Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs): comparison of functional outcome 1 year after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) versus open reduction internal fixation (ORIF)

The Application of Bidirectional Rapid Reductor in Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for the Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Case Series

OBJECTIVE

Rapid and effective reduction is difficult for minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) surgery. This study aims to introduce a bidirectional rapid reductor (BRR) designed to assist in the reduction during MIPO surgery for proximal humeral fractures (PHFs).

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted between June 2021 and February 2022 in the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, involving patients diagnosed with PHFs. A detailed technical approach of BRR in MIPO surgery was described, and the patients' outcomes based on postoperative radiographic results including x-ray postoperative follow-up, and clinical outcome parameters including visual analogue scale (VAS) and constant-Murley score at last follow-up were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients were included in this study, comprising three males and nine females, with an average age of 67.58 years. The mean operative time was 70.92 min (range 63-80 min). The mean blood loss was 102.27 mL (range 50-300 mL). The mean VAS and constant-Murley scores at final follow-up were 0.33 and 88, respectively. All patients had their fractures healed without secondary displacement at last follow-up. One patient experienced shoulder stiffness post-operation. There were no adverse events or complications following the use of this technique, such as acromion fracture, nerve or blood vessel injury.

CONCLUSION

The BRR can assist MIPO for good reduction of PHFs. However, the efficacy should be validated with a large-sample randomized controlled trial and longer follow-up.

Surgical Considerations for Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, and Vitamin D Deficiency in Upper Extremity Surgery

Fragility fractures as a result of osteoporosis, osteopenia, or vitamin D deficiency are some of the most common injuries encountered in orthopedics and require careful consideration when determining the appropriate management and treatment options. A thorough perioperative evaluation can identify causes of low bone mineral density allowing for initiation of appropriate therapy. Surgical treatment of these fractures can be difficult, and techniques should be employed to ensure stable fixation. It is important to understand the potential pitfalls associated with treatment of fragility fractures to prevent avoidable complications. Postoperative management is key to preventing future injuries in this unique patient population.

Limb Fractures Treated With the Novel Plate Osteosynthesis Application Technique: Second to Minimally Invasive Plates osteosynthesis

BACKGROUND

The main aim of this article was to propose a new concept of minimally invasive surgery for treating limb fractures, named as second to minimally invasive plates osteosynthesis (STMIPO).

METHODS

We have described the STMIPO technique in a step-wise and standardized manner based on our findings from a study involving six patients treated at our institution. All patients with fracture achieved satisfactory outcomes.

RESULTS

Ours clinical trials have shown that the STMIPO technique can be successfully applied in various limb fractures, including fibula fractures, tibial fractures, femur fractures, humerus fractures, ulna fractures, and radius fractures. All fracture patients achieved satisfactory outcomes.

CONCLUSION

As a new minimally invasive technology, the STMIPO technique can serve as an alternative solution for fractures that are difficult to reduce with minimally invasive plates osteosynthesis (MIPO).

Proximal humerus fractures: deltopectoral open reduction and internal fixation vs deltosplit minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: which surgical approach provides superior results?

Purpose

To compare the two main surgical approaches to address proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) stratified for Neer fracture types, to demonstrate which approach gives the best result for each fracture type.

Methods

A literature search was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to 4 January 2022. Inclusion criteria were studies comparing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with deltopectoral (DP) approach and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) with deltosplit (DS) approach of PHFs. Patient's demographic data, fracture type, Constant-Murley Score (CMS), operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, fluoroscopy time, and radiological outcomes were extracted. Results were stratified for each type of Neer fracture.

Results

Eleven studies (798 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. No functional difference was found in the CMS between the two groups for each type of Neer (P = n.s.): for PHFs Neer II, the mean CMS was 72.5 (s.e. 5.9) points in the ORIF group and 79.6 (s.e. 2.5) points in the MIPO group; for Neer III, 77.8 (s.e. 2.0) in the ORIF and 76.4 (se 3.0) in the MIPO; and for Neer IV, 70.6 (s.e. 2.7) in the ORIF and 60.9 (s.e. 6.3) in the MIPO. The operation time in the MIPO group was significantly lower than in the ORIF group for both Neer II (P = 0.0461) and Neer III (P = 0.0037) fractures.

Conclusion

The MIPO with DS approach demonstrated no significant differences in the results to the ORIF with DP approach for the different Neer fractures in terms of functional results, with a similar outcome, especially for the Neer II and III fracture types. The MIPO technique proved to be as safe and effective as the ORIF approach.

Displaced Humeral Head After Intramedullary Nailing for Proximal Humeral Fracture is Associated With the Worse Short-term Outcomes -multicenter (TRON) study-

Background

In recent years, complex and unstable proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are treated with intramedullary nails (IMNs) in the elderly; however, the postoperative radiographic findings related to the clinical outcome are not clear. This study evaluated the association of clinical outcomes with the radiographic findings of PHFs treated with IMNs.

Methods

We collected data of patients aged >60 years with PHFs treated with IMNs from 2015 to 2019 in 13 associated centers' database (named TRON). We excluded patients lost to follow-up of <6 months postoperatively (PO6M). We evaluated clinical outcomes with the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) score at PO6M and defined a score of <27 as poor. We assessed the radiographic findings on the anteroposterior view of the humeral head postoperatively, and each radiographic finding such as humeral head height (HHH), head shaft angle, and cranialization of the greater tuberosity was divided into two groups: poor and good. Factors associated with poor UCLA at PO6M were extracted by logistic regression analysis, and the factors were divided into two groups (poor and good) and matched for age, sex, and fracture type. The UCLA score at PO6M between the groups was examined by the Mann-Whitney U test, and the significance level was set at 0.05. The minimal clinical important difference in the UCLA score was set 2 points.

Results

The study included 243 patients (mean age, 76 years; range, 60-95 years). The mean follow-up period was 12 months (range, 6-56 months). The correlation coefficients indicated that there was either no or only a weak correlation between HHH, head shaft angle, and cranialization of the greater tuberosity. A poor HHH (HHH <0 or >10 mm) was extracted as a factor associated with a poor UCLA score at PO6M by logistic regression analysis (odds ratio: 5.78, 95% confidence interval = 1.2-27.7, P = .0287). In matched pair analysis, the UCLA score at PO6M was significantly lower in the poor HHH group (26 [range: 9-33] vs. 24 [range: 10-35], P = .0458).

Conclusion

We revealed that the HHH was an independent risk factor for poor short-term outcomes. There was a significant difference in the UCLA score between groups divided by the HHH in cases treated with IMNs. The HHH can be used intraoperatively or postoperatively as a reliable parameter to predict clinical outcomes in PHFs treated with IMNs.