[Soft tissue sarcoma : resection and plastic reconstruction]

[Soft tissue sarcomas: limb salvage using reconstructive plastic surgery techniques]

The treatment of choice for soft tissue sarcomas with local involvement is still the complete surgical removal into healthy tissue. The aim of surgery is to achieve tumor-free resection margins in the sense of a R0 resection. No other treatment option can equally replace this important oncological condition. The enormous development in the field of reconstructive plastic surgery and in particular the advances in flap techniques and microsurgery enable limb salvage and the functional reconstruction even in the case of extensive tumors.

Is revisional surgery mandatory when an unexpected sarcoma diagnosis is made following primary surgery?

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are often diagnosed unexpectedly after surgery, and many excisions are incomplete. As histopathological assessments are challenging, patients later referred to comprehensive cancer centers (CCC) often come with an unclear status. This can make treatment planning problematic. We investigated the reliability of primary histopathological assessments, whether revisional surgery improved resection status, and the prognostic value of residual tumor at re-excision.

METHODS

We analyzed the demographic and clinical characteristics of all patients referred to our CCC between 2003 and 2013. We compared patients treated exclusively at our CCC with those who had primary surgery elsewhere, and focused on resection margins, re-excision type, residual tumor, resection status after re-excision, and oncological outcome.

RESULTS

Over half (n = 110) of all patients (n = 204) were referred from elsewhere. Seventy-one had undergone an excision without suspicion of malignancy. Resection status in referred patients was significantly inferior to the CCC group (p < 0.0001), although the latter had significantly more serious tumors and advanced disease stages (p < 0.05). The residual tumor rate was 53.13%, with a significantly higher probability in an upper extremity (p = 0.001). Initial histopathological classification was misleading in 46.9% of cases. Re-excision improved resection status in 69% of cases. Residual tumor presumably leads to higher rates of local recurrence (p = 0.057) and significantly shorter times to recurrence (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Re-excision should always follow unplanned STS excisions. Resection margins and histopathological assessments from referring institutions are often unreliable and unsuitable for treatment planning. Residual tumor is a risk factor for earlier and more likely local recurrence.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in the Treatment of Oncological Perineal and Genital Defects

Defects of the perineum may result from ablative procedures of different malignancies. The evolution of more radical excisional surgery techniques resulted in an increase in large defects of the perineum. The perineogenital region per se has many different functions for urination, bowel evacuation, sexuality, and reproduction. Up-to-date individual and interdisciplinary surgical treatment concepts are necessary to provide optimum oncological as well as quality of life outcome. Not only the reconstructive method but also the timing of the reconstruction is crucial. In cases of postresectional exposition of e.g., pelvic or femoral vessels or intrapelvic and intra-abdominal organs, simultaneous flap procedure is mandatory. In particular, the reconstructive armamentarium of the plastic surgeon should include not only pedicled flaps but also free microsurgical flaps so that no compromise in terms of the extent of the oncological resection has to be accepted. For intra-abdominally and/or pelvic tumors of the rectum, the anus, or the female reproductive system, which were resected through an abdominally and a sacrally surgical access, simultaneous vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap reconstruction is recommendable. In terms of soft tissue sarcoma of the pelvic/caudal abdomen/proximal thigh region, two-stage reconstructions are possible. This review focuses on the treatment of perineum, genitals, and pelvic floor defects after resection of malignant tumors, giving a distinct overview of the different types of defects faced in this region and describing a number of reconstructive techniques, especially VRAM flap and pedicled flaps like antero-lateral thigh flap or free flaps. Finally, this review outlines some considerations concerning timing of the different operative steps.

[Interdisciplinary treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities]

Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumors. Surgery clearly remains the standard therapy of non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. A pretreatment biopsy is necessary to determine the histology and grade of soft tissue sarcomas and to diagnose entities that can be treated by targeted therapies, such as dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans or alveolar soft tissue sarcoma once they are in a metastatic stage. Nevertheless, locally advanced disease requires multimodal treatment and interdisciplinary treatment decisions. Limb sarcoma of borderline resectability (encasement of vessels, invasion of joints or close proximity to motor nerves) may profit from isolated limb perfusion with recombinant tumor necrosis factor and melphalan. Preoperative chemotherapy may be applied in locally advanced high grade tumors when clear resection margins are difficult to achieve. Deep wave hyperthermia has proven to be a useful addition to systemic chemotherapy in such a neoadjuvant setting. Also preoperative radiation therapy has proven to be effective in controlling locally advanced sarcoma despite higher perioperative morbidity which pays off in the long run by better limb function. Postoperative adjuvant external beam irradiation therapy with the best available technique is recommended for any tumor larger than 5 cm with (FNLCC) grades 2 and 3 (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IIb/III). Given all these therapeutic options, it is absolutely crucial that interdisciplinary decision-making starts early in the therapeutic process. Patients are often seen first by the surgeon. For an optimal treatment surgeons need to know the efficacy and toxicity of the multimodal treatment options described.