[Nociception monitoring : Method for intraoperative opioid control?]

Analysis of the Effects of Epidural Anesthesia on the Nociception Level Index (NOL®) during Abdominal Surgery

Background: The NOL® system (PMD-200™ Nociception Level Monitor; Medasense Ltd., Ramat Gan, Israel) is used for the real-time detection of physiological nociception in anesthetized patients by assessing the parameters indicative of sympathetic activity, such as photoplethysmography, skin conductance, peripheral temperature, and accelerometry, which are quantified into the NOL®-Index. This index is more sensitive than traditional clinical parameters in estimating pain and stress responses. While its effectiveness in general anesthesia is well documented, its efficacy in epidural anesthesia needs further investigation. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed NOL®-Index dynamics compared to conventional parameters after epidural administration of bupivacaine. Following ethics committee approval, 119 NOL® measurements were retrospectively analyzed after thoracic epidural catheter administration in 40 patients undergoing abdominal and urological surgery. The NOL-Index® was assessed at 0, 1, 3, and 5 min post application and compared to heart rate, blood pressure, and bispectral index dynamics. Results: This study showed a significant decrease in the NOL®-Index post-local-anesthetic administration with better sensitivity than classical clinical parameters (0 min = 38 ± 11; 1 min = 22 ± 13*; 3 min = 17 ± 11*; 5 min = 12 ± 10*). Higher doses of local anesthetics led to a significant, dose-dependent decrease in NOL®-Index (low dose, 5 min = 15 ± 10*; high dose, 5 min = 8 ± 8*). Conclusions: This study is the first to demonstrate the effectiveness of the NOL®-Index in measuring nociceptive effects following epidural administration, highlighting its potential superiority over conventional parameters and its sensitivity to dose variations.

Age-related changes in intraoperative mean values of nociceptive response in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia: A retrospective cohort study

Intraoperative nociception is affected by preoperative factors, surgical invasiveness, and anesthesia. Although age-related changes in nociception in conscious humans have been well examined, those in intraoperative nociception in unconscious patients under general anesthesia are unknown. To clarify associations between age and intraoperative nociception under general anesthesia, we performed a retrospective cohort study in consecutive patients of all ages undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia from January 2019 to July 2023. The intraoperative nociception value in each surgery was assessed by the averaged value of nociceptive response (mean NR) index during surgery. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), emergent surgery, preoperative serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and comorbidities were also collected. After excluding patients with missing data of CRP and mean NR index, 22,061 patients were enrolled, and were divided into low, intermediate, and high surgical risk groups. Multivariable regression analysis showed a significant association between age and mean NR index in all three surgical procedure risk groups. The preoperative variables of CRP levels, BMI, emergent surgery, atrial fibrillation, renal failure, and long-term steroid use also showed significant associations with mean NR index in all three groups. Sensitivity analysis showed that intraoperative mean NR index was higher in younger children than that in both older children and younger adults, and it gradually increased again in older adults to the same level as in younger children. In conclusion, there is likely an association between age and intraoperative mean NR index in patients under general anesthesia.

The Impact of Nociception Monitor-Guided Multimodal General Anesthesia on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Bowel Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Excess surgical stress responses, caused by heightened nociception, can lead to elevated levels of postoperative inflammation, resulting in an increased incidence of complications after surgery. We hypothesized that utilizing nociception monitor-guided multimodal general anesthesia would exert effects on postoperative outcomes (e.g., serum concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) after surgery, postoperative complications).

METHODS

This single-center, double-blinded, randomized trial enrolled ASA class I/II adult patients with normal preoperative CRP levels, scheduled for laparoscopic bowel surgery. Patients were randomized to receive either standard care (control group) or nociception monitor-guided multimodal general anesthesia using the nociceptive response (NR) index (NR group), where NR index was kept below 0.85 as possible. The co-primary endpoint was serum concentrations of CRP after surgery or rates of 30-day postoperative complications (defined as Clavien-Dindo grades ≥ II).

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and four patients (control group, n = 52; NR group, n = 52) were enrolled for analysis. The serum CRP level on postoperative day (POD) 1 was significantly lower in the NR group (2.70 mg·dL-1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.19-3.20]) than in the control group (3.66 mg·dL-1 [95% CI, 2.98-4.34], p = 0.024). The postoperative complication rate was also significantly lower in the NR group (11.5% [95% CI, 5.4-23.0]) than in the control group (38.5% [95% CI, 26.5-52.0], p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Nociception monitor-guided multimodal general anesthesia, which suppressed intraoperative nociception, mitigated serum concentrations of CRP level, and decreased postoperative complications after laparoscopic bowel surgery.

A novel non-invasive nociceptive monitoring approach fit for intracerebral surgery: a retrospective analysis

Background

Measuring depth of anesthesia during intracerebral surgery is an important task to guarantee patient safety, especially while the patient is fixated in a Mayfield-clamp. Processed electro-encephalography measurements have been established to monitor deep sedation. However, visualizing nociception has not been possible until recently and has not been evaluated for the neurosurgical setting. In this single-center, retrospective observational analysis, we routinely collected the nociceptive data via a nociception level monitor (NOL®) of 40 patients undergoing intracerebral tumor resection and aimed to determine if this monitoring technique is feasible and delivers relevant values to potentially base therapeutic decisions on.

