[Four years of specialized outpatient palliative care in a rural area : Cooperation and acceptability from general practitioners' view]

[General practitioners' palliative care activities in Westphalia-Lippe compared to other federal states - Secondary analysis of a survey]

INTRODUCTION

In palliative home care frictional loss at the interface between primary palliative care (PPC) and specialised palliative home care (SPHC) is repeatedly pointed out. PPC and SPHC appear to be insufficiently interlinked. The model implemented in Westphalia-Lippe differs from others in Germany: it relies on close cooperation between general practitioners (GPs) and palliative consultancy services (PCS), an early start of the palliative care process and comprehensive/widespread collaboration. We hypothesize that the framework conditions applying in Westphalia-Lippe have positive effects on the uptake of palliative care activities by GPs. The objective of this study therefore is to compare GPs' attitudes and their willingness to provide palliative care between GPs in Westphalia-Lippe and GPs in other federal states/Associations of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (ASHIPs) in order to empirically test our hypothesis.

METHODS

Secondary evaluation of a nationwide paper-based survey from 2018 for national data acquisition of GPs' palliative care activities at the interface of SPHC. Answers of the participating GPs from Westphalia-Lippe (n=119) are contrasted with the answers of the GPs from seven other federal states (n=1,025).

RESULTS

GPs from Westphalia-Lippe have a consistently higher self-perception of being responsible for palliative care of their patients, more often take responsibility for palliative care activities and feel more confident in carrying them out. GPs from Westphalia-Lippe are more likely to know other palliative care facilities/actors and they find them to be more likely available for GPs. They rate the quality of the overall palliative infrastructure higher. For GPs from Westphalia-Lippe the involvement of PCS/SPHC providers is less important than for GPs from other regional ASHIPs. If they are involved in the palliative treatment of a patient, GPs from Westphalia-Lippe feel more frequently involved in the course of treatment.

DISCUSSION

Our study indicates that the special framework conditions for palliative care provided by GPs in Westphalia-Lippe have positive effects on their uptake of palliative care activities. An essential factor could be the PPC- and SPHC-integrated approach to palliative care in Westphalia-Lippe.

CONCLUSION

Westphalia-Lippe may provide orientation for other regions regarding the involvement of GPs at the interface to specialized palliative care. Whether the type of palliative home care in Westphalia-Lippe also produces advantages in terms of quality and costs of care compared to the rest of Germany is something that needs to be investigated in the future.

[Utilization of palliative care at the end of life in Germany: temporal trend (2016-2019) and regional variability]

BACKGROUND

In Germany, palliative care (PC) is provided on a homecare, inpatient, general, and specialized basis. Since little is currently known about the temporal course and regional differences in the forms of care, the present study was aimed to investigate this.

METHOD

In a retrospective routine data study with 417,405 BARMER-insured persons who died between 2016 and 2019, we determined the utilization rates of primary PC (PPC), specially qualified and coordinated palliative homecare (PPC+), specialized palliative homecare (SPHC), inpatient PC, and hospice care on the basis of services billed at least once in the last year of life. We calculated time trends and regional variability and controlled for needs-related patient characteristics and access-related county of community characteristics.

RESULTS

From 2016 to 2019, total PC increased from 33.8 to 36.2%, SPHC from 13.3 to 16.0% (max: Rhineland-Palatinate), and inpatient PC from 8.9 to 9.9% (max: Thuringia). PPC decreased from 25.8 to 23.9% (min: Brandenburg) and PPC+ came in at 4.4% (max: Saarland) in 2019. Hospice care remained constant at 3.4%. Regional variability in utilization rates remained high, increased for PPC and inpatient PC from 2016 to 2019, and decreased for SPHC and hospice care. The regional differences were also evident after adjustment.

CONCLUSION

Increasingly more SPHC, less PPC, and high regional variability, which cannot be explained by demand- or access-related characteristics, indicate that the use of PC forms is oriented less to demand than to regionally available care capacities. In view of the growing need for palliative care due to demographic factors and decreasing personnel resources, this development must be viewed critically.

GPs’ involvement in specialised palliative home care: A mixed methods study in Germany

Background

General practitioners (GPs) are important providers of palliative home care (PHC). To deliver adequate palliative care, cooperation with specialised PHC teams is necessary. Specialised PHC is a type of care for severely ill patients by specialised providers. Little is known about the involvement of German GPs in specialised PHC.

Objectives

To analyse GPs’ experience with realised and desired involvement in specialised PHC. Realised involvement means GPs took part in specialised PHC patients’ care. Desired involvement is GPs’ hoped-for cooperation with specialised PHC teams: GPs could state whether they want to stay involved, be informed, or provide medical services themselves after referral to specialised PHC.

Methods

Mixed methods design (focus group with 6 GPs; survey of 445 GPs in North Rhine, Germany, about their experiences in PHC/specialised PHC): Qualitative data was interpreted using content analysis. The authors developed a questionnaire and performed descriptive analysis based on qualitative results.

Results

GPs are mostly satisfied with specialised PHC teams’ care, although they report cooperation is not always optimal. GPs describe a high satisfaction with quality of care by specialised PHC teams. However, physicians with higher PC knowledge are less satisfied with specialised PHC. Also, GPs are often less involved in specialised PHC than they wish, especially when they have a higher PC qualification.

Conclusion

In general, GPs are satisfied with the quality of care provided by specialised PHC teams but GPs do not always perceive cooperation as optimal. Involvement of GPs in specialised PHC needs to be improved.

[PARPACT: Paramedic Palliative Care Test : Validation of a questionnaire to assess palliative care knowledge and self-efficacy expectations of paramedics]

BACKGROUND

Given the large number of palliative patients cared for by the emergency services, education and training in palliative care topics are playing an increasingly important role. To support decision-making in an emergency setting a palliative or emergency card has been introduced in many cities.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the success of educational interventions and the effect of the palliative or emergency card, a questionnaire was developed and validated to determine palliative knowledge and palliative self-efficacy expectations in the emergency services.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Delphi process was applied for development and content validation. Factor analysis was used for construct validation. Criterion validity was assessed with the help of 22 nurses specially trained in palliative care. Reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha as a measure of internal consistency.

RESULTS

In all, 291 of 750 paramedics participated in the voluntary survey. After completion of the Delphi process, there was consensus that the important topics of pain, dyspnea, sedation, end-of-life care, euthanasia, and legal aspects were covered in the questionnaire. Factor analysis was in favor of a six-factor solution. Criterion validation revealed a significant difference in palliative knowledge between palliative care nurses (MRang 289.73) and paramedics (MRang 146.97, U = 281.000, r = 0.40, p < 0.001). Cronbach's alpha was 0.70 for the knowledge questions and 0.82 for the palliative care self-efficacy expectancy subscale.

CONCLUSIONS

The Paramedic Palliative Care Test (PARPACT) is a validated measurement tool for testing educational interventions in paramedicine.