[Health for refugees - the Bremen model]

Associations between physical and mental health and the utilization of ambulatory and emergency healthcare among asylum-seekers: results from a cross-sectional survey in Berlin, Germany

BACKGROUND

Despite a high burden of chronic and mental illness, asylum-seekers show low utilization of ambulatory specialist healthcare. Forgoing timely healthcare when facing access barriers may direct them toward emergency care. This paper examines interrelations of physical and mental health and utilization of ambulatory and emergency care, and explicitly addresses associations between the different types of care.

METHODS

A structural equation model was applied to a sample of n = 136 asylum-seekers living in accommodation centers in Berlin, Germany. Utilization patterns of emergency care (outcome) and physical and mental ambulatory care (endogenous predictors) were estimated, while controlling for age, gender, chronic conditions, bodily pain, depression, anxiety, length of stay in Germany (exogenous predictors) and self-rated health (endogenous predictor).

RESULTS

Associations were observed between ambulatory care utilization and poor self-rated health (0.207, CI: 0.05; 0.364), chronic illness (0.096, CI: 0.017; 0.175) and bodily pain (0.019, CI: 0.002; 0.036); between mental healthcare utilization and anxiety (0.202, CI: 0.051; 0.352); and between emergency care utilization and poor self-rated health (0.621, CI: 0.059; 1.183), chronic illness (0.287, CI: 0.012; 0.563), mental healthcare utilization (0.842, CI: 0.148; 1.535) and anxiety (0.790, CI: 0.141; 1.438) (values in parentheses show estimated regression coefficients and 95% confidence intervals). We found no associations between the utilization of ambulatory and emergency care.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study generates mixed results concerning associations between healthcare needs and ambulatory and emergency care utilization among asylum-seekers. We found no evidence that low utilization of ambulatory care contributes to emergency care utilization; neither did we find evidence that ambulatory treatment obviates the need to seek emergency care. Our results indicate that higher physical healthcare needs and anxiety are associated with more utilization of both ambulatory and emergency care; whereas healthcare needs related to depression tend to remain unmet. Both the undirected and under-utilization of health services may reflect navigation and accessibility issues. To facilitate more needs-based and effective healthcare utilization and thus contribute to health equity, support services such as interpretation and care navigation as well as outreach are warranted.

Challenges in health care services for refugees in Cologne, Germany: A providers' perspective using a mixed-methods approach

Since the peak of refugees arriving in Germany in 2015, existing health care structures have faced major challenges. The city of Cologne developed ad-hoc new structures to address these challenges, including a separate department for refugee medicine. We examine the processes of health care provision and perceived challenges in the health care of refugees in Cologne. We used a mixed-methods approach using 20 semi-structured interviews and analyzed descriptively a database including 353 datasets with socio-demographic, health-related and resource-related information to link with the results of qualitative data. Our qualitative data revealed several challenges in providing health care to refugees. Challenges included receiving approval of health care services and medical aids by the municipality, communication and cooperation between the actors in care of refugees, undersupplies in mental health care and addictive disorders as well as improper housing conditions for refugees with mental health issues, psychiatric disorders or elderly persons. Quantitative data confirmed the challenges in approving health care services and medical aids, but no valid statement could be made about communication and cooperation. Undersupplies for mental health issues were confirmed, the gap for treatment of addictive disorders shows a divergence within the database. Improper housing conditions for mentally ill persons were reflected, for elderly persons this did not appear in data. In conclusion, analyzing the challenges in care can stimulate necessary changes to improve health services for refugees locally, while others are beyond the control of the local authority and require legislative and political action.

[Care of infectious diseases in underage refugees exemplified by Ukraine]

Background

By early June 2022, around 300,000 children and adolescents from Ukraine were registered in the German central registry for foreigners.The updated recommendations for action should provide the foundations for an evidence-based and targeted care for the diagnosis and prevention of infectious diseases in underage refugees and asylum seekers, exemplified by Ukraine.

Objective

The recommendations for action are intended to support medical personnel in the care of minor refugees in order to1) ensure early recognition and completion of an incomplete vaccination status,2) diagnose and treat common infectious diseases,3) ensure early recognition and treatment of infectious diseases that are rare in the German healthcare system.

Material and methods

The recommendations for action were drafted as level 1 (S1) guidelines coordinated by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) and were adapted to the situation of refugees from Ukraine.The recommendations were compiled by a representative expert panel appointed by the participating professional societies in an informal consensus and finally officially adopted by the board of directors of all societies concerned.