Methods

Forty patients (age 56 ± 18 years) received total intravenous anesthesia and were non-invasively connected to the NOL® via a finger clip as well as a bispectral-index monitoring (BIS®) to confirm deep sedation. The measured nociception levels were retrospectively evaluated at specific time points of nociceptive stress (intubation, Mayfield-positioning, incision, extubation) and compared to standard vital signs.

Results

Nociceptive measurements were successfully performed in 35 patients. The largest increase in nociceptive stimulation occurred during intubation (NOL® 40 ± 16) followed by Mayfield positioning (NOL® 39 ± 16) and incision (NOL® 26 ± 12). Correlation with BIS measurements confirmed a sufficiently deep sedation during all analyzed time points (BIS 45 ± 13). Overall, patients showed an intraoperative NOL® score of 10 or less in 56% of total intervention time.

Conclusions

Nociceptive monitoring using the NOL® system during intracerebral surgery is feasible and might yield helpful information to support therapeutic decisions. This could help to reduce hyperanalgesia, facilitating shorter emergence periods and less postoperative complications. Prospective clinical studies are needed to further examine the potential benefits of this monitoring approach in a neurosurgical context.

Trial registration

German trial registry, registration number DRKS00029120.

The association of hemodynamic parameters and clinical demographic variables with acute postoperative pain in female oncological breast surgery patients: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Appropriate administration of intraoperative analgesia is an essential factor in care and reasonable recovery times. Inappropriate intraoperative analgesia puts the patient at risk of acute postoperative pain (APOP). The absence of an objective standard for intraoperative nociceptive monitoring complicates pain care. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) have been suggested as useful parameters during general anesthesia for nociceptive monitoring. However, studies focusing on whether intraoperative heart rate variability (HRv) and mean arterial blood pressure variability (MABPv) during general anesthesia can accurately monitor nociception in patients have remained inconclusive. The current study aimed to (1) identify the association of intraoperative heart rate and blood pressure variability in patients undergoing low-risk surgery with the incidence of APOP in the immediate postoperative setting and (2) evaluate the associations of clinical demographic factors with the incidence of APOP.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted. The outcome was moderate-to-severe APOP, defined as a numeric rating scale score of ≥ 4. HRv, MABPv, and potential confounders, such as age, body mass index, duration of surgery, smoking, depression, preoperative use of analgesics, and type of surgery, were used as independent variables.

RESULTS

Data from 764 female oncological breast surgery patients were analyzed. No statistically significant association of HRv and MABPv with APOP was found. Lower age was associated with higher odds of APOP (odds ratio [OR] 0.978, p = 0.001). Increased length of surgery (OR 1.013, p = 0.022) and a history of depression were associated with increased odds of APOP (OR 2.327, p = 0.010). The subtype of surgery was statistically significantly associated with APOP (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that heart rate and blood pressure variability intraoperatively, in female patients undergoing low-risk surgery, are not associated with, and thus not predictive of, APOP in the immediate postoperative setting.

Prediction of blood pressure changes during surgical incision using the minimum evoked current of vascular stiffness value under sevoflurane anesthesia

Necessary and sufficient opioids should be administered for safe and stable anesthesia. However, opioid sensitivity varies among individuals. We previously reported that sympathetic responses to nociceptive stimuli under propofol anesthesia could be predicted by measuring the minimum evoked current of the vascular stiffness value (MECK). However, this result has only been proven under propofol anesthesia. We propose that MECK could be used under anesthesia with a volatile anesthetic. Thirty patients undergoing laparotomy with sevoflurane anesthesia received 0.7 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane and intravenous remifentanil at a constant concentration of 2 ng/mL, followed by tetanic stimulation, to measure MECK. After tetanic stimulation, the same anesthetic conditions were maintained, and the rate of change in systolic blood pressure (ROCBP) during the skin incision was measured. The correlation coefficient between the MECK and ROCBP during skin incision under sevoflurane anesthesia was R =  - 0.735 (P < 0.01), similar to that in a previous study with propofol (R =  - 0.723). Thus, a high correlation was observed. The slope of the linear regression equation was - 0.27, similar to that obtained in the study on propofol (- 0.28). These results suggest that, as with propofol anesthesia, MECK can be used as a predictive index for ROCBP under 0.7 MAC sevoflurane anesthesia.Clinical trial registration: Registry, University hospital Medical Information Network; registration number, UMIN000047425; principal investigator's name, Noboru Saeki; date of registration, April 8, 2022.

