: 1.036-1.657, P = 0.024). The receiving operator characteristics analysis yielded area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.8187, 0.9083, 0.8947, and 0.8394, respectively, for CRP, IgE, IL-6, and IL-13, confirming their significance in the diagnosis of CAA (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for CAA include CRP, IgE, IL-6, and IL-13. The combination of these serological markers can be used to diagnose CAA.

Management of Intra-Abdominal Infections: The Role of Procalcitonin

Patients with intra-abdominal sepsis suffer from significant mortality and morbidity. The main pillars of treatment for intra-abdominal infections are (1) source control and (2) early delivery of antibiotics. Antibiotic therapy should be started as soon as possible. However, the duration of antibiotics remains a matter of debate. Prolonged antibiotic delivery can lead to increased microbial resistance and the development of nosocomial infections. There has been much research on biomarkers and their ability to aid the decision on when to stop antibiotics. Some of these biomarkers include interleukins, C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT). PCT's value as a biomarker has been a focus area of research in recent years. Most studies use either a cut-off value of 0.50 ng/mL or an >80% reduction in PCT levels to determine when to stop antibiotics. This paper performs a literature review and provides a synthesized up-to-date global overview on the value of PCT in managing intra-abdominal infections.

Role of serum levels of tumour necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) in predicting severity of acute appendicitis

Objectives

One of the most prevalent abdominal crises is acute appendicitis (AA). Clinical diagnosis, even for skilled surgeons, is frequently challenging, as indicated by the high proportion of negative investigations. The purpose of this study was to see if serum TWEAK levels might be used to diagnose acute appendicitis.

Material and Methods

Between June 2017 and May 2019, all patients who had surgery with the original diagnosis of AA were included in the study. TWEAK, WBC, CRP, and bilirubin levels were compared.

Results

The levels of WBC, CRP, and bilirubin were compared to pathology. All three blood indicators increased significantly in AA patients. However, no statistically significant difference in the levels of all three blood indicators was seen between individuals with simple AA and those with severe AA. TWEAK plasma concentrations were considerably greater in patients with severe AA than in the healthy control and NAA groups. TWEAK levels were significantly greater in individuals with severe AA compared to patients with simple AA.

Conclusion

Serum TWEAK levels that are elevated may be used to diagnose acute appendicitis as well as prognostic indicators for the severity of appendicitis.

The Use of Procalcitonin in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common surgical pathologies. Its diagnosis is often carried out based on clinical signs and symptoms, with additional minimally invasive tests (i.e., blood testing) done to support the diagnosis. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a relatively novel biomarker that is starting to be used by clinicians for patients admitted into hospitals with a variety of infections. Its level can be used to identify the presence of infection. The aim of this review is to assess how useful PCT is as a biomarker in supporting clinicians' assessment of patients with suspected appendicitis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out, yielding a total of 16 primary research papers deemed appropriate for appraisal.

RESULTS

The usefulness of PCT in aiding the diagnosis of AA depends on the severity of appendicitis. Patients who experience complicated appendicitis (CAA) such as perforation, gangrene, or necrosis have a significantly raised PCT level (p<0.05) compared to those with uncomplicated appendicitis (UAA) and a variety of other non-appendiceal intra-abdominal pathologies.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PCT in UAA is weak, however, PCT was deemed useful in helping predict CAA, thus helping portray the severity of infection. This, in turn, will help ensure patients are taken to the operating theatre in a timely and safe manner for subsequent appendicectomy.

Identifying Recurrence Risk Factors in CT-Confirmed Acute Appendicitis in Adults Managed Non-operatively During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background/Objective: Acute appendicitis (AA) is predominantly managed with appendectomy, but can be treated non-operatively, leading to a high risk of recurrence. Non-operative management has been more common since the COVID-19 pandemic affected the feasibility of performing surgery. This case-control study analyzed non-operatively managed patients in order to identify clinical and radiological factors associated with recurrence risk. 

Methods: Over 12 months, 48 adults with CT-proven AA managed non-operatively were identified, and followed up for at least six further months to assess them for recurrence (readmission to hospital more than 14 days after discharge and after symptom resolution, requiring treatment for appendicitis). Clinical and CT data were collected and a Cox regression survival analysis was performed to produce hazards ratios (HRs).

Results: Of the 48 patients, 12 (25%) experienced a recurrence up until the end of the follow-up period, eight of whom were then treated operatively, and four treated non-operatively. On the univariate analysis, greater recurrence risk was observed in patients with diabetes mellitus, higher heart rate (on admission and maximum value during admission), lower white cell count and neutrophils and appendiceal wall thinning on CT. On the multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus (HR=7.72, p=0.021) and higher heart rate (HR=1.08, p=0.018) were associated with statistically significant greater recurrence risk.

Conclusions: Diabetes mellitus and higher heart rate on admission are associated with greater recurrence risk of AA managed non-operatively. No CT findings were associated with statistically significant greater risk. Clinicians should, therefore, consider DM and heart rate when making decisions on appendicitis management, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic but also beyond it.

