Umsetzung eines Wärmemanagementkonzeptes zur Vermeidung von perioperativer Hypothermie

The appropriate method of hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma within University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria through neural network analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to find effective treatments for the patient within UCSF criteria.

METHODS

This study enrolled 1006 patients meeting UCSF criteria, undergoing hepatic resection (HR), divided into two groups: single tumor group and multiple tumors group. We compared and analyzed the risk factors between these two groups' long-term outcomes, through log-rank test, cox proportional hazards model and using neural network analysis to identify the independent risk factors.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates in single tumor were significantly higher than multiple tumors (95.0%, 73.2% and 52.3% versus 93.9%, 69.7% and 38.0%, respectively, p < 0.001). The 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 90.3%, 60.7%, and 40.1% in single tumor and 83.4%, 50.7% and 23.8% in multiple tumors, respectively (p < 0.001). And tumor type, anatomic resection and MVI were the independent risk factors for the patient within UCSF criteria. MVI was the most important risk factor affecting OS and RFS rates in neural network analysis. The method of hepatic resection and the number of tumors were also affected OS and RFS rates.

CONCLUSION

The anatomic resection should be applied to the patient within UCSF criteria, especially for the patient was in single tumor with MVI-negative.

Development and validation of a risk prediction scale for hypothermia during cesarean section: A prospective study

Background

Evidence shows that active insulation can reduce the incidence of hypothermia during cesarean section; however, compliance is lower than recommended. Moreover, several aspects of temperature management via active heat preservation remain unclear, including patient indications, timing, methods, and duration. Therefore, promptly identifying parturients at a high risk for hypothermia during cesarean section is crucial.

Objective

To develop and validate a scale for predicting hypothermia in parturients during cesarean section.

Design

Prospective study.

Setting

Three grade A hospitals in Hunan Province, China.

Participants

The prediction scale was developed based on data from 369 parturients who underwent cesarean section from July 2018 to January 2019. Inclusion criteria were as follows: cesarean section under lumbar anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, or combined lumbar and epidural anesthesia; voluntary participation in the study and completion of the informed consent form; age >18 years.

Methods

Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine factors influencing hypothermia and establish the predictive model for hypothermia risk during cesarean section. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to determine the goodness of fit of the prediction tool, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the predictive ability of the proposed scale. The cutoff value of the prediction scale was determined according to the Youden index.

Results

In the logistic regression prediction model, the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test yielded a p-value of 0.425. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.888. The model exhibited a good fitting effect and discriminant validity. Total risk scores for hypothermia ranged from 0 to 11. A score of 7 was used as the diagnostic cutoff value. Parturients during the operation who had total scores of ≥7 and <7 were considered the high-risk and low-risk groups, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the scale was 0.891. The authenticity evaluation indicated that the incidence of hypothermia was significantly higher in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group.

Conclusions

The risk prediction scale developed in this study exhibits moderately predictive efficiency, sensitivity, and specificity for identifying parturients at high risk of hypothermia during cesarean section. Implementing this scale in clinical practice may help to decrease the incidence of hypothermia in such patients.

Tweetable

 .

abstract

This new predictive model can identify women who are at a high risk of hypothermia during cesarean section.

Effect of temperature maintenance by forced-air warming blankets of different temperatures on changes in inflammatory factors in children undergoing congenital hip dislocation surgery

Background

Hypothermia is associated with many adverse clinical outcomes in pediatric patients, and thus, it is important to find an effective and safe method for preventing peri-operative hypothermia and its associated adverse outcomes in pediatric patients. This study aimed to investigate the effect of forced-air warming blankets with different temperatures on changes in the transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-10 levels in children undergoing surgical treatment for developmental displacement of the hip (DDH).

Methods

The study included 123 children undergoing surgery for DDH under general anesthesia. The patients were randomly assigned to three groups, using a random number table: the 32, 38, and 43°C groups according to the temperature setting of the forced-air warming blankets. For each patient, body temperature was recorded immediately after anesthesia induction and intubation (T₀), at initial incision (T₁), at 1 h after incision (T₂), at 2 h after incision (T₃), at the end of surgery (T₄), immediately upon return to the ward after surgery (T₅), and then at 12 h (T₆), 24 h (T₇), 36 h (T₈), and 48 h (T₉) after the surgery. The serum levels of TGF-β, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-10 were measured at T₀ and T₄ for all groups.

