[Minimally invasive resections of gastric tumors]

Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric submucosal tumors, including esophagogastric junction tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Recently, the use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric submucosal tumor (gSMT) and the development of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) have enabled either preservation of the stomach or minimization of the extent of partial resection. In the present study, the outcomes following the recent introduction of LECS for gSMT are presented. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LECS for gSMT, including esophagogastric junction (EGJ) SMT.

METHODS

LECS is indicated for lesions that have an intragastric growth pattern, or for which fundusectomy can be avoided despite an extragastric growth pattern. We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of LECS carried out in 25 patients including five EGJ SMT.

RESULTS

Surgery was completed achieving an R0 resection rate of 100% with no postoperative complications. Mean tumor size was 32.3 ± 13.5 mm and mean resected specimen size was 37.6 ± 13.5 mm. Resection margins were tumor-free in all cases, with adequate minimum surgical margins, and precise conclusive diagnosis was achieved with perfect operative specimens. Endoscopic confirmation of the EGJ enabled the extent of resection to be minimized and the stomach to be preserved, avoiding fundusectomy. Although there were significant differences in tumor size and resected specimen size between EGJ SMT and non-EGJ SMT, there were no significant differences in outcomes of the LECS procedure.

CONCLUSION

LECS is feasible and safe for cases with gSMT including lesions adjacent to the EGJ.

Modern treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare mesenchymal smooth muscle sarcomas that can arise anywhere within the gastrointestinal tract. Sporadic mutations within the tyrosine kinase receptors of the interstitial cells of Cajal have been identified as the key molecular step in GIST carcinogenesis. Although many patients are asymptomatic, the most common associated symptoms include: abdominal pain, dyspepsia, gastric outlet obstruction, and anorexia. Rarely, GIST can perforate causing life-threatening hemoperitoneum. Most are ultimately diagnosed on cross-sectional imaging studies (i.e., computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging in combination with upper endoscopy. Endoscopic ultrasonographic localization of these tumors within the smooth muscle layer and acquisition of neoplastic spindle cells harboring mutations in the c-KIT gene is pathognomonic. Curative treatment requires a complete gross resection of the tumor. Both open and minimally invasive operations have been shown to reduce recurrence rates and improve long-term survival. While there is considerable debate over whether GIST can be benign neoplasms, we believe that all GIST have malignant potential, but vary in their propensity to recur after resection and metastasize to distant organ sites. Prognostic factors include location, size (i.e., > 5 cm), grade (> 5-10 mitoses per 50 high power fields and specific mutational events that are still being defined. Adjuvant therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as imatinib mesylate, has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrence after one year of therapy. Treatment of locally-advanced or borderline resectable gastric GIST with neoadjuvant imatinib has been shown to induce regression in a minority of patients and stabilization in the majority of cases. This treatment strategy potentially reduces the need for more extensive surgical resections and increases the number of patients eligible for curative therapy. The modern surgical treatment of gastric GIST combines the novel use of targeted therapy and aggressive minimally invasive surgical procedures to provide effective treatment for this lethal, but rare gastrointestinal malignancy.

Role of surgery combined with kinase inhibition in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the standard treatment for primary, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST); however, surgical resection often is not curative, particularly in large GIST. Five years after complete removal of their tumor, approximately half of treated patients relapse. Imatinib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is first-line treatment in patients with metastatic or unresectable GIST. It has resulted in durable objective responses or stable disease in 84% of patients and is well tolerated. The efficacy of imatinib in advanced GIST has created interest in a variety of potential multimodal approaches to management that combine surgery with systemic therapy.

RESULTS

Recently, a large, randomized, Phase III, US cooperative group trial that compared adjuvant imatinib, for 1 year after primary complete surgical resection, with placebo in primary GIST, reported a significantly shorter time to relapse for those in the placebo group. This led to the approval of imatinib for this new indication in the US and Europe. Several studies evaluating the efficacy of adjuvant imatinib in patients with primary GIST who are at high risk for postoperative relapse are ongoing; in particular two large European studies are expected to yield preliminary results in the near future. Neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib is also being investigated for its effect on surgical outcomes, with first trial results reported.

