Deep infection following reconstruction of pelvic fractures: prevalence, characteristics, and predisposing risk factors

Factors Associated With Infection in Patients With Combined Pelvic Ring and Bladder Injuries

OBJECTIVES

To identify the infection rate in patients with combined pelvic ring and bladder injuries. Secondary aims included identifying treatment and injury factors associated with infection.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Single Level I Tertiary Academic Center.

PATIENTS SELECTION CRITERIA

All patients over a 12-year period with combined pelvic ring and bladder injuries were evaluated. Exclusion criteria were nonoperative management of the pelvic ring, isolated posterior fixation, and follow-up <90 days.

OUTCOME MEASURE AND COMPARISONS

Primary outcome measured was deep infection of the anterior pelvis requiring surgical irrigation and debridement.

RESULTS

In total, 106 patients with anterior stabilization of the pelvis in the setting of a bladder injury were included. Seven patients (6.6%) developed a deep infection and required surgical debridement within 90 days. Patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation with plating of the anterior pelvis and acute concomitant bladder repair had an infection rate of 2.2% (1/43). Patients undergoing closed reduction and anterior fixation with either external fixation or percutaneous rami screw after bladder repair had an infection rate of 17.6% (3/17). There was a higher infection rate among patients with combined intraperitoneal (IP) and extraperitoneal (EP) bladder injuries (23%) when compared with those with isolated EP (3.8%) or IP (9.1%) bladder injuries (P = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute open reduction and internal fixation of the anterior pelvis in patients with combined pelvic ring and bladder injuries has a low infection rate. Patients with combined IP and EP bladder injuries are at increased risk of infection compared with those with isolated IP and EP injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Factors Associated With Pelvic Infection After Pre-Peritoneal Pelvic Packing for Hemodynamically Unstable Pelvic Fractures

Background: Preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) and external fixation has led to improved mortality after devastating pelvic trauma. However, there is limited literature on infection after this intervention. We aim to study the risk factors associated with pelvic infection after PPP. Patients and Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent PPP at a single level 1 trauma center was performed. Results: Over the 18-year study period, 222 patients were identified. Twenty-three percent of patients had an open fracture. Pelvic angiography was performed in 24% of patients with 16% requiring angioembolization (AE). The average time to packing removal was two (one to two days) days, although 10% of patients had their pelvis re-packed. Overall infection rate was 14% (n = 31); if pelvic re-packing was performed, the infection rate increased to 45%. Twenty-two of the patients with an infection required additional procedures for their infection, and ultimately hardware removal occurred in eight patients. On univariable analysis, patients with pelvic infections had more open fractures (55% vs. 17%; p < 0.01), underwent AE more frequently (29% vs. 14%; p = 0.04), were more likely to undergo repacking (32% vs. 6%; p < 0.01), and had packing in place for longer (2 [1,2] vs. 2 [2,3]; p = 0.01). On logistic multivariable regression analysis, open fracture (odds ratio [OR], 5.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-14.1) and pelvic re-packing (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.2-18.5) were independent risk factors for pelvic infection. Conclusions: Pelvic infection after PPP is a serious complication independently associated with open fracture and re-packing of the pelvis. Re-intervention was required in most patients with infection.

Angioembolization Has Similar Efficacy and Lower Total Charges than Preperitoneal Pelvic Packing in Patients With Pelvic Ring or Acetabulum Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To compare cost, hospital-related outcomes, and mortality between angioembolization (AE) and preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) in the setting of pelvic ring or acetabulum fractures.

METHODS

.

DESIGN

Retrospective database review.

SETTING

National Inpatient Sample, years 2016-2020.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Hospitalized adult patients who underwent AE or PPP in the setting of a pelvic ring or acetabulum fracture.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Mortality and hospital-associated outcomes, including total charges, following AE versus PPP in the setting of pelvic ring or acetabulum fractures.