Results

Recommendations are given for the extent of the medical evaluation of minor refugees, including the medical history and physical examination, adapted to the situation of refugees from Ukraine. A blood count and screening for tuberculosis, hepatitis B and C as well as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections are recommended for all minor refugees.For a rapid completion of the vaccination status, an age-related and indications-related prioritization of individual vaccinations will be undertaken.

Conclusion

In view of the continuing high numbers of refugees not only from Ukraine, a further professionalization of medical health care is necessary. For this purpose, the necessary structural and personnel framework conditions need to be accomplished.

[Updated recommendations on the treatment of infectious diseases in refugees in childhood and adolescence in Germany (situation as of 30 March 2022), registered as S1 guidelines (AWMF-Register Nr. 048-017)]

Background

Based on 190,000 applications for asylum, Germany remains a top destination for refugees and asylum seekers in Europe. The updated recommendations are considered evidence-based and targeted guidelines for the diagnosis and prevention of infectious diseases in underage refugees and asylum seekers.

Objective

The objective of these recommendations is to guide medical staff in the care of minor refugees, in particular to:1. assure early recognition and completion of incomplete vaccination status,2. diagnose and treat common infectious diseases,3. recognize and treat imported infectious diseases that are considered uncommon to the German healthcare system.

Material and methods

The recommendations have been formally written to be published as AWMF S1 guidelines.This includes a representative expert panel appointed by several professional societies, and formal adoption of the recommendations by the board of directors of all societies concerned.

Results

Recommendations are given for the medical evaluation of minor refugees, including medical history and physical examination. A blood count as well as screening for tuberculosis and hepatitis B should be offered to all minor refugees. In addition, screening for other infectious diseases like hepatitis C, HIV or schistosomiasis should be considered depending on age and country of origin. Vaccinations are recommended based on both age and country of origin.

Conclusion

As thousands of minor refugees continue to seek shelter in Germany every year, professional health care with adequate financial support needs to be established to ensure an appropriate medical treatment of this particularly vulnerable population.

An overview of health policies for asylum-seekers in Germany

Health policies for asylum-seekers are a subject of debate across European countries. However, information on current strategies to respond to these populations' health needs is scarce. To facilitate comparative research, this paper renders a detailed overview of Germany's asylum-seeker health policies. Following a description of the historic development and administrative structure of asylum-seeker health care in Germany, we provide a detailed account of asylum-seekers' scope of health entitlements, as it is defined by federal law. We explain the main mechanisms that are used to implement the law on local levels and regulate health care access; namely, the electronic health insurance card and the health care voucher. Financing and billing structures are described, and main points of critique of Germany's asylum-seeker health policies are summarized. Our description highlights fragmentation and internal variations as central features of Germany's asylum-seeker health policies. It explicates how these features are rooted in decentralization, and in the regulation of restricted health benefits through a parallel system, separate from statutory health insurance. As a case-study, Germany's asylum-seeker health policies illustrate the administrative, economic and ethical burdens implied in granting health benefits through a parallel system, and in absence of central health governance. The (re)integration of asylum-seeker health care in statutory health insurance could reduce these burdens and contribute to equitable health care access.

Health and Healthcare Utilization among Asylum-Seekers from Berlin's LGBTIQ Shelter: Preliminary Results of a Survey

BACKGROUND

LGBTIQ asylum-seekers face multiple health risks. Yet, little is known about their healthcare needs. In 2016, Berlin opened the only major shelter for LGBTIQ asylum-seekers in Germany. This preliminary study describes health and healthcare utilization by asylum-seekers living in Berlin's LGBTIQ shelter. To identify particular healthcare needs, we compared our results to asylum-seekers from other shelters.

METHODS

We surveyed residents of the LGBTIQ shelter and 21 randomly selected shelters in Berlin, using a validated questionnaire in nine languages (n = 309 respondents, including 32 respondents from the LGBTIQ shelter). Bivariate tests and generalized linear mixed models were applied to examine differences in health and healthcare utilization between the two groups.

RESULTS

Residents of the LGBTIQ shelter show high rates of chronic and mental illness. They use ambulatory and mental health services more frequently than asylum-seekers from other shelters, including a significantly higher chance of obtaining psychotherapy/psychiatric care in case of need. Emergency room utilization is also higher in the LGBTIQ group.

