[Total intravenous anesthesia. On the way to standard practice in pediatrics]

A comparison of sedation with midazolam-ketamine versus propofol-fentanyl during endoscopy in children: a randomized trial

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of midazolam plus ketamine versus fentanyl plus propofol combination administered to children undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) and to determine the most appropriate sedation protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized, single-blind study included patients between the ages of 4 and 17 years who underwent UGE for diagnostic purposes. Patients were divided randomly into groups A (midazolam-ketamine combination, n=119) and B (fentanyl plus propofol combination, n=119). The effectiveness of the sedation and complications during the procedure and recovery period were recorded.

RESULTS

The processes started without an additional dose of the drug for 118 patients (99.1%) in group A and for 101 patients (84.8%) in group B (P=0.001). The average dose of ketamine administered to the patients in group A was 1.03±0.15 mg/kg and the average dose of propofol administered to the patients in group B was 1.46±0.55 mg/kg. None of the patients stopped the endoscopic procedure in group A, but one patient (0.8%) had to discontinue the endoscopic procedure in group B. 27 patients in group A (22.7%) and 41 patients (34.5%) in group B developed complications during the procedure (P=0.044). The rate of complications during the recovery of group A (110 patients, 92.4%) was significantly higher than that in group B (48 patients, 40.3%) (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

In children, UGE procedures can be quite comfortable when using the midazolam-ketamine combination. However, adverse effects related to ketamine were observed during recovery.

Quality and Safety of General Anesthesia with Propofol and Sevoflurane in Children Aged 1-14 Based on Laboratory Parameters

INTRODUCTION

Knowledge of anatomic, physiological, biochemical and physical characteristics of children of all age groups, the existing illness and possible pathological response of the organism to the existing situation, require a pediatric anesthesiologist to participate in the preparation of a child for surgical treatment, to choose the best anesthesia technique and medications, and manipulative techniques to enable the scheduled surgical treatment with minimum anesthesia risks. The aim of this clinical study was to prove reliability and quality of propofol or sevoflurane general anesthesia in children in the age group of 1-14 years from the ASA I group and in the elective surgical treatments in duration of 60 minutes, based on preoperative and postoperative levels of laboratory findings (transaminases, blood sugar, urea and creatinine).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

the study included 160 patients randomized in two groups based on different approaches: total intravenous anesthesia was used for the propofol group (n=80) (TIVA) and the inhalation technique was used for the sevoflurane group (n=80).

RESULTS

statistical evaluation of the obtained results indicates stability of laboratory findings in the immediate postoperative course (after 24 hours) in respect to the preoperative period. Based on the Mann Whitney test (P), preoperative and postoperative blood sugar levels in the sevoflurane vs. propofol group were P=0.152 vs. 0.021; creatinine levels P=0.113 vs. 0.325; urea levels P= 0.016 vs. 0.900; AST levels P=0,031 vs. 0,268 and ALT levels P=0.021 vs. 0.058. Level of significance was P<0.5.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of the examined laboratory parameters show that propofol and sevoflurane provide full security and quality of general anesthesia in children age group 1-14 years, from the ASA I group. All analyzed laboratory levels in the postoperative course remained in their referential values in both groups of participants.

Influence of topical anesthetics on oculocardiac reflex and corneal healing in rabbits

AIM

To investigate the incidence of oculocardiac reflex (OCR) with two anesthetic regimens and its prevention using topical anesthetics in a rabbit model, and to explore the effect of topical anesthetics on corneal healing.

METHODS

Forty-eight clinically healthy adult New Zealand white rabbits of either sex were divided into two groups (Group A and B) and anesthetized with either ketamine (Group A, n =24) or propofol (Group B, n =24). he incidence of OCR was recorded in each group with a variety of ocular manipulation with or without the use of topical anesthetics (40g/L lignocaine, 5g/L proparacain, 5g/L bupivacaine). Corneal toxicity and healing following the use of each topical anesthetic was assessed one day after surgery and up to 7 days postoperatively by clinical examination of the eye, histopathology and collagen staining and transmission electron microscopy.

