[Blood-borne infections and the pregnant health care worker. Risks and preventive measures]

[Maternity protection in pneumology: considerations for a positive list]

It seems difficult to continue to employ expectant/breastfeeding mothers in interventional medical fields due to numerous risks involved, such as in handling infectious agents or anaesthetic gases. Pregnancy for female doctors is thus often associated with a ban on employment and is therefore synonymous with a delay in their professional career. The aim of this article was to develop a positive list that allows pregnant women to continue working during their pregnancy at low risk and provides employers with a guide for drawing up risk assessment for specific occasions. The brief narrative overview is based on the recommendations drawn up by both professional associations and the Maternity Protection Committee. It is intended to provide assistance for the preparation of an event-related risk assessment after notification of a pregnancy in the speciality of pneumology in order to be able to continue to employ female doctors working in interventional medicine at low risk.

[Pregnant Physicians in Surgical Specialties - Implementation of the Maternity Protection Act Among Female Physicians in Saxony]

AIM

The aim of the study was to investigate compliance with occupational health and safety (OHS) among pregnant surgeons.

METHODS

All female surgeons in Saxony up to 45 years of age received a written questionnaire about their work environment during pregnancy. Predefined and expert-based criteria of OHS were analyzed descriptively. Poor compliance with OSH was defined as meeting a maximum of half of the criteria. Using logistic regression, professional factors (i. e. "operating due to lack of staff") and personal factors (i. e. "operating due to residency") were investigated for poor compliance with OSH.

RESULTS

Of the participating female specialists, 55% (response=39%) had performed surgery during pregnancy. On average, 7.4 of the 16 occupational health and safety measures were fulfilled (median=8; range 1-13). In none of the cases were all predefined OSH criteria fulfilled. Two-thirds of the women who worked in non-operative areas took on invasive activities. When the women were working outside the operating theatre, an average of 4.1 of 13 predefined OSH criteria was fulfilled (median=4; range 0-8). "Lack of staff" was related to poor OSH compliance in the multivariate analysis (OR=5.9 (95% CI 1.7-20.0)).

CONCLUSION

The results of the study show a great need for improvement in the occupational safety of pregnant surgeons.

[Dream job orthopedics and trauma surgery-This can also come true for women!]

BACKGROUND

At least two thirds of medical students are female. How can they be won over in the competition for the best heads and hands in the field of orthopedics and trauma surgery? 25% of the inpatient surgeons are female, while the proportion of women in managerial positions is only 5%.

GOAL OF THE WORK (QUESTION)

How do the specialist field and the specialist society have to change in order to be attractive for the younger generation, and be regarded as a dream job?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

With the help of surveys and scientific literature, the following problem areas are identified and highlighted: What do today's young doctors want? How should employers and superiors behave in relation to the women-specific life events of pregnancy, maternity leave and breastfeeding? How to enable female surgeons to continue operating as desired in accordance with the law? Often in clinics, care is not taken to provide female surgeons with individually sized instruments. A manufacturer survey was carried out for this purpose. How can we counteract the sexual harassment and discrimination in the workplace? How can male and female professionals achieve a more equal balance between family and work in the clinic and practice?

RESULTS

The Gender Bias, the glass ceiling, the lack of female role models and female mentors mean that female surgeons do not have equal opportunities. The gender pay gap and the gender care gap are discussed and presented with data. Significantly, there is a specific lack of data on the gender pay gap in Germany. The everyday clinical practice and the professional society are still a man's world. In order to attract a sufficient number of young professionals, the working environment and participation in committees must be transformed into a world that is equal for male and female surgeons.

DISCUSSION

With regard to the identified problem areas, suggestions for improvement for active implementation are listed.

[Hazard assessment and occupational safety measures in surgery : Relevant knowledge on occupational medicine]

Surgeons routinely work in an environment with occupational risks and hazards about which they are often uninformed. Based on the currently available scientific literature this review article describes the various hazards in the operating theater and their effects on personnel, particularly from the surgical perspective. A further aim of this article is to describe the occupational safety measures to reduce the burdens and to maintain the long-term health of personnel. Ultimately, surgeons should be equipped with the necessary knowledge for implementing hazard assessments according to the German Occupational Health and Safety Act. Surgeons are exposed to increased risks and hazards by working in awkward positions with a high risk for musculoskeletal pain and injuries. They are also commonly exposed to inhalational anesthetics, surgical smoke, radiation, noise and infectious agents. Furthermore, the mental and emotional stress associated with these activities is also high. Meaningful occupational safety measures for reduction of burdens are from a technical aspect the installation of effective air extraction systems, measures to reduce exposure to radiation and noise and the use of safer instruments to prevent needle stick injuries. Furthermore, individual occupational safety measures, such as the use of personal protective equipment (e.g. radiation protective clothing and double gloves) must be observed. The consistent implementation and also adherence to these described occupational safety measures and regulations can reduce the burden on operating theater personnel and contribute to maintaining health. Furthermore, periodic preventive healthcare controls and health checks by the company medical officer and individually initiated additional prevention measures can be a sensible augmentation to these safety measures.

The prevalence of hepatitis C among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of viral hepatitis C (HCV) infection among healthcare workers (HCWs) compared to the general population. A systematic search for the years 1989–2014 was conducted in the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases. Studies on hepatitis C in HCWs were included if they incorporated either a control group or reference data for the general population. The study quality was classified as high, moderate or low. Pooled effect estimates were calculated to determine the odds of occupational infection. Heterogeneity between studies was analysed using the χ² test (p<0.10) and quantified using the I² test. 57 studies met our criteria for inclusion and 44 were included in the meta-analysis. Analysis of high and moderate quality studies showed a significantly increased OR for HCV infection in HCWs relative to control populations, with a value of 1.6 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.42). Stratification by study region gave an OR of 2.1 in low prevalence countries; while stratification by occupational groups gave an increased prevalence for medical (OR 2.2) and for laboratory staff (OR 2.2). The OR for professionals at high risk of blood contact was 2.7. The pooled analysis indicates that the prevalence of infection is significantly higher in HCWs than in the general population. The highest prevalence was observed among medical and laboratory staff. Prospective studies that focus on HCW-specific activity and personal risk factors for HCV infection are needed.

[Seroprevalence of antibodies against infectious pathogens relevant to pregnancy among healthcare workers]

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are exposed to infectious diseases throughout the course of their work. The concerns of pregnant HCWs are considerable because certain otherwise mild infections may affect fetal development. We studied 424 pregnant HCWs at the University Hospital Frankfurt between March 2007 and July 2011. Serological tests were carried out for varicella zoster virus (VZV), measles, mumps, rubella (MMR), cytomegalovirus (CMV) and parvovirus B19. Our overall seroprevalence data with regard to VZV, MMR, CMV and parvovirus B 19 corresponded to the general population. However, physicians demonstrated lower seroprevalence towards the two non-vaccine-preventable diseases (CMV: 37.5% [KI 27.4-48.5]; parvovirus B19: 69.3% [KI 58.6-78.7]) compared with nurses (CMV: 53.4% [KI 46.1-60.6], parvovirus B19: 75.1% [68.4-81.1]). It was striking that, only one in five of the study population showed IgG antibodies against all of the six pregnant-relevant viral diseases tested, of the physicians as few as one in six. A routine exclusion from the workplace due to non-immunity would mean that it would not be possible to employ the majority of pregnant staff in healthcare and childcare.