Results

The number of patients with fever in the 38°C group was significantly less than those in the 32 and 43°C groups (χ² = 6.630, P = 0.036). At T₀, the body temperatures in the 38 and 43°C groups were significantly higher than that in the 32°C group (F = 17.992, P < 0.001). At T₂, the body temperature was significantly higher in the 43°C group than those in the 32 and 38°C groups (F = 12.776, P < 0.001). Moreover, at T₄, the serum levels of TGF-β (F = 3286.548, P < 0.001) and IL-10 (F = 4628.983, P < 0.001) were significantly increased in the 38°C group, and the serum levels of TNF-α (F = 911.415, P < 0.001) and IL-1β (F = 322.191, P < 0.001) were significantly decreased in the 38°C group, compared with the levels in the 32 and 43°C groups.

Conclusion

Force-air warming blankets set at 38°C maintained stable body temperature with less adverse outcome and effectively inhibited the inflammatory response in pediatric patients undergoing surgery for DDH.

Clinical trial registration

ChiCTR1800014820; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=25240.

Short interruptions between pre-warming and intraoperative warming are associated with low intraoperative hypothermia rates

BACKGROUND

Prevention of inadvertent hypothermia is recommended for procedures >30 minutes because hypothermia increases the risk of myocardial ischemia, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion and wound complications. Therefore, short warming interruptions between pre-warming and intraoperative warming might result in lower hypothermia rates. The aim of this retrospective investigation was to determine whether the incidence of inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia was affected by the warming interruption.

METHODS

The lowest intraoperative body core temperature value and the warming interruption time were taken from anaesthesia records. Body core temperature was recorded continuously, and a patient was classified to be hypothermic if the lowest recorded temperature value was <36°C. Hypothermia rates and the correlation between warming interruption times and intraoperative hypothermia rates were calculated.

RESULTS

Five thousand eighty-four patients were analysed. The intraoperative hypothermia rate was 15.3%. Nineteen patients (0.4%) had a recorded temperature of <35.0°C. An increase in forced-air warming interruption time was significantly associated with an increase in intraoperative hypothermia rates (P < .0001). Patients with interruptions in forced-air warming >20 minutes showed significantly higher hypothermia rates than those with interruptions of ≤20 minutes (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative hypothermia rates increased significantly with longer forced-air warming interruptions between pre-warming and intraoperative warming. Short warming interruptions can preserve the effect of pre-warming and are associated with low intraoperative hypothermia rates.

Perioperative inadvertent hypothermia among urology patients who underwent transurethral resection with either TURis or transurethral resection of the prostate method

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate the incidence of perioperative hypothermia in urology patients undergoing transurethral resection with either TURis or transurethral resection of the prostate method and to recognize the risk factors that were responsible for the occurrence of hypothermia intraoperatively in these patients.

METHODS

It was a randomized prospective study. A total of 168 patients, according to American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III, were scheduled for transurethral resection either with TURis or transurethral resection of the prostate method. We measured the core body temperature before (preoperative), during (perioperative) and after (postoperative) the surgery. Age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, duration of surgery, preoperative prostatic volume, and vital signs were also recorded.

RESULTS

The prevalence of inadvertent hypothermia was 64.1% for the TURis group and 60% for the transurethral resection of the prostate group. Hypothermic patients in TURis group were significantly older (87.7 ± 1.7 vs 68 ± 6.7 years, p < 0.05) and had lower body mass index (26.9 ± 3.6 vs 29.2 ± 2.7, p < 0.05), while hypothermic patients in the transurethral resection of the prostate group were significantly older (86 ± 1.1 vs 70 ± 7.4 years, p < 0.05) and had notably higher duration of surgery (140.6 ± 28.9 vs 120.3 ± 14.3 min, p < 0.05) than normothermic patients.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative inadvertent hypothermia among urology patients who underwent transurethral resection with both TURis and transurethral resection of the prostate method is of high incidence. We recommend monitoring of the temperature of core body of all these patients, especially those with advanced age and lower body mass index.

