[Hartmann's procedure indication in colorectal carcinoma]

Does intestinal anastomosis in resection of colon cancer have a significant impact onto early postoperative outcome and long-term survival?

Objectives

To investigate the influence of anastomosis on the early postoperative and long-term oncological outcomes of patients with primary colon carcinoma (CA).

Methods

All consecutive patients with the histologically diagnosed primary colon CA (design, prospective multicenter observational study) were registered with regard to patient-, diagnostic-, tumor (Tu) finding-, and treatment-related aspects using a computer-based registry with 60 items to characterize early postoperative and long-term oncological outcome.

Results

Basic data: From 2010 to 2016, data from a total of 14,466 patients were documented (mean age, 72.8 [range, 22-96] years; sex ratio, m:f=7,696:6,770). - 717/14,466 patients (4.96 %) were included in a matched-pair analysis. The majority of these patients underwent elective surgery (n=12,620 patients; 87.2 %) regardless of whether a bowel anastomosis or an ostomy was created. In emergency surgery, a bowel anastomosis was possible in a large proportion (n=1,332 patients [72.1 %]). In contrast, in 514 patients (27.9 %) who underwent emergency surgery, an ostomy was created. Interestingly, ostomy had to be created even less frequently in patients who had undergone planned surgery (n=366 [2.5 %]). - Early postoperative outcome: Cases of postoperative mortality were mainly due to general complications. Especially among the patients treated in an emergency situation without intestinal anastomosis, a high proportion died of their pre-existing condition (17.0 %). Patients who underwent ostomy creation or emergency surgery had a worse risk profile (incl. arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and secondary cardiac or renal diseases) which led to the decision to operate without anastomosis. Furthermore, data show no matter which technique had been used, patients that had undergone surgical intervention without anastomosis were more likely to develop complications. - Long-term oncosurgical outcome: The most important factors influencing long-term survival were age, resection status, and tumor stage (according to TNM and UICC). The more advanced the tumor growth, the lower the long-term survival. Patients categorized with the same tumor stage, age, and risk factors had a better chance of survival, if they underwent elective surgical intervention and with intestinal anastomosis. Interestingly, the multivariable analysis showed that older patients and such with distant metastasis benefit from a discontinuity resection.

Conclusions

The association of intraoperative and postoperative complications with increased postoperative mortality, as well as preexisting risk factors and perioperative complications is in line with findings of current studies. Furthermore, current studies also agree that older patients and such with reduced general condition benefit from discontinuity resection.

Predictors of Long-Term Outcomes of Video-Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery in Obese Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Background: Minimally invasive methods in colorectal surgery offer unquestionable advantages, especially in the context of obesity. The current study addresses the lack of scientific evidence on the long-term oncologic safety of video-laparoscopic (VL) approaches in excess-weight CRC patients undergoing surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a surgical database consisting of 138 CRC patients undergoing VL (n = 87, 63%) and open CRC surgery (n = 51, 37%). To reduce selection bias, a propensity score matching was applied as a preliminary step to balance the comparison between the two surgery groups, i.e., VL and open surgery. Data from patients treated by the same surgeon were used.to minimize bias. Additional Cox regression models were run on the matched sample (N = 98) to explore the observed benefits of VL surgery in terms of overall and cancer-free survival. The nonparametric Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the two surgical approaches and assess the likelihood of survival and cancer relapse. Results: The study sample was mostly male (N = 86, 62.3%), and VL outnumbered open surgery (63% versus 37%). Both before and after the matching, the VL-allocated group showed better overall survival (p < 0.01) with comparable cancer-free survival over more than five years of median observation time (66 months). Kaplan Meier survival probability curves corroborated the VL significant protective effect on survival (HR of 0.32; 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.81) even after adjusting for major confounding factors (age, gender, comorbidity index, BMI, tumor localization, tumor staging, tumor grading, clearance, CRM). Findings on oncologic performance by tumor relapse were comparable but lacked significance due to the small number of events observed. Conclusions: Comparing CRC surgical approaches, VL allocation showed comparable cancer-free survival but also a better performance on overall mortality than open surgery over more than five years of median observation.

