Verkürzte präoperative Nüchternheit: Erhebung eines Istzustands nach Analyse von Patienten- und Mitarbeiteraussagen

Real-World Evidence: How Long Do Our Patients Fast?-Results from a Prospective JAGO-NOGGO-Multicenter Analysis on Perioperative Fasting in 924 Patients with Malignant and Benign Gynecological Diseases

BACKGROUND

Despite the key role of optimized fasting in modern perioperative patient management, little current data exist on perioperative fasting intervals in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

In this multicenter prospective study, the length of pre- and postoperative fasting intervals was assessed with the use of a specifically developed questionnaire. Between 15 January 2021 and 31 May 2022, 924 gynecology patients were included, from 13 German gynecology departments.

RESULTS

On average, patients remained fasting for about three times as long as recommended for solid foods (17:02 ± 06:54 h) and about five times as long as recommended for clear fluids (9:21 ± 5:48 h). The average perioperative fasting interval exceeded one day (28:23 ± 14:02 h). Longer fasting intervals were observed before and after oncological or extensive procedures, while shorter preoperative fasting intervals were reported in the participating university hospitals. Smoking, treatment in a non-university hospital, an increased Charlson Comorbidity Index and extensive surgery were significant predictors of longer preoperative fasting from solid foods. In general, prolonged preoperative fasting was tolerated well and quality of patient information was perceived as good.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative fasting intervals were drastically prolonged in this cohort of 924 gynecology patients. Our data indicate the need for better patient education about perioperative fasting.

Optimized perioperative management (fast-track, ERAS) to enhance postoperative recovery in elective colorectal surgery

Aim

This manuscript provides information on the history, principles, and clinical results of Fast-track or ERAS concepts to optimize perioperative management (OPM).

Methods

With the focus on elective colorectal surgery description of the OPM concept and its elements for with special attention to the prevention of infectious complications and clinical results compared to traditional care will be given using recent systematic literature reviews. Additionally, clinical results for other major abdominal procedures are given.

Results

An optimized perioperative management protocol for elective colorectal resections will currently consist of 25 perioperative elements. These elements include the time from before hospital admission (patient education, screening, and treatment of possible risk factors like anemia, malnutrition, cessation of nicotine or alcohol abuse, optimization of concurrent systemic disease, physical prehabilitation, carbohydrate loading, adequate bowel preparation) to the preoperative period (shortened fasting, non-sedative premedication, prophylaxis of PONV and thromboembolic complications), intraoperative measures (systemic antibiotic prophylaxis, standardized anesthesia, normothermia and normovolemia, minimally invasive surgery, avoidance of drains and tubes) as well as postoperative actions (early oral feeding, enforced mobilization, early removal of a urinary catheter, stimulation of intestinal propulsion, control of hyperglycemia). Most of these elements are based on high-level evidence and will also have effects on the incidence of postoperative infectious complications.

Conclusion

Optimized perioperative management should be mandatory for elective surgery today as it enhances postoperative patient recovery, reduces morbidity and infectious complications.

Preoperative Fasting Times for Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery at a Pediatric Hospital in Shanghai: The Big Evidence-Practice Gap

PURPOSE

Preoperative fasting is a necessary experience for pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery. The American Society of Anesthesiologist guideline shows that preoperative fasting times were reduced and safe (no solid food up to 8 hours, no fluid or formula up to 6 hours, no breast milk up to 4 hours, and no clear fluids up to 2 hours before surgery). However, preoperative fasting is usually more prolonged than the suggested time. This study aimed to investigate the duration of preoperative fasting for elective surgery at a pediatric hospital in Shanghai, China, and compare it with the evidence from guidelines.

DESIGN

The study used a descriptive cross-sectional design.

METHODS

A total of 211 children under anesthesia in a Shanghai's pediatric hospital were included in the study. The preoperative fasting status was assessed using a self-administered record card of preoperative fasting developed by Chinese researchers.

FINDINGS

The results indicated that the length of time fasted preoperatively was longer for all participants than that recommended by the American Society of Anesthesiologists. With the long length of fasting time, it is evident that the majority of children experienced hunger (17.5%), thirst (19.4%), and anxiety (16.1%) as indicated with 8 points of the Likert 10-point scale. The degrees of these experiences were relevant to the length of preoperative fasting time.