RESULTS

A total of 3780 patients, 3620 undergoing AE and 160 undergoing PPP, were included. No significant differences in mortality, length of stay, time to procedure, or discharge disposition were found ( P > 0.05); however, PPP was associated with significantly greater charges than AE ( P = 0.04). Patients who underwent AE had a mean total charge of $250,062.88 while those undergoing PPP had a mean total charge of $369,137.16.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite equivalent clinical efficacy in terms of mortality and hospital-related outcomes, PPP was associated with significantly greater charges than AE in the setting of pelvic ring or acetabulum fractures. This data information can inform clinical management of these patients and assist trauma centers in resource allocation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Availability and use of resources for emergency fracture care of pelvic trauma associated with haemorrhagic shock in Latin America: A cross-sectional study

Determining the true availability of resources and understanding the level of training of surgeons involved in the treatment of patients with pelvic fractures and haemorrhagic shock is critical. In the herein study, the availability of technical, technological, and human resources for the care of this injury in Latin America region was analysed, and the preferences of orthopaedic trauma surgeons when performing interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with pelvic trauma and associated haemorrhagic shock was described. A cross sectional web-based survey containing questions on knowledge, attitudes, and practices with respect to imaging resources, emergency pelvic stabilization methods, and interventions used for bleeding control was sent to 948 Latin America orthopaedic trauma surgeons treating pelvic fractures in the emergency department. Differences between regional clusters, level of training, type of hospital, and pelvic surgery volume were assessed. 368 responses were obtained, with 37.5% of respondents reporting formal training in pelvic surgery and 36.0% having available protocol for managing these patients. The most frequently used interventions were the supra-acetabular pelvic external fixator and pelvic packing. Limited hospital and imaging resources are available for the care of patients with pelvic trauma and associated haemorrhagic shock throughout Latin America. In addition, the training of orthopaedic trauma surgeons dealing with this type of injury and the volume of pelvic surgeries per year is heterogeneous. It should be urgently considered to develop management protocols adapted to Latin America according to the availability of resources, as well as to promote training in this severe life-threatening traumatic condition.

Treatment of Fracture-Related Infection after Pelvic Fracture

BACKGROUND

The management of pelvic fractures is a significant challenge. Surgical site infection can result in the need for revision surgery, cause functional impairment, and lead to a prolonged length of stay and increased treatment costs. Although reports on fracture-related infection (FRI) after pelvic fracture fixation are sparsely reported in the literature, it is a serious complication. This study analysed patients with FRIs after pelvic fracture regarding patient characteristics, treatment strategies, and an evaluation of risk factors for FRI.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-centre study, FRI was diagnosed based on clinical symptoms of infection and a positive culture of a bacterial infection. Depending on the severity and acuteness of the infection, osseous stabilization was restored either via implant retention (stable implant, no osteolysis), exchange (loose implant or bony defect), or external fixation (recurrence of infection after prior implant retaining revision). Healing of infection was defined as no sign of recurring infection upon clinical, radiological, and laboratory examination in the last follow-up visit.

RESULTS

The FRI rate in our patient population was 7.5% (24/316). In 8/24 patients, the FRI occurred within the first three weeks after initial surgery (early) and 16/24 presented with a late onset of symptoms of FRI. A strategy of debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) was successful in 9/24 patients with FRI after pelvic fracture. A total of 10 patients required an exchange of osteo-synthetic implants, whereof three were exchanged to an external fixator. In five patients, we removed the implant because the fracture had already consolidated at the time of revision for infection. A total of 17/24 patients had a poly-microbial infection after a pelvic fracture and 3/24 patients died from post-traumatic multi-organ failure within the first 6 months after trauma. There were no cases of persistent infection within the remaining 21 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although poly-microbial infection is common in FRI after pelvic fracture, the recurrence rate of infection is relatively low. A complex pelvic trauma with significant soft tissue injury is a risk factor for recurrent infection and multiple revisions. A strategy of DAIR can be successful in patients with a stable implant. In cases with recurrent infection or an unstable fracture site, the exchange of implants should be considered.

Morel-Lavallee lesions and number of surgeries for associated injuries predict surgical site infection risk following pelvic ring injury osteosynthesis

We examined the incidence and causative factors of surgical site infection (SSI) following osteosynthesis for pelvic ring injury by reviewing the data of 97 consecutive patients with pelvic ring injuries treated between 2014 and 2019. Osteosyntheses, including internal or external skeletal fixation with plates or screws, were performed based on fracture type and patient's condition. Fractures were treated surgically, with a 36 months minimum follow-up period. Eight (8.2%) patients experienced SSI. The most common causative pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus. Patients with SSI had significantly worse functional outcomes at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months than those without. For patients with SSI, the average Merle d'Aubigné and Majeed scores at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after injury were 2.4, 4.1, 8.0, 11.0, and 11.3, and 25.5, 32.1, 47.9, 61.9, and 63.3, respectively. Patients with SSI had a higher likelihood of undergoing staged operations (50.0 vs. 13.5%, p = 0.02), more surgeries for associated injuries (6.3% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.04), higher likelihood of Morel-Lavallee lesions (50.0% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.002), higher incidence of diversional colostomy (37.5% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.05), and longer intensive care unit stay (11.1 vs. 3.9 days, p = 0.001) than those without. The contributing factors for SSI were Morel-Lavallee lesions (odds ratio [OR] 4.55, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 3.34-50.0) and other surgeries for associated injuries (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.07-5.28). Patients with SSI after osteosynthesis for pelvic ring injuries may have worse short-term functional outcomes.