Video-Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery in Obese Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Simple Summary

Extended evidence on minimally invasive surgery in colorectal cancer (CRC) settings is needed, especially as applied to obese patients. We aimed to explore and compare postoperative outcomes between open and video-laparoscopic (VL) surgery in two groups of obese patients undergoing surgical resection for CRC. VL surgery was found to reduce postoperative recovery time and the severity of complications. This Italian experience provides a further contribution to the short-term prognostic quality of minimally invasive VL surgery in obese patients.

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive surgery in obese patients is still challenging, so exploring one more item in this research field ranks among the main goals of this research. We aimed to compare short-term postoperative outcomes of open and video-laparoscopic (VL) approaches in CRC obese patients undergoing colorectal resection. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a surgical database including 138 patients diagnosed with CRC, undergoing VL (n = 87, 63%) and open (n = 51, 37%) colorectal surgery. As a first step, propensity score matching was performed to balance the comparison between the two intervention groups (VL and open) in order to avoid selection bias. The matched sample (N = 98) was used to run further regression models in order to analyze the observed VL surgery advantages in terms of postoperative outcome, focusing on hospitalization and severity of postoperative complications, according to the Clavien–Dindo classification. Results: The study sample was predominantly male (N = 86, 62.3%), and VL was more frequent than open surgery (63% versus 37%). The two subgroup results obtained before and after the propensity score matching showed comparable findings for age, gender, BMI, and tumor staging. The specimen length and postoperative time before discharge were longer in open surgery (OS) patients; the number of harvested lymph nodes was higher than in VL patients as well (p < 0.01). Linear regression models applied separately on the outcomes of interest showed that VL-treated patients had a shorter hospital stay by almost two days and about one point less Clavien–Dindo severity than OS patients on average, given the same exposure to confounding variables. Tumor staging was not found to have a significant role in influencing the short-term outcomes investigated. Conclusion: Comparing open and VL surgery, improved postoperative outcomes were observed for VL surgery in obese patients after surgical resection for CRC. Both postoperative recovery time and Clavien–Dindo severity were better with VL surgery.

[Spleen injuries during colorectal carcinoma surgery. Effect on the early postoperative result]

INTRODUCTION

Unlike gastric carcinomas, the consequences of spleen damage during operative treatment of colorectal carcinoma have barely been investigated, as splenectomy is not performed on these tumor patients to extend the radicality. In this context, the only interest is in the iatrogenic intraoperative spleen lesions, which make a splenectomy necessary or require reconstructive spleen preservation.

METHODOLOGY

During the study period from January 2000 to the end of December 2004 the perioperative data of a prospective multicenter observational study of 46,682 Patients whose tumor had been removed with a curative or palliative intent were analyzed with respect to the early postoperative consequences of an iatrogenic spleen lesion.

RESULTS

Of these 46,682 Patients, 640 (1.4%) suffered an iatrogenic spleen injury during the operative therapy. The spleens of 127 Patients (0.3%) were removed and the spleens of 513 Patients (1.1%) could be left in situ following repair. In more than 80% of the cases with an iatrogenic spleen injury, the tumor was localized in the left colon and in the rectum. Logistic regression analysis showed that the decisive risk factor for this organ lesion was the mobilization of the left colonic flexure with tumor localization in the left colon and rectum. Following spleen lesion a significantly higher morbidity rate was registered (47.2% following splenectomy, 48.5% following spleen repair) compared to patients without spleen injury (36.5%). Anastomotic leaks requiring surgery were most frequently observed following splenectomy (7.9%) but this was significantly lower following spleen preservation (3.3%, p = 0.003). The total hospital mortality was 3.1%. In patients with splenectomy the hospital mortality was 11.8% and subsequent repair with organ preservation was 4.7% (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Iatrogenic spleen lesions during colorectal carcinoma surgery represent a significant risk factor for a poor early postoperative result. In particular, this concerns the high rate of anastomotic leaks and infectious septic complications. This also leads to a higher rate of total morbidity and hospital mortality. By comparison significantly worse postoperative results were found in the group of splenectomised patients compared to the group with organ preservation through repair of the injured spleen.

The impact of age on outcome after surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) increases with age. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of age and age-related factors on post-operative mortality and survival following CRC resections.