CONCLUSIONS

A big gap was revealed between the recommendation and actual practice, and children underwent an uncomfortable experience before the surgery. These results suggest that evidence-based clinical improvement is required, and the recommended preoperative fasting instruction transform into clinical practice should be promoted.

[Implementation of emergency classifications-Where do we stand? : Results of a nationwide survey]

Hintergrund

Ziel der vorliegenden Studie ist eine aktuelle Standortbestimmung im Hinblick auf die Umsetzung der Empfehlungen zur Klassifikation von Notfalloperationen, welche von den Verbänden BDA/DGAI, BDC/DGCH und VOPM im Jahr 2016 veröffentlicht wurden.

Methodik

In Anlehnung an die gemeinsamen Empfehlungen der Fachverbände wurden mithilfe eines Online-Fragebogens verschiedene organisatorische Aspekte der operativen Notfallversorgung untersucht. Hierzu wurden bundesweit OP-Manager/‑Koordinatoren an operativ tätigen Kliniken mit einer Mindestanzahl von 200 Betten befragt.

Ergebnisse

An der Umfrage beteiligten sich 274 der 550 angeschriebenen Kliniken (49,8 %). Die Empfehlungen werden aktuell in 70,7 % der Häuser umgesetzt. Die Auffassung, dass die Notfallklassifizierung die zeitgerechte Notfallversorgung von Patienten verbessert, teilt eine Mehrheit von 78,2 % der OP-Verantwortlichen. 33,6 % sind allerdings auch der Ansicht, dass die definierten Zeitintervalle zur Umsetzung der Notfälle die Möglichkeit einer subjektiven Auslegung bieten. Zusätzliche hausinterne Empfehlungen zu den am häufigsten auftretenden Notfallindikationen würden 80,1 % als hilfreich erachten; in 39,1 % der Häuser sind diese bereits implementiert. 65,2 % der Krankenhäuser halten für die Versorgung von Notfällen keine zusätzliche Notfallkapazität vor, 30,1 % arbeiten hingegen mit definierten Konzepten zur Sicherstellung der bedarfsgerechten Verfügbarkeit von Saalkapazitäten.

Schlussfolgerung

Die Empfehlungen zur Notfallklassifikation sind über alle Versorgungsstufen hinweg in der klinischen Realität Deutschlands angekommen und werden von der großen Mehrheit der OP-Verantwortlichen als hilfreiches Instrument in der OP-Koordination erachtet. Zusätzliche, indikationsbezogene Empfehlungen zur Klassifizierung der am häufigsten auftretenden Notfalleingriffe werden mehrheitlich befürwortet. Das Vorhalten eines definierten Notfallsaales ist entgegen bisherigen Annahmen in der deutschen Krankenhauslandschaft nahezu die Ausnahme.

Zusatzmaterial online

Die Online-Version dieses Beitrags (10.1007/s00101-021-00971-2) enthält den zugrunde liegenden Fragebogen. Beitrag und Zusatzmaterial stehen Ihnen auf www.springermedizin.de zur Verfügung. Bitte geben Sie dort den Beitragstitel in die Suche ein, das Zusatzmaterial finden Sie beim Beitrag unter „Ergänzende Inhalte“.

Effects of an Individualized Fasting Program on Fasting Time and Comfort in Infants and Young Children During the Perioperative Period

PURPOSE

The study was designed to evaluate the effect of an individualized fasting program on fasting time and comfort in infants and young children during the perioperative period.

DESIGN

A quasiexperimental design was used.

METHODS

The study included 675 children (intervention = 353, control = 322). Data collection tools included Characteristics of Children Form and the Infant Hunger Rating Scale. The fasting program included individualized fasting education and fasting in batches. On the day of the operation, clear liquids were fed 2 hours before surgery and refed after the patient woke after surgery.

FINDINGS

The duration of perioperative fasting and the time to refeeding were shorter, the hunger scores were lower in the intervention group than those in the control group (P < .05). There was no difference in the incidence of vomiting between the two groups (P > .05), and no coughing and bloating occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The fasting program for infants and young children can shorten the duration of fasting and can reduce the degree of hunger. This program is safe and feasible.

