[Pericardial effusion. Differential diagnostics, surveillance and treatment]

[Forensic imaging of sharp force injuries]

BACKGROUND

Answering legal questions is everyday routine in forensic medicine. The reconstruction of violent crimes following attacks with sharp and/or pointed instruments is usually complex and can hardly be adequately answered using traditional forensic methods such as autopsies. For this reason, clinical and postmortem radiology has become the ideal complement to forensic medicine.

METHODS

While classic X‑ray is unsuitable to image soft tissue injuries, and magnetic resonance imaging is too expensive, too complex and also not available everywhere, multislice computed tomography (MSCT) has now emerged as the method of choice in forensic imaging for the assessment of the consequences of sharp force injuries.

ACHIEVEMENTS

Forensic imaging, especially MSCT, offers an indispensable addition to reconstruction, particularly after stab wounds. In many cases, it is at least equal to, and in some cases superior to, the classic autopsy in the assessment of stab wounds, the reconstruction of the sequence of events or the assessment of (life-threatening) injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

The forensic radiological assessment after sharp violence requires experience in both the field of radiology and forensic medicine. Provided that both disciplines work closely together, forensic radiology can be an essential tool in the care for victims of violence.

Perforation of myocardial wall and great vessels after cardiovascular interventions-a 5-year analysis

Background

Less invasive procedures have replaced open surgical treatment in many cardiovascular disorders. During these interventions, iatrogenic cardiac perforation may ensue, which is a severe complication and requires immediate diagnostic assessment and treatment.

Methods

From March 2011 to April 2016, all patients referred to the Dept. of Cardio-thoracic Surgery with the diagnosis of iatrogenic perforation of myocardial wall or great vessels were included into the retrospective study. Complications during transapical transcutaneous aortic valve replacements (TAVR) procedures and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were excluded from analysis. Symptoms, therapeutic strategy, intraoperative findings, and outcome were evaluated.

Results

Forty-four patients suffered from myocardial wall or vessel perforation. Most common site of perforation were right (n=26; 59.1%) and left (n=8; 18.2%) ventricle. Other structures were involved in ten cases (22.7%). Open surgical treatment was required in 27 cases (61.4%). Mortality after left and right ventricular laceration was 75.0% and 11.5%, respectively. Most common cause of death was cardiocirculatory failure (n=5).

Conclusions

Iatrogenic perforation of myocardial wall or central vessels during percutaneous interventional procedures is a rare but life-threatening complication. Despite immediate treatment efforts, mortality is high, particularly after left ventricular laceration.