METHODS

A prospectively collected database of 459 CRC resections was analysed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 70 years (range: 25-95 years) and 54% were male. The relative proportion of female patients increased with age so that for patients aged over 77 more women were treated than men. The probability of undergoing an emergency resection (25%) did not change with age. In older patients the proportion of rectal cancers resected decreased and the proportion of hemicolectomies and Hartmann's operations performed increased. The 30-day mortality rate was 4% after elective and 11% after emergency resections. Most deaths were caused by medical complications, reflecting increased co-morbidity in the elderly. Post-operative mortality was 1% in patients under the age of 59. This increased by 3 percentage points every 10 years after elective resections and by 8 percentage points every 10 years after emergency resections. CRC-specific survival was independent of age whereas overall survival decreased so the likelihood of dying from CRC decreased with age: at age 50 half the deaths were from CRC, at age 70 a third and at age 80 a quarter.

CONCLUSIONS

CRC stage and the probability of presenting as an emergency did not change with age but older patients were more likely to be female and have colon cancer. Post-operative mortality progressively increased with age. Most deaths were caused by medical complications, reflecting increased co-morbidity. Older patients were less likely to die from CRC.

Mortality and postoperative care after emergency laparotomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Emergency laparotomy is a common high-risk surgical procedure, but with few outcome data and few data on postoperative care. We aimed to observe mortality within a mixed general surgical population and to explore the potential impact of postoperative care on mortality.

METHOD

A prospective observational study of 124 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. For all patients, overall mortality and 30-day survival were observed; the predicted death rate (PDR) using the P-POSSUM (Portsmouth predictor - Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and Morbidity) score and the standardised mortality ratio (SMR) were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients died (19.4%); 21 in the first 30 days (16.9%). Twenty-six patients were over 80 years; 10 died (38%). PDR for all patients was 27.4%. The overall SMR was 0.71. Eighty-seven patients (70.2%) followed a postanaesthesia care unit (PACU)-ward pathway (observed mortality 13.6%; mean PDR 15.4%; SMR 0.82). Thirty (24.2%) patients followed an ICU-high dependency unit (HDU)-ward pathway (observed mortality 40.0%; mean PDR 57.2%; SMR 0.69). Six patients (4.8%) followed a PACU-HDU-ward pathway (observed mortality 0%, mean PDR 41.8%, SMR 0.0).

CONCLUSION

Mortality after emergency laparotomy was high and very high in patients more than 80 years of age. The SMR was higher in the PACU-ward pathway compared to the ICU-HDU-ward pathway, suggesting room for improvement in the postoperative period.

The care of patients with colon cancer: current treatment, and evaluation of new surgical approaches

BACKGROUND

Multi-center observational studies in surgery can yield important findings, as long as they are appropriately designed and monitored and employ modern methods of statistical analysis.

METHODS

In a multi-center quality assurance study carried out in 346 German hospitals from 2000 to 2004, data were collected from a total of 31 055 patients who underwent surgery for colon carcinoma. The current, overall state of medical care for this disease was analyzed, with particular attention to aspects of quality assurance.

RESULTS

46.7% of the patients were in the advanced, prognostically unfavorable stages UICC III and IV and had an overall 5-year survival of 53.8% in stage III and 9.8% in stage IV. Laparoscopic intention-to-treat procedures were performed on 1401 patients (4.7%), of whom 20.6% required conversion to laparotomy. The patients who required conversion to laparotomy had a worse overall outcome. 28 271 patients were treated with tumor resection and primary anastomosis; in this group, 3% (n = 844) developed an anastomotic leak. Logistic regression analysis identified the following risk factors for anastomotic leakage: duration of surgery, ileus, tumor localization in the left colon, and single-layer suturing.

CONCLUSION

This multi-center observational study yields valid findings about the epidemiology and overall quality of medical care for colon carcinoma in Germany.