CT based Acute Appendicitis Severity Index for acute appendicitis and validate its effectiveness in predicting complicated appendicitis

AIM

To propose a CT-based scoring system called Acute Appendicitis Severity Index (AASI) for diagnosis of acute appendicitis and validates its effectiveness in predicting complicated appendicitis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analyses of CT images of 120 adult patients with pathologically proven uncomplicated (n = 64) and complicated (n = 56) acute appendicitis were performed. All patients had undergone a CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis using 320 multi-detectors computed tomography with Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D (AIDR 3D). CT image parameters were identified and used to develop a CT-based scoring system (AASI) to predict the severity of acute appendicitis and its outcome. All image analysis was performed by 2 radiologists and the total score was assigned to each patient based on the proposed CT scoring system. Validation of the effectiveness of the proposed scoring system (AASI) was done using statistical models.

RESULTS

The mean and standard deviation of AASI was found to be significantly higher (P value = 0.001) in the complicated appendicitis group (observer 1 = 10.2 ± 1.6 and observer 2 = 9.63 ± 2.3) as compared to that in uncomplicated acute appendicitis group (observer 1 = 7.09 ± 2.2 and observer 2 = 6.38 ± 1.9). There was an excellent interobserver agreement of the Acute Appendicitis Severity Index for both the uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis groups (K = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.87-0.92, P = 0.001). The cutoff value for AASI used to predict complicated appendicitis was taken as 9.5 and 8.5. This resulted in an AUC of 0.877 and 0.848, accuracy of 83% and 81%, the sensitivity of 75% and 80%, the specificity of 90% and 81%, the positive predictive value of 87% and 78%, and a negative predictive value of 81% and 83% by both reviewers respectively.

CONCLUSION

The proposed CT-based AASI is a reliable parameter for the prediction of complicated appendicitis.

Acute Appendicitis in Childhood and Adulthood

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of the acute abdomen, with an incidence of 1 per 1000 persons per year. It is one of the main differential diagnoses of unclear abdominal conditions.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications that were retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases.

RESULTS

In addition to the medical history, physical examination and laboratory tests, abdominal ultrasonography should be performed to establish the diagnosis (and sometimes computed tomography [CT] or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], if ultrasonography is insufficient). Before any treatment is provided, appendicitis is classified as either uncomplicated or complicated. In both types of appendicitis, the decision to treat surgically or conservatively must be based on the overall clinical picture and the patient's risk factors. Appendectomy is the treatment of choice for acute appendicitis in all age groups. In Germany, appendectomy is mainly performed laparoscopically in patients with low morbidity. Uncomplicated appendicitis can, alternatively, be treated conservatively under certain circumstances. A meta-analysis of five randomized, controlled trials has revealed that ca. 37% of adult patients treated conservatively undergo appendectomy within one year. Complicated appendicitis is a serious disease; it can also potentially be treated conservatively (with antibiotics, with or without placement of a drain) as an alternative to surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment is being performed more frequently, but the current state of the evidence does not justify a change of the standard therapy from surgery to conservative treatment.

[Recommendations on treatment of acute appendicitis : Recommendations of an expert group based on the current literature]

The paradigm shift in the treatment concept for acute appendicitis is currently the subject of intensive discussions. The diagnosis and differentiation of an uncomplicated from a complicated appendicitis as well as the selection of an adequate treatment is very challenging, especially since nonoperative treatment models have been published. The laparoscopic appendectomy is still the standard for most cases. Guidelines for the treatment of acute appendicitis do not exist in Germany. Therefore, a group of experts elaborated 21 recommendations on the treatment of acute appendicitis after 3 meetings. After initial definition of population, intervention, comparison and outcome (PICO) questions, recommendations have been finalized through the Delphi voting system. The results were evaluated according to the current literature. The aim of this initiative was to define a basic support for decision making in the clinical routine for treatment of acute appendicitis.

A study of C-reactive protein and D-dimer in patients of appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Acute appendicitis is the most common abdominal surgical emergencies across the world.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the value of C-reactive protein (CRP) and D-dimer as diagnostic markers of acute appendicitis.

STUDY DESIGN

It was a Prospective observational clinical study.

METHOD

The present study was carried out in General Surgical Unit of University Hospital, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi from September 2015 to July 2017. All data including patient's demography, clinical examination, laboratory test results, and appendix histology were summarized. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of TLC, CRP, and D-dimer was analyzed.

RESULTS

Total 65 patients who presented with periumbilical pain or pain in right iliac fossa (RIF) were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 31.18 ± 14.59 years (range: 15 to 65 years) with male : female ratio was 2.21:1. The most common symptom was pain in right iliac fossa (100%) followed by nausea/vomiting (69.2%). The mean leucocyte count, CRP, and D-dimer levels were significantly raised in appendicitis group as compared to negative appendicectomy group (P = 0.025, P = 0.036, and P = 0.025, respectively). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for TLC was not helpful for differentiating between appendicitis and negative appendicitis (P = 0.073). In addition, D-dimer was helpful for differentiating between appendicitis and negative appendicitis (P = 0.002). However, CRP was also found to be helpful for differentiating between appendicitis and negative appendicitis (P = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of appendicitis remains multifactorial and biochemical markers like CRP and D-dimer may help to guide the surgeon in the decision making.