RESULTS

No incidence of OCR was recorded with ocular manipulation under ketamine anesthesia, whereas significant reduction in heart rate (P<0.01) was recorded under propofol anesthesia. Topical anesthetics could successfully prevent the OCR without affecting the corneal healing.

CONCLUSION

Topical anesthetics may be recommended for prevention of OCR without any local adverse effect.

[Propofol for paediatric patients in ear, nose and throat surgery. Practicability, quality and cost-effectiveness of different anaesthesia procedures for adenoidectomy in infants]

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was an improvement in patient comfort, reduction of anaesthesia costs and room contamination by the use of propofol for adenoidectomy.

METHODS

A total of 103 infants (aged 1-5 years) undergoing elective adenoidectomy were randomized for anaesthesia with sevoflurane-nitrous oxide/oxygen (group 1), sevoflurane-air/alfentanil (group 2), alfentanil-propofol under induction with sevoflurane (group 3) or alfentanil-propofol (group 4).

RESULTS

Using propofol, postoperative agitation and emesis were significantly less and the anaesthesia costs as well as the need for analgesics was reduced compared to inhalative anaesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of propofol for preschool children undergoing ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery seems to be advantageous because of less postoperative agitation, emesis and costs.

Paediatric anaesthesia and inhalation agents

Inhalation agents are amongst the mainstays of paediatric anaesthesia, as children are often induced by mask before venous access is obtained. Children do not like needles and obtaining venous access in an awake and moving child can be very demanding. Safety aspects are of particular importance in paediatric anaesthesia. Therefore, the possibility of monitoring end-tidal concentrations facilitates correct dosing in all patients, from the preterm infant weighing less than 1000 g to the adult-sized adolescent. For induction, sevoflurane has nearly universally replaced halothane, leading to increased cardiovascular safety. The main disadvantages of inhalation agents, especially sevoflurane and desflurane, are delirious behaviour and agitated states during emergence. In addition, there remains uncertainty regarding the relevance of the cerebral stimulating pattern of some of these agents. Inhalation anaesthesia has a long tradition, whereas the experience with propofol is comparatively small. The incidence and clinical relevance of the propofol infusion syndrome during clinical anaesthesia are still unknown. Inhalation anaesthesia is still considered to be the gold standard by the overwhelming majority of paediatric anaesthetists world-wide, however, intravenous techniques can be an attractive alternative in specific clinical situations.

Total intravenöse Anästhesie mit Propofol und Remifentanil

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate efficacy and tolerability of propofol, remifentanil and cisatracurium or mivacurium in routine anesthetic practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 6,161 patients scheduled for abdominal or orthopedic surgery were included in this open multicenter phase IV study. Perioperative hemodynamics as well as induction, recovery and discharge times, anesthetics, frequency of PONV and side-effects were studied.

RESULTS

Quality of induction and maintenance of anesthesia were evaluated by anesthesiologists to be good or very good in 88%. 86% of the patients assessed anesthesia as good or very good. Adverse events were reported for 28 patients (0.45%), with hypotension and bradycardia being most frequent. Recovery was evaluated by anesthesiologists to be good or very good in 88%, surgeons and nursing staff assessed the TIVA as good or very good in 90%. Most frequent postoperative complaints were pain (16.7%), nausea (6.1%), shivering (3.1%) and vomiting (0.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that total intravenous anesthesia using propofol, remifentanil and cisatracurium or mivacurium is safe, tolerable and effective and has a high degree of acceptance.

[Anaesthesia for radiation therapy of brain tumours in children. A multidisciplinary challenge]

Radiation therapy of childhood intracranial malignancies is always a challenge for radiation oncologists, anaesthetists and paediatric oncologists. Detailed knowledge of the course of the disease prior to radiation therapy and a critical evaluation of the child's actual physical status are mandatory in each case. Furthermore the anaesthetist should be informed about the child's individual preferences and aversions. The optimum prearrangement of the radiation therapy is of paramount importance. Interdisciplinary communication structures which must always involve the child's parents have to be established. Perfect adjustment of the mask that fixes the head during each radiation procedure is necessary to give the child the possibility to breathe spontaneously without an endotracheal tube or a laryngeal mask. Two case reports highlight these aspects of the complex procedure of paediatric radiation therapy which are relevant for the anaesthetist.