[Thorax injuries]

Is it Necessary to Stabilize Every Fracture in Patients with Serial Rib Fractures in Blunt Force Trauma?

Introduction

Management of traumatic rib fractures is subject of controversial discussions. Rib fractures are common, especially after traffic accidents and falls. There is no consensus on whether and how many rib fractures need reconstruction. Not every rib fracture needs to be stabilized, but conservative treatment by internal splinting and analgesia is not effective for all patients. Deformities of the chest wall with reduced thoracic volume and restrictive ventilation disorders must be avoided. Intraoperative assessment of fractures and chest stability plays a central role.

Material and methods

From 07/2016 to 07/2021, a total of 121 chest wall stabilizations were performed (m:f = 2:1, age 65 ± 14.5 a). Indications for surgery were the following criteria: (1) palpatory instability of the chest wall, (2) dislocated fracture endings, (3) concomitant injuries, (4) uncontrollable pain symptoms. In all patients, a computed tomography scan of the thorax was performed before the osteosynthetic treatment to assess dislocation of the fracture endings and possible concomitant injuries of intrathoracic organs.

Results

Video-assisted thoracoscopy was performed in all patients. Hemothorax and concomitant injuries of the lung, diaphragm and mediastinum could be assessed. This was followed by an intraoperative assessment of the rib fractures, in particular penetration of fracture endings and resulting instability and deformity. Relevant fractures could be identified and subsequent incisions for rib osteosynthesis precisely defined. 6.3 (±2.7) rib fractures were detected, but 2.4 (±1.2) ribs treated osteosynthetically. Bilateral rib fractures were present in 26 patients (21.5%). Post-operative bleeding occurred in seven patients (5.8%), a breakage of the osteosynthetic material in two patients (1.7%).

Discussion

Intraoperative assessment of relevant fractures and dislocation is the decisive criterium for osteosynthesis. Thoracoscopy is mandatory for this purpose - also to identify accompanying injuries. Not every fracture has to be approached osteosynthetically. Even with serial rib fractures or multiple fractures in a single rib, the thoracic contour can be restored by stabilizing only relevant fractures. Intraoperative palpation can adequately assess the stability and thus the result of the osteosynthesis. Even after surgical treatment of thoracic trauma, adequate analgesia and respiratory therapy are important to the healing process.

[Interventional management of secondary retentions after thoracic and abdominal trauma]

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous treatment of secondary thoracic and abdominal retention formations after blunt or penetrating trauma now represents a standard interventional radiological procedure. Various supportive imaging procedures are available, whereby computed tomography is mostly the treatment of choice due to the high diagnostic sensitivity.

OBJECTIVE

Based on clinical examples this review article gives an overview of the state of the art minimally invasive interventional treatment of secondary posttraumatic retention formations of the thorax and abdomen. The indications and contraindications are illustrated and typical techniques and access routes are described.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Besides the general introduction and technical part, the article is divided into the anatomical compartments thorax and abdomen and frequently asked questions are dealt with.

CONCLUSION

After the study of this article you should have got to know and understand the indications for a minimally invasive approach, the possible techniques and necessary materials as well as the indications and contraindications.

[Organ injuries due to thoracic trauma : Diagnostics, clinical importance and treatment principles]

Thoracic trauma can be a life-threatening condition due to the involvement of vital organs, such as the heart, lungs, tracheobronchial tree and the great vessels. A coordinated interdisciplinary management is vital for the survival of the injured person. Modern diagnostic procedures provide an essential basis for the surgical treatment of patients. Surgical treatment principles include insertion of chest drainage, emergency thoracotomy, complex bronchoplastic and vascular reconstructive techniques and cardiac surgical maneuvers. For this reason highly complex surgical procedures are available, which can be effectively and specifically integrated into an interdisciplinary concept. In this review, the most frequent and prognostically relevant conditions, the indicated diagnostics and their significance as well as the surgical treatment principles, are comprehensively presented under consideration of the clinical situation.

[Imaging of blunt chest trauma]

CLINICAL/METHODOLOGICAL ISSUE

Blunt chest trauma is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Consequently, all patients should be evaluated radiologically after blunt chest trauma to allow timely and appropriate treatment.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

Conventional chest radiographs and computed tomography (CT) are proven modalities with which to evaluate patients after blunt chest trauma.

METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS

Over the last several years extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (eFAST) has gained increasing importance for the initial assessment of seriously injured patients.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

In the acute phase of severely injured patients eFAST examinations are helpful to exclude pneumothorax, hemothorax and hemopericardium. Chest radiographs may also be used to diagnose a pneumothorax or hemothorax; however, the sensitivity is limited and CT is the diagnostic modality of choice to evaluate severely injured patients.