CONCLUSION

This article provides an update on the rapidly evolving role of surgery, treatment with TKI therapy, and their combination in the management of GIST as well as further reviews pertinent to current clinical research findings.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric submucosal tumor, endoscopic sub-tumoral dissection

Gastric submucosal tumor (SMT) is frequently found during screening endoscopy, but definitive diagnosis based on histological confirmation is relatively difficult. Even without accurate diagnosis before treatment, open or laparoscopic surgery is currently carried out to remove SMT. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in diagnostic treatment for submucosal tumor (SMT) of the stomach. Subjects in this case study comprised nine patients who had undergone ESD for gastric SMT. Before treatment, endoscopic ultrasonography was carried out in all cases to evaluate depth and origin of the SMT. Then ESD was only indicated for tumors of submucosal layer or muscularis mucosa origin. Using an endoscopic sub-tumoral dissection technique with a hook knife and a flex knife, local complete resections were achieved in all patients without severe complications. These results suggest the clinical benefits of ESD avoiding oversurgery for the diagnostic treatment of gastric SMT of the submucosal layer and muscularis mucosa origin.

Perioperative and oncological outcome of laparoscopic resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) of the stomach

Background. Surgery remains the only curative treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST). Resection needs to ensure tumour-free margins while lymphadenectomy is not required. Thus, partial gastric resection is the treatment of choice for small gastric GISTs. Evidence on whether performing resection laparoscopically compromises outcome is limited. Methods. We compiled patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of suspected gastric GIST between 2003 and 2007. Follow-up was performed to obtain information on tumour recurrence. Results. Laparoscopic resection with free margins was performed in 21/22 patients. Histology confirmed GIST in 17 cases, 4 tumours were benign neoplasms. Median operation time and postoperative stay for GIST patients were 130 (range 80-201) mins and 7 (range 5-95) days. Two patients experienced stapler line leakage necessitating surgical revision. After median follow-up of 18 (range 1-53) months, no recurrence occurred. Conclusions. Laparoscopic resection of gastric GISTs yields good perioperative outcomes. Oncologic outcome needs to be assessed with longer follow-up. For posterior lesions, special precaution is needed. Laparoscopic resection could become standard for circumscribed gastric GISTs if necessary precautions for oncological procedures are observed.

Simultaneous use of laparoscopy and endoscopy for minimally invasive resection of gastric subepithelial masses - analysis of 93 interventions

BACKGROUND

Subepithelial gastric tumors are common findings during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Tumor resection is mostly done laparoscopically, but there is still discussion concerning the size of lesion for which the treatment may be minimally invasive; additionally there is very little data available concerning patient outcome after minor access surgery.

METHODS

Clinicopathologic features and survival data of 93 consecutive patients undergoing a combined laparoscopic-endoscopic approach for gastric submucosal tumors were prospectively analyzed. Analysis included preoperative diagnostic work-up, perioperative data, and postoperative complications. Follow-up was carried out for patients with GIST to check for tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

It was possible to resect 88 of 93 lesions by the laparoscopic-endoscopic approach, with tumor-free margins in all patients. Intraoperative endoscopy facilitated exact tumor localization in 92 patients. Most lesions were removed by endoscopic-laparoscopic wedge resection or, less frequently, by a combined transgastric approach. Mean operative time was 90.7 min; the postoperative hospitalization was 7.3 days. Adverse events appeared in 7.5%, and conversion to open surgery was required in 6.5%. For patients suffering from gastrointestinal stromal tumors, there was no tumor recurrence at a mean follow-up of 40 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined laparoscopic-endoscopic "rendez-vous" procedures are easy to perform and offer a curative approach for almost all gastric submucosal lesions. The technique is associated with low morbidity and short hospitalization. Though even patients with large GISTs of intermediate and high risk were treated, no tumor recurrence has been observed to date.

Laparoscopic treatment of gastric GIST: report of 21 cases and literature's review

BACKGROUND

Although the feasibility of laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has been established, various aspects are debated. This paper describes the problems of minimally invasive resection of gastric GISTs and compares this experience with an extensive literature review.

