1
|
Trentzsch H, Lefering R, Schweigkofler U. Imposter or knight in shining armor? Pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCD) for severe pelvic injuries in patients with multiple trauma: a trauma-registry analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2024; 32:2. [PMID: 38225602 PMCID: PMC10790519 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-023-01172-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic Circumferential Compression Devices (PCCD) are standard in hemorrhage-control of unstable pelvic ring fractures (UPF). Controversial data on their usefulness exists. Aim of the study was to investigate whether prehospital application of PCCD can reduce mortality and transfusion requirements in UPF. METHODS Retrospective cohort study. From 2016 until 2021, 63,371 adult severely injured patients were included into TraumaRegister DGU® of the German Trauma Society (TR-DGU). We analyzed PCCD use over time and compared patients with multiple trauma patients and UPF, who received prehospital PCCD to those who did not (noPCCD). Groups were adjusted for risk of prehospital PCCD application by propensity score matching. Primary endpoints were hospital mortality, standardized mortality rate (SMR) and transfusion requirements. RESULTS Overall UPF incidence was 9% (N = 5880) and PCCD use increased over time (7.5% to 20.4%). Of all cases with UPF, 40.2% received PCCD and of all cases with PCCD application, 61% had no pelvic injury at all. PCCD patients were more severely injured and had higher rates of shock or transfusion. 24-h.-mortality and hospital mortality were higher with PCCD (10.9% vs. 9.3%; p = 0.033; 17.9% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.070). Hospital mortality with PCCD was 1% lower than predicted. SMR was in favor of PCCD but failed statistical significance (0.95 vs. 1.04, p = 0.101). 1,860 propensity score matched pairs were analyzed: NoPCCD-patients received more often catecholamines (19.6% vs. 18.5%, p = 0.043) but required less surgical pelvic stabilization in the emergency room (28.6% vs. 36.8%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in mortality or transfusion requirements. CONCLUSION We observed PCCD overuse in general and underuse in UPF. Prehospital PCCD appears to be more a marker of injury severity and less triggered by presence of UPF. We found no salutary effect on survival or transfusion requirements. Inappropriate indication and technical flaw may have biased our results. TR-DGU does not contain data on these aspects. Further studies are necessary. Modular add-on questioners to the registry could offer one possible solution to overcome this limitation. We are concerned that PCCD use may be unfairly discredited by misinterpretation of the available evidence and strongly vote for a prospective trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Trentzsch
- Institut für Notfallmedizin und Medizinmanagement (INM), Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Schillerstr. 53, 80336, Munich, Germany.
| | - R Lefering
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, University Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany
| | - U Schweigkofler
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt Am Main Friedberger, Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vrancken SM, de Vroome M, van Vledder MG, Halm JA, Van Lieshout EMM, Borger van der Burg BLS, Hoencamp R, Verhofstad MHJ, van Waes OJF. Non-compressible truncal and junctional hemorrhage: A retrospective analysis quantifying potential indications for advanced bleeding control in Dutch trauma centers. Injury 2024; 55:111183. [PMID: 37981519 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Truncal and junctional hemorrhage is the leading cause of potentially preventable deaths in trauma patients. To reduce this mortality, the application of advanced bleeding control techniques, such as resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA), junctional tourniquets, Foley catheters, or hemostatic agents should be optimized. This study aimed to identify trauma patients with non-compressible truncal and junctional hemorrhage (NCTJH) who might benefit from advanced bleeding control techniques during initial trauma care. We hypothesized that there is a substantial cohort of Dutch trauma patients that can possibly benefit from advanced bleeding control techniques. METHODS Adult trauma patients with an Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥3 in the torso, neck, axilla, or groin region, who were presented between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2018 to two Dutch level-1 trauma centers, were identified from the Dutch Trauma Registry. Potential indications for advanced bleeding control in patients with NCTJH were assessed by an expert panel of three trauma surgeons based on injury characteristics, vital signs, response to resuscitation, and received treatment. RESULTS In total, 1719 patients were identified of whom 249 (14.5 %) suffered from NCTJH. In 153 patients (60.6 %), hemorrhagic shock could have been mitigated or prevented with advanced bleeding control techniques. This