[Liver resection: Part I. Anatomy and operative planning]

[Liver transection: modern procedure: Technique, results and costs]

Liver resection has developed into the current standard procedure due to modern resection techniques, profound knowledge of the liver anatomy and optimized surgical and anesthesiological strategies to allow extended resections with both low morbidity and mortality. Initially major blood loss was the biggest concern with liver resection and a Pringle's manoeuvre was necessary. Nowadays, biliary leakage is the major problem after liver surgery. Besides the classical conventional clamp crushing technique for parenchymal transection, various devices including ultrasound, microwaves and staplers have been introduced. Minimally invasive techniques have become increasingly important for liver resection but are still applied in selected patients only. The selection of the resection technique and device mainly depends on the extent of the resection and also on the liver parenchyma, the liver disease, costs, personal experiences and preferences. This article presents a selection of techniques used in modern parenchymal transection during liver resection with special focus on transection time, blood loss, bile leakage and costs.

[Vascular management in anatomical liver resection]

The vascular management in anatomical liver resection plays a pivotal role in maintaining an adequately functional residual liver volume. In this respect it is essential to guarantee an adequate portal and arterial inflow as well venous outflow for the whole residual liver (lobe or segments). To achieve this, the liver surgeon should have excellent perioperative imaging, surgical expertise based on knowledge of vascular anatomy, physiology and hemodynamics of the liver and a well-designed and cautious operative strategy. The use of intraoperative ultrasonography (with or without contrast enhancement) and modern parenchymal dissectors (e.g. ultrasound or water jet dissectors) are strongly recommended.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma beyond Milan Criteria: Multidisciplinary Approach to Improve Outcome

The implementation of the Milan criteria (MC) in 1996 has dramatically improved prognosis after liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Liver transplantation has, thereby, become the standard therapy for patients with "early-stage" HCC on liver cirrhosis. The MC were consequently adopted by United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) and Eurotransplant for prioritization of patients with HCC. Recent advancements in the knowledge about tumor biology, radiographic imaging techniques, locoregional interventional treatments, and immunosuppressive medications have raised a critical discussion, if the MC might be too restrictive and unjustified keeping away many patients from potentially curative LT. Numerous transplant groups have, therefore, increasingly focussed on a stepwise expansion of selection criteria, mainly based on tumor macromorphology, such as size and number of HCC nodules. Against the background of a dramatic shortage of donor organs, however, simple expansion of tumor macromorphology may not be appropriate to create a safe extended criteria system. In contrast, rather the implementation of reliable prognostic parameters of tumor biology into selection process prior to LT is mandatory. Furthermore, a multidisciplinary approach of pre-, peri-, and posttransplant modulating of the tumor and/or the patient has to be established for improving prognosis in this special subset of patients.

[Indications and operative procedures for neuroendocrine liver metastases]

Neuroendocrine malignancies encompass a variety of tumors that differ considerably in origin, hormonal activity, and biological behavior. Because of their rarity most therapeutic recommendations have been based on limited evidence from small retrospective series observing miscellaneous patient cohorts. Only in recent years proposals for TNM and histological grading systems have been elaborated that allow further stratification of patients suffering from these tumors. Especially patients with well and moderately differentiated neuroendocrine malignancies benefit from resection of liver metastases, improving the 5-year survival rate from <50% to 80%. Orthotopic liver transplantation can likewise improve survival in carefully selected patients. New developments in imaging modalities, intensive care treatment, and in liver surgery itself have broadened the selection of potentially resectable tumors.