Pre-operative fluid bolus for improved haemodynamic stability during minor surgery: A prospectively randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Haemodynamic instability during the induction of anaesthesia and surgery is common and may be related to hypovolaemia caused by pre-operative fasting or chronic diuretic therapy. The aim of our prospective, controlled, randomized study was to test the hypothesis that a predefined fluid bolus given prior to general anaesthesia for minor surgery would increase haemodynamic stability during anaesthetic induction.

METHODS

Two hundred and nineteen fairly healthy adult patients requiring minor surgery were enrolled. All received standard treatment, including a pulse contour analysing device for non-invasive measurement of cardiac index. Infusion therapy was started in all patients at induction. The intervention group (106 patients) was randomized to receive an additional fluid bolus of 8 mL/kg Ringer's acetate solution before the induction of anaesthesia. The primary endpoint was the incidence of haemodynamic instability, defined as a significant reduction of blood pressure or cardiac index during induction of anaesthesia.

RESULTS

The interventional group had a lesser incidence of haemodynamic instability during induction (41.5% vs 56.6%, P = .025). This group also had higher cardiac index, stroke volume index, systolic and mean blood pressure and a greater left ventricular end-diastolic area.

CONCLUSIONS

A fluid bolus prior to anaesthesia reduced the incidence of haemodynamic instability during induction of general anaesthesia. The total fluid volume was slightly greater in the intervention group compared to the control group (1370 ± 439 mL vs 1219 ± 483 mL, P = .007). We conclude that a defined fluid bolus can help stabilizing haemodynamics in patients undergoing general anaesthesia.

Preoperative Fasting among Adult Patients for Elective Surgery in a Kenyan Referral Hospital

Background. Preoperative fasting (POF) is physiologically and precautionary important during anesthesia and surgery. POF from midnight has been practiced despite the recommended shorter practice. Objective. Assessing preoperative fasting among adult patients scheduled for elective surgery at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH). Methods. A descriptive cross-sectional study involving 65 surgical patients. A questionnaire of mixed questions on demographics, reasons, source of instructions, opinion on instructions, time, premedication practices, outcome, and complains on NPO was used. Analysis was quantitatively done with SPSS v. 22. Ethical approval was obtained from KNH-UoN ERC. Results. Of the respondents 93.8% lacked knowledge on the correct reasons for POF and felt that the instructions were unclear and less important <50%. POF instructions were administered by nurses 80%, anesthetists 15%, and surgeons 5%. Most of respondents (73.8%) fasted > 15 hours. The POF outcomes were rated moderately challenging as follows: prolonged wait for surgery 44.6%, thirst 43.1%, hunger 36.9%, and anxiety 29.2%. Conclusion. Nurses are critical in providing POF instructions and care, and patient knowledge level is a mirror reflection of the quality of interventions. This underscores the need to build capacity for nurses and strengthen the health system to offer individualized preoperative interventions as well as monitoring and clinical auditing of fasting practices.

Improved patient education facilitates adherence to preoperative fasting guidelines

Preoperative fasting is recognised as an important factor in perioperative patient care. Implementation of guidelines on preoperative fasting remains sub-optimal. We audited perioperative fasting in a district general hospital, implemented changes to the preoperative information leaflet and improved fasting practices. The manner in which information is presented to patients impacts behavior and adherence to recommendations. Improving this domain of clinical practice requires thorough and conscious effort and repeated reassessment.

[Preoperative fasting guidelines: an update]

Anesthesiology societies have issued various guidelines on preoperative fasting since 1990, not only to decrease the incidence of lung aspiration and anesthetic morbidity, but also to increase patient comfort prior to anesthesia. Some of these societies have been updating their guidelines, as such that, since 2010, we now have 2 evidence-based preoperative fasting guidelines available. In this article, an attempt is made to review these updated guidelines, as well as the current instructions for more controversial patients such as infants, the obese, and a particular type of ophthalmic surgery.

