Mikrochirurgische Beckenbodenrekonstruktion nach Exenteratio pelvis: Verminderte Morbidität und verbesserte Lebensqualität durch ein interdisziplinäres Konzept

Free latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for pelvic floor reconstruction following pelvic exenteration

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic floor defects following pelvic exenteration constitute a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. Whenever the common reconstruction options such as the gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap (GLM) and the vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (VRAM) are not feasible, free tissue transfer will be the only remaining option. Being one of the most reliable and versatile flaps used for microsurgical reconstruction, the free latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle flap provides an adequate solution to this problem.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We describe our experience with 12 consecutive patients who underwent the free transfer of LD free flap for secondary reconstruction of the pelvic floor and perineum following pelvic exenteration for management of locally advanced pelvic malignancies in Klinikum Oldenburg from 2007 to 2014.

RESULTS

Recurrent cancer of the anal canal was the most common pathology necessitating the performance of pelvic exenteration. Thrombosis of the vascular anastomosis was reported in two cases and ended with total flap loss in one of them. Functional limitations arose in two patients postoperatively. The mean hospital stay was 25 days.

CONCLUSION

Free LD myocutaneous flap provides an adequate solution for reconstruction of pelvic defects resulting from radical oncological resections in cases where the use of locoregional flaps, such as the gluteus maximus flap and the vertical rectus abdominis flap, is not feasible because of an extensive defect, disruption of the vascular pedicle, or due to planning for bilateral stomas placement.

A hundred patients with vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap for pelvic reconstruction after total pelvic exenteration

PURPOSE

We analysed the outcomes of a series of 100 consecutive patients with anorectal cancer with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and abdominoperineal exstirpation or total pelvic exenteration, who received a transpelvic vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap for pelvic, vaginal and/or perineal reconstruction and compare a cohort to patients without VRAM flaps.

METHODS

Within a 10-year period (2003-2013) in our institution 924 patients with rectal cancer stage y0 to y IV were surgically treated. Data of those 100 consecutive patients who received a transpelvic VRAM flap were collected and compared to patients without flaps.

RESULTS

In 100 consecutive patients with transpelvic VRAM flaps, major donor site complications occurred in 6 %, VRAM-specific perineal wound complications were observed in 11 % of the patients and overall 30-day mortality was 2 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The VRAM flap is a reliable and safe method for pelvic reconstruction in patients with advanced disease requiring pelvic exenteration and irradiation, with a relatively low rate of donor and recipient site complications. In this first study, to compare a large number of patients with VRAM flap reconstruction to patients without pelvic VRAM flap reconstruction, a clear advantage of simultaneous pelvic reconstruction is demonstrated.

Use of gluteus maximus adipomuscular sliding flaps in the reconstruction of sacral defects after tumor resection

Background

While performing sacrectomy from a posterior approach enables the en bloc resection of sacral tumors, it can result in deep posterior peritoneal defects and postoperative complications. We investigated whether defect reconstruction with gluteus maximus (GLM) adipomuscular sliding flaps would improve patient outcomes.

Methods

Between February 2007 and February 2012, 48 sacrectomies were performed at He Nan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou City, China. We retrospectively examined the medical records of each patient to obtain the following information: demographic characteristics, tumor location and pathology, oncological resection, postoperative drainage and complications. Based on the date of the operation, patients were assigned to two groups on the basis of closure type: simple midline closure (group 1) or GLM adipomuscular sliding reconstruction (group 2).

Results

We assessed 21 patients in group 1 and 27 in group 2. They did not differ with regards to gender, age, tumor location, pathology or size, or fixation methods. The mean time to last drainage was significantly longer in group 1 compared to group 2 (28.41 days (range 17–43 days) vs. 16.82 days (range 13–21 days, P < 0.05)) and the mean amount of fluid drained was higher (2,370 mL (range 2,000–4,000 mL) vs. 1,733 mL (range 1,500–2,800 mL)). The overall wound infection rate (eight (38.10%) vs. four (14.81%), P < 0.05) and dehiscence rate (four (19.05%)] vs. three (11.11%), P < 0.05) were significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2. The rate of wound margin necrosis was lower in group 1 than in group 2 (two (9.82%) vs. three (11.11%), P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The use of GLM adipomuscular sliding flaps for reconstruction after posterior sacrectomy can significantly reduce the risk of infection and improve outcomes.

Pelvic exenteration for advanced rectal cancer

SUMMARY Advanced rectal cancer is defined by local tumor invasion into adjacent structures and organs in the pelvis. A curative multimodal therapy approach for patients with advanced rectal cancer includes neoadjuvant treatment with subsequent pelvic exenteration. Pelvic exenteration is associated with high perioperative morbidity as this surgical procedure includes an extensive resection of pelvic anatomical planes with en bloc removal of the tumor and surrounding organs and structures. Safe reconstruction of the large pelvic floor defect is very important. Quality of life and oncological outcome after pelvic exenteration for advanced rectal cancer are good. In this article, we highlight important clinical and surgical aspects of pelvic exenteration for advanced rectal cancer and review the recent literature.