STUDY DESIGN

Between August 2001 and December 2006, 21 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of gastric GISTs were enrolled in a prospective study. A literature review of laparoscopic treatment was performed on Pubmed using keywords GIST and surgery. A comparison with authors' experience with open wedge-segmental resection of GISTs (25 cases from November 1995 to December 2000) was also carried out. Statistical analysis was based on chi-squared test and t Student evaluation.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients, mean age 50.1 years (range, 34-68 years), were submitted to laparoscopic wedge- segmental gastric resections. Mean tumor size was 4.5 cm (range, 2.0-8.5 cm). Mean operative time was 151 min (range, 52-310 min), the mean blood loss was 101 mL (range, 10-250 mL), and the mean hospital stay was 4.8 days (range 3-7 days). There were no major operative complications or mortalities. All lesions had negative resection margins. At a mean follow-up of 35 months, all patients were disease-free. Morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and oncologic outcomes were comparable to the open surgery retrospective evaluation (p=not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

As found also in the literature review, the laparoscopic resection is safe and effective in treating gastric GISTs. Given these findings as well as the advantages afforded by laparoscopic surgery, a minimally invasive approach should be the preferred surgical treatment in patients with small- and medium-sized gastric GISTs.

Endoscopic resection of benign very low-risk gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Is it enough?

Great ongoing debate still exists over the definition, diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumour especially for small gastric submucosal tumours. Simple endoscopic biopsy is not sufficient to determine their biological behaviour and their complete excision is necessary. We report the case of a 65-year-old woman, who was kept under observation after previously operated breast cancer, with a casual computed tomography-diagnosed submucosal gastric lesion. Endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound confirmed a submucosal mass of 2-3 cm in diameter. An endoscopic resection was performed and the mass was integral at pathologic examination. It confirmed the stromal origin with a mitotic index of 1 (5/50 high power field). No more treatment was carried out because it was classified as a very low risk gastrointestinal stromal tumour according to Fletcher's classification. After 34 months follow-up, the patient is disease free and we believe that endoscopic treatment is sufficient and recommended for mainly intragastric growing gastrointestinal stromal tumour with a diameter of less than 3 cm.

Laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric GIST: long-term follow-up results

AIM

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. Recently, many investigations have been conducted on various aspects of laparoscopic surgery for gastric GIST. However, no study has provided long-term follow up results of laparoscopic surgery for gastric GIST. The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for gastric GIST and to evaluate the oncologic validity of the procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1998 and August 2005, 51 patients with submucosal tumor of the stomach were treated by laparoscopic surgery at our institution. Of 51 patients, 23 patients were confirmed as gastric GIST by immunohistochemistry (CD 117, c-kit gene product). Patients' clinicopathologic characteristics, operative outcomes, postoperative complications, and follow-up findings were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 59.7 years, and 12 patients were women. Twelve patients (47%) presented with epigastric pain. The mean tumor size was 4.2+/-2.1 cm, and most tumors were located in the upper stomach (52.2%). The mean operative time was 104.3 min. No case of open conversion, reoperation and operative mortality occurred in the present study. Most patients had very low and low risk (60.6%), while only two patients had high risk malignancy. During a median follow-up period of 61 months (range, 7-98 months), there have been no recurrences or metastases.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric GIST is safe, and oncologically and technically feasible in the hands of an experienced laparoscopic gastric surgeon.

Minimally invasive and local treatment for mucosal early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Early gastric cancer (EGC) can present an indication for local resection procedures under pertain circumstances. Especially endoscopic mucosal resections (EMRs) and laparoscopic resections or those combined with endoscopy have been made possible in recent years.

METHODS

From 1996 to 2004, of a total of 425 patients with gastric cancer, 58 patients with EGC (13.6%) were prospectively analyzed and observed. Of these, 35 patients had preoperatively diagnosed submucosal infiltration and subsequently underwent gastrectomy and standard lymphnodectomy. Of the 23 patients with intramucosal EGC, 22 underwent local resection. One patient displayed lymph node and liver metastasis at the time of diagnosis and received chemotherapy following staging laparoscopy.

RESULTS

Among the 23 patients with intramucosal EGC, 13 were female and 10 male. The average age of the patients was 77.4 years (range: 69-86). The rate of lymph node metastasis was 12.5% (n = 35) for submucosal EGC and 4.3% (n = 23) for intramucosal EGC. Twenty-two patients with intramucosal EGC underwent local resection (four EMR, six laparoscopic intragastric resection, 12 laparoscopic wedge resection). The average tumor size was 1.2 cm (range 0.3-2.3). The definitive histological findings yielded in all patients tumor-free resection margins without venous or lymphangic infiltration. In 10 of 18 patients undergoing laparoscopic resection a simultaneous sentinel lymph node sampling (4 +/- 3 LN) was performed. There were no metastases detected. Method-specific complications did not occur. The morbidity of this patient group was 13.6% (three of 22). Mortality was zero. The average postoperative hospital stay was 6.5 days (range 2-12). In the median follow-up of 30.3 months (range 1-86) no recurrences have yet been diagnosed. Four patients died within the observation period of non-cancer-related causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive local resection of intramucosal EGC represents a favorable option when strict determination of indication has taken place.

Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of synchronous multifocal gastric carcinomas

BACKGROUND

We sought to define differences between multifocal and solitary gastric carcinoma to decrease the risk of missing a cancer while resecting another more evident carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined clinicopathologic characteristics of multifocal gastric carcinoma including anatomic distribution and postoperative survival.

RESULTS

Multifocal gastric carcinoma was seen more frequently when patients were older and when the largest tumor was small and at an early stage. More than half of accessory lesions were located near the main tumor. No significant difference in postoperative survival was seen between patients with multifocal and solitary carcinoma, whether early or advanced.

CONCLUSIONS

The entire stomach should be examined carefully before and during resection, especially when local or endoscopic surgery is performed.

Laparoscopic resection of submucosal tumor on posterior wall of gastric fundus

AIM

Laparoscopic resection of tumors on the posterior wall of gastric fundus, especially when they are next to the esophagocardiac junction (ECJ), is both difficult and time-consuming. Furthermore, it can lead to inadvertent esophagus stenosis and injury to the spleen. In order to overcome these difficulties, laparoscopically extraluminal resection of gastric fundus was designed to manage submucosal tumors located on the posterior wall of gastric fundus and next to ECJ.

METHODS

From January 2001 to September 2003, laparoscopically extraluminal resection of gastric fundus was successfully carried out on 15 patients. There were 11 males and 4 females with an average age of 58 years (range, 38 to 78 years). The mean diameter of the tumors was 4.8 cm. The distance of the tumor border from ECJ was about 1.5-2.5 cm. The four-portal operation procedures were as follows: localization of the tumor, dissection of the omentum, mobilization of the gastric fundus and the upper polar of spleen, exposure of ECJ, and resection of the gastric fundus with Endo GIA.

RESULTS

The laparoscopic operation time averaged (66.2+/-10.4) min, the average amount of bleeding was (89.4+/-21.7) mL. The mean post-operative hospital stay was (5.3+/-1.1) d. Within 36 h post-operation, 73.3% of all the patients recovered their gastrointestinal function and began to eat something and to walk. In all the operations, no apparent tumor focus was left and no complication or conversion to open surgery occurred.

CONCLUSION

Our newly designed procedure, laparoscopically extraluminal resection of the gastric fundus, can avoid contamination of the abdominal cavity, injury to the spleen and esophageal stenosis. The procedure seems to be both safe and effective.

Laparoscopic resection of submucosal tumor in gastric fundus

AIM: Laparoscopic resection of the submucosal tumors on the gastric fundus, especially when they are on the posterior wall and next to the esophagocardiac junction (ECJ), is both difficult and time-consuming. Furthermore, it can lead to the inadvertent esophagus stenosis and injury to spleen. In order to solve these problems, wedge gastrectomy was adopted for the submucosal tumor on the anterior wall and the greater curvature of the gastric fundus, and laparoscopically extraluminal resection of the gastric fundus was designed for the submucosal tumor on the posterior wall of the gastric fundus and next to ECJ.

METHODS: Retrospective analysis was made in 32 cases, including 23 male and 9 female with an average age of 55 (range 36-78). Laparoscopic wedge gastrectomy had been carried out in 11 cases of submucosal tumor on the anterior wall of the gastric fundus and 6 on the greater gastric curvature. And laparoscopically extraluminal resection of the gastric fundus had been carried out on 15 cases on the posterior wall.

RESULTS: The mean operative time and intra-operative bleeding and postoperative hospital stay were (56.3±19.4 min), (53.1±30.1 mL), (4.7±0.5 d) respectively. Within 36 hours post-operation, 78.1% of all the patients resumed their gastrointestinal function and began to eat something and ambulated. The pathological diagnosis included mesen-chymoma of low malignancy (3 cases), leiomyoma (21 cases), mesenchymoma (7 cases), and neurofibroma (1 case). All the procedures were completed successfully with no apparent tumor focus left and no complication or conversion to open surgery happened.

CONCLUSION: The adopted and newly designed procedure can avoid the abdominal cavity contamination, the injury to spleen and the esophageal stenosis. And there is no limit to the range of gastric resection. Therefore, the procedure is both safe and effective.