[Checkpoint inhibitors for cancer therapy]

[Side effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors : Diagnostics and Management-an Update]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) represent a breakthrough in cancer therapy. They are effective in various tumor entities and can be used in more and more treatment settings. This leads to an increase in the number and complexity of cases with immune-related adverse events (irAE). The most common irAE are cutaneous, gastrointestinal and endocrine side effects, whereas less common irAE include pneumonitis, nephritis, myocarditis or neurological reactions. IrAE can usually be successfully treated, mainly with corticosteroids or other immunosuppressants, but they can also result in long-term sequelae or death. The optimal management of patients with steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent side effects still remains unclear. Broad awareness of these irAE across specialties is therefore of crucial importance to ensure early diagnosis and to improve irAE management.

Risk factors for immune-related adverse effects during CPI therapy in patients with head and neck malignancies - a single center study

Introduction

Checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD1 inhibitors, represent an important pillar in the therapy of advanced malignancies of the head and neck region. The most relevant complications are immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), which represent an immense burden for patients. Currently, no sufficient stratification measures are available to identify patients at increased risk of irAEs. The aim of this retrospective study was to examine whether demographic, histopathological, clinical, or laboratory values at the start of CPI therapy represent a risk factor for the later occurrence of autoimmune complications.

Material and methods

Data from 35 patients between 2018 and 2021 who received therapy with nivolumab or pembrolizumab for head and neck malignancy were analyzed and assessed for any associations with the subsequent occurrence of irAEs.

Results

IrAE developed in 37% of patients, with pneumonitis being the most common form (14%). Pneumonitis was found in patients with an average significantly lower T-stage of primary tumors. An increase in basophilic leukocytes was found in patients with dermatitis later in the course. When thyroiditis developed later, the patients had a higher CPS score and lower monocyte levels.

Discussion

Even though individual laboratory values at the beginning of therapy might show a statistical association with the later occurrence of irAEs, neither demographic, histopathological, nor laboratory chemistry values seem to be able to generate a sound and reliable risk profile for this type of complication. Therefore, patients need to be educated and sensitized to irAEs, and regular screening for irAEs should be carried out.

[Emergencies in cancer immunotherapy]

BACKGROUND

Immunomodulatory therapies are becoming increasingly important in uro-oncology. For this reason, we will probably be increasingly confronted with side effects. In addition, there is an increasing number of combinations with other mechanisms of action. Immune-mediated side effects may occur as a consequence of this therapy. These are different from the side effects of chemotherapy and other targeted therapies and therefore require different treatment strategies.

AIM

Based on the current literature, the data on graduation and stage-dependent management will be presented as well as illustrated with examples from practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review on the detection and therapeutic management of adverse events mediated in the setting of immuno-oncologic therapy.

RESULTS

Treatment-related events can in principle affect all organ systems. Toxicities in the area of the skin, such as rash or pruritus, hypo- or hyperthyreosis, arthritis, muscle pain and gastrointestinal symptoms are frequently seen. In terms of frequency, most side effects are grade 1 to 2, but grade 3 to 4 toxicities are also generally well treatable if detected early. Rare complications such as neurological toxicities, pneumonitis or carditis can develop a fulminant course if diagnosed too late.

CONCLUSIONS

Even emergencies are manageable if we know the most important side effects and the therapeutic options. Immune-mediated side effects are of particular importance because they can affect any organ system. However, as long as we consider the possibility of toxicity from checkpoint inhibitors when the patient presents with symptoms, most side effects are easy to treat and therefore manageable.

Immune-Checkpoint-Inhibitor Therapy-Principles and Relevance of Biomarkers for Pathologists and Oncologists

Immune-checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI) therapy has been one of the major advances in the treatment of a variety of advanced or metastatic tumors in recent years. Therefore, ICI-therapy is already approved in first-line therapy for multiple tumors, either as monotherapy or as combination therapy. However, there are relevant differences in approval among different tumor entities, especially with respect to PD-L1 testing. Different response to ICI-therapy has been observed in the pivotal trials, so PD-L1 diagnostic testing is used for patient selection. In addition to PD-L1 testing of tumor tissue, liquid biopsy provides a noninvasive way to monitor disease in cancer patients and identify those who would benefit most from ICI-therapy. This overview focuses on the use of ICI-therapy and how it relates to common and potential future biomarkers for patient-directed treatment planning.

Biomarkers and 3D models predicting response to immune checkpoint blockade in head and neck cancer (Review)

Immunotherapy has evolved into a powerful tool in the fight against a number of types of cancer, including head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Although checkpoint inhibition (CPI) has definitely enriched the treatment options for advanced stage HNSCC during the past decade, the percentage of patients responding to treatment is widely varying between 14-32% in second-line setting in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC with a sporadic durability. Clinical response and, consecutively, treatment success remain unpredictable in most of the cases. One potential factor is the expression of target molecules of the tumor allowing cancer cells to acquire therapy resistance mechanisms. Accordingly, analyzing and modeling the complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is key to i) stratify subgroups of patients most likely to respond to CPI and ii) to define new combinatorial treatment regimens. Particularly in a heterogeneous disease such as HNSCC, thoroughly studying the interactions and crosstalking between tumor and TME cells is one of the biggest challenges. Sophisticated 3D models are therefore urgently needed to be able to validate such basic science hypotheses and to test novel immuno-oncologic treatment regimens in consideration of the individual biology of each tumor. The present review will first summarize recent findings on immunotherapy, predictive biomarkers, the role of the TME and signaling cascades eliciting during CPI. Second, it will highlight the significance of current promising approaches to establish HNSCC 3D models for new immunotherapies. The results are encouraging and indicate that data obtained from patient-specific tumors in a dish might be finally translated into personalized immuno-oncology.

[A decade of checkpoint inhibitors: current standard of care and future trends]

Therapy with checkpoint inhibitors still revolutionizes the therapeutical landscape in oncology. Since the first approval of a checkpoint inhibitor for the therapy of malignant melanoma 2011, many other approvals in the field of hematology and oncology followed. Besides monotherapy, a rapidly increasing number of trials is investigating checkpoint inhibitors in different combination therapies for advanced disease. Cumulating evidence suggests checkpoint blockade also as promising option for (neo)-adjuvant treatment. Here we review the different treatment strategies of mono- and combination-therapies. Additionally, important biomarkers for the treatment with checkpoint inhibitors are discussed.