Advances in the Treatment of Implant-Associated Infections of the Pelvis: Eradication Rates, Recurrence of Infection, and Outcome

INTRODUCTION

Surgical site infections after operative stabilization of pelvic and acetabular fractures are rare but serious complications. The treatment of these infections involves additional surgical procedures, high health care costs, a prolonged stay, and often a worse outcome. In this study, we focused on the impact of the different causing bacteria, negative microbiological results with wound closure, and recurrence rates of patients with implant-associated infections after pelvic surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a study group of 43 patients with microbiologically proven surgical site infections (SSI) after surgery of the pelvic ring or the acetabulum treated in our clinic between 2009 and 2019. Epidemiological data, injury pattern, surgical approach, and microbiological data were analyzed and correlated with long-term follow-up and recurrence of infection.

RESULTS

Almost two thirds of the patients presented with polymicrobial infections, with staphylococci being the most common causing agents. An average of 5.7 (±5.4) surgical procedures were performed until definitive wound closure. Negative microbiological swabs at time of wound closure were only achieved in 9 patients (21%). Long-term follow-up revealed a recurrence of infection in only seven patients (16%) with an average interval between revision surgery and recurrence of 4.7 months. There was no significant difference of recurrence rate for the groups of patients with positive/negative microbiology in the last operative revision (71% vs. 78%). A positive trend for a correlation with recurrent infection was only found for patients with a Morel-Lavallée lesion due to run-over injuries (30% vs. 5%). Identified causing bacteria did not influence the outcome and rate of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence rates after surgical revision of implant-associated infections of the pelvis and the acetabulum are low and neither the type of causing agent nor the microbiological status at the timepoint of wound closure has a significant impact on the recurrence rate.

Surgical site infections after stabilization of pelvic ring injuries: a retrospective analysis of risk factors and a meta-analysis of similar studies

PURPOSE

Pelvic ring fractures requiring surgical stabilization are severe injuries. Surgical site infections occurring after stabilization of the pelvis are serious complications, requiring complex and multidisciplinary treatment.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study from a level I trauma centre. One hundred and ninety-two patients who underwent stabilization of closed pelvic ring injuries without signs of pathological fracture were selected for inclusion into the study. After excluding seven patients for having incomplete data, the final study group consisted of 185 patients (117 men and 68 women). Basic epidemiologic data and potential risk factors were recorded and analyzed by Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier curves, and risk ratios in 2 × 2 tables. Categorical variables were compared by Fisher exact tests and chi squared tests. Parametric variables were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis tests with post hoc Wilcoxon tests.

RESULTS

Surgical site infections occurred in 13% of the study group (24 from 185). Eighteen infections occurred in men (15.4%) and six in women (8.8%). There were two significant risk factors in women: age over 50 years (p = 0.0232) and concomitant urogenital trauma (p = 0.0104). The common risk ratio for both these factors was 212.59 (8.78-5148.68), p = 0.0010. No significant risk factors were identified in men despite younger men having a higher incidence of infection (p = 0.1428).

CONCLUSION

Overall rate of infectious complications was higher than in the literature, but this might be caused by inclusion of all patients regardless of surgical strategy. Higher age in women and lower age in men were associated with higher infection rates. Concomitant urogenital trauma was a significant risk factor in women.

Infection from an Iliosacral Screw 16 Years Postoperatively in Demolition Derby Umpire Crushed Between 2 Cars: A Case Report

CASE

A 47-year-old man crushed between 2 cars during a demolition derby, a nonracing North American motorsport, underwent open reduction and internal fixation, iliosacral screw fixation, arterial embolization, and multiple urologic procedures after massive pelvic ring injury, remarkably recovering nearly full function. Sixteen years after injury, he developed an abscess emanating from an iliosacral screw requiring irrigation, debridement, and hardware removal.

CONCLUSION

Deep surgical infections from iliosacral screws may present late, even more than 15 years after the original surgery. Obesity, preoperative embolization, diabetes, and urethral injuries are relevant risk factors. Similar patients should have a low threshold for infection workup when presenting with symptoms, even years after surgery.