Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency treatment of the pudendal nerve in chronic pelvic pain

Efficacy of ganglion impar block combined with pudendal nerve pulsed radiofrequency for pudendal neuralgia management-a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Pudendal neuralgia is a chronic and debilitating condition. Its prevalence ranges from 5 to 26%. Currently, therapeutic approaches to treat pudendal neuralgia include patient education, medication management, psychological and physical therapy, and procedural interventions, such as nerve block, trigger point injections, and surgery. Drug therapy has a limited effect on pain relief. A pudendal nerve block may cause a significant decrease in pain scores for a short time; however, its efficacy significantly decreases over time. In contrast, pudendal nerve pulsed radiofrequency can provide pain relief for 3 months, and ganglion impar block has been widely used for treating chronic perineal pain and chronic coccygodynia. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of monotherapy (pudendal nerve pulsed radiofrequency) and combination therapy (pudendal nerve pulsed radiofrequency plus ganglion impar block) in patients with pudendal neuralgia.

METHODS

This randomized, controlled clinical trial will include 84 patients with pudendal neuralgia who failed to respond to drug or physical therapy. Patients will be randomly assigned into one of the two groups: mono or combined treatment groups. The primary outcome will be a change in pain intensity measured using the visual analog scale. The secondary outcomes will include a Self-Rating Anxiety Scale score, Self-Rating Depression Scale score, the use of oral analgesics, the Medical Outcomes Study Health Survey Short Form-36 Item score, and the occurrence of adverse effects. The study results will be analyzed using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. Primary and secondary outcomes will be evaluated between the mono and combined treatment groups. Subgroup analyses will be conducted based on the initial ailment, age, and baseline pain intensity. The safety of the treatment will be assessed by monitoring adverse events, which will be compared between the two groups.

DISCUSSION

This study protocol describes a randomized, controlled clinical trial to determine the efficacy and safety of mono and combination therapies in patients with pudendal neuralgia. The study results will provide valuable information on the potential benefits of this combination therapy and contribute to the development of more effective and safer treatments for patients with pudendal neuralgia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200061800).

Interventional treatment options for women with pelvic pain

Purpose of review

I.To provide an overview of current interventional treatment options for women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).

Recent findings

II.Accessibility of CT imaging, ultrasound, and fluoroscopy have assisted the development of novel interventional techniques. Similarly, neuromodulation techniques have improved with the development of novel stimulation patterns and device implants.

Summary

III.Numerous small-scale studies report high success rates with injection intervention therapies in CPP but there are limited well designed large-scale studies that demonstrate superiority of treatment. Female pelvic pain is difficult to diagnose due to the multifactorial etiology and the variable presentation causing delay in accurate diagnosis and lack of response to conventional medical and initial interventional therapies. Despite the shortfalls of current studies, collectively our understanding of chronic pain conditions and helpful injection interventions are improving. Undoubtedly the breadth of current research will provide a rich foundation for future large-scale well-designed studies involving multiple disciplines with more uniform methods and criteria to produce reliable and reproducible results.

Pulsed Radiofrequency of Pudendal Nerve for Treatment in Patients with Pudendal Neuralgia. A Case Series with Long-Term Follow-Up

Pudendal neuralgia (PN) is an impairing neuropathic disorder, affecting both men and women, involving a severe burning and sharp pain along the course of the pudendal nerve. Treatment is often insufficient, and options are limited. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a technique which might be useful in therapy. This case series aims to determine the effectiveness of PRF in patients with PN in the context of evaluation of care. Between 2010 and 2016, all female patients of University Medical Center Utrecht diagnosed with PN who experience insufficient pain relief after common treatment were offered PRF. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI‐I) scores were assessed at 3‐month follow‐up and at long‐term follow‐up (median 4 years). PGI‐I scores were recorded to evaluate our quality of care. Twenty patients with PN consented to undergo PRF. We lost one patient in follow‐up. Seventy‐nine percent of the patients described their condition as “(very) much better” at 3‐month follow‐up. At long‐term follow‐up, 89% of the patients described their condition as “(very) much better.” No serious side effects were observed. In conclusion, PRF is a successful treatment option in patients not responding to standard treatment options, including pudendal nerve blocks. PRF of the pudendal nerve can be used for PN to provide relief in patients’ chronic pelvic pain.

[Interdisciplinary position paper: the value of radiofrequency denervation in the treatment of chronic pain]

Radiofrequency denervation has been established for many years as an important minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of chronic pain conditions. Positive experiences of many users for various indications are contrasted by a nonuniform evidence. With meticulous patient selection and correct assessment of the indications a longer term reduction of pain, a reduced need for analgesics and an improvement in the quality of life can be achieved. The aim of this interdisciplinary position paper is to present the value of radiofrequency denervation in the treatment of chronic pain. The summarized recommendations of the expert group are based on the available evidence and on the clinical experiences of Austrian centers that frequently implement the procedure. The position paper contains recommendations on patient selection and proven indications. We discribe safety aspects, complications, side effects and contraindications.

A Comprehensive Review of the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Urologic Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS) is a chronic, noncyclic pain condition which can lead to significant patient morbidity and disability. It is defined by pain in the pelvic region, lasting for greater than 3 to 6 months, with no readily identifiable disease process. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive update of diagnosis and treatment of UCPPS.

