Massenanfall Verletzter

[Safety aspects, emergency preparedness and hazard prevention in hospitals concerning mass casualty incidents (MCI)/terror-related MCI : Prospects on future challenges based on survey results from the 3rd emergency conference of the DGU]

Hintergrund

Weltweite terroristische Aktivitäten seit „9/11“ und folgend auch im europäischen Raum haben im Rahmen der Bewertung von kritischer Infrastruktur in Deutschland zu einem Umdenken auch hinsichtlich der Sicherheit an und in Kliniken geführt.

Ziel der Arbeit

Die vorliegende Publikation befasst sich mit der Bewertung vorliegender Konzepte zu Themen wie „Alarmierung“, „Sicherheit“, „Kommunikation“ und „Vorbereitung“ im vorgenannten Kontext.

Material und Methoden

Anhand einer Literatursichtung sowie einer Umfrage unter den Teilnehmern*innen der 3. Notfallkonferenz der DGU (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie) werden diese Thematik und die aktuell vorliegende Situation weiter analysiert und vorgestellt.

Ergebnisse

Die gewonnenen Daten verdeutlichen, dass ein Großteil der Kliniken zwar über eine Krankenhausalarm- und Einsatzplanung verfügt, jedoch die Frequenz der Aktualisierungen und die innerklinische Kommunikation zur Steigerung der Wahrnehmung eine deutliche Streuung zeigen.

Weiterhin verdeutlichen die Ergebnisse eine Heterogenität der vorliegenden innerklinischen Alarmierungskonzepte sowie einen Mangel an Sicherheitskonzepten und Kooperationen mit Sicherheits- und Wachdiensten. Zudem zeigt sich, dass die Thematik einer möglichen CBRN(chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear)-Bedrohung in der Risikoanalyse noch nicht adäquat wahrgenommen wird bzw. umgesetzt ist.

Diskussion

Zusammenfassend scheint die latente Bedrohung durch terroristische Aktivitäten dazu geführt zu haben, dass sich deutsche Kliniken in der Bewertung als kritische Infrastruktur mit der Thematik „Krankenhausalarm- und Einsatzplanung“ auseinandergesetzt und diese überwiegend auch umgesetzt haben. Allerdings zeigt sich für die nachgeordneten Bereiche und die aus der Alarmplanung ableitbaren Konsequenzen noch nicht die nötige Stringenz, um letztendlich adäquate Reaktionen in diesen besonderen Szenarien im Hinblick auf die Sicherheit in und an deutschen Kliniken zu gewährleisten.

Medical and Disaster Preparedness of US Marathons

BACKGROUND

Despite the events that occurred at the 2013 Boston Marathon (Boston, Massachusetts USA), there are currently no evidence-based guidelines or published data regarding medical and disaster preparedness of marathon races in the United States. Purpose To determine the current state of medical disaster preparedness of marathons in the US and to identify potential areas for improvement.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted from January through May of 2014. The questionnaire was distributed to race directors of US road and trail marathons, as identified by a comprehensive internet database.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-three questionnaires were available for analysis (19% usable response rate). Marathon races from all major regions of the US were represented. Runner medical information was not listed on race bibs in 53% of races. Only 45% of races held group training and planning sessions prior to race day. Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) were immediately available on 50% of courses, and medications such as albuterol (30%), oxygen (33%), and IV fluids (34%) were available less frequently. Regarding medical emergencies, 55% of races did not have protocols for the assessment of dehydration, asthma, chest pain, syncope, or exercise-induced cramping. With regard to disaster preparedness, 50% of races did not have protocols for the management of disasters, and 21% did not provide security personnel at start/finish lines, aid stations, road crossings, and drop bag locations.

CONCLUSIONS

Areas for improvement in the preparedness of US marathons were identified, such as including printed medical information on race bibs, increasing pre-race training and planning sessions for volunteers, ensuring the immediate availability of certain emergency equipment and medications, and developing written protocols for specific emergencies and disasters.

[Cardiac arrest in spectators in German football stadiums. Precautionary measures, frequency and short-term outcome]

BACKGROUND

Provision of medical care is an important element of safety precautions for visitors of sports arenas. The organizational requirements are especially high if cardiac arrest occurs; how this scenario is managed may thus serve as the ultimate indicator of the quality of stadium medical care. The objectives of this study were to analyze the structures and the resources available for the medical care of spectators in German professional soccer stadiums and to identify the frequency and the primary resuscitation success of cardiac arrest.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 2011 a questionnaire-based survey was performed among the clubs of the first and second German soccer leagues regarding medical care of spectators during the seasons 2008/2009 and 2009/2010. The focus was on the qualifications of emergency teams, the equipment and the incidence of cardiac arrest.

RESULTS

A total of 15 stadiums were included (38%) in the survey. The mean number of physicians and emergency medical technicians on site was 0.6/10,000 seats and 16/10,000 seats, respectively. Of the latter, a mean of 82% (minimum 20% and maximum 100%) had received training with automatic external defibrillators. In 87% of the stadiums regular advanced life support training (ALS) was required. The mean number of defibrillators per stadium was 2.8/10,000 seats (minimum 1.3 and maximum 3.8) including 1.7 automatic defibrillators (minimum 0.4 and maximum 2.8). For patient transport, a mean of 0.65 ALS ambulance vehicles per 10,000 seats (minimum 0.14 and maximum 1.46) were available on site. In all stadiums staff members were connected via mobile radio communication with the stadium medical control room. A total of 52 cardiac arrests (=0.25/100,000 spectators) were recorded of which 96% of the patients were transported to hospitals with spontaneous circulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac arrests are not a rare occurrence in German soccer stadiums. The participating stadiums are overall well prepared for such incidents in terms of organization, staff and technology and due to short response times, the resuscitation success by far surpasses that of the standard emergency medical services. These findings may in addition serve as a motivational example to start resuscitation early in public information campaigns.