[Pathology of neuroendocrine neoplasms]

Novel prognostic markers revealed by a proteomic approach separating benign from malignant insulinomas

The prognosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is related to size, histology and proliferation rate. However, this stratification needs to be refined further. We conducted a proteome study on insulinomas, a well-defined pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor entity, in order to identify proteins that can be used as biomarkers for malignancy. Based on a long follow-up, insulinomas were divided into those with metastases (malignant) and those without (benign). Microdissected cells from six benign and six malignant insulinomas were subjected to a procedure combining fluorescence dye saturation labeling with high-resolution two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Differentially expressed proteins were identified using nano liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization/multi-stage mass spectrometry and validated by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays containing 62 insulinomas. Sixteen differentially regulated proteins were identified among 3000 protein spots. Immunohistochemical validation revealed that aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 and voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein 1 showed significantly stronger expression in malignant insulinomas than in benign insulinomas, whereas tumor protein D52 (TPD52) binding protein was expressed less strongly in malignant insulinomas than in benign insulinomas. Using multivariate analysis, low TPD52 expression was identified as a strong independent prognostic factor for both recurrence-free and overall disease-related survival.

[Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Role of biopsies]

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas and the gastrointestinal tract are heterogeneous regarding etiology (e.g. sporadic or hereditary), histomorphology, hormone expression, hormone-related functional activity and especially the malignant potential. In neuroendocrine neoplasms the biopsy-based diagnosis plays an important role for the clinical management of patients. The diagnosis most importantly relies on the differentiation (e.g. organoid versus diffuse growth patterns) and the grading of tumors. The latter is based on the proliferation activity as determined by Ki-67 immunostaining and mitotic count and results in the current tumor classification into neuroendocrine tumors G1, neuroendocrine tumors G2 or neuroendocrine carcinomas G3. Occasionally, tumors may show mixed differentiation containing a non-neuroendocrine cancer component. The neuroendocrine markers synaptophysin and chromogranin A are recommended for the immunohistochemical confirmation of the diagnosis. Furthermore, biopsy material can be used to investigate the expression of therapy-related markers, such as somatostatin receptor-2A. Moreover, if needed, the expression of transcription factors and hormones can be determined to obtain information on the possible site of origin of metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms or to determine the syndrome-inducing hormone in functionally active neuroendocrine neoplasms. Finally, using the stomach as an example, biopsies may also be successfully used to investigate neuroendocrine precursor lesions which may harbor prognostic significance.

[The relevance of PET/CT for the surgical management of neuroendocrine neoplasms]

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare malignancies with a wide spectrum of metastatic potential which originate from the endocrine cells of the body and express somatostatin receptors. The (68)gallium somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) technique is the most sensitive method of assessment of well-differentiated NENs and for the detection of cancer of unknown primary (CUP syndrome) NENs. Imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG PET/CT) is indicated in poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. The receptor-dependent imaging of NENs has a decisive impact on further management.

Secondary malignancy in patients with sporadic neuroendocrine neoplasia

The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasias (NENs), especially of the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP), system relatively increased over the past decades, as a result of advanced diagnostic tools, a better clinical awareness, and distinguished pathological diagnostic recognition. Previous reports hypothesized an increased risk for secondary malignancies in patients with NEN especially in GEP-NENs. The present study was designed to investigate the coincidence of NENs and secondary malignancies in a large patient collective. A retrospective analysis was performed on 161 patients (85 female and 76 male) with NEN of various origins. Clinical data of these patients, different classification systems (TNM/WHO), proliferations-based grading, and clinical follow-up were collected and analyzed. Out of 143 patients with a sporadic NEN, 15 (10.49 %) patients were identified with secondary malignant tumors. Median age at the time of the primary operation for NEN was 65 years, whereas the median age of initial diagnosis of associated tumors was 59 years. Mean follow-up time was 61 months. The risk of developing a secondary malignancy was most elevated for patients with an NEN of the lung, the stomach, and the ileum (60, 50 and 20 %, respectively). The spectrum of secondary malignancies included various types of cancer. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis shows a difference suggesting that patients with a secondary malignancy demonstrate a worse survival compared to patients without a secondary tumor; no significance was detected (p = 0.349). Our data suggest that secondary malignancies in patients with NEN's especially in GEP-NENs are found more frequently than in general population. Therefore, patients with NEN need a continuous and detailed follow-up. The reason for the increased incidence of secondary malignancies in patients with NENs remains to be elucidated.

[Extent of resection for neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine]

Neuroendocrine tumors of the small intestine have been diagnosed with increasing frequency over the past 35 years and presently account for approximately 2% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms. While most of these tumors are discovered incidentally during emergency laparotomy or in the clinical setting of unknown primary cancer with hepatic metastases, the growing awareness of this rare entity and improved diagnostic methods promote earlier diagnosis. The classical carcinoid syndrome with flush, diarrhea and cardiac strain is observed only in 20-30% of patients. The clinical symptoms necessitate a special preoperative preparation of the patient including evaluation of cardiac function.Prospective studies assessing the efficacy of surgical treatment strategies for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the small intestine do not exist. However, retrospective studies have demonstrated that curative as well as palliative resection of the primary tumor improves the prognosis and the quality of life of patients. Besides limited resection of the small bowel in order to avoid postoperative short bowel syndrome an effective clearance of the regional lymph nodes is essential. A primary tumor site in the terminal ileum requires dissection of the lymph nodes on the right side of the ileocolic artery which usually implies an additional resection of the right colon. In cases of a primary tumor site located in the lower ileum up to the distal jejunum, a cone-shaped resection of the mesenterium of the small bowel with extension of lymphadenectomy into adjacent segments with preservation of vascularization is performed.

[Gastric neuroendocrine tumors. Endoscopic and surgical treatment]

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the stomach are the most frequent among all neuroendocrine neoplasms in the digestive tract. The diagnosis and classification are complicated by the fact that these tumors have to be categorized not only by common staging and grading but also according to their pathophysiological background (types). The types differ in their biological behaviour (aggressiveness) which influences therapeutic concepts. This article explains and summarizes the etiology and classification of gastric NETs and offers a precise concept for diagnosis and treatment to improve clinical outcome.