CONCLUSIONS

Asylum-seekers from the LGBTIQ shelter face high chronic and mental health burdens. Tailored services in the LGBTIQ shelter help obtain adequate healthcare; they should be scaled up to maximize their potential. Yet, unmet needs remain and warrant further research.

Differences in realized access to healthcare among newly arrived refugees in Germany: results from a natural quasi-experiment

BACKGROUND

Germany has a statutory health insurance (SHI) that covers nearly the entire population and most of the health services provided. Newly arrived refugees whose asylum claim is still being processed are initially excluded from the SHI. Instead, their entitlements are restricted and parallel access models have been implemented. We assessed differences in realized access of healthcare services between these access models.

METHODS

In Germany's largest federal state, North Rhine-Westphalia, two different access models have been implemented in the 396 municipalities: the healthcare voucher (HcV) model and the electronic health card (eHC) model. As refugees are quasi-randomly assigned to municipalities, we were able to realize a natural quasi-experiment including all newly assigned refugees from six municipalities (three for each model) in 2016 and 2017. Using claims data, we compared the standardized incidence rates (SIR) of specialist services use, emergency services use, and hospitalization due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) between both models. We indirectly standardized utilization patterns first for age and then for the sex.

RESULTS

SIRs of emergency use were higher in municipalities with HcV (ranging from 1.41 to 2.63) compared to emergency rates in municipalities with eHC (ranging from 1.40 to 1.71) and differed significantly from the expected rates derived from official health reporting. SIRs of emergency and specialist use in municipalities with eHC converged with the expected rates over time. There were no significant differences in standardized hospitalization rates for ACSC.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the eHC model is slightly better able to provide refugees with SHI-like access to specialist services and goes along with lower utilization of emergency services compared to the HcV model. No difference between the models was found for hospitalizations due to ACSC. Results might be slightly biased due to incompletely documented service use and due to (self-) selection on the level of municipalities with municipalities interested in facilitating access showing more interest in joining the project.

[Health and primary care surveillance among asylum seekers in reception centres in Germany: concept, development, and implementation]

BACKGROUND

Reliable data on health and primary care among asylum seekers in reception centres are not routinely available, but required to plan needs-based healthcare services.

OBJECTIVES

To present the concept, development, and implementation of a routine surveillance system in reception centres for asylum seekers.

METHODS

In the scope of the project PRICARE, medical records in reception centres were standardized and digitized, and continuous surveillance was enabled by means of suitable IT infrastructure. The core elements of the surveillance system were developed in three project phases using an iterative and participative design.

FUNDING

Federal Ministry of Health (Grant no. 2516FSB415).

RESULTS

Forming the basis for the surveillance, the electronic health record Refugee Care Manager® (RefCare®) was developed and gradually implemented in 13 reception centres in three federal states. For implementing the tool in daily care routines, IT infrastructure was implemented in all sites and a legally required data protection concept was established. An indicator set was developed and agreed upon for the surveillance, comprising a total of 64 indicators in four domains: morbidity, processes of care, quality of care, and syndromic alerts.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time in Germany, a harmonized infrastructure spanning federal states was implemented in healthcare settings ensuring medical documentation and surveillance of health and healthcare of asylum seekers in conformity with data protection requirements. The surveillance is feasible; the long-term benefits of routine surveillance and research within the network will be assessed in the future.

Asylum-seekers in Germany differ from regularly insured in their morbidity, utilizations and costs of care

In the wake of the European refugee crisis, Germany has received over a million new applications for asylum in the last two years. The health care system is struggling to provide asylum-seekers with access to essential medical services and facilitate their longer-term integration. In this article, we report on the morbidity, utilization and costs of care for a sample of asylum-seekers as compared to a matched group of regularly insured. Using administrative data, we found that asylum-seekers had more hospital and emergency department admissions, including more admissions that could be avoided through good outpatient care or prevention. Their average expenditures were 10 percent higher than for the regularly insured, mostly because of higher hospital expenditures, although there was substantial variation in expenditures by country of origin. Facilitating access to the health care system, especially outpatient and mental health care, could improve asylum-seekers health status and integration, possibly at lower costs.

A cross-sectional investigation of the health needs of asylum seekers in a refugee clinic in Germany

BACKGROUND

Over one million asylum seekers were registered in Germany in 2016, most from Syria and Afghanistan. The Refugee Convention guarantees access to healthcare, however delivery mechanisms remain heterogeneous. There is an urgent need for more data describing the health conditions of asylum seekers to guide best practices for healthcare delivery. In this study, we describe the state of health of asylum seekers presenting to a multi-specialty primary care refugee clinic.