Surgical practices for malignant left colonic obstruction in Germany

AIM

Data from the multicentric observation study Kolon/Rektum-Karzinome (Primärtumor) (primary colorectal carcinoma) are adduced to assess the status of surgical treatment of this condition in Germany and to compare different operative approaches in the emergency treatment of obstructive left-sided colon cancer, especially diversion (Hartmann's procedure) and primary anastomosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Out of 15,911 patients with cancer of the left colon, recorded between 01.01.2000 and 31.12.2004, a total of 743 patients underwent emergency surgery for an obstructive tumour, performed as a radical resection. These patients were compared in respect of their risk profile and postoperative result.

RESULTS

In 57.9% (n=430) a one-stage operation (Group I), in 11.7% (n=87) a primary anastomosis with protective stoma (Group II), and in 30.4% (n=226), Hartmann's procedure (Group III) was performed. In Group III more patients were male, overweight and multimorbid, and more had advanced-stage tumours. The morbidity and hospital mortality (overall hospital mortality, 7.7%; n=57) did not differ significantly between the groups. The insertion of a protective stoma did not affect the rate of anastomotic insufficiency (Group I, 7%; Group II, 8.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary anastomosis for emergency left colon carcinoma obstruction should only be regarded as indicated in cases where the risk profile is favourable. Our results suggest that in advanced obstruction and in high-risk cases Hartmann's procedure should be used. A protective stoma did not appear to confer any advantage.

Safety of bowel resection for colorectal surgical emergency in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

Colorectal emergency requiring radical surgery is becoming increasingly frequent in the elderly and problems remain as regards the best management policy. Our long-time experience is presented in this study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the last 23 years, 105 elderly patients, aged > or = 65 years, with colorectal disease underwent an emergency operation in our Surgical Department. Forty-five patients (mean age 72 years) had benign disease and 60 patients (mean age 76.5 years) colorectal carcinoma.

RESULTS

The carcinoma was located in the left colon (68%), right colon (18%) and rectum (14%). Mostly, patients with malignant cancer presented with obstructive ileus, and patients with benign tumours with perforation and peritonitis, with a predominance of diverticulitis. A resection operation either with primary anastomosis or Hartmann's procedure was performed in 75% of cases; in the rest, only palliation was resorted to. Forty-three percent of the patients with colorectal cancer emergency were > or = 80 years of age. The mean morbidity was 25% and mortality 17%, which make up to 33% and 26.6% for benign disease, and 20% and 10% for malignant cancer, respectively. The mortality rate was higher in patients with perforation than those with obstruction.

CONCLUSION

Advanced age is not a contraindication to radical surgery in case of colorectal emergency in the elderly. In the majority, a resection operation is feasible. In high-risk patients, colostomy is a life-saving alternative.

Incurable Stenosing Colorectal Carcinoma: Endoscopic Stent Implantation or Palliative Surgery?

BACKGROUND

Palliative surgery for the treatment of incurable obstructive colorectal carcinoma is associated with a considerable perioperative morbidity and mortality but no substantial improvement of the prognosis. The aim of the present study was to study the effectiveness of colorectal stenting compared with palliative surgery in incurable obstructive colorectal carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From April 1999 to April 2005, data of consecutive patients with incurable stenosing colorectal carcinoma, either treated with stent implantation or palliative surgical intervention, were prospectively recorded with respect to age, sex, tumor location (including metastases), ASA-score, peri-interventional morbidity, mortality, rates of complications, and re-interventions as well as survival.

RESULTS

Of 40 patients, 38 (95%) were successfully treated with a stent. Two patients (5%) underwent surgical intervention after stent dislocation. In contrast, 38 patients primarily underwent palliative surgical intervention. Stent patients were significantly older (P=0.020), had a higher ASA-score (P=0.012), and had more frequently distant metastases (P=0.011). After successful stent implantation, no early complications were observed, but late complications occurred in 11 subjects (29%). Following palliative surgical intervention, postoperative complications occurred in 12 individuals (32%) . Postoperative mortality was 5% in the surgery group, whereas no patient died following stent implantation. There was no significant differences in the survival of both groups (9.9 vs. 7.8 months, respectively; log rank: 0.506).

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative treatment of incurable obstructive colorectal carcinoma using stents is an effective and suitable alternative to palliative surgery with no negative impact on the survival but less peri-interventional morbidity and mortality as well as comparable overall morbidity.