Single-Port-Kolonchirurgie: Techniken und Indikationen

Single incision laparoscopic resection for diverticulitis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy is the standard procedure in elective surgery for recurrent diverticular disease. Recently, Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) have been developed as the next generation technique of minimally invasive surgery. SILS advantages include reduced surgical trauma due to reduction in the number of surgical incisions, faster recovery times, and reduced hospitalization. However, the use of SILS in colorectal surgery is technically demanding and requires expert surgeons, which has hampered the reproducibility and the diffusion of this technique.

METHODS

Between October 2009 and August 2013, 488 consecutive patients were referred to Evangelisches Hochstift Hospital (Worms, Germany) and/or Stadt Klinikum Frankental Hospital (Frankenthal, Germany) for sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. SILS sigmoidectomy via the umbilicus was performed in 484/488 cases. Clinical outcomes such as the rate of conversion to standard laparoscopy and/or to open surgery, operation time, post-operative complications and hospitalization time were recorded.

RESULTS

SILS sigmoidectomy was successfully completed for 484 out of 488 patients. SILS was converted to standard laparoscopy in 3 patients (0.6%) and to an open procedure in 1 patient (0.2%). Median time for the procedures was 103.26 min (range, 52-156 min). No mortalities or major complications were noted. The average hospitalization period was of 5 days.

CONCLUSION

Our work demonstrates that SILS sigmoidectomy via the umbilicus is effective in the treatment of patients affected by diverticular disease on a routine basis and, moreover, is technically feasible also in patients who have been subjected to previous abdominal surgery, with high Body Mass Index and/or patients with perforation at presentation. Thus this procedure represents a valid alternative to standard laparoscopy.

Current advances in single-port laparoscopic surgery

PURPOSE

Single-port laparoscopic surgery has the intention to further minimize the access trauma similar to natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. While special trocars and instruments are needed, the spectrum of clinical indications corresponds to the conventional laparoscopic surgery. This review gives an overview of the current applications and advances in single-port laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for "single incision laparoscopic surgery" or "single port" and different operations (e.g., cholecystectomy, colectomy, and appendectomy). The references and our own experiences were considered for historic development and current advances.

RESULTS

The spreading of single-port laparoscopic surgery is not as fast as expected. References show that operations using a single-port technique are feasible, safe, and efficient. More technical difficulties for the surgeon and higher costs must be considered. A better cosmetic result, less postoperative pain, and a faster recovery could be potential benefits for the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Current advances in single-port laparoscopic surgery are difficult to define. The most common procedures are single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomies, colectomies, and appendectomies. Significant clinical benefits have not yet been proven even in prospective, randomized studies.

[Single-port surgery and adnexal procedures: which indications in oncological surgery?]

OBJECTIVE

To show the interest of single trocar in order to perform uni- or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A descriptive study monocentric.

RESULTS

A total of 79 unilateral or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomies were performed by single-port laparoscopy between January 2010 and September 2012 at the Institut Paoli-Calmettes (Marseille). There are three surgical indications: diagnostic, therapeutic and prophylactic. The median age was 50 years (22-78 years). The median BMI was 22.4 kg/m(2) (17.5 to 37.7 kg/m(2)). The median blood loss was 0cc (0cc-50cc). The median hospital stay of patient was one day (0-6 days). The conversion rate in this study was 8.8%.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The single-port laparoscopic approach to perform uni- or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomies is a natural evolution of the conventional laparoscopy. If the cosmetic role seems obvious, its therapeutic value compared to traditional technique must be demonstrated by prospective studies with larger numbers.

Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have shown multiport laparoscopic surgery to be safe compared with open surgery in elective colonic disease. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) represents the latest advance in laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the safety and complication profile of colonic SILS.

METHODS

The search was performed in October 2011 using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Search terms were 'colorectal', 'colon', 'colectomy', 'rectal' and single incision/port/trocar/site/scar. Only pure single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery for benign and malignant colonic disease was included. Primary outcomes were the early postoperative complication profiles of colonic SILS. Secondary outcomes were duration of operation, lymph node yields, conversion rate and duration of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Colonic SILS data were compared with data from a Cochrane review on the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colonic surgery and four main RCTs on laparoscopic colonic surgery. Median operating times and time to first bowel motion for colonic SILS were comparable with those for laparoscopic colonic surgery. The median lymph node retrieval for malignant disease achieved with SILS was acceptable. Evidence for a reduction in postoperative pain with SILS was conflicting. There was no significant reduction in length of hospital stay with SILS. Most patients selected for colonic SILS had a low body mass index, non-bulky tumours and were operated on by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. There was significant heterogeneity in study group characteristics, indications for surgery, research methodology, operative techniques and follow-up time.

CONCLUSION

Colonic SILS should be restricted to highly selected patients; operations should be performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons, with critical appraisal of clinical outcomes.

Single-port laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease

Background. Single Port Laparoscopic Surgery (SPLS) is being increasingly employed in colorectal surgery for benign and malignant diseases. The particular role for SPLS in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been determined yet. In this review article we summarize technical aspects and short term results of SPLS resections in patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. Methods. A systematic review of the literature until January 2012 was performed. Publications were assessed for operative techniques, equipment, surgical results, hospital stay, and readmissions. Results. 34 articles, published between 2010 and 2012, were identified reporting on 301 patients with IBD that underwent surgical treatment in SPLS technique. Surgical procedures included ileocolic resections, sigmoid resections, colectomies with end ileostomy or ileorectal anastomosis, and restorative proctocolectomies with ileum-pouch reconstruction. There was a wide variety in the surgical technique and the employed equipment. The overall complication profile was similar to reports on standard laparoscopic surgery in IBD. Conclusions. In experienced hands, single port laparoscopic surgery appears to be feasible and safe for the surgical treatment of selected patients with IBD. However, evidence from prospective randomized trials is required in order to clarify whether there is a further benefit apart from the avoidance of additional trocar incisions.