group was younger and more heavily injured: median age of 40 versus 48 years and median ISS 33 versus 22 as compared to the entire cohort. The mortality rate in these patients was 31.8 %. On average, each of the included level-1 trauma centers treated an NCTJH patient every 24 days in whom a form of advanced bleeding control could have been beneficial. CONCLUSIONS More than half of included Dutch trauma patients with NCTJH may benefit from in-hospital application of advanced bleeding control techniques, such as REBOA, during initial trauma care. Widespread implementation of these techniques in the Dutch trauma system may contribute to reduction of mortality and morbidity from non-compressible truncal and junctional hemorrhage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne M Vrancken
- Department of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands; Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Matthijs de Vroome
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark G van Vledder
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jens A Halm
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther M M Van Lieshout
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Rigo Hoencamp
- Department of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands; Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Defense Healthcare Organization, Ministry of Defense, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Michael H J Verhofstad
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oscar J F van Waes
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Defense Healthcare Organization, Ministry of Defense, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lier H, Gooßen K, Trentzsch H. [The chapters "Stop the bleed-prehospital" and "Coagulation management and volume therapy (emergency departement)" in the new S3 guideline "Polytrauma/severe injury treatment"]. Notf Rett Med 2023; 26:259-268. [PMID: 37261335 PMCID: PMC10117256 DOI: 10.1007/s10049-023-01147-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The S3 guideline on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries by the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies was updated between 2020 and 2022. This article describes the essence of the new chapter "Stop the bleed-prehospital" and the revised chapter "Coagulation management and volume therapy".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. Lier
- Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 Köln, Deutschland
- Sektion „Klinische Hämotherapie und Hämostasemanagement“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI), Schumannstr. 2, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - K. Gooßen
- Institut für Forschung in der Operativen Medizin (IFOM), Universität Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Straße 200, 51109 Köln, Deutschland
| | - H. Trentzsch
- Institut für Notfallmedizin und Medizinmanagement (INM), Klinikum der Universität München, LMU München, Schillerstr. 53, 80336 München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Effect of C-Clamp Application on Hemodynamic Instability in Polytrauma Victims with Pelvic Fracture. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2022; 58:medicina58091291. [PMID: 36143972 PMCID: PMC9503952 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58091291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: C-clamp application may reduce mortality in patients with unstable pelvic fractures and hemodynamic instability. Decreasing C-clamp use over the past decades may have resulted from concerns about its effectiveness and safety. The purpose of this study was to document effective hemodynamic stabilization after C-clamp application by means of vital parameters (primary outcome parameter), and the subsequent effect on metabolic indices and volume management (secondary outcome parameters). Materials and Methods: C-clamp application was performed between 2014 and 2021 for n = 13 patients (50 ± 18 years) with unstable pelvic fractures and hemodynamic instability. Vital parameters, metabolic indices, volume management, and the correlation of factors and potential changes were analyzed. Results: After C-clamp application, increases were measured in systolic blood pressure (+15 mmHg; p = 0.0284) and mean arterial pressure (+12 mmHg; p = 0.0157), and a reduction of volume requirements (p = 0.0266) and bolus vasoactive medication needs (p = 0.0081) were observed. The earlier C-clamp application was performed, the greater the effect (p < 0.05; r > 0.6). Heart rate, shock index, and end-tidal CO2 were not significantly altered. The extent of base deficit, hemoglobin, and lactate did not correlate with changes in vital parameters. Conclusions: In the majority of hemodynamically unstable trauma patients not responding to initial fluid resuscitation and severe pelvic fracture, early C-clamp application had an additive effect on hemodynamic stabilization and reduction in volume substitution. Based on these findings, there is still a rationale for considering early C-clamp stabilization in this group of severely injured patients.
Collapse
|