Influence of Intraoperative Nociception during Hip or Knee Arthroplasty with Supplementary Regional Anaesthesia on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption

Background and Objectives: Early postoperative mobilization is central for postoperative outcomes after lower extremity joint replacement surgery. By providing adequate pain control, regional anaesthesia plays an important role for postoperative mobilization. It was the objective of this study to investigate the use of the nociception level index (NOL) to determine the effect of regional anaesthesia in hip or knee arthroplasty patients undergoing general anaesthesia with additional peripheral nerve block. Materials and Methods: Patients received general anaesthesia, and continuous NOL monitoring was established before anaesthesia induction. Depending on the type of surgery, regional anaesthesia was performed with a Fascia Iliaca Block or an Adductor Canal Block. Results: For the final analysis, 35 patients remained, 18 with hip and 17 with knee arthroplasty. We found no significant difference in postoperative pain between hip or knee arthroplasty groups. NOL increase at the time of skin incision was the only parameter associated with postoperative pain measured using a numerical rating scale (NRS > 3) after 24 h in movement (-12.3 vs. +119%, p = 0.005). There was no association with intraoperative NOL values and postoperative opioid consumption, nor was there an association between secondary parameters (bispectral index, heart rate) and postoperative pain levels. Conclusions: Intraoperative NOL changes may indicate regional anaesthesia effectiveness and could be associated with postoperative pain levels. This remains to be confirmed in a larger study.

[Intraoperative guidance of anesthesia: Analgesie Nociception Index (ANI) vs. standard care for hysterectomy under anesthesia with sevoflurane : A randomized controlled simple blinded study on intraoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain and patient satisfaction]

BACKGROUND

General anesthesia leads to different effects depending on the drugs used (hypnosis, analgesia, muscle relaxation). While there are validated methods for clinical monitoring and control of hypnosis and muscle relaxation in routine anesthesia, the assessment of analgesia is still mainly based on the interpretation of clinical vital parameters, such as heart rate, blood pressure, perspiration or intraoperative movements of the patient. The present clinical study investigated whether the use of a so-called nociception monitor to record the intraoperative need for analgesics is superior to the previous analysis of vital parameters. The analgesia nociception index (ANI; MDoloris, Lille, France) was used, which is one of several nociception monitors currently on the market for recording the sympathicovagal balance. In the case of the ANI, the measurement is based on the analysis of the heart rate variability (HRV) as a function of breathing. The index is given in the form of a dimensionless score between 0 and 100, where 0 stands for a lack of parasympathetic activity and 100 for a very strong parasympathetic activity. According to the manufacturer, a value between 50-70 under anesthesia corresponds to sufficient intraoperative analgesia.

METHODS

This was a clinical prospective randomized study in which 110 patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy under balanced anesthesia using propofol, fentanyl and atracurium for induction and sevoflurane and fentanyl for anesthesia maintenance, were divided into two groups. In the intervention group (ANI group), during the operation analgesics were administered with the aid of the ANI monitor (bolus of 0.1 mg fentanyl if the ANI was < 50), whereas in the comparison group analgesics were administered according to previous clinical parameters (vital parameters, intraoperative defensive movements). The groups were then compared with respect to intraoperative fentanyl consumption (primary outcome), postoperative pain and opioid-induced side effects (measured by the numeric rating scale [NRS]) as well as patient satisfaction on postoperative day 3 (secondary outcome).

RESULTS

The observations showed a higher total intraoperative consumption of fentanyl in the intervention group, due to a significantly higher number of individual doses (0.54 vs. 0.44 mg, p < 0.001). With respect to the other observation points, there were hardly any differences between the groups, neither with respect to the pain score nor the side effects in the recovery room. At most there was a trend towards a slightly lower pain score at the first measurement point in the recovery room (NRS at 15 min). In the patient survey on the postoperative day 3, there was a difference with respect to the subjectively described reduction in vigilance in the ANI group, but not other side effects or overall satisfaction with the pain therapy.

CONCLUSION

In this group of patients the additional use of the ANI monitor for intraoperative control of analgesia led to an increased consumption of fentanyl compared to the comparison group, without having an impact on the postoperative pain score, opioid-induced side effects or patient satisfaction. An optimization of pain therapy through intraoperative use of the ANI monitoring in hysterectomy patients under balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane and fentanyl could therefore not be proven. Transferability of the results to a much older and/or sicker patient collective remains questionable.

Intraoperative Assessment of Surgical Stress Response Using Nociception Monitor under General Anesthesia and Postoperative Complications: A Narrative Review

We present a narrative review focusing on the new role of nociception monitor in intraoperative anesthetic management. Higher invasiveness of surgery elicits a higher degree of surgical stress responses including neuroendocrine-metabolic and inflammatory-immune responses, which are associated with the occurrence of major postoperative complications. Conversely, anesthetic management mitigates these responses. Furthermore, improper attenuation of nociceptive input and related autonomic effects may induce increased stress response that may adversely influence outcome even in minimally invasive surgeries. The original role of nociception monitor, which is to assess a balance between nociception caused by surgical trauma and anti-nociception due to anesthesia, may allow an assessment of surgical stress response. The goal of this review is to inform healthcare professionals providing anesthetic management that nociception monitors may provide intraoperative data associated with surgical stress responses, and to inspire new research into the effects of nociception monitor-guided anesthesia on postoperative complications.