METHODS

Demographic and medical diagnosis data were extracted from the electronic medical records of patients seen at the ambulatory refugee clinic in Dresden, Germany between 15 September 2015 and 31 December 2016. Data were de-identified and analyzed using Stata version 14.0.

RESULTS

Two-thousand-seven-hundred and fifty-three individual patients were seen in the clinic. Of these, 2232 (81.1%) were insured by the state indicating arrival within the last 3 months. The median age was 25, interquartile range 16-34. Only 786 (28.6%) were female, while 1967 (71.5%) were male. The most frequent diagnoses were respiratory (17.4%), followed by miscellaneous symptoms and otherwise not classified ailments (R series, 14.1%), infection (10.8%), musculoskeletal or connective tissue (9.3%), gastrointestinal (6.8%), injury (5.9%), and mental or behavioral (5.1%) categories.

CONCLUSIONS

This study illustrates the diverse medical conditions that affect the asylum seeker population. Asylum seekers in our study group did not have a high burden of communicable diseases, however several warranted additional screening and treatment, including for tuberculosis and scabies. Respiratory illnesses were more common amongst newly arrived refugees. Trauma-related mental health disorders comprised half of mental health diagnoses.

[How do asylum seekers experience access to medical care?]

BACKGROUND

In Germany basic medical care for asylum seekers is organized outside the statutory health insurance system. Currently there are few empirically based statements on how asylum seekers experience their access to healthcare. The aim is therefore to evaluate their experiences with healthcare focussing on subjective health, utilisation and access to medical care, and experiences with medical care.

METHODS

Between August and November 2015, we performed 16 qualitative problem-oriented guided interviews with asylum seekers, who received or sought medical care in Saxony-Anhalt. The interpreter-assisted interviews were evaluated with content analysis.

RESULTS

Access begins with a voucher for medical treatment issued by the social security office. Asylum seekers experience that procedure as onerous and incapacitating. These experiences influence subjective health and utilisation of medical help. If their efforts for treatment certificates are rejected, people increasingly resign. If medical treatment is achieved, they experience medical staff mostly as competent and friendly, in spite of language difficulties and time pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing the "voucher bureaucracy" by uniform rules and practices may bring about a relief to access and utilisation of healthcare. Introducing an electronic health insurance card for asylum seekers would retransfer decision making about treatment needs from the welfare system into the medical system.

Multidrug-resistant organisms in refugees: prevalences and impact on infection control in hospitals

Introduction: The refugee crisis is a great challenge to the social and healthcare system in European countries, especially in Germany. An abundance of data has been published on the refugees’ health problems (infections as well as physical diseases and psychiatric problems) and their prevention (i.e., sanitary and vaccination programs). However, data on prevalences of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in refugees are scarce, although it is known that most refugees are from or travelled through countries with high prevalences of MDRO. This paper presents current data on MDRO colonization of refugees admitted to hospitals, and the impact of screening upon admission and infection control in hospitals is discussed.

Methods: Anonymous data obtained by screening upon hospital admission were reported by hospitals in the Rhine-Main region of Germany to the local public health department. Screening and microbiological analyses were performed from December 2015 to March 2016 according to standardized and validated methods.

Results: 9.8% of the refugees screened (32/325) exhibited colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and 23.3% of the refugees (67/290) were colonized with Gram-negative bacteria with extended spectrum beta-lactamases, and/or enterobacteria with resistance against 3 or 4 groups of antibacterials, so-called 3MRGN (multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria with resistance against penicillins, cephalosporins and quinolones) and 4MRGN (with additional resistance against carbapenems). Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGN) were detected in 2.1% (6/290) of the refugees.

Conclusion: The data confirms the studies published between 2014 and 2016, encompassing refugees tested in Germany, the Netherlands and Israel, with prevalences of MRSA and CRGN up to 13.5% and 5.6%. The MDRO prevalences are higher than those of “risk groups” for MRSA, such as hemodialysis patients and patients depending on outpatient home-nursing care or residing in nursing homes. Therefore, screening and special infection control in hospitals is strongly suggested when refugees are admitted to hospitals, in order to ensure best medical practice and safety for all hospital patients regardless of their country of origin.