RECENT FINDINGS

UCPPS encompasses chronic pelvic pain syndrome or chronic prostatitis (CP/CPPS) in men and interstitial cystitis or painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS) in women. Underlying inflammatory, immunologic, and neuropathic components have been implicated in the pathogenesis of UCPPS. For optimal patient management, an individualized and multimodal approach is recommended. Medical management and physical therapy are the mainstays of treatment. Injection therapy may offer additional relief in medically refractory patients. Further minimally invasive management may include spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation, though evidence supporting efficacy is limited.

Impact of ultrasound diagnosis for chronic pelvic pain

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess the impact of ultrasound diagnosis in patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).

METHODS

We will carry out a comprehensive electronic search from the databases below: PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PSYCINFO, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WANGFANG databases from inception to July 1, 2019. The case-controlled studies focusing on impact of ultrasound diagnosis for patients CPP will be included in this study. Two authors will independently conduct all study selection, data collection, and risk of bias assessment. The risk of bias assessment will be assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. We will apply RevMan V.5.3 software and Stata V.12.0 software for data pooling and statistical analysis.

RESULTS

This study will present pooled effect estimates regarding the impact of ultrasound diagnosis for CPP by assessing sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of ultrasound to determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis for CPP.

CONCLUSION

This study will provide modest evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in patients with CPP.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42019142799.

Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency for Recalcitrant Metatarsalgia A Case Report

Metatarsalgia is characterized by pain in the forefoot, which is associated with increased stress over the metatarsal head region. Despite the availability of a variety of conservative or surgical treatments for this condition, a few cases have demonstrated relapse or poor response to treatment. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) can provide pain relief in patients with diverse chronic conditions without causing neural injury. Recently, studies have shown that ultrasound-guided PRF may be beneficial for adhesive capsulitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, tarsal tunnel syndrome, and recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. Here, we describe a successful case of significant pain relief achieved by using ultrasound-guided PRF targeting the posterior tibial nerve (PTN) at the ankle of a 67-year-old woman with recalcitrant metatarsalgia. Ten minutes after ultrasound-guided PRF was applied at the PTN, the patient reported decreased pain (from 8 to 3 on a visual analogue scale) and did not exhibit any particular side effects. Three months after PRF application, the patient's visual analogue scale score remained more than 50% below the baseline, and she did not need additional conservative treatment during the follow-up period. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first case report using ultrasound-guided PRF at the PTN for treatment of recalcitrant metatarsalgia. We hypothesize that ultrasound-guided PRF at the PTN may be a potentially novel approach for treating recalcitrant metatarsalgia.

Clinical effect and safety of pulsed radiofrequency treatment for pudendal neuralgia: a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial

Background

Pudendal neuralgia is an intractable pain related to the pudendal nerve. The clinical effect and safety evaluation of pudendal neuralgia were investigated by pulse radiofrequency (PRF) treatment of pudendal nerve.

Patients and methods

Eighty patients who were diagnosed with pudendal neuralgia were randomly divided into PRF group (PRF and pudendal nerve block [NB]) and NB group. After surgery, the patients were followed up to evaluate the visual analog scale (VAS) score and the Patient Health Questionnaire score on the postoperative day and at 2 weeks, 1 and 3 months. Meanwhile, the patients' efficacy assessment and the usage of pain medication were also recorded for 3 months during follow-up. All the surgical complications were recorded.

Results

A total of 77 patients were followed up, 38 in the PRF group and 39 in the NB group. On the postoperative day, the VAS scores was significantly decreased in both groups than before (P<0.01), whereas there was no statistical difference within the two groups (P>0.05). However, the VAS score of PRF group was significantly lower than that of NB group in 2 weeks, 1 and 3 months after surgery, respectively (P<0.01). In the meanwhile, the Patient Health Questionnaire score of PRF group was also significantly lower than that of NB group (P<0.01) in 3 months after the operation. The clinical effective rate of PRF group was 92.1% in 3 months after surgery, while this rate was only 35.9% in the NB group. The postoperative analgesic usage of PRF group was superior to that of NB group (P<0.01). No severe adverse events were observed in either group.

Conclusion

Compared with the single NB treatment, pudendal nerve PRF combined with NB therapy could provide more long-lasting relief from pain symptoms of pudendal neuralgia and improve the depression symptoms in patients.

Management of refractory sciatic neuropathic pain using ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Nowadays, pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is being used to control several types of musculoskeletal pain. Herein, we report a successful application of ultrasound (US)-guided PRF for a patient with refractory sciatic neuropathic pain.

CASE REPORT

We applied US-guided PRF to a 50-year-old man, suffering from refractory neuropathic pain on the left foot following sciatic neuropathy for a period of approximately 6 months. We performed PRF on the level of piriformis muscle because the lesion of the sciatic nerve was presented digitally from the level of piriformis muscle on the magnetic resonance images. Under US guidance, the catheter needle was placed close to the left sciatic nerve, and dysesthesia and tingling sensation were reported to be less than 0.2 V. The PRF treatment was administered at 5 Hz and 5 ms pulsed width for 360 seconds at 45 V. After PRF on the left sciatic nerve, pain intensity - based on a numeric rating scale - decreased from 8 to 2. The reduction of pain was sustained for at least 6 months after the PRF procedure.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that the PRF treatment is a very useful treatment technique for patients with refractory sciatic neuropathy.