Actual preoperative fasting time in Brazilian hospitals: the BIGFAST multicenter study

Background

Prolonged fasting increases organic response to trauma. This multicenter study investigated the gap between the prescribed and the actual preoperative fasting times in Brazilian hospitals and factors associated with this gap.

Methods

Patients (18–90-years-old) who underwent elective operations between August 2011 and September 2012 were included in the study. The actual and prescribed times for fasting were collected and correlated with sex, age, surgical disease (malignancies or benign disease), operation type, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, type of hospital (public or private), and nutritional status.

Results

A total of 3,715 patients (58.1% females) with a median age of 49 (18–94) years from 16 Brazilian hospitals entered the study. The median (range) preoperative fasting time was 12 (2–216) hours, and fasting time was longer (P<0.001) in hospitals using a traditional fasting protocol (13 [6–216] hours) than in others that had adopted new guidelines (8 [2–48] hours). Almost 80% (n=2,962) of the patients were operated on after 8 or more hours of fasting and 46.2% (n=1,718) after more than 12 hours. Prolonged fasting was not associated with physical score, age, sex, type of surgery, or type of hospital. Patients operated on due to a benign disease had an extended duration of preoperative fasting.

Conclusion

Actual preoperative fasting time is significantly longer than prescribed fasting time in Brazilian hospitals. Most of these hospitals still adopt traditional rather than modern fasting guidelines. All patients are at risk of long periods of fasting, especially those in hospitals that follow traditional practices.

A pragmatic cluster randomised trial evaluating three implementation interventions

Background

Implementation research is concerned with bridging the gap between evidence and practice through the study of methods to promote the uptake of research into routine practice. Good quality evidence has been summarised into guideline recommendations to show that peri-operative fasting times could be considerably shorter than patients currently experience. The objective of this trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of three strategies for the implementation of recommendations about peri-operative fasting.

Methods

A pragmatic cluster randomised trial underpinned by the PARIHS framework was conducted during 2006 to 2009 with a national sample of UK hospitals using time series with mixed methods process evaluation and cost analysis. Hospitals were randomised to one of three interventions: standard dissemination (SD) of a guideline package, SD plus a web-based resource championed by an opinion leader, and SD plus plan-do-study-act (PDSA). The primary outcome was duration of fluid fast prior to induction of anaesthesia. Secondary outcomes included duration of food fast, patients’ experiences, and stakeholders’ experiences of implementation, including influences. ANOVA was used to test differences over time and interventions.

Results

Nineteen acute NHS hospitals participated. Across timepoints, 3,505 duration of fasting observations were recorded. No significant effect of the interventions was observed for either fluid or food fasting times. The effect size was 0.33 for the web-based intervention compared to SD alone for the change in fluid fasting and was 0.12 for PDSA compared to SD alone. The process evaluation showed different types of impact, including changes to practices, policies, and attitudes. A rich picture of the implementation challenges emerged, including inter-professional tensions and a lack of clarity for decision-making authority and responsibility.

Conclusions

This was a large, complex study and one of the first national randomised controlled trials conducted within acute care in implementation research. The evidence base for fasting practice was accepted by those participating in this study and the messages from it simple; however, implementation and practical challenges influenced the interventions’ impact. A set of conditions for implementation emerges from the findings of this study, which are presented as theoretically transferable propositions that have international relevance.

Trial registration

ISRCTN18046709 - Peri-operative Implementation Study Evaluation (POISE).

[Preoperative risk evaluation from the perspective of anaesthesiology]

Medical and technical progress together with demographic changes has led to a more complex perioperative care for patients. Accordingly, an optimal preoperative assessment in particular an adequate risk evaluation is more important than ever. A recently published joint recommendation of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, the German Society of Surgery and the German Society of Internal Medicine aims to reduce considerable uncertainties in the preoperative risk evaluation especially with regard to"technical tests" by providing transparent and comprehensive arrangements. Consequently, routine screening will be abandoned in favour of targeted patient and operation-oriented individual risk assessment. This approach will change the preoperative risk evaluation in a scientific, organisational and economic way. The following article on preoperative risk evaluation is based on the valuable and helpful recommendation and aims to provide additional important aspects from the perspective of anaesthesiologists.