[Hurricane Ike and the University of Texas Medical Branch Hospital's evacuation]

Long-term outcomes of patients evacuated from hospitals near the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant after the Great East Japan Earthquake

Introduction

After the accident of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant due to the Great East Japan Earthquake in March 2011, the Japanese government issued a mandatory evacuation order for people living within a 20 km radius of the nuclear power plant. The aim of the current study was to investigate long-term outcomes of these patients and identify factors related to mortality.

Materials and methods

Patients who were evacuated from hospitals near the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant to the Aizu Chuo Hospital from 15 to 26 March, 2011 were included in this study. The following data were collected from medical records: age, sex, activities of daily life, hospital they were admitted in at the time of earthquake, distance between the facility and the nuclear power plant, reasons of evacuation and number of transfers. The patient outcomes were collected from medical records and/or investigated on the telephone in January 2012.

Results

A total of 97 patients (28 men and 69 women) were transferred from 10 hospitals via ambulances or buses. No patients died or experienced exacerbation during transfer. Median age of the patients was 86 years. Of the total, 36 patients were not able to obey commands, 44 were bed-ridden and 61 were unable to sustain themselves via oral intake of food. Among 86 patients who were followed-up, 41 (48%) died at the end of 2011. Multiple-regression analysis showed that non-oral intake [Hazard Ratio (HR): 6.07, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 1.94–19.0] and male sex [HR: 8.35, 95% CI: 2.14–32.5] had significant impact on mortality.

Conclusion

This study found that 48% of the evacuated patients died 9 months after the earthquake and they had significantly higher mortality rate than the nursing home residents. Non-oral intake and male sex had significant impact on mortality. These patients should be considered as especially vulnerable in case of hospital evacuation.

[Impact assessment of inadequate hospital disaster management : Reflection based on a risk model]

BACKGROUND

According to legal regulations alarm and emergency plans have to be developed and kept current in hospitals. However, often neither the hospital administration, nor the medical employees and nursing staff pay the necessary attention to these alarm and evacuation plans. In particular, risks and consequences - including financial ones - due to insufficient planning, are not adequately considered.

OBJECTIVES

Risks in hospitals are assessed based on a risk analysis. The risk assessment evaluates, whether the risk is acceptable, critical or unacceptable. Parameters for the risk analysis are the magnitude of damage and number of affected people. The intention of this paper is to evaluate whether there is a connection between estimated risk, quality of risk planning, and financial damage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We visualized the risk analysis as a two-dimensional matrix. In addition, we introduced disaster planning quality as a third dimension and calculated the dependency between risk and planning quality and also between the resulting damage level and the planning quality.

RESULTS

We showed that a poor disaster planning quality increases the unacceptable risk exponentially. Risk assessment can also draw conclusions about the extent of financial damage caused, for example fires, terrorist attacks or infrastructure failure. The amount of damage can be described as a function depending on the planning deficit of emergency planning. The worse the planning quality, the higher the amount of damages for non-tolerable risks can be.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk management means recognizing risks, assessing risks and managing risks. In hospitals, this mostly means using a critical incident reporting system (CIRS), however risk management in the sense of disaster planning is largely unknown. With a three-dimensional risk matrix, we showed a clear correlation between the quality of disaster planning and relative risk or financial damage. To substantiate the presented theoretical considerations, however, further research must be designed and implemented.

[The hospital emergency plan]

STRUCTURE

The hospital emergency plan consists of a basic plan and an appendix. The basic plan deals with the general aspects of emergency operation and the special aspects of external and internal emergencies. The appendix contains special instructions, e.g., emergency action orders, staff alert lists, material lists, and situation plans.

CONTENT AND IMPLEMENTATION

External emergencies (e.g., mass casualty incidents) and internal emergencies (e.g., fire and other environmental threats) should be regarded. Once a defined experienced physician decides to activate the emergency plan, the hospital changes from routine to emergency service. Due to its security significance, the emergency plan should be regarded as confidential.

MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS

A two-tier chain of command is implemented: the hospital staff deals with administrational and organizational aspects, whereas the subsequent medical staff is in charge of immediate patient care. Repeated updating and exercises are necessary. Furthermore, a basic logistic autonomy of the hospital is essential.

Decision to evacuate a hospital during an emergency: the safe way or the leader's way?

Hospitals have frequently been evacuated because of natural or man-made disasters. In this article, we identify elements to be considered when confronted with the possibility of hospital evacuation. Hospital evacuation may have a significant impact on the surrounding community and the overall population. When the patients in a hospital are placed at risk, hospital leadership often decides to evacuate the facility to safeguard the well-being of both patients and staff. Such a decision is not likely to be criticized. We present various considerations. The effect of evacuation on patients, hospital staff, family members, the community, and even the nation as a whole, as well as repercussions affecting potential patients should be integral to the decision-making process and parallel to the risk assessment.

[Emergency response management near the tracks of the public railway network: special aspects of missions connected with the German national railway system]

Emergency response management and rescue operations concerning the railway network in Germany need special attention and implementation in several ways. The emergency response concerning the German national railway network managed by Deutsche Bahn AG is subject to various rules and regulations which have to be followed precisely. Only by following these rules and procedures is the safety of all emergency staff at the scene ensured. The German national railway network (Deutsche Bahn AG) provides its own emergency response control center, which specializes in managing its response to emergencies and dispatches an emergency response manager to the scene. This person serves as the primary Deutsche Bahn AG representative at the scene and is the only person who is allowed to earth the railway electrical power lines. This article will discuss different emergency situations concerning railway accidents and the emergency medical response to them based on a near collision with a high speed train during a rescue mission close to the railway track. Injury to personnel could only be avoided by chance and luck. The dangers and risks for rescue staff are specified. Furthermore, the article details practical guidelines for rescue operations around the German national railway track system.