The health economic benefits of perioperative patient warming for prevention of blood loss and transfusion requirements as a consequence of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia

Active warming of patients is recommended by The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to prevent inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (IPH). This paper examines the cost effectiveness of one consequence of IPH, an increase in blood loss and the resulting transfusion risk. We quantified the risk and modelled two patient pathways, one with and one without warming, across two different surgery types. We were able to demonstrate the cost effectiveness of active warming based on one consequence even allowing for uncertainties in the model.

[Prewarming according to the AWMF S3 guidelines on preventing inadvertant perioperative hypothermia 2014 : Retrospective analysis of 7786 patients]

BACKGROUND

Inadvertent perioperative hypothermia, which is defined as a core body temperature of less than 36.0 °C, can have serious consequences in surgery patients. These include cardiac complications, increased blood loss, wound infections and postoperative shivering; therefore, the scientific evidence that inadvertent perioperative hypothermia should be avoided is undisputed and several national guidelines have been published summarizing the scientific evidence and recommending specific procedures. The German AWMF guidelines were the first to emphasize the importance of prewarming for surgery patients to avoid inadvertant perioperative hypothermia; however, in contrast to intraoperative warming, prewarming is so far not sufficiently implemented in clinical practice in many hospitals. Furthermore, a recent study has questioned the effectiveness of prewarming.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective investigation was to evaluate the hypothermia rates that can be achieved when prewarming in the anesthesia induction room is introduced into the clinical practice and performed in addition to intraoperative warming.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg gave approval for data storage and retrospective data analysis from the anesthesia database. According to the existing local standard operating procedure, prewarming with forced air was performed in addition to intraoperative warming in the anesthesia induction room in 3899 patients receiving general anesthesia with a duration of 30 min or longer from January 2015 to December 2016. The results were compared with a control group of 3887 patients from July 2012 to August 2014 who received intraoperative warming but were not subjected to prewarming. Tracheal intubation was carried out in all patients and temperature measurements after the induction of anesthesia were performed using esophageal, urinary catheter or intra-arterial temperature probes.

RESULTS

The mean duration of prewarming was 25 min in the treatment group. Patients subjected to prewarming showed an intraoperative hypothermia rate of 15.8% and a postoperative hypothermia rate of 5.1%. Patients without prewarming showed an intraoperative hypothermia rate of 30.4% and a postoperative hypothermia rate of 12.4%. This means a 52% reduction of the intraoperative hypothermia rate and a 41% reduction of the postoperative hypothermia rate for patients who received prewarmimg (p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the lack of prewarming was independently associated with intraoperative hypothermia with an odds ratio of 2.5 (95% confidence interval CI 2.250-2.841; p < 0.0001) and postoperative hypothermia with an odds ratio of 2.8 (95% CI 2.316-3.277; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Prewarming, as recommended in the AWMF guidelines, resulted in a significant and clinically relevant reduction in the incidence of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia; therefore, prewarming can still be regarded as an effective method to avoid perioperative hypothermia. Hypothermia rates of 15.8% intraoperatively and 5.1% postoperatively can be achieved in clinical practice, when prewarming is performed in addition to intraoperative warming in the anesthesia induction room directly before the start of surgical procedures.

Forced-Air Warming in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Procedures: Comparison between 2 Thermal Blanket Models

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency between 2 thermal blanket models: the upper blanket and the underbody blanket in patient heating and hypothermia prevention during endovascular surgery.

METHODS

Fifty patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 2-4, receiving endovascular surgery repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm or lower limb angioplasty by endovascular technique were studied. Primary outcome was to determine which forced-air blanket is more warming effective during the surgeries. Age, type of surgery, gender, body mass index, surgery duration, and initial patient temperature were analyzed to determine possible hypothermia association as secondary outcomes. Patients were randomized and split into 2 groups based on blanket model. All patients received general anesthesia, and temperature was obtained by an esophageal thermometer inserted after tracheal intubation and registered at intervals of 15 min until extubation.

RESULTS

Groups significantly differed in body temperature (P = 0.006) and hypothermia occurrence (P = 0.020). The underbody blanket group hada higher ratio of hypothermic patients and a lower average temperature at the end of surgery. The average temperature after 60 min in the underbody blanket group was lower than the upper blanket group,although this difference was only significant after 150 min (P = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that upper thermal blanket is more effective thanunderbody thermal blanket in patient warming and hypothermia prevention during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and lower limb angioplasty after 150 min